HOME | DD

NOKAPIplz β€” They Aren't Evil

Published: 2012-03-21 21:04:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 5759; Favourites: 116; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Most of them were child sexual abuse victims who were forced into the industry as young as 13.

The stamp says:
"Prostitutes aren't evil and I don't support shaming them. Okay?"

Or just look at this: [link]

EDIT: This has to be my most popular thing I've got going. WHOA.
Related content
Comments: 433

Licca-ChanFTW [2023-09-03 23:55:38 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xX-Royally-Mystic-Xx [2017-03-22 23:38:02 +0000 UTC]

I hate prostitution, but again not all prostitutes are evil. Like you said, some have been trafficked and some do it to support their family, etc.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

gdpr-19335497 [2016-06-19 04:20:04 +0000 UTC]

They are children of God who made horrible mistakes with their life.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fuckshiru [2015-11-21 18:05:23 +0000 UTC]

I have mixed opinions on the matter. I used to be against it. Then I fully supported it, and now I just see prostitution as pointless because there are websites where you can fuck someone for free.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OctarinePegacorn [2015-06-06 04:15:17 +0000 UTC]

I have waaay more respect for prostitutes than I do pimps or johns.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SNlCKERS [2014-03-23 18:28:53 +0000 UTC]

Pfftt hahahaahhaha

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WoodLily [2013-09-11 18:33:26 +0000 UTC]

I feel so bad for theme because there are some sick fucks who think their a plague to the world and use that as an excuse to kill them. It's as if they don't see them as human.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NOKAPIplz In reply to WoodLily [2014-05-18 12:53:22 +0000 UTC]

It's like "Jack the Ripper is terrible, oh my!" until current day prostitutes and their problems are brought into the picture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WoodLily In reply to NOKAPIplz [2014-05-19 03:18:04 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I know what you mean.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nightshade43 [2013-09-11 14:27:44 +0000 UTC]

I was about to argue that, but realised I was thinking about strippers XD

I can't believe I used to think prostitution was immoral when I was young

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NOKAPIplz In reply to nightshade43 [2014-05-18 12:52:21 +0000 UTC]

What sane person doesn't want to slap their past selves?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nightshade43 In reply to NOKAPIplz [2014-05-19 05:58:39 +0000 UTC]

Amen to that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Aneirasilvermoon [2013-07-19 16:21:02 +0000 UTC]

It isn't evil, but it's not exactly a sanitary or respectable job.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Ferkru In reply to Aneirasilvermoon [2013-10-07 19:00:42 +0000 UTC]

yep

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sauti-Alamisi [2013-06-30 03:37:11 +0000 UTC]

Ehh, I only dislike the slutty gals at my school, not prostitution generally.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CandyReaper-Malloko [2013-05-07 00:10:26 +0000 UTC]

Most of them are children forced into it, so instead of saying there evil, we should just help them.

But if they wanna be prostitutes, fine by me, as long as they're not minors and they don't have STDs.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NOKAPIplz In reply to CandyReaper-Malloko [2013-05-07 02:03:44 +0000 UTC]

Agreed. I think it's sad they're seen as less than human.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CandyReaper-Malloko In reply to NOKAPIplz [2013-05-07 02:09:04 +0000 UTC]

I've seen people even WORSE than prostitutes yet those jerks get their ass kissed.

Also, if that religious, misognyistic brat is reading this, tell her that her that she's a bitch and report her for hatespeech.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Boschian-Fantasies [2013-02-15 04:09:06 +0000 UTC]

I feel for hookers, both male and female. PROSTITUTION IS NOT ROMANTIC! I'm sick of prostitution being portrayed as romantic when its anything but. Basically, to me, prostitution is a form of rape. Hookers get raped for money. Does that sound like a glamorous job to you?

There is a major difference between love and lust. Being gangbanged by 20 people is not a sign of love. It's a sign of power,domination and lust. Love is much deeper. Love is built on respect, dignity and caring. Intimacy is only a bonus in a romantic relationship.

See where I am coming from.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

gdpr-19335497 In reply to Boschian-Fantasies [2016-06-19 04:22:22 +0000 UTC]

I find it a bit interesting that the scene from Hitman Absolution that Anita Sarkeesian criticized for being "sexist" was the same scene where the strippers and dancers are complaining to each other about how shitty their lives.Β  In other words, she criticized Hitman Absolution for portraying the industry in a negative light!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Boschian-Fantasies In reply to gdpr-19335497 [2016-06-19 04:41:53 +0000 UTC]

Most video games that deal with the issues of rape and sexual do not glamorize rape nor sexual assault. It's usually the villain being a rapist or sexual abuser, not the hero.

Unless you're play the Lolicon simulator Rape Lay, where you get to impregnate little girls and rape their newborn baby after they give birth. That games was so sick and disturbing, even Japan banned it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-19335497 In reply to Boschian-Fantasies [2016-06-19 21:11:51 +0000 UTC]

Jesus Christ.Β  That makes Hatred look like Care Bears.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Boschian-Fantasies In reply to gdpr-19335497 [2016-06-19 21:14:46 +0000 UTC]

Hatred? Is that a video game?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-19335497 In reply to Boschian-Fantasies [2016-06-19 21:32:13 +0000 UTC]

youtu.be/qV3PhvCf_Jg

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatred_(…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Boschian-Fantasies In reply to gdpr-19335497 [2016-06-19 21:59:17 +0000 UTC]

Of course, people blame video games for violence, rape, genocide and domestic abuse.

Video games are not babysitters people. Not all video games are for kids. Shitty parents should be punished for their stupidity, selfishness and negligence.Β 

But no, negligent parents only get a slap on the wrist. They deserve a much more harsher punishment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Totally-dead In reply to Boschian-Fantasies [2013-04-02 16:58:02 +0000 UTC]

... And where does casual sex fit into this conceptual world?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Boschian-Fantasies In reply to Totally-dead [2013-04-02 17:19:28 +0000 UTC]

Casual sex is a sign of nymphomania, which is a serious mental illness, not something to be encouraging. I actually feel sorry for nymphomaniacs because they don't choose to be that way. They need to seek help and therapy for their mental illness.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Totally-dead In reply to Boschian-Fantasies [2013-04-02 18:28:12 +0000 UTC]

... My god.

Nymphomania or Hypersexuality is a rather rare condition in reality, and so incredibly excessive that you would have difficulty passing half a day without sexual stimulation, no matter what distractions or activities you would be distracting yourself with. Not that there is any real consensus on a proper disorder as of yet, and it CERTAINLY does not qualify as a mental disorder officially. DSM even completely rejected that proposal for the fifth edition. Nor is there any "real" criteria for diagnosis. For instance, I do not consider sleeping with 3 women a week casually, Hypersexuality. I am fairly sure some idiots with full psychiatric degrees from conservative backgrounds would disagree.

May I ask why casual sex is SO incredibly bad to you?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Boschian-Fantasies In reply to Totally-dead [2013-04-02 20:51:01 +0000 UTC]

Think of all the STDs and unwanted pregnancies. I know we have birth control and condoms, but even condoms may break and birth control has a chance of failing. Besides, I prefer to use sex with someone I love rather than to throw orgies and sex parties.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Totally-dead In reply to Boschian-Fantasies [2013-04-02 22:46:03 +0000 UTC]

Your preferences do not permit you to judge it an indicator for a mental health disorder. Nor is it a reason to judge it a bad thing for the general populace.

And may I add that your prejudgemental ignorance is showing: I have had quite an active sex life, especially on the casual front, and not once have I participated in orgies or sex parties, not that there is anything wrong with either, I would just get pretty turned off by a naked dude right next to me. Most participators in casual sex do not go further than having a mild sexual relationship with a friend, short periods of booty call or the odd one night stand.

As for birth control and condoms: Do you know the risk of either actually happening statistically? Especially, if you know what you are doing? In practice it has been voiced multiple times that the majority people who are victims of that tiny percentage of accidents, when spoken to, show that something was not being done properly. Honestly, I must have used a few thousand condoms by now and the only time one broke was because someone nibbled. The risk is minimal, and there are ways of dealing with the consequences and making sure your potential partner is less likely to have STDs. Around here we have clinic cards with our names, and photos on them to prove we get checked up every 6 months. I have only slept with 2 people who didn`t show me one of them, one is my current girlfriend, and with the other it was both of our first times.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NOKAPIplz In reply to Boschian-Fantasies [2013-02-18 14:53:45 +0000 UTC]

I see. Prostitution is risky and messy business. It's very sad that people continue to look down on hookers as if they're the bad guys.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonKnightMirren [2013-01-11 21:29:57 +0000 UTC]

To Someone give send this to the sexist coward, please:

"I am a woman (and even if I were male, you are the sexist for being a Feminazi 'all women are perfect faultless beings who cannot be criticized, and if you do you are a misogynist' who does not allow such an opinion). It is not fucking 'sexist' (or β€˜oppressive’ or β€˜misogynistic’), it is the "Penetrator-Penetrated Relationship" that exists in heterosexual intercourse - women are penetrated by the men and therefore are weaker if they have sex. It is the completely understandable and non-sexist reason why the 'double standard' exists (though people tend to not know this, or ignore it, especially Feminazies, along with men being the ones shamed in Ancient times, as being too sexual was seen as an insult to their virility as women, they believed, were too lustful to refuse sex). Saying that is a Double Standard is like saying men having penises and women having vaginas is a Double Standard. It is laughable.
And why did you bring up the rape thing? Do you think I do not believe in it? As a Feminist seeking equality, I believe women can abuse men, and other women, as can men abuse other men.
And there are people without even proper clothing to wear. I am working class and have a shit rented flat, but I do not complain, as I know that (sadly) there are people in a much worst situation."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 17

Aneirasilvermoon In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-07-19 16:24:57 +0000 UTC]

Someone is weak because they choose to be penetrated? And what if I like doing my husband in the butt with a strapon? Is he weaker than me now? Apparently anyone who enjoys penetration is weak now. lol XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonKnightMirren In reply to Aneirasilvermoon [2013-07-19 20:38:50 +0000 UTC]

Nope, he's not a woman.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

AClockworkKitten In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-10-01 19:53:52 +0000 UTC]

Explain this double standard to me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Aneirasilvermoon In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-07-19 20:54:37 +0000 UTC]

Well no shit. I said you need a woman if you're so dicks-gusted

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Totally-dead In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-04-02 17:10:50 +0000 UTC]

... What psychological studies are you basing this oh so incredibly insightful pile of festering Nabillaswill on?
That the fact that men penetrating women affects in the slightest the relationship of strength or weakness of any kind in a relationship? Is this Freudian? Because if it is, I would like to know where the hell you found it, because despite having read half his stuff, I still haven`t found that gem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MisterTurtle In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-03-26 22:44:45 +0000 UTC]

Christ, lady. I hope someday that spare brain stem of yours finally connects with that tiny bit of gray flesh swimming around in your big, empty, ignorant head. You are several kinds of fucked up from any sort of political view. You are entirely ignorant of the way human beings think, feel, and act in real life. I imagine it's very tough to find work at all, what with political views that would piss off anyone with a sense of human decency and an obvious tendency to vomit them out at every opportunity.

I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Xanthriane In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-02-14 04:17:10 +0000 UTC]

Having read all the comments on here, I can easily say that you and your horrid, degrading, sickening, backwards thought process are part of the reason women have such a hard time in this world. Women are weak for wanting and enjoying sex? Women are weak because they are penetrated in the act of sex? This is the exact thought process that has created the split between the sexes in the first place. So what, our organs are on the inside and penetration is how sex works. What is so wrong with that? There are women that enjoy dominance acts (handcuffs, for example). There's absolutely nothing weak about penetration. And guess what, it is the very definition of sexist to call women weak because of a physiological difference. So yes, your claim is incredibly sexist. Using historically accurate oppressive facts doesn't help your claim either.

For the record, female hyenas have a pseudo phallus and still need to be penetrated. They have possibly the most violently matriarchal society in the animal kingdom, yet by your logic, because they're penetrated they're weak.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

littleladylucifer In reply to Xanthriane [2013-03-26 01:06:56 +0000 UTC]

This!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fuckshit In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-01-21 23:45:01 +0000 UTC]

This person didn't block you did they?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonKnightMirren In reply to fuckshit [2013-01-22 13:03:03 +0000 UTC]

Well, duh. Only cowards block without waiting for a reply.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fuckshit In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-01-22 14:05:05 +0000 UTC]

You realize trying to get people to harass them after they've blocked you is considered block evasion. You'd better hope no one's reported you, since that's the one thing the staff will not have mercy on you over.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Totally-dead In reply to fuckshit [2013-04-02 17:13:22 +0000 UTC]

... I doubt they would care if it was someone else, honestly. They usually don`t give more than a warning unless we are talking repeat offense, or actually contact.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Totally-dead In reply to Totally-dead [2013-04-02 17:13:34 +0000 UTC]

*actual

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonKnightMirren In reply to fuckshit [2013-01-22 14:32:32 +0000 UTC]

No, I was simply wanting a final message to be passed and then end the conversation, by corrected her/his wrong assumptions about me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fuckshit In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-01-22 15:03:27 +0000 UTC]

That's still block evasion, which is a serious offense on DA. They implemented the block feature as the only tool for users to solve harassment problems themselves. Once someone has breached that, it's become an issue for the staff- and they don't take kindly to it.

I really hope telling this random person that there are people "without even proper clothing to wear" was worth the perma ban.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonKnightMirren In reply to fuckshit [2013-01-22 15:15:49 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm sorry then, as I do not realise. I will not do that again.

Huh? I know I am a random person on the internet to you, and I know I do not matter.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fuckshit In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-01-22 15:18:07 +0000 UTC]

Let me reiterate.

I really hope telling exoticjackal, someone you don't know and shouldn't even matter to you, that there are people "without even proper clothing to wear" was worth getting banned over.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

endler In reply to DragonKnightMirren [2013-01-21 23:22:53 +0000 UTC]

Us lesbians must be strong as fuck.

I think you're overthinking this. Just a tad. Why do we have to have all this shit when it comes to sex? Why can't people just have sex and be happy without someone claiming something over the top like this?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>