HOME | DD
OmicronPhi — Death To Authoritarian Communism. v. 2
Published: 2014-07-29 18:35:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 1966; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description
Based on this: scontent-b-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hp…I dislike tankie-ism but I like the hammer and sickle. DPRK-version.
Anti-DPRK sticker: omicronphi.deviantart.com/art/…
Anti-USSR poster: omicronphi.deviantart.com/art/…
Anti-USSR sticker: omicronphi.deviantart.com/art/…
Related content
Comments: 47
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Claiming to be a progressive socialist while tearing down flags of socialist brown-people revolutions like the ignorant and chauvinist dirtbag that you are.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
and asian, i just meant that you're a privileged white kid.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
libertarian communism is a thing? I'm sorry, but every communist country I've seen was either authoritarian (North Korea, China, USSR) or in between centrist and authoritarian (Vietnam maybe? assuming they didn't commit any genocides?)
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
a true socialist govt is a direct democracy with freedom of speech religion ect ya know. it woudleve been better. but then stalin ruined it all
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
i wouldnt even call it "authoritarian communism" because its an oxymoron. authoritarianism is always inherrently based on the private property concept " i have the power, i provide things, so obey", "my capital my business, get over it or die or leave". it would dismantle itself if you do left policies so that the only authority would be the peoples interest against the market/elitist/boss type authority.
i think the best way to handle this problem is to establish the term "pseudocommunism, pseudosocialism". If you find it worth using please share this idea!
Love your work!!
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Well it is still a communist ideology; it's just flawed in its method for reaching communism.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
not really there whole ideology is not based on collective ownership but in a leader or elite which people should obey, in exchange of certain politics. just because it in the "name of the people" doesnt mean it it practically.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Libertarian Communism is like Amish tech support; a contradiction in terms.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kroptkin. You should read him.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Sure the land has poverty and bad camps but it has fun places like places
with arcades,fun rides, buffet, cool museums and North Korea celebrates
Childrens day and they are loyal to the children like the proloteriat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I hope that's a poor attempt at satire...
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
You literally just said "Oh, yeah; the DPRK has extreme economic inequality and prison camps but that's all fine and dandy because they have musueums and roller coasters."
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
And children's day, they are loyal to children on that day.
does america do that?
and.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
THEY HAVE CHILDRENS' DAY! STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES! THE DPRK HAS REDEEMED ITSELF!
Make an argument you fucking buffoon.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
I don't see children's day celebrations in america.
not even loyal to the children.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, Man is corrupt, therefore, we need a State run by an elite group of Men, who considering that they are human beings like everyone else, would probably be corrupt, which thus couldn't/wouldn't prevent or stop corruption in Man...?
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
man is only corrupt because at this point in history man lives in a class system that makes man corrupt. an anarchist society would not have such a class system and thus would not have such corruption. the state however is part of that corrupting class system and thus creates corruption rather than mitigating it.also if man is corrupt then how can a state stop man from being corrupt because the state is made up of human beings.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
That's really just an unfounded asserion, but even if we accept the premiss (that is, man is corrupt) I would say that's one of the reasons we cannot have a state. Because the state corrupts. Humans aren't inherently corrupt (I know you deny this on religious grounds but that's irrelevant); rather it is power that corrupts.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
If we have no state, there will be murder and crime unenforced because there's no gov..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Again, that's an unfounded assertion. Furthermore, there's a difference between government and state.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your sayingno gov,no gov = Chaos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Government: The way a society is run.
State: A Social institution marked by 3 universal aspects:
1) A "monopoly of violence" in a given territorial area
2) This violence having a "professional," institutional nature; and
3) A hierarchical nature, centralisation of power and initiative into the hands of a few.
(Source: anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/s…
I don't see the similarity whatsoever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'm saying no state, though that's irrelevant. This is not even a discussion. You're just stating your beliefs without actually backing them up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
well your ana anarchist and anarchy is a lack of authority.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anarchy a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority.
Anarchism is a political philosophy that advocates stateless societies often defined as self-governed voluntary institutions, but that several authors have defined as more specific institutions based on non-hierarchical free associations. Anarchism holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, or harmful. While anti-statism is central, some argue[11] that anarchism entails opposing authority or hierarchical organisation in the conduct of human relations, including, but not limited to, the state system
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm an anarchist. I oppose illegitimate hierarchies, including but not limited to capitalism and the state. I don't see how chaos necessarily follows from those conditions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
the state is a necessary evil, without, it they would be chaos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WHY!? GIVE SOME FUCKING ARGUMENTS OR EVIDENCE!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Its common sense, which I see you do not have..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You can't just say it's common sense and expect everyone to buy into it; it's ridiculous. Especially since non-chaotic anarchist societies have existed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/t…
www.revleft.com/vb/practical-f…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, just link some articles written by stupid fucking tankies. If you can do it; so can I.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jytf-5…
Oh, look at that! Kropotkin just adressed your ENTIRE ARGUMENT.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dude, you are so fucking annoying..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1