HOME | DD

#hopps #judy #tf #transformation #zootopia #zootopie
Published: 2016-04-06 15:08:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 36373; Favourites: 208; Downloads: 296
Redirect to original
Description
[FR]En ce morne début d'année 2016, il y avait un film au cinéma qui titillait ma curiosité et que j'avais vraiment envie de voir: le dernier Disney en date, Zootopie. Eh bien! Autant dire que ce film s'est avéré bon bien au-delà de mes espérances!
Ce qui a abouti à cette petite idée de dessin... et voilà ce qui se passe quand on va voir Zootopie pour la 34ème fois.
Non, tout-à-fait sérieusement, les gens: allez voir Zootopie. Je vous le dis sans exagération, ça fait bien longtemps qu'un film ne m'avait pas autant enthousiasmé au point de sortir de la salle avec un sourire jusqu'aux oreilles. Au-delà de l'aspect "les animaux anthro c'est cool" qui rajoute évidemment un plus-value indéniable pour les gens comme moi, c'est un film qui, tout simplement, a été magistralement exécuté dans tous les domaines. C'est visuellement très beau, imaginatif, plein de bonnes idées, souvent drôle, parfois hilarant, intéressant, doublé avec talent (n'en déplaise aux extrémistes de la version originale, les voix françaises sont excellentes, surtout pour les deux personnages principaux (1)), et ça aborde des thèmes plus profonds que ce à quoi on pourrait s'attendre avec une justesse et une pertinence qui font plaisir à voir. Un "classique Disney" instantané en ce qui me concerne et qui, je le sais déjà, trônera fièrement sur mon étagère à DVD quelque part entre Aladdin et La belle et la bête. Et Atlantide l'empire perdu. Sérieux, pourquoi personne n'aime ce film?...
(1) Il faut dire que, pour l'adaptation française, ils ont eu la bonne idée d'engager de vrais comédiens de doublage pour les personnages principaux au lieu de suivre la regrettable mode qui sévit dans ce milieu, qui consiste à engager la célébrité éphémère du moment, qui n'a aucun talent mais dont le nom rameute en masse les crétins bineuronaux. D'ailleurs, instant coup de gueule: moi qui attendais avec intérêt le film Ratchet & Clank, adapté de la série de jeux vidéo éponyme qui a bercé mon enfance et dont la sortie est prévue prochainement, je me vois hélas obligé de boycotter la chose parce que... non, non, le doublage français, là, vraiment, je peux pas. Je vous laisse découvrir vous-même qui a été casté, surtout pour le rôle de Ratchet (je ne vais pas l'écrire, mon clavier risquerait de souffrir). C'est honteux, irrespectueux pour les comédiens qui doublaient dans les jeux, incompréhensible et débile à un point que ça en est presque surnaturel.
Et pour ceux qui me sortiraient un argument du genre: "Ouais mais, hé! Le gusse fait des vidéos sur Youtube, il a un peu de talent de comédien, c'est le même domaine d'activité, ça marche aussi!"... à ces gens-là, je me ferai un plaisir de venir leur perforer un poumon avec un pic à glace puis, pour les soigner, de faire appel à un ophtalmologue en disant: "Ouais mais, hé! Il a fait des études de médecine, c'est le même domaine d'activité, ça marche aussi!"
...erf, je pourrais continuer pendant des heures à ce sujet, mais je me retiens parce que je râle déjà beaucoup trop et que je patauge dans le hors-sujet. Je m'arrête là. Par contre, s'il y a quelqu'un qui veut continuer le débat dans les commentaires, laissez-moi prendre mon poing américain et je suis tout à vous!
[EN]
At this gloomy beginning of the year 2016, there was a movie in the cinema that was exciting my curiosity: the last Disney released, Zootopia. Well! That is to say that this movie went far beyond my greatest expectations!
Resulting in the idea of this little picture... this is what happens when you go to see Zootopia for the 34th time.
But, speaking seriously, people: go watch Zootopia. I can tell you without exaggeration: it was a long time since I had not seen a so exciting movie, to the point where I left the cinema with a smile from ear to ear. Beyond the "anthro animals are great" thing, which is of course a significant advantage for people like me, it's a movie that was simply brilliantly executed on all points. It's visually stunning, imaginative, with lots of good ideas, often funny, sometimes hilarious, interesting, nicely dubbed (with all due respect to the extremists of the original version, the french voices are amazing, especially for the two main characters(1)), and it covers some deep subjects that I wasn't really expecting, with great pertinence and relevance. A instant "Disney classic" for me, which I already know will take pride of place in my DVD shelf somewhere between Aladdin and Beauty and the Beast. And Atlantis, the Lost Empire. Seriously, why is no one liking this movie?...
(1) It must be noted that, for the french adaptation, they had the great idea of hiring real dubbing actors, insted of following the regrettable fashionable line in this environment today, which consists in employing an ephemeral celebrity, having no talent at all but whose name attracts great crowds of bineuronal dumbasses. By the way, a bit of my personal anger: being someone who was waiting with great interest the Ratchet & Clank movie, adapted from the eponymous video game series which I was a huge fan during my young years and which is about to be released, I am compelled to boycott it because... no, no, the french voices, really, I can't stand that. I let you discover who was selected as dubbers, especially for Ratchet's voice (I'm not gonna write his name here, my keyboard would suffer a lot). It's shameful, disrespectful to the actors who dubbed in the games, incomprehensible and almost supernatural how stupid it is.
And for those who are gonna say arguments like: "Yeah but, hey! This guy does some youtube videos, he has a bit of actor talent, it's the same activity sector, it also works!" ...to those people, I'd be glad to pierce one of their lungs with an ice pick, and then hire an ophthalmologist to heal them and say: "Yeah but, hey! He studied medicine, it's the same activity sector, it also works!"
...erf, I could go on for hours about that, but I'm gonna contain myself because I'm already grumbling enough and I'm floundering in off-topic stuff. I think I had better stop here. However, if there's someone who wants to continue the debate in the comments, let me grab my knuckleduster and I am at your disposal!
Related content
Comments: 56
GaronneDelTRES-UN [2023-07-08 16:59:15 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to GaronneDelTRES-UN [2023-07-14 12:35:54 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GaronneDelTRES-UN In reply to oldiblogg [2023-07-14 19:40:48 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to GaronneDelTRES-UN [2023-07-15 09:00:48 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
GaronneDelTRES-UN In reply to oldiblogg [2024-04-21 15:27:31 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GaronneDelTRES-UN In reply to oldiblogg [2023-08-17 09:32:17 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
GaronneDelTRES-UN In reply to oldiblogg [2023-07-15 17:26:31 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to GaronneDelTRES-UN [2023-07-24 15:51:04 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PikminPower [2016-11-03 03:58:41 +0000 UTC]
If you actually like this movie, DON'T DRAW FETISH STUFF OF IT. please...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Emillie-Wolf In reply to PikminPower [2016-11-06 10:47:43 +0000 UTC]
This is not fetish stuff !
THIS is fetish stuff : www.furaffinity.net/view/16910…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PikminPower In reply to Emillie-Wolf [2016-11-07 05:29:05 +0000 UTC]
That's all that appears on the page for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Emillie-Wolf In reply to PikminPower [2016-11-07 11:43:08 +0000 UTC]
Ah, yes. I suppose you don't have FA account, so you can't see how disgusting are TRUE fetish stuff.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
oldiblogg In reply to PikminPower [2016-11-06 02:50:17 +0000 UTC]
Erm - if you think this is "fetish stuff", never type "zootopia" on the search bar of FurAffinity. You wouldn't survive to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PikminPower In reply to oldiblogg [2016-11-06 04:00:45 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I know what goes down on furrafinity.
that doesn't make this OK, tho.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to PikminPower [2016-11-06 14:15:31 +0000 UTC]
Well... in this case, if you know there's a lot of worse pictures on FA, why aren't you going to bother the creators of these ones?...
It makes no sense to bother me about this - I mean, come on, I'm really not interested by the "fetish" part of transformations. I'm not even interested by any sexual stuff, look: there's not even 1% of pictures with simple nudity in my gallery 'cause I don't give a sh*t about it... and there's really weird people besides that who, for their part, really deserve some reprimands.
It's like scolding someone because he coughed without covering his mouth with his hand, while there's a guy next to him strangling a kid with his bare hands.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PikminPower In reply to oldiblogg [2016-11-06 18:24:04 +0000 UTC]
Wait, so theirs a non-sexual part of this?...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to PikminPower [2016-11-09 14:43:32 +0000 UTC]
Of course! Well... as usual -and sadly- the "fetishist people" about it are those who are the most talked-about...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PikminPower In reply to oldiblogg [2016-11-11 05:14:43 +0000 UTC]
wait, so if I want to draw TF, how do I make it obvious I'm not doing it for sexual pleasure?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to PikminPower [2016-11-27 02:42:02 +0000 UTC]
Ah! Difficult question. Especially as there's a LOT of different sexual preferences, and anything -anything- can be interpreted as "sexually attractive" for somebody.
I'm pretty sure someone, somewhere in the world, already had a "good pleasure" by looking at this pic. www.technocrazed.com/wp-conten…
But, well, about your question, if there's no nudity and sexual content on the pictures of the gallery, that's a good start. Also, if you see someone drawing only some weird stuff, and there's nothing else on his/her gallery, not even one picture... well... I guess there's something behind this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GaronneDelTRES-UN In reply to oldiblogg [2023-07-11 16:52:01 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
jakehunter In reply to oldiblogg [2016-04-22 06:37:06 +0000 UTC]
love your avatar by the way
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to jakehunter [2016-04-26 11:29:46 +0000 UTC]
Thanks ^^
and yours is... ... ...funny but a bit disturbing, in fact xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to jakehunter [2016-04-28 08:39:12 +0000 UTC]
O_O AHMAGAD WHAT THE HELL IS THIS PIC KILL IT WITH FIRE
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shiiriru [2016-04-07 09:27:30 +0000 UTC]
*grooooos hug* ouuuuuuuuuuh le ch'tiiiii lapinouuuuuuuuuuuu !
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
oldiblogg In reply to Shiiriru [2016-04-21 10:34:52 +0000 UTC]
Mais... mais! Pas si fort, tu m'étouffes! D: tu veux une amende?!...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Emillie-Wolf In reply to Shiiriru [2016-04-14 10:49:01 +0000 UTC]
...à noter qu'il ne faut pas confonde un ch'ti lapinou et un lapinou ch'ti !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Animefan-279 [2016-04-07 03:37:44 +0000 UTC]
Eh, I'm going with Kung Fu Panda 3 as the superior movie. On another note, I take it Alain Chabat wasn't used for either of those dubs? Are you sure ephemeral is the right word? I mean, are they last year's models or what? What are you talking about? Atlantis has a huge fanbase.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to Animefan-279 [2016-04-07 09:11:25 +0000 UTC]
I didn't saw Kung Fu Panda 3 yet, but I have planned to :3
In fact... let's take the example of Alain Chabat, as you are talking about it... when he was selected as the french voice of Shrek, it was a good idea because his voice matched with the character, and before that, Alain Chabat was already doing shows, sketches and movies for almost 15 years. He was very known, and everyone knew he was talented as an actor.
Here, the youtuber who was selected for Ratchet's voice, Squeezie... he is just a guy doing some let's play for a couple of years, he never did something requiring a real voice talent, and his voice don't fit the character at all - and, why, why would anyone hire this guy since the Ratchet & Clank characters have ALREADY some very good french dubbers since 10 years in the games?! erf... <.<
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Animefan-279 In reply to oldiblogg [2016-04-08 00:41:05 +0000 UTC]
Heck, even I knew he was a talented actor. Shawn Levy did too. That's why he was Napoleon Bonaparte. Wait, for real, a Youtuber? Dang, that is last year's model.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
oldiblogg In reply to NiatalesTGTF [2016-04-07 09:03:46 +0000 UTC]
J'avoue qu'il y a pas trop de quoi se plaindre
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Emillie-Wolf [2016-04-06 15:29:44 +0000 UTC]
héhé ! Mais t'es mignon, comme ça ! Même si tu n'étais déjà pas mal en raton-laveur chômeur... ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to Emillie-Wolf [2016-04-07 09:03:36 +0000 UTC]
Au moins, ici j'ai un job ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Emillie-Wolf In reply to oldiblogg [2016-04-07 09:49:02 +0000 UTC]
Ouais. Alors charge ton stylo, prépare ton carnet de contraventions et fais chauffer la voiturette électrique ! ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to Emillie-Wolf [2016-04-26 11:30:34 +0000 UTC]
Allons chasser les délinquants, yaaaaay!
-voiturette qui avance à la vitesse d'un escargot rhumatisant-
... ... ...RAAAAAAAAAAAH
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Emillie-Wolf In reply to oldiblogg [2016-04-26 11:52:14 +0000 UTC]
Aaaaaah... J'ai jamais compris l'intérêt de rouler dans une voiture si lente qu'on irait plus vite à pied...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oldiblogg In reply to Emillie-Wolf [2016-04-28 08:40:21 +0000 UTC]
C'est... choupi? J'imagine?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>