HOME | DD
NOKAPIplz — They Aren't Evil
Published: 2012-03-21 21:04:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 5763; Favourites: 116; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Most of them were child sexual abuse victims who were forced into the industry as young as 13.The stamp says:
"Prostitutes aren't evil and I don't support shaming them. Okay?"
Or just look at this: [link]
EDIT: This has to be my most popular thing I've got going. WHOA.
Related content
Comments: 433
-You've said over and over that people here are stupid just because they had sex, even though you don't know them at all. Went further to snap at anyone even though some of the people whom were claimed as sex-weakened freaks were virgins.
That TOTALLY isn't acting like you know the person. Totally.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, I do not understand why a virgin would believe that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Because not every virgin is a hivemind centered around you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*Raises eyebrows* And I said they did where...?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
[link] Because it baffles you so much that a virgin has an opinion different from yours.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Because opinion. I don't personally understand how anyone can think of sex to be a vile, unnatural act but of course there are still going to be people who are going to think that way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And you are free to that, as am I to mine. If people would just accept each other expressing themselves, unless it was true oppression such as racism or homophpbia, there would be so much conflict in the world. And once again, it sex for pleasure that I find unnatural.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay. The thing is, yes you are free to expressing opinions.
It's natural to express opinions. We all have them.
The second you start insulting people is when the walls of opinion that were previously keeping you safe start to fall down. And all through this you've been insulting every single person you could get your hands on.
If you just said you don't like sex and you thought it was immoral and unnatural and stopped there, fine. But you didn't. You had to go on to start insulting women and then insulting anyone who tried to go against your opinion, which is also quite natural; you said yourself you have an uncommon opinion, so of course people are going to stand up against you. That's where you fell. The second you start using your opinion as a grounds to start insulting people, that's the point where people won't give a shit if it's your opinion or not. They'll just see the mindless insults which more than half of your opinion seems to be made up of.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, while I know it is not an excuse, I am socially awkward, and sometimes do not understand if, how, or why I am offending someone (as a matter of fact, I am actually paranoid about offending people, as it is always worse, I find, if a stranger hates you than someone who knows your flaws). For exmaple, I really cannot see how I have insulted women.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You really want me to list every little thing?
Alright, here we go.
-they are just stupid, weak and have no self-respect, dignity or honour.
-Is that clear enough, or has that sexuality activity rotted your intelligence so much that you cannot read properly and understand it?
-Go down to the sewers where your filthy, defiled body belongs so you do not have to hear it.
-you and all the other weak-minded sluts and live sex dolls have yet to prove your disgusting, primitive, weak behaviour
-Prove it, dumb-dumb.
- do not care how dumb a bunch of lust-driven (though I see even fellow virgins agree), immature, unintelligent, oppressive, hypocritical idiots on the internet think of my view
-You (and the other lustful, sex-obsessed freaks)
-weak-minded, retarded, man-pleasing/male-dependant, self-disrespecting, undignified, dishonourable, immoral, sluts/whores/live sex dolls and men.
-Oh, and regardless of how he feels about you elsewhere, when your 'boyfriend' (or as I call it 'sex buddy with other stuff thrown in' as true romance/a true romantic relationship has nothing to do with sex, and is only there for the sake of it) he is still looking at you as an object of pleasure during it, and neither you nor him can deny that.
Now let's see, here we have:
-Really petty insults (dumb dumb?).
-Continually calling people retarded, which you have before.
-That second last one just gave every insult you can to a woman, really. Though, I should have mentioned it wasn't just women, you were throwing insults to anyone who dared to disagree with you.
-Continually insulting everyone's intelligence (not to mention putting your's on a pedestal just because you're 'pure').
-Continuing on in a sea of arrogance (by implying just because you don't have sex with your boyfriend that means the lover of anyone else who's sexually active is a dick bag who only wants books) and making yourself seem like a complete hypocrite by acting like you knew one of their boyfriends, when you said yourself that you do not wish to be treated like everyone knows you.
There is much more and not just on that stamp. You seem adamant on throwing shit like this everywhere you can.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Please have my babies~
Oh wait. That's right. I shouldn't have your babies because that would require sex, and having sex makes me weak and a slut because it's degrading and oppressive to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I wouldn't know. She says that gay guys get a free pass (can't remember where exactly that comment was) but when I asked about lesbians she didn't give an answer. You'd assume we were the strongest beings in the world in her eyes! Nothing natural being shoved up the front or back end! We shall take down the virgins by being more pure than them despite engaging in sexual activity!
But, really, she has rules for every sexuality too. :L
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Sooo...You can't have sex unless you're gay? 
Because MOAR SEX MAKES US AND OUR BABIES STRONG! WE SHALL LIVE LIEK THE AMAZON WARRIORS AND PROCREATE WITH THE STRONGEST PEOPLE AND WE WILL RULE THE WORLD!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, she pretty much answered that; and that is a yes. You can have sex as long as you're a homosexual.
Considering all of the people who cry more about how gay people can't have sex, this is strangely refreshing on that one part.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well that logic isn't fair!
And her logic can apply to any woman, even her mother. I mean, how else does she think she was made? She just didn't pop out of the ground. 
...This user is very contradictory.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I do not 'ignore' the bit about lesbians. As I said, at least with homosexual sexual activity (which refers to both gay men and women), things are more euqal due to the genders being the same. You are still being sexuality active, but at least it is not as defiling and weak, I feel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually you did.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I am just WAITING to see what sort of response she comes up with to this. You really threw her argument right down. I'm a virgin who's very sensitive about sex and I think she's being absolutely ridiculous
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, we had been discussing straight through on a continual pattern until I posted this, so I'll just have to wait and see.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aaaannnndddd she completely avoided it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I like how she only corrected herself on the comment about gays and ignored her own hypocrisy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"Stop acting like you know everything about me, who I am or what I am like."
Stop acting like you know everything about non-asexuals, who they are, or what they are like.
"I do not believe I am some God-being who knows what is best for everyone."
Then why do you crow about how to express affection like it's some great and ultimate truth, and the only way?
"If you must know, anyone who knows me would know I have low self-confidence, and is pessimistic and cynical."
Seeing as you feel the need to put down everyone who isn't exactly like you, I can believe that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The only thing needed to know about non-aseuxals, as you call them (makes sense, I guess), unless they did it for reproduction is that they are weak of the mind and will, becausse they let themsleves be driven by lust, and no amount of acheievement can change that. For example, Einstien might have dicovered that there may have been some errors in his theories if he had not wasted some of his study/pleasure time with sex (it has been said recently that he may have been wrong in some aspects).
I do not 'put down everyone who isn't exactly like me' or it is because of my low confidence. In fact, I like that I have low confidence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"For example, Einstien might have dicovered that there may have been some errors in his theories if he had not wasted some of his study/pleasure time with sex (it has been said recently that he may have been wrong in some aspects)."
So people should never enjoy time with others ever, and should instead lock themselves away and chain themselves to a desk. Gotcha. Dollface, I am living proof that being asexual does not an error-free person make.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Urgh...where do people like you get these asumptions? Did you not see the study SLASH pleasure (or should it be lesicure?) time? Sex is a waste of that time as you will only want to do it again. At least activies like sports, video games or reading are deigned for entertainment purposes (well, unless that reading of some political or work-related, of coruse).
Once a-bloody-again, I do not imply things unless I am writing fiction and it is for effect, so I am not implying I think asexuals are error-free. I can make as much mistkaes as anyone else.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"My definitions are biological fact."
Dipshit, bring UP those facts. Find GOOD sources on the internet! Link to them! You have refused to do that ever since the beginning, because all of this you are just spewing out your ass. It's not FACT, it's BULLSHIT with no evidence or anything to prove it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Prove it, dumb-dumb. And we would not all 'die out' as their are enough humans on the earth as it is. If we only fucked for the true, biologically, reproductive purpose, then there would not be so many. The human population would be more in check. Alas, that will never happen, being humans are innately selfish, and most are weak-minded enough to give into pointless lust and have recreational sex, even though it does nothing other than start a cycle of lust and 'satisfaction' because once is never enough.
I do not care how dumb a bunch of lust-driven (though I see even fellow virgins agree), immature, unintelligent, oppressive, hypocritical idiots on the internet think of my view, and I shall refute their claims until one of us is the bigger person and stops (most likely me).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Prove what? What do I have to prove? See, you are doing it again, AVOIDING SHOWING PROOF because you HAVE NONE. This is all being pulled out of your ass.
I didn't even read the rest of your shit. PROVE to me this is all biological fact, and I (and MANY OTHERS) will listen.
All your doing right now is arguing with a bunch of brick walls because you are preaching with nothing to back yourself up. You want people to understand? Prove that what you are saying has some fact behind it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You (and the other lustful, sex-obsessed freaks) should provide me with evidence and proof that giving into lust and having heterosexual intercourse for pleasure is unselfish, 'natural' and not only done by weak-minded, retarded, man-pleasing/male-dependant, self-disrespecting, undignified, dishonourable, immoral, sluts/whores/live sex dolls and men. Provide me evidence of a woman not allowing herself be used, even though I have provided the blatant evidence of the Penetrator-Penetrated Relationship.
Provide me evidence to show how it is natural even though it is stopping the natural process of reproduction (and there is the blatant sexism of claiming being anti-abortion is 'anti-woman' and excluding men from a right to an opinion on the life of their child, just because it happen to be, due to simple biology, in the female's body. Prove to me how that is not so).
Provide me evidence that opposing slut-shaming and people having a negative opinion on sex is not sexist and oppressive.
Studies and meaningless words are not evidence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Who said I am a lustful sex obssesed freak? I am a virgin, stupid.
Again, you are avoiding it. Fucking proove your "facts" or shut your trap. I told you, I won't read your shit UNLESS you prove it. We have nothing to prove, YOU do. Get that into your thick skull and bring up your evidence.
Yea, meaningless words are not evidence, that's why you need REAL STUFF. The shit your saying means nothing. You are talking to brick walls basically. Nobody will listen and believe you unless you bring up evidence.
But you have none. You have tried to avoid giving some ever since the beginning.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Because you say you believe in equal rights and that people should not be sexist, and yet you believe that women are terrible for having sex just because they have a vagina (and even if they are the one penetrating, you say it's disgusting). Unless of course you believe that literally no one on this planet should have sex. You can't say you believe in equality when you believe that women and males can never be equal because of how their body was when they were born.
Wow, you just completely went off on a rant that didn't make sense at all. What's with all the text in brackets? You might want to rephrase yourself in a way that makes sense. It's not 'using' someone if you want it as well. Why can't you understand that? Using someone for sex is when you are in a relationship for someone just for sexual intercourse.
Just... wow. It's like you don't even listen to what's coming out of your own mouth. You don't seem to realize how what you're saying effects other people, and how preachy you're being. Look, I'd have no problem with you not wanting to have sex and being dirty if you just kept that stupidity to yourself. Be ignorant and think rude things all you want, but don't start preaching to us about. I guarantee you, you will convince nobody to participate in your asexual ways the way you are going about, so what other reason would you have to preach? Attention?
Enjoying sex NORMAL. Therefore, people are going to be more open about enjoying it. But when you have a conflicting, strange opinion like yours, you should expect people to not want to hear it. Do you think we want to hear about people having sex with animals, people who think genocide is right and people who think their parents are the most stupid people ever for not giving them an iPad for Christmas? No. Stupidity like that is best kept to yourself, or between you and people you care about. No one else wants to hear that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
Oops, I meant 'crime' not 'cream'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Finally, saying you cannot rightfully chastise, shame or punish someone for choosing to have sex is like saying you cannot chastise, shame or punish someone for chosing to commit a high-level cream )murder, virgin-rape or pysical abuse).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wait, are you comparing sex to murder? Golden.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, I am saying choosing to commit a stupid, pointless act is just as stupid as the choice to commit a crime. Both are the fault of the person who decided. It is funny. I knew someone would say this 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So... basically the same thing? No matter how you word it, you are comparing sex to murder.
And your multiple comments to me are considered a text wall, trust me. You are repeating the same points over and over again, and have offered me no proof. Why would I bother reading something as long as a typical fanfiction when I could be doing something more interesting? Who has the time for reading that much bullshit, especially when you've said it before multiple times?
I'm starting to suspect you are just a troll. No... more of I'm starting to pray you are a troll. I'd like to believe that humans can't be this stupid and pigheaded.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*Sigh* Again, more perdictable tripe. I am a troll for daring to have a different, uncomon and non-brainwashed opinion? Typical. I am 'stupid' and 'pigheaded' for that same opinion? Typical. *Yawn*
Even if it were so (which it is not), you and all the other weak-minded sluts and live sex dolls have yet to prove your disgusting, primitive, weak behaviour is anything other than that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
So, you are not a troll? How sad.
How are we supposed to prove anything to you when you disregard everything we said? Women feel pleasure while having sex. That is common fact, and yes, there have been studies to prove that the vaginal orgasm does indeed exist.
[link]
[link]
Of course, not every woman experiences them, and in that case they only need to have sex in order to reproduce or for the emotional and spiritual connection that you feel with that special partner. So yes, if they did have sex, it would only be for pleasing their husbands and if they felt no emotional or spiritual connection with their partner, they would be nothing more than a sex toy.
While having orgasms, whether clitoral, vaginal, or ejaculating, your body releases several hormones like oxytocin that give you a relaxed, happy state. It is a healthy way to keep stress at bay. But giving yourself an orgasm doesn't give you the physical benefit that sex does. In fact, sex has many good side effects.
[link]
Alright, I gave scientific proof. So where's yours?
Also, if you would have just been kinder about your opinion (like avoiding calling people sluts just because they don't have the same opinion as you), not many people would have been upset about what you are saying. I think it's perfectly fine to be asexual. But it's not okay to call everyone who isn't a 'slut'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
No, you're being deemed a troll because it's impossible to believe that anyone can actually have this sort of thought process; not the 'don't want sex thing' the...well, everything that you've put in your last sentence.
The fact that you continue to fall to insults right, left and crooked is not helping in the least.
Plus...you have to yet to prove that sex does actually make people weak.
Just want to point that out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
And once again, I am not 'asexual' I am bi-romantic. I do not have lust/do not given into lust because I am an strong (in will, mentally and emotionally) intelligent, self-repsecting human being.
And a relationship, not matter how love it has, is more driven by lust than love if it has sex-for-pleaure in it. Sex means nothing to love and is just there for the sake of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sex is the highest form of expressing your love. Just because one has sex with no intention on having a baby doesn't mean they love eachother any less. Sex bonds the body and soul.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes it is. Ask around, look it up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nope. Having a penis inside you or a man putting his penis inside a woman could show love any less. It is lust. Love and lust are completely seperate. There is no crossover, no evidence, and no definations (spelling fail) to prove otherswise. And, no, I will not believe any bullshit you try to 'prove' it with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Well then lets all do the smart thing and NOT have sex so we all eventually die out. At least we won't look weak and pathetic.
Dumbass
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lmfao. Closed minded and admitting it. I feel sorry for you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Again, nope. And again, there is nothing to pity about a real, strong, intelligent, independant, self-respecting, dignfied, honourable woman such as myself, being prude, a virgin, and masculine.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Oh, honey. I respect your views, but I putty the fact you can't see the truth. Oh well. Have a good life.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If you were as open-minded as you claim, then you wouldn't be spouting this.
But then again, I guess we all have to show love exactly the same as you do. Which means not showing it at all. Ta!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>