HOME | DD
NOKAPIplz — FeministFrequency In A Nutshell
Published: 2012-08-11 03:29:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 27604; Favourites: 240; Downloads: 32
Redirect to original
Description
This is the funniest TLDR I wrote. It's all based on how Anita Sarkeesian's videos are. I know she looks a bit like Meg Griffin here, but eh, I tried.
She doesn't talk about sexism against men at all, even though she claims feminism is for equal rights.She has never made a video about misogyny in the middle east.She hates art that includes sexy dead women and says it has no place in art and that it's disempowering.She exploded trying to sum up Zack Snyder's "Sucker Punch". Basically getting mad that some men have a libido and a fetish for that stuff.She hides comments that are sexist or anything that criticizes her points of view and questioning her source material.She never acknowledges the constructive criticism and only posted the troll comments she got on one blog entry. This is an attempt to make her look like the victim.She conned people into giving her money.All she really wants to do is make the world realize the first world problems of females in the North American continent.
Don't joke about periods in front of her, because doing so is the equivalent of joking about people dying from diseases.Don't argue with her, she'll pull an excuse out of one of her three glory holes.If you do argue with her, prepare for lulz.PS: She has some of the most idiotic fans I've seen in a while. Barely any of them actually do their own research and goes with what she says unless they happen to be more familiar with the subject matter than she is. They also can't tell the difference between trolls and cyberbullies.
Related content
Comments: 227
Seems like an insult to Meg Griffin!
In all seriousness though, I have watched her ravings and rantings, and felt like I needed a scalding hot shower afterwards. This woman expects to be taken seriously by those of us who actually have common sense? Uh, nope. Not in my eyes at least. I know she'd hate me in a New York minute because I'd tell her she's straight up full of crap.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
and that's why i like drawing jasper fat with people inside her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thing is, Bayonetta was designed by a woman. Checkmate, feminazi hoes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Next time someone brings up the dictionary definition of feminism, say this.
"The dictionary definition of Faggot is a bundle of sticks. And yet, what would you use it for?"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
How the eff do Christmas carols promote misogyny?
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Yeah she's that stupid
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I will admit that I am a feminist (hear me out for a sec) and lately see just how much other feminists ignore very important facts when it comes to being one and supporting their arguments have made me a bit ashamed to be one. It's hard to get the world to see what we are trying to do if we keep making ourselves look like idiots, and it's pissing me off........
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tell me about it >~<. They are giving the real feminists a bad name
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
And the best part?
They completely turn a blind eye to REAL misogyny and REAL rape culture:
- Female genital mutilation in Islamic countries
- Islamic sex slavery
- The drug cartels' sex trafficking in Mexico
- Poor Hindu families in India selling their own daughters into religious sex slavery/forced prostitution
- REAL sexual objectification of girls and women in American black rap and hip-hop music
- Some Theravada Buddhists justifying the sexual enslavement of girls and women in Thailand
- Lolicon and child pornography in Japan
- 70-80% of the North Korean defectors being girls and women vulnerable to sex slavery and forced marriage
- Basically anything they can't use to blame the non-existent "evil white patriarchy"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Everything Anita, and basically every feminist says is stupid, hypocritical, or contradicting to anything logical. These people always act like basically everything every man does is oppressing them, even when they're doing what they want them to do. They hate everything, and there's no reasoning with them.
- They want to be allowed to express themselves, despite hating on people who express themselves in typical female ways.
- Half the things they claim men do are typically done to men as well as females, such as rape, domestic abuse, and discrimination.
- They trick people into believing that women are paid unequally while being too stupid to realize that there are too many contributing factors to make these polls equal. It makes perfect sense for a female employee at McDonalds who works part-time to be paid less than a male doctor, and the reason has nothing to do with gender.
- They feel that the media is negatively effecting female youth by setting unrealistic expectations and images of girls, without realizing the exact same thing is true with young males.
- They believe it is wrong to make female characters sexy, but have no problem with sexy male characters.
I'm so done with feminists. Every time they say something, it removes about 50 brain cells. I know I made a comment a long time ago, but I wanted to post another because I really hate feminists.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
May I show them this? m.youtube.com/watch?v=Lxb7VW7s…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
STRRRAAAWWWWWWMMMMAAANNNN.
For once I would like to see an actual argument from you people instead of "wahhhh, der femmmaallless pull out arguments from der glory holes (oh, tots not sexist, right?) about how they hate all art that induces sexy wimins".
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
I'll note you my argument.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So you're a woman who believes women are less likely to be raped than men.
Did your mother drink bleach when she was pregnant with you by any chance?
Oh and you're an American too. Big surprise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Lol, Americans are dumb!"
Thomas Edison was American.
The most respected engineer in his time was from the oh-so-dreaded America.
Honestly, this is the internet. Saying I have down syndrome, autism, a birth defect, etc isn't really that effective considering you're just some stranger on the internet.
You can look up the statistics yourself. Compare 140,000 males raped annually to 100,000 females raped annually. Surprise surprise, prison rape counts as rape.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Americans are dumb. Sorry it's true. There have been many intelligent Americans (surprise surprise, you only know one American inventor). But contemporary American society; it's media, it's education system, it's political corporate plutocracy/oligarchy, shows the most Americans are ill-informed, ignorant, totally unwilling to learn or educate themselves and utterly uninterested in finding out about the world around them.
I'm not saying you have downs or autism, I'm saying you have a shitty personality and make nonsensical shitty argument, your only arguments so far have been a) a list stolen from some MRA, why did you even send me that, are you unable to construct proper arguments yourself? Did you expect me to debate 80 different points. American teenagers on here tend to not THINK before they post it seems b) some supposed statistic you appear to have pulled out of your ass that you don't link to. Tell me the name of the study you're referencing, the institution who conducted it and the authors of the supposed study.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I mention one American inventor.
"Lol, u only mention one! Americans are dumb xD!!!"
Do you realise how bad your grammar is?
I'd suggest you move to America and experience the country before saying that everything about it is shit.
a) I wrote that list myself. I expected you to at least address part of my argument. Apparently you aren't smart enoug0h to read more than a paragraph of text.
b) I said you can look it up yourself, but oh well. It seems you can't do your own research.
I'd show you the study, but I'd rather you gather your own sources and prove me wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
How is my grammar bad? I didn't say "Lol, u only mention one! Americans are dumb xD!!!", I said "There have been many intelligent Americans (surprise surprise, you only know one American inventor)". That's grammatically incorrect how? Answer me honestly, are you a troll and just fucking with me right now or is your general stupidity earnest? Also I'm just saying how typical it is of you to mention Edison because that's the only fucking American inventor most Americans know off.
I actually lived in the US for 6 months and I'm perfectly aware of what a dump it is. Huge poverty rate, racial inequality, income inequality, gender inequality, hate bills being passed targeting queer people (North Carolina bathroom bill), the Christian right prevail, society sucking on the dick of notions such as the perfect nuclear family and the American dream, shitty education system, shitty health care system, over-crowed prisons (highest prison population in the WORLD), over-bloated military (most expensive military in the WORLD), poisoning your own water, poor animal rights, shit tons of ghettoisation, crumbling architecture, pretty poor press freedom rating, poor life expectancy, crumbling welfare system, very imperialistic, shit foreign policy, funding dictators, genocides and terrorists and you're not a fucking democracy, you're a corporate plutocracy at best and an outright oligarchy at worst (do you know what those words mean, sweetie?) Did I forget anything?
1) That's even more unfortunate.
2) "you can look it up yourself" is an admission that you made it up. Hey man, I'm doubting that study even exists, why not prove me wrong and LINK IT! Oh right, because it doesn't exist. You made it up and your refusal to tell me it's name, the organisation that conducted it/penned and it's authors is an admission of that. Tell me those things and I'll happily do "my research" and look it up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because you had missing words, "it's" instead of "its," changing tenses in the same sentences, etc.
I mentioned Edison because he was one of the most respected engineers of his time.
The rest of this paragraph is just you calling me a troll.
Do you live in fucking Detroit? I love how you mentioned income inequality and gender inequality. Yes, women have tons of rights that men don't have in America. On the military, the only reason it's the most expensive military in the world is because America spends the most money on it.
1) That's unfortunate because...? I wrote the privileges of being a woman in the US or the UK.
2) I said that because I have multiple sources. Just look up "men raped annually" and "women raped annually" and do more research than the typical 1 in 5 bullshit you see on the front page.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's not a missing word, that's a missing piece of punctuation which I missed out due to a type. Why must so many childish little American teenagers be grammar Nazis and try to derail conversations with "you wrote its instead of it's, you got poor grammar duuurrppp" nonsense. It's just derailing. It doesn't advance your argument, it's a piss poor attempt to one up the person you're debating but in actuality all it does it makes you look like a petty arsehole.
Actually you're doing some of the worst out of the West in terms of gender equality, the UN has done countless studies calling out your shit. Americans like to think they're the most progressive country in the world in terms of racial equality and gender equality and women should just be thankful that they don't live in Saudi Arabia. Mate, Europe is embarrassed by you fuckers, in terms of gender equality, you're cavemen to us.
"On the military, the only reason it's the most expensive military in the world is because America spends the most money on it." - Wat? I'll ask again, are you fucking with me or generally this dim? Yes dumb dumb, that's my point, your shitty little oligarchy spends the most money on a shitty over-bloated military when you should be putting your money to better use. That's reason #34 of why you guys suck.
1) Most of which are fallacious and wrong, similarly, why send it me in the first place? Do you expect me go down eighty points and debate each one? Ain't nobody got time for that. Why not take one point and send me that? If you wanted an actual debate you won't overwhelm someone with a wall of text, instead you would chose one topic to focus on and discuss that. Debating 101 American!
2) I've looked it up on google, yahoo, bling and googlescholar and nothing. Once again, your abject refusal to give me information on this supposed report under the grounds of "derp, I want you to look it up yourself" is such a transparent excuse for the reality that you made it up!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I wasn't talking about that, I was saying that there were multiple places in your reply where words were missing for a complete sentence.
In terms of gender equality, the UK has sexist laws against men, including the law that men can't sit next to children on airplanes. A man can't sit next to his son on the plane. That's a tad bit worse.
The reason you consider it the most expensive military is because they spent the most money on it. If you didn't spend that much money on developing a military, it wouldn't be that expensive. It's simple.
1) Debating 101, yuropoor! Just say one thing, don't overwhelm me with more than one paragraph! You told me that you didn't even read it. How do you know it's wrong and fallacious?
2) You looked it up on different search engines, yay. That's not doing actual research. I'm saying this so you can find it out for yourself. I'm giving you an opportunity to prove me wrong. Why aren't you taking it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Where exactly?
A law that men can't sit next to children on airplanes? Hahahahahahahahahahaha, and what law is that called honey? Oh fuck, the future of America people, brought to you by the same country that funded Pinochet and instated the Shah. Christ were fucked. Honey, I'm FROM the UK. You can't bullshit someone with some fantasy made up bullshit about THEIR OWN COUNTRY. I am a transman, male on my passport, look like any other man, I've flown all over, I'd sat next to children many times. Sorry mate, I think you might have serious problems with your intellect. Get yourself checked.
"The reason you consider it the most expensive military is because they spent the most money on it. If you didn't spend that much money on developing a military, it wouldn't be that expensive. It's simple." - You were in the slow class at school weren't you? How much slower do I need to do this before you grasp what I'm saying? Your country is spending too much money on it's military, that's one of the reasons your country ssuuuuuccckkksss. Okay?
1) I skimmed a few a few messages back, honey you're a typically delusional, below average IQ level American teenage girl, you believe bollocks that you either made up or read about on a MGTOW forum that men can't sit next to children on airplanes in the UK. Most of your list conveys similar levels of stupidity.
2) Then link. Why don't you link? Because it doesn't exist. Almost all professionally conducted research/studies will show up on googlescholar, so why not yours? I was arguing with this sorry sack of redneck shit once who tried to convince me that a group of atheist gay men in his town had burnt down a church in an act of some sort of gay supremacy proclamation, when I asked for evidence (i.e an article/newspaper clipping ect), you wanna know what he said? "You should do your own research", honey it's the most transparent excuse for the fact that you made it up. You could one up me by linking me or giving me the name of the article. So why don't you. BECAUSE IT DOESN'T EXIST, you literally couldn't make it more obvious.
Seriously, you're a fucking idiot, hating women with MGTOWs, MRAS and other manosphere fucktards won't make you more desirable to them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Just re-read your reply.
For the last time. It's only expensive because they've decided to spend that much money on it. If the Government decided to have a cheap, shitty military, and not spend anything on it, then it wouldn't be so expensive.
1) Ad hominems don't make you smarter. You're calling my claims logically fallacious while committing the same logical fallacies over and over again.
2) Alright, you begged me. Here. www.hrw.org/reports/2001/priso…
Holy fucking shit. So because I'm an MRA, I hate women? That's like saying "Because you disagree with ISIS, you're an Islamophobe!"
The epitome of stupidity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So that evidence about laws in the UK preventing men from sitting next to children on planes? I've notice that topics suddenly absent from the discussion hahahahahahaha.
Yes, that's one of the reasons your countries garbage. You. Spend. Too. Much. Money. On. Your. Military. Fuck Christ man. Also, downgrading your military budget slightly won't somehow automatically turn it into a cheap shitty underfunded military. Seriously, the US is such garbage.
1) All I'm saying is next time, don't send someone eighty odd points off nonsense, it's a shitty way to debate. Okay?
2) Took you a fucking while didn't it? Hahahahahahahaha, dude, that's to do with rape in PRISON and yes, there's evidence to suggest men get raped in prison more than women do, that doesn't somehow mean men get raped more than women in general. I love how you took a report that's too do with serious issues of under-reporting rape in prison and guard or prisoner sexual abuse and turned it into "men get raped more than women", something that that report is absolutely 100% not saying.
No I think you're an MRA because you act like an MRA and make up nonsense about how men are oppression (*cough lies about laws on planes *cough)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
there all over you tube mr male trope is a good one Vipersword100 she has good videos hell here other women www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3O86Q…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This post is still a fucking strawman...
I fail to see how those links provide an argument to show otherwise...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"For once I would like to see an actual argument from you people instead of "wahhhh, der femmmaallless pull out arguments from der glory holes (oh, tots not sexist, right?) about how they hate all art that induces sexy wimins"." you asked i answered
secant This post is pretty accurate it sums up Anita's arguments
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I find it fucking incredible how you 'Mericans can look at a post that says "Don't argue with her, she'll pull an excuse out of one of her three glory holes" and generally think that it's not sexist. This shit does not fly in my country, no wonder you people are behind in gender equality in comparison to basically all developed countries.
"This post is pretty accurate it sums up Anita's arguments" - No...No it is not.
Also, the amount of whining because of one woman's gender critic of video games is astonishing to me. Fucking hell, gendered critiques of media have been going on for the last forty years! I study film and television and in film analysis we have to cover post-colonial critiques, gender critiques, feminist critiques ect. For something to be considered an art form, it's fans must understand that a wide range of critique styles will be used to critique it, they don't have to agree with all these critiques (I don't agree with all the gendered film critiques) but there's a minority of gamers who seem to be personal offended and affronted by something as simple as a gendered critique of games that they personally disagree with. The harassment campaign and gamergate campaign was COMPLETELY unnecessary in proportion to what is, essentially, just a gendered critic of a new media (video games).
Instead of understand that post-colonial critiques, gendered critiques ect are a necessary for a new rising art form, a bunch of whiny gamers seem to think that "gendered critique of video games" equals "Abolish all men from der games. no women in sexy clothing in games! we will use our glory holes to destroy yous!!!" Besides, the gaming coming HAS pushed women out of the industry! In the 1980s, video games were sold as family entertainment consoles, in the 1990s, video game companies began to marketed almost exclusively towards suburban middle-class boys. Today, the industry is once again, becoming more variety in it's demographics and yes, a history of gender in video games (or indeed any media) is a necessary, you don't have to agree with these critiques but the amount of whining I see from the gamer community towards these critiques is astounding to me, especially when fucking strawman arguments like these ones are which mingle sexist tripe in to boot (I mean seriously, she'll pull an excuse out of one of her three glory holes? Seriously???) No wonder the gamer community is still associated with nerdy, socially inept, sheltered virgins. They certainly don't help themselves with this bollocks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
is called freedom of speech and men get nasty comment too
"no wonder you people are behind in gender equality" can you name me a right or privilege a man has that a woman does not? i can do the revers
This post is pretty accurate it sums up Anita's arguments calls any critic a misogynist
anitas argument
is basically just the moral panic argument same argument Jack Thompson made not just him also Patricia Pulling, Fredric Wrentham, Will H Hays, Jack t Chick , Phil Phillips , Gary Greenwald you know people who are consider quacks and they shares the same argument with them that D&D/video games/comics/movies/toys will influences people to /become a satanic and or commit Suicide/ led to in crest vileness and or sexism/ murderer/devaluing human life
nerd herd all this bullshit be for
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"is called freedom of speech and men get nasty comment too" - No, it's called being a sexist turd, you can't say incredibly sexist shit and then just turn around and say "derp, it ma freedom of speech", like that's some sort of defence and makes it okay. If that's the case, then all your arguments against Sarkeesian can be met with "is called freedom of speech". You're right, it is your freedom of speech for nasty little socially inept gamers to say shit like "Don't argue with her, she'll pull an excuse out of one of her three glory holes", however, it is also MY freedom of speech to point that out as sexist garbage, which it is.
"can you name me a right or prestige a man has that a woman does not? i can do the revers " - Wat? Is English your second language or are your grammar skills just exceptionally poor?
Yeah, not gonna talk to a dude who defends shit like, "Don't argue with her, she'll pull an excuse out of one of her three glory holes" and thinks Sarkeesian is devaluing human life because she points out problems with your fucking video games. I mean, Good lord, PROPORTION man. This is a woman making a gendered critique of your video games. She's not trying to run men out of the industry, force all female characters to wear realistic clothing and she isn't Jack Chick, she wants more representation, and more recognition, for people outside of the demographic of suburban white boy.
Again, women in the video game industry HAVE been marginalised, we should be able to point that out without sad little sexist gimps saying shit about out fucking orifices and then crying "freedumb of speech" as if that's a defence for their awful behaviour. Gamers are always going on about how "der vid game industry aint sexist" and yet constantly defend shit like this!
"nerd herd all this bullshit be for " - That isn't a fucking sentence. Jesus Christ.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
her positions like she is playing the same game of mad libs. depictions of (____a____) in(____b____) reinforces (_____c____) Patricia Pulling (a);satanic imagery (b) D&D (c)Satanism, Fredric Wrentham (a) violence (b) comics (c) violence, Will H Hays (a)what ever is in the Hays Code (b) movies (c) moral decay,Jack Thompson a) violence (b) video games (c) violence, Anita Sarkeesian (a) sexism (b) video games (c) sexism,
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMWEg-…
Don't argue with her, she'll pull an excuse out of one of her three glory holes
oh how horrible a spine on pulling out of hes/her ass and noting females have three orifices
did you which any of her videos or the hundreds debunking her?
as for females in video games
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXMoLC…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
there all over you tube
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh noes, Meg Griffin is complaining about the patriarchy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I don't think you put in the word "sexist" enough.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
1.) what is sexism towards men? how would you describe that?
2.) is every feminist required to talk about misogyny in the middle east? i could have sworn the goal post was right over here.
3.) yeah, that's her opinion. i thought you anti-feminists were all about freedom of speech.
4.) once again, her opinion.
5.) only posting the extremist trolls in opposition to her? that's either a genuine flaw on her part, or she's trying to highlight how bad the harassment she faces is. you don't get to ignore that, by the way.
6.) does she really do that? hiding offensive comments isn't really that controversial - but does she really hide comments genuinely trying to open up a dialogue?
7.) did she really con people or did you just come up with that?
8.) that sounds like a dogwhistle for "she wants people to recognize that misogyny does exist in the western world, just in different ways from the rest of the world."
9.) what? really?
10.) is that really what she does?
i'm trying to find a single coherent, well thought-out argument against her in your bullet points, and so far i've found... maybe one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1 most likly the same you say is sexist to a woman most wold also say sexist to a man
2 no
3&4 opinion she clams a fact
is basically just the moral panic argument same argument Jack Thompson made not just him also Patricia Pulling, Fredric Wrentham, Will H Hays, Jack t Chick , Phil Phillips , Gary Greenwald you know people who are consider quacks and they shares the same argument with them that D&D/video games/comics/movies/toys will influents people to /become satins and or commit Suicide/ led to in crest vileness and or sexism/ murderer/devaluing human life
5
6 do that yes We aren't getting to have a productive Anita does not want it she knows it would tern out like this (Jack Thompson will play of Anita because they share the same arguments ) www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey- -3YV6FCw&page=9 that,s the problem Anita does not critique games in an honest way she does not it the Patricia Pulling, Jack Thompson Fredric Wrentham, Will H Hays, a dishonest incendiary inflammatory way
7 Technically yes is way over do
8 same as 2&3
9 ok even in terms of hyperbole that a one hell of a stretch
10 yes calls any critic a misogynist and hied behind all the troll comments
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
You forgot to put "Any woman, who draws the other sexy women, is a whore/prostitute" in the picture.
I saw several girls, who claimed to be the feminists, but at the same time were spitting on the other women, who were drawing voluptuous woment or just the women, who are not flat/slim.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
I'd debate the bitch. But name ONE person she'd agree to debating, some no name? Doubtful, we're too small for her. Anyone big? Doubtful, They can do real damage to the bullshit that spews from her face hole.
OH MY GOD SHE'S PAT ROBERTSON!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Or you can just get rid of your virginity by banging her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Because everyone knows that Samus Aran is so sexist. Man this is really how the majority of feminists act isn't it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Somebody send her to Vanguard Princess, so she shuts up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>