HOME | DD
Notshurly — Universal Anti Alchemy Array
by-nc-nd
Published: 2010-10-30 02:45:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 23622; Favourites: 129; Downloads: 397
Redirect to original
Description
A request byPart of the Week of Too Much Alchemy! An Array a Day, every single freaking day for a week! Heck, maybe more than one, but that's if I am in a good mood...
So this array is a wonderful anti alchemy array, and it's the bane off all other arrays (unless... Well you will see soon...). This array will counteract another array within it's range, but it's very specific to that array. It takes the function of that array, and lets you mess with it in your own little way. Thus, rather than causing some sort of unknown reaction, you can make your own! Yay!
Related content
Comments: 21
So this is why we can't us Alchemy haha I do have a question tho..Say i have everything down for a Standard Transmutation Circle as in trying to make stone from dirt or a small pylon. How does one go about activating the array? I know Alchemy is very possible. Just not like FMA thats just for show its impossible to create walls and what not..but i know it is possible to Manipulate matter using the energy displacement from the Earth and the body and mind. Focusing Electronic energy from your Brain..through your body amplified through the earth, little hard to explain in a small paragraph. But once i try to use this method its not working. Or atleast the way i try doesn't work. Haha iam sure this all sounds a little far fetched..But anways, how would someone activate your Arrays? Or are they not Energy based Arrays. Are they merely Chemical? Some advice and help passed down to another Alchemist would be more grateful than you think. Thank you! By the way Very nice work on this one as always!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Soul juice is my cheap excuse for how to activate an array.
I honestly have no idea. Alchemy, being rather impossible, has left me with no curiosity in how to activate it. I just like to make the arrays.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
is the writing legit? or is it just for filling purposes?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
'Tis legit. And it looks nice...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Is there a link where I could read this up for better understanding?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not yet. I have yet to break this one down and explain it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
*stares at it* can you break this one down? :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Perhaps. I will put it on the list
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So with THIS anti-alchemy array, you can take control of the OTHER person's anti-alchemy array. But what if they make one of these and mess with yours so that they can take their first array back, and then you make one to control theirs that controls your that controls theirs? And then DFGNCHCHDCGMSKXHJCHGXKJHKGJBXHFKJKDHFJGHDKJVBHSBFVFGJBVHJGFKJLDFSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Eliminate the first array, what you have remaining is:
Anti-Alchemy altering Anti-Alchemy altering the previous Anti-Alchemy altering the second Anti-Alchemy further...
= Infinite alteration/cancellation of both functions, sort of like a stable time loop
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And what happens if you incorporated a third into this loop? D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Notice that only two arrays are required for this to work, another would be needed if the two preexisting arrays were already cancelled, but since they are both cancelling each other, neither of them are actually in effect. If neither of them are in effect, then the array that they are intended to cancel would activate, bringing about the cancellation of both arrays, which in turn deactivates both of their cancelling. There would be no need for a third array, because the two are already in an infinite loop.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
But like, say if two alchemist bunny armies were at war over the carrot stalks, and they did that, but then a third party of alchemy bunnies decided that they wanted all of the carrots to themselves, and they're the types to not let things play out but just take control of the whole battlefield, and used another array to cancel one of the other bunny army's arrays which is canceling the third array with is cancelling the previous array?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Two arrays cancelling one array cancelling one of the arrays used to cancel itself still does not resolve anything.
Array A and B are cancelling each other. Array C is activated afterwards and directed towards A. B and C effectively cancel A's effect of cancelling B. Since B is now active, it is still trying to cancel array A, which is already cancelled. B deactivates, whereas C does the same, A activates, cancels B again, and C activates, cancelling A, which activates B and deactivates C, which activates A cancelling B...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Really, be careful! Your over thinking this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AHFIUAGNFFFFFFFWKAJSHIHIHAHIDMAIKMVDBSBHDDKSJNDCJNDIJNHDSIHCNIJKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So basically, it alters the function of the target array, at the will of the user?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Alters the effect of the meltdown, so basically, yes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0