HOME | DD
NordicB3rry β Spinosaurus but not really
Published: 2018-05-30 18:35:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 1863; Favourites: 89; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Oxalaia quilombensisI had this particular scene in my head for a week now, but didn't have motivation to draw it... UNTIL NOW!
Two Oxalaia wandering around or something. I rarely know myself what animals are doing in my drawings...
Also are whiskers still a thing for Spinosaurids? I haven't seen illustrations with whiskers in some time now, but I like em so I don't care!
UPDATE: It seems already that whiskers are cancer so im sorry for triggering everybody it was a bad idea to add tiny whiskers.
References:
Late Cretaceous Brazil.Β
AlcΓ’ntara Formation
Related content
Comments: 46
Too bad we lost this guy in the fire...
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
RIP OxalaiaΒ Β Β Β
π: 0 β©: 1
What does the universe have against spinosaurids?!
π: 0 β©: 1
I really hope that they find more remains of Oxalaia...
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah, whiskers aren't really likely in Spinosaurids, who probably had a crocodile-like face, but speculation amirite?
Anyway, this drawing is lovely, and doing nothing in particular is something that animals tend to do, so...
π: 1 β©: 1
I mean yeah, it's bipedal here m8.
π: 1 β©: 0
Uh it's shown bipedal here.
Also, we can't really say for sure, we need more fossils.
π: 1 β©: 1
Jeez you guys are really hating whiskers meme, just like everybody are hating Ugandan Knuckles now, and some big DA paleoartists used whiskers on Spinosaurids before too. Its a small thing and yet, everyone in the comments here are saying how cancerous this harmless meme is. Mages meh sad.
π: 0 β©: 2
Sorry if we took it way to hard, it is an idea that was hypothesized but we had no proof of it and those are dangerous if they are treated a a true theory so that's why most may take it to hard.
I liked what you did, I don't know if it accurate but the drawing is mine I do what I want, your drawing you do what you want I'm also against the accuracy patrol.
Just adding a note in the description that this is just was an idea that is inaccurate and so people should not treat it as so, as you kinda did.
We don't wanna mage you sadΒ Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah i mean if theres no fossil evidence of something it doesn't mean it's not accurate, but i do believe they did not have them. But let's say that those whiskers were part of style of art instead of accuracy? xd
π: 0 β©: 0
How can we redeem ourselves for this heinous act?
π: 0 β©: 1
Nohow, I curse you, may you never enter heavens.
π: 0 β©: 1
Just say no to spinosaur whiskers. They are contradicted by the rostral foramina and connected neurovascular canals, which indicate the presence of crocodilian-like integumentary sensory organ (ISO's). Additionally, mammalian vibrissae don't attach to foramina in the bone, but rather a complex system of facial muscles. The resemblance between spinosaur rostral foramina and mammalian vibrissae attachments is entirely superficial and whoever started this meme should have known better.
π: 0 β©: 1
Chill, its not the end of the world
π: 1 β©: 2
Oh but it is, for you have unleased WHISKERGEDDON!
In all seriousness, you're right and it isn't a big deal. It's just good to eliminate inaccurate memes so they don't continue being used.
π: 0 β©: 0
Ignore this guy. He has no idea how to be constructive.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Err, so politely pointing out a widespread error isn't constructive?
π: 0 β©: 1
You clarified. Ignore me.
π: 0 β©: 0
Nice one.
But please no meme whiskers : )
π: 0 β©: 1
I DE DEM WISKRS IF AI WUNT T !!!11!!!!1
π: 1 β©: 1
Β NO U NEED TO DO DEM D UEI I WUNT 1!11!!!14(*_Β
π: 0 β©: 1
NU MENS NU!!!1!
π: 1 β©: 0
no meme whiskers in this good Christian server now
π: 0 β©: 1
Looks good, tho as far as I know there is no evidence for whiskers.
Not to mention the questionable validity of Oxalaia (from my knowledge)
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, I know there are no evidence for whiskers, but I draw Spinosaurids so rarely, Im used to whiskers xd I guess I'll have to move on with the rest and be like everyone :d Also Oxalaia indeed is extremely poorly known, but I always liked the idea of similar in size to Spinosaurus spinosaurid from Brazil
π: 1 β©: 1
Well, it would be useful if we got some real clarity when it comes to Spinosaurinae. How valid are the different genera or just how many are there. Are Sigilmassasaurus and Oxalaia just different species of Spinosaurus, are Angatumara and Irritator the same etc.. Speaking of Spinosaurids, this might interest you:Β peerj.com/articles/4785/
π: 0 β©: 1
Well i always thought that Sigilmassasaurus is just a species of Spinosaurus. :d
π: 0 β©: 1
I think it is considered valid at this moment, tho I could be wrong. As far as I know Spinosaurus maroccanus is a nomen dubium. Again, maybe I'm wrong, those things seem to change every couple of years.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nah, the whiskers are a meme with no evidence.
οΌΉο½ο½γο½ο½ο½ο½γο½ο½
ο½ο½ο½
ο½ο½ο½ο½ο½
ο½γο½ γο½ο½
ο½ο½
π: 1 β©: 1
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
π: 1 β©: 0
