HOME | DD
NOKAPIplz — They Aren't Evil
Published: 2012-03-21 21:04:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 5759; Favourites: 116; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Most of them were child sexual abuse victims who were forced into the industry as young as 13.The stamp says:
"Prostitutes aren't evil and I don't support shaming them. Okay?"
Or just look at this: [link]
EDIT: This has to be my most popular thing I've got going. WHOA.
Related content
Comments: 433
This. I wish I could like comments just for this one right here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You, my friend, are a fucking genius xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Uh, what? I can't really speak for everyone, but I certainly dominate in bed. Just because you have sex doesn't make you weak -_- Sorry if I was misunderstanding you, but I just don't know how you could think something so silly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, you cannot domininate. A woman who 'initiatea' is being especially weak and feminine, as she is presenting her body to a man without him even having to ask first. Unless you are the one penetrating, you cannot dominate, and the only way to do that is disgusting-waste-of-money-and-resources sex toys.
👍: 0 ⏩: 6
I take it you hate homosexuals and think they're sluts? And there's a thing called fingers. You don't have to buy them. Sex toys aren't a waste of money if you enjoy them and they aren't hurting anything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Again with this assumption. I do not hate homosexuals. Again, as I said before, at least in homosexual intercourse, while pregnancy is impossible, at least things are more equal (as they are the same gender) and there is far less selfishness in it. They are selfish, due to their purpose. End of.
Clearly you have read my comments despite the shit-load of comments you have wrote to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have read almost every comment you posted. Enjoying something does not make you self. You must first be completely happy and fulfilled in life in order to give. You cannot give and give and wither away. Enjoying sex is natural, healthy, and a simple biological fact if you ever went to school at all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
... What SCIENTIFIC jusutification do you have for this rather incredibly stupid theory?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Here, let me say this clearly;
YOU. ARE. A. FUCKING. DIPSHIT.
Who's you to say women can't be dominating, and- hell- who knows; the man could be the one presenting himself to the woman.
You seriously need to go get laid or something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fuck you. That is all. Sexist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Translation: "Wah! I don't like your opinion so I am not even going to think of a proper comment! Waaah!"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's because it doesn't deserve one. You're so caught up in your prejudice that you can't just accept other people's choices. It's really limiting. Just because not everyone shares the same view as you, you judge them evil. But, I will answer anyway.
Also, the sheer fact that you say that having sex makes the female weak is sexist in itself. Just because you are biologically female doesn't mean that you have to conform to being submissive or passive when it comes to sex. You cannot say it is oppressive without having some experience with it. The very fact you think it's degrading to WOMEN is sexist. Oh, it's fine if men do it! But no no no...women aren't allowed. It's not like men can't control themselves either, that's also sexist to say that. Women can use men for sex just as much as a man can use women for sex. Sure, remaining a virgin for the rest of your life can be rewarding in it's own way, but don't wish it upon all other people. You say you can accept people "fucking for no apparent reason" but I'm not sure how true that is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wow I think you need to buy a fucking dictionary for fuck's sake.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have one, thank you, and I know what the words mean thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mind if I ask where you got that definition from? Because all my sources say that to 'dominate' means to be in control, to be in the superior position. So yes, in technical terms, I do dominate. In your fantasy world, I suppose I do not.
So, what ever led you to be such a sexist person? I really apologize if it was how drastic some of the femnazis can be, but not all feminists are like that. I believe in equality, through and through, and what you are saying is that the female is the weaker sex just because she was born with a vagina. I find that very offensive, and still can't quite understand why you would even suggest something so silly. After all, I never asked to be born with a vagina. It just happened.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You are not 'on top' because you are still allowing a man to penetrate, and therefore own and domininate you. You are atill allowing yourself to be used, to be little more than a sex doll (though I of course know most men are good people, same with women). There is no 'fantasy' about, only biological facts.
I am not. And nor am I sexist. Once again, it is not having a vagina that makes a woman weak, it is desiring and enjoying a primitive process that is blantantly and (unfortunely) self-oppressive, passive and submissive to females. I believe in equality, for both men and women. Refer to my upper comment on abortion for example.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
And a man allows the woman to put him in herself. It goes both ways. Both partners give each other the permission. The woman is not the only one who's permission matters. The man's permission matters too.
A woman can dominate a man in one of the same ways a man dominates a woman. Domination has nothing to do with penetration. For example, a woman could command a man to perform oral on her. If the man has a submissive personality or just enjoys female domination play, she could command him to do her bidding and he will obey. Some couples find this type of play fun and exciting.
Yes, you are sexist. You seem to think it is OK for men to be sexually forward towards women but not the other way around. Why does enjoying sex make a woman weak? Does enjoying sex make a man weak, or only a woman?
If you want to go by biological facts, both men and women enjoy sex. Both men and women have a natural sex drive. What is unnatural is trying to act like being a virgin is something to be proud of (neither having sex nor being a virgin is something to be proud of, they are just things--being proud of either is like being proud of any other perfectly normal mundane thing), or acting like sex is somehow shameful when it is natural to us. We should not be ashamed of sex. Sex is not degrading, it's natural.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
A sex doll? Yes, of course. Because it's not like I have sex to fulfill my own greedy desires. Sure, not at all. What about when I have my hot lesbian sex? If we take turns fingering each other, does that make us equally dominating?
I have come to the conclusion that you have never had sex before and have never done any research into the sexual world. How old are you? I certainly hope that you are under twenty, or that is just sad. And if you're thinking of saving yourself for marriage or something, please discard those delusions. If you wait until after you're married and find out he's not the right sexual partner, your marriage is almost certainly doomed.
Sex is a lot more than 'dominating'. It's about passion, pleasure and connecting with a person. It's something that brings you closer. You are using no 'biological facts'. In fact, you sound like you partake in the opposite of scientific study. If this is truly 'biological facts', please state your sources and link me to some research on the matter.
You are completely, utterly sexist, whether you want to believe it or not. Women do not become weak because they have sex. It is a necessary tool used to reproduce, and yes, necessary thing for relationships to strive. It feels good and helps the mental state tremendously. In fact, I bet the reason why you're so much against sex is because you aren't getting any.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, more predictable tripe I have heard a good few times before! Well done! Especially the parts about assuming I am "waiting","too young" and "againist sex because I'm 'not getting any". Consult the other comments for my corrections for that bullshit. I am not 'waiting' for anyone and it does not matter to me whether I am 'sexually campatable' because sex is the defining thing of romance! I want to die a virgin.
These 'studies' are only relative to the area they were done in. And how do we know someone was not lying? And sex is not 'nessessary'. It has only banned hammered into so many poor brainwashed foold's minds that it is. I am a great mentel state.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Well you certainly will die a virgin and alone with your obnoxious attitude. No one and I mean no one would be dumb enough to date someone as cunty and arrogant as you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Oh, and even if I was datinga woman, things would still be pretty much the same
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you want to be sexually insecure, that's fine, but do not insult men and women by calling them weak, slutty, unpure, etc. because their decision isn't the same as your's. That is where you went wrong. Having a disagreeing opinion and just blatantly going into a fit of rage on people who are sexually active is obtuse and there is a vast difference.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Again with the arrogant assumptions. I have a boyfriend, retard. And he And dating does not equal sex. That's being a slut. Not to mention I have an ex-girlfriend whom I am still friends with. We just realised neither of us had time to date that time (We were still in school, after all). And amoung other things, of course, he likes that I am not some typical, boring, boosing, drug-taking, sex-having waste-of-life whore. Again you non-virgins show your blatant sexism, hypocrisicy, and sex-weakened minds.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks for calling me a retard, really makes me feel special. I don't usually like to call anyone this, especially not a woman, but you are the most misogynistic hypocrite I have ever encountered in my life. Just being you're a virgin doesn't make you special. I'll have you know I valued my virginity and shared it with someone I loved dearly. We love each other more than anything in the world and we're married now. Me making love and enjoying it doesn't make me weak in any sense. You're pretty weak-minded for attacking the entire female population and then having the nerve to claim I'm "sexist". I don't think that word means what you think it means. I find myself doubting your relationship is going to last. Pics or it didn't happen. I've never gotten drunk, never smoked, I've only had sex with my husband whom I saved it for, I've never gotten high, I've never gone to a drug, drinking, smoking party, and I am disgusted by promiscuity and believe that sex is sacred and that is why it should be shared between 2 committed lovers; However, it is not your place to call everyone woman on the planet but yourself a slut just because we are biologically built to enjoy sex. Obviously you've never had loving sex with someone. Of course love and sex don't correlate 100% of the time, but they can and should. Loving, spiritual sex exists.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So you are asexual, and any girl who isn't is weak? And you still didn't state any evidence. I'm guessing that's because you don't have any.
No, you are not in a great mental state. You are pigheaded and hypocritical. But really, who isn't any once and awhile. The important thing is that you are willing to man up every once and awhile and admit that you are wrong, or at least that these things are your 'opinion' and not 'fact'. By stating that your delusions are fact, you are basically ignoring everyone else's opinion and stating that you are better than anyone else. That your opinion is law, and all that matters. You'll quickly learn, however, that people don't enjoy the company of the self proclaimed princesses like you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
How am I hypocritical? Yes, I know we all are sometimes, but how am I this time? I would rather die than partake in any sexual activity whatsoever - everything from French-kissing (or 'germ-sharing') to masturbation, to oral sex - etc. Hell, even if it was a painful death, it would still be a hell of a lot better than defiling my body.
My definitions are biological fact. Prude virgins (non-virgins cannot be prude, and virgins still sexual, and the former have cheek/are hypocritical to be disgusted by/refuse to do a certain sexuality activity, because they are totally in the position to judge). And that biological fact, in my opinion is oppression and degrading to women unless it is used for it’s natural, reproductive purpose.
And for the last time, no matter what ‘desires’ you have, no matter your relationship with him, by having sex with a man, you are still allowing him to use you.
Self-proclaimed ‘princess’? What? I do not care if people like my ‘company’. They are shoving their non-virginity/sex for ‘pleasure’ or with more than one person in my face, as if it is something worth a speck of acceptance, praise, respect or approval. Until they (and you) stop doing that, I (and other people with that equal right to an opinion) will not stop showing those primitive, lust-driven beasts our purity and self-respect. It goes both ways.
👍: 0 ⏩: 5
Biological fact SOURCED FROM WHERE?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Because god forbid non-asexuals be affectionate with each other. We should all just ignore the needs of our partners and never express love in any way ever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Love is expressed through romantic and courtly activities, such as hand-holding, kissing (not 'making out'), hugging, and well, doing romantic or fun activies together (I can perdict what one would say to that last part). These non-sexual activies show love, as unlike sexual ones, they are not driven by the most primtive of human desires (eating, drinking and the lke are needs, so are not as primtive). Sex is not a need, as unless you are using it to produce the next generation (it's true and only purpose), as you would not die without it. You would die without breathing, food, water or expultion of waste products.
P.S.: You are the close-minded one, as you cannot accept my view. I can accept people fucking for no good reason, but will not approve. I will also not waste my time stopping those weak-minded animals either, as peole such as you are trying to stop veiws like mine by oppressing perfectly-allowed slut-shaming and negative opinions on vagina-owners.
👍: 0 ⏩: 5
Read up on some of Harry Harlow`s discoveries sometime. You will find it particularly interesting on the "needs" front. His work with Rhesus Monkeys was quite interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh no, what about all those times your PARENTS did it for no good reason?! Or your GRANDPARENTS?! 
Moron.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
My mother was only with my father for three years, and on two of these years, she was pregnant with me, and then my brother, and she had a good to no longer be with him any more (well, he threw her out, but she got her own back by nicking his car). She only had sex for reproductive reasons, and mentioned it when I told her I feel that way, and was happy that I feel the same. She is not the kind to lie to her own children.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Surrrrreeeeee...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You do not believe me, that is understandable. But once again, as I am me, I know I am telling the truth. For example, I know the truth to be that you are in immature, over-grown man/woman-child.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So we can get this clear, I am a lady, and I don't take kindly to your sexist remarks. I know the truth that you are a sexist pig who constantly shoves their opinion down everyone's throat.
We get it, you think sex is only good when it's used for reproduction and is immoral when it is *GASP* used for pleasure-related reasons between a man and a woman.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I can't help but agree with you, seriously..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Seriously? Or is this sarcasm? Sorry that that sounds rude.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not sarcasm, I promise (:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, well, thanks 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh yes I know it's a very unpopular opinion, but I figure that says more about the people who disagree so fiercely than it says about us. Love must be built on a connection of souls, not bodies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I know this is an overused statement, but: Amen to that
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Also:
"I will also not waste my time stopping those weak-minded animals either"
Then why are you even commenting here, since you find it a waste of time?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am not tring to stop anyone, am I? That involves actually getting off my arse and going out and pysically punishing people for said activties, and I have better things to do with my time. I am simply showing the other side of the arugment and the sexist hypocrisy of the sexuality active, and being it the original topic, why prostitutes do deserve shaming.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"I am not tring to stop anyone, am I?"
Yes, you are. You keep bringing up the subject instead of dropping it when it's obvious that they don't care what you think.
"That involves actually getting off my arse and going out and pysically punishing people for said activties"
You don't have to get up in order to stop things.
"I am simply showing the other side of the arugment"
You did it, people stated they did not care/did not want to. Yet you keep bringing it up.
"why prostitutes do deserve shaming."
Some don't have a choice.
(Also, before you try to use my level of sexual activity against me: I'm a virgin with little to no interest in actually having sex. It's just that, unlike you, I don't feel this life-or-death need to care about what other people are doing with their genitalia 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
To your first part: Oh yeah, I forgot, everybody is a clone of you in every way. Everyone should do things you approve of, feel things exactly like you, and express things in the same way you do. You are a superior GodJesusBuddha. Shall I bow down to you, oh lord and master of everything ever?
Second part:
"You are the close-minded one, as you cannot accept my view."
Correction, I would accept your view, but you can't seem to stop shaming people that *gasp* do things differently from you. And not only that, but you refuse to drop the subject when people have already given you evidence that they either won't change, or don't give a shit.
"I can accept people fucking for no good reason, but will not approve."
Because your approval is oh-so needed and having your disapproval would kill them. So sad. 
"as peole such as you are trying to stop veiws like mine by oppressing perfectly-allowed slut-shaming and negative opinions on vagina-owners."
So you're the only one allowed a negative opinion on something. Gotcha.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ok, in responce to all of that: Nope. Stop acting like you know everything about me, who I am or what I am like. I knew myself more than some random idiot online, and I do not believe I am some God-being who knows what is best for everyone.
If you must know, anyone who knows me would know I have low self-confidence, and is pessimistic and cynical.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Nope. Stop acting like you know everything about me, who I am or what I am like.
I think everyone will be happy to stop that once you stop doing that yourself to everyone around you. (:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am not, I am only going on what I am given. I do not do implying unless it is in writing of stories. I like to make things as clear as possible otherwise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>