HOME | DD
NOKAPIplz β They Aren't Evil
Published: 2012-03-21 21:04:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 5766; Favourites: 116; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Most of them were child sexual abuse victims who were forced into the industry as young as 13.The stamp says:
"Prostitutes aren't evil and I don't support shaming them. Okay?"
Or just look at this: [link]
EDIT: This has to be my most popular thing I've got going. WHOA.
Related content
Comments: 433
Very basic details to grasp it:
1. Women gets toy.
2. Man bends over.
3. Well... you can guess the rest.
tl;dr Men do have holes too. Does it symbolize weakness in any way? No, even if if it's a dom/sub fetish (the sort of thing mentioned... sure, it's normally associated with femdom but not always) there is no weakness present as long as both are willing to consent.
π: 0 β©: 1
.............Well...that seems......weird e.e
By their logic, holes in femals = weakness, and males have holes to so they would be weak.
But their logic is crap 
Except for rape. That is a whole different story.
π: 0 β©: 3
How is it weird? Have you ever researched the p-spot?
π: 0 β©: 0
Kindly do not past your assuming and factless crap about someone you do not know to other people, please.
π: 0 β©: 2
So you're the only one that is allowed to assume things about people?
After all, you seem to know everything about the people that are sexually active...
π: 0 β©: 0
It isn't "assuming and factless" crap. By your logic, everyone is weak.
π: 0 β©: 0
It does to most people. Everyone just has something they get off to, as long as they keep it private enough it's perfectly fine with me.
The only time when such a thing actually symbolizes weakness (no matter who's doing who) is in Hentai or just plain fetish play (outside of rape anyway... which is yet again, a whole other subject). Looking at their background with all this RP, I would assume they've been reading too much or live by their kink religiously like a lot of people on dA do.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yea, same here I guess. As long as it doesn't affect me I'm ok.
Yep. Lol, it probably got to their head and infected their mind!
π: 0 β©: 0
I know right. So a hole in our bodies makes us weak? Makes so much sense. I've seen women that could beat the shit out of men. All humans are equal no matter the gender
π: 0 β©: 2
I am not going to explain myself agian to idiots on the internet who cannot read properly...
π: 0 β©: 1
That's what it sounded like you were saying. I'm not an idiot. Look how many people agree that that's how it sounded. I'm not trying to sound rude and I don't want a fight.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, me neither. I do not want a flame war or a pot of hatard.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well that's good
π: 0 β©: 2
I wanted to point out ""yet polotical essats/writing in general is one of my few talents."
I felt kinda bad.
π: 0 β©: 0
Really, I just like having a calm conversation/disscussion/debate, though I know my words do not come accross as that, but I find it hard to express myself without using these words, yet polotical essats/writing in general is one of my few talents. Really, it makes no sense.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's okay. It's hard to tell peoples tone through text so people can come off rude even if they aren't meaning to be
π: 0 β©: 1
That's a problem for me I thik. That and my temper, but they are not an excuse, I know.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, just work on it
π: 0 β©: 0
Well if it counts all holes, then wouldn't men be weak too? They have mouths, those are holes.
According to their logic.
Exactly. All people are equal. A women gets penetrated for sex, so what? That's how humans, and all other animals were made. Nobody can do anything about it, and is has nothing to do with a person being weak or strong.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, so by their logic, everyone is weak and helpless.
Agreed 100%. It's just the nature of the body. Nowhere anywhere does it say that being a female makes you weaker.
π: 0 β©: 0
That icon is perfect for this comment. Just saying.
π: 0 β©: 0
I really do not see what is so hard to understand about my opinion, which all have a right to express it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Maybe it's because your 'opinion' is fucked up?
" it is the "Penetrator-Penetrated Relationship" that exists in heterosexual intercourse - women are penetrated by the men and therefore are weaker if they have sex."
π: 0 β©: 1
Nope. It is biologically sound. Look up the relationship. It exists.
π: 0 β©: 1
So what if it's a man being penetrated by another man, does that make him weak?
π: 0 β©: 1
I know someone would ask this. No, it does not. They are both of the same gender. Homosexuality intercourse, while unable to produce babies is more...equal. That is how I describe it anyway. However, lesibans who use sex toys are not lesbians, rather bisexual, because if you are not attracted to men, then why would you want something that looks like a penis? It makes no sense. I know I am bi-romantic, as I have felt romantic attrached to both genders. I just would date a non-virgin (especially a prostitute, as there is no 'moral' or 'heart of gold' as forced or not, she is/was a prostitute) woman (as for men...I do not know) as I could kiss lips or touch hands that could been on a rather unclean part of someone else's body.
On an unrelated topic, I feel the desire to admit to liking your avatar.
π: 0 β©: 1
Lesbians who use sex toys are still lesbians! OH my glob! A piece of plastic that stimulates the nerve endings inside of you does not make you into men. It's just a fucking piece of plastic for sexual pleasure. FFS
π: 0 β©: 0
Today in Social Just Warrior; watch this "feminist" attempt to fit as many conjured up buzzwords and "factual statements" with zero support as possible.
The SJWs on Tumblr would LOVE you.
Here's your ~*~Special Snowflake~*~ Award.
π: 0 β©: 1
Bullshit. I am far more Feminist than most of them combined, as I care about both women's AND men's rights (and those of the unborn, for that matter, as we were all foetuses once and pregnancy is the natural result of sex, not some bloody STD with abortion as the 'cure', not to mention the blatant irony and sexism of excluding men, even the father of the child, from an opinion, just because, biologically speaking, in most species, it is the female who carries the child, and it is no longer 'her' body, as she is a non-virgin). I care about EQUALITY and do not ignore fifty percent of the human population.
I have never heard of a 'Social Just Warrior' (nor anyone who was not against freedom of speech and opinion, and allowing hypocrisy and sexism by being for abortion and against slut-shaming) but I know that I am not one, as I know me, whereas people like you, random people on the internet, do not (and I am that to you). Even with my flaws, as a virgin and prude, I am a real, strong, intelligent self-respecting, dignified, honourable and body-respecting, liberated (oh, it is so ironic and hilarious how 'feminists' and 'women' say that allowing a man (or men) to dominate and invade them makes you 'sexuality liberated' when them could not be more the opposite) young woman.
Take your sarcasm and seemingly Feminazi crap elsewhere.
π: 0 β©: 1
All I can still see is "How many buzzwords can I fit into one post while still making some relative sort of sense?".
Sorry only one ~*~Special Snowflake~*~ Award per person. There are many like you who need to receive it. If you wish for another award please move to the back of the line and conjure up something race or homosexual related, thank you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh, grow the hell up.
π: 0 β©: 2
Look who's talking.
Going out of your way to shove your opinion in other people's faces.
π: 0 β©: 0
Not the one playing the Oppression Olympics here cupcake. I'm also not the one declaring that anybody who disagrees with me is a sexist. ;D That's extremely counter productive by the way.
π: 0 β©: 1
'Oppession Olimpics'...What? Your sarcasm will get you no-where. I am not. It is sexist to say you cannot have an negative opinion on someone purely because of their gender, or perfection is implied due to that gender.
π: 0 β©: 1
Just because you don't understand what it is doesn't make it sarcasm. I am not being sarcastic at all, try again.
What? That makes no sense whatsoever. Yes it's sexist to say that one gender is superior to another, but how is it sexist to say that you can't have a negative opinion of someone purely based on their gender?
I really don't know what you're trying to pull, but it really seems like you're pissed at the fact that nobody puts girls with their virginity in tact up on a pedestal. You're pretty much calling anybody who isn't a virgin a sexist all for the sake of wanting to be honored and treated better because you chose not to have sex. That is your personal business and what others choose to do in regards to their sexuality and anything else is their business. Bringing them down just so you can feel superior is incredibly disgusting and, again, counter productive to the feminist movement.
Feminism isn't about honoring girls who are abstinent and keep their chastity till marriage. It's about not giving a fuck if they do or don't and tearing down the gender norms that a woman should remain pure. It's about stopping the passing judgement of what a girl chooses to do with her body. You're objectifying women and you're attempting to preserve gender norms from the Renaissance Age. Again, counter productive.
Stop parading around your virginity, acting like you deserve a medal. Nobody gives a shit if your hymen is intact.
π: 0 β©: 2
*Sigh* More predictable, assuming, Feminazi bullcrap. Really, it gets boring when you people have no mind of your own.
I understood it fully. I just prefer it when people having a serious discussion act serious.
Because you are saying that, simply because someone is female, you cannot have a negative opinion on them without being 'misogynistic', 'sexist' or 'oppressive'. How the hell is that not sexist?
Again, I do not choose not to have sex. I naturally do not do so as I am a strong, intelligent, self-respecting (and all the above things I said) woman, not a slut and a living sex doll.
No, it is not. It is having a equal right to an opinion. You cannot put someone down who has already done that to themselves. I am merely showing their stupidity and hypocrisy.
I never said it was. Feminism was never about βchoiceβ, it was about equal rights. Learn the difference. It is Femifascist brats like you who have corrupted the cause into treating all women as all faultless angels of perfection, who are never to blame for anyone and undeserving of all criticisms and insults, while all men are evil raping bastards who have no right an opinion the lives of their own children and cannot be abused. At least I am one of the few true Feminists in this word, who do not ignore fifty percent of the worldβs population.
I am not 'abstinent' (again, this paragraph is full of the same brainwashed crap I have seen before). It implies that I have lust/sexual attraction, and that I am βwaitingβ for the βright personβ or marriage. What is a choice is have lust, and use contraception, to have recreational sex.
Exactly. She chose to have sex and oppress herself, therefore, I may chose to express my right to an opinion on it. They are one objectifying themselves, by making themselves into sexual, well, objects. How is not seeing a woman as an out source for pleasure 'objectification'? Also, it is no longer 'her' body, as she allowed a man to penetrate and dominate it for pure pleasure, and therefore allowed him to take and own it.
And saying my views are very old-fashioned? Again, such classic Feminazi stupidity. There is nothing wrong with this view. It is not harming anyone. The sluts, and the sluts alone are ones doing the harming (to both themselves and others), ruining romance, equal rights, and pregnancy and sex. They have led to sex being considered essential to romance, being in a relationship to be assumed to have sex it in it and if not, is βstrangeβ and βunnaturalβ.
I am not. I am jsut not the one who gave into or is driven by primitive lust to oppress myself. I, and all other prude virgins (they can be sexual and therefore slutty) are the ones with the intelligence to ignore these 'feelings' and do more of the more productive, intelligent and interesting things in life. I am one of the woman who exist nowadays with any self-control and respect. And this is coming from someone with low confidence and little self-esteem 
π: 0 β©: 2
Translation: "I'm lazy and do not care even though I wrote something equally as long"
π: 0 β©: 1
Ha you think what I wrote is equally as long as what you just did. Yours is easily twice as long as mine. Try again.
Yes, I'm lazy. That's what tl;dr means. ;D If you're trying to offend, try not to point out the obvious.
π: 0 β©: 0
I couldn't read the rest of your post because I couldn't get over the face you said you have no mind of your own.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, many prostitutes (over here, were it's legal) do it because... Well, they like their job. They are proud. It's a job, nothing else. They do services. A baker makes bread, a vendor sells things and a prostitute sells her body. Nothing wrong with that.
π: 0 β©: 0
And before you assume that bullshit, no, I do not hold these views because of religion.
π: 0 β©: 0
I am so sick of using this excuse. There is always another option. Even in a country with no official care system, there is always another option and being a woman does not change that. Even if there were, sad as that is, forced into the βjobβ it is still their choice to partake in the sexual activities they are βforcedβ into. They are scum, as they do not have the intelligence or self-respect (though, them being non-virgins even if they did quit, they can never regain that self-respect or intelligence anyway, but at least they can have something) to think about another job or option to do instead. That is why vapid, boring, stupid forms of media (fictional and real) prove that non-virgins are hypocritical idiots, especially prostitutes and porn stars, in particularly by refusing to do or being disgusted by certain sexual activities (having βboundariesβ). And then there is them trying to stop people having a rightfully negative opinion on their lifestyle. Take the film βPretty Womanβ for example. Kissing on the lips is βtoo personalβ but touch and a man (or several men) to shove their dicks inside you is not? HA!
I know, and came to the conclusion a long time ago that, even if I were, God forbid, kidnapped and forced into that industry, I would take death over partaking in any sexual activity whatsoever. I would rather watch my guts be pulled out of me than touch a man penis or let the man with it use it to invade me. I would rather starve to death because I cannot afford food than French-kiss. At least them, while it would be painful, I would die with my self-respect, dignity and honour intact. And this is coming from a person who believe suicide is wrong and pointless.
π: 0 β©: 7
Sometimes it's not about the woman herself. I've known women who were call girls because it was the only way to feed and house their kids. Motherhood does that to you. I'm not even a mom yet and I understand that.
π: 0 β©: 0
Not being a virgin automatically makes you worthless and idiotic? Guess no one should have sex ever. Lets just let the human race die out.
Also, some people value their lives. Or the men literally rape them.
Or maybe they have children to provide for. It's easy to say you'd let yourself starve, but if you had someone else to care for it would be selfishness.
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>