HOME | DD

Published: 2016-07-30 21:00:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 2159; Favourites: 104; Downloads: 2
Redirect to original
Description
Let us have choice!Favorite before using. Credit is appreciated, but not required. Usage is allowed only within deviantART, if you find this elsewhere, please inform me. The stamp template I used is not my own, and can be found here .
Author's Notes: Apologies if the center-balance is off by a bit, I rushed to make this. I keep finding stamps that are either too garish, or plain unattractive, so I made a simple monochrome one for those that would use it. That's not to say that this stamp is entirely attractive or anything, but at least I'll use it! If you're anti-choice/pro-life, please do not leave a disrespectful comment, you may disagree peacefully. This is for those that are pro-choice, so please find a pro-life/anti-choice stamp instead.
• "But abortion is murder!" - At most, abortion could be considered involuntary manslaughter. Murder is the premeditated killing of one human being by another. Whether it is murder or not would depend on sentiency and personhood, both of which I believe that the fetus does not retain. Besides, people justify murder by numerous things, namely, as self-defense. I personally believe that bodily-autonomy of the person carrying the fetus should be put above all. Regardless of whether the fetus is alive or not, it doesn't grant it the rights to use another's body without continuous consent - the same way nobody can force another to give a blood donation or offer an organ.
• "You chose to have sex!" - Granted, consent to sex is (biological) consent to pregnancy, if it involves PIV-action. However, consent to sex isn't consent to remaining pregnant, so whether the pregnant person decides to abort, birth, or leave for adoption is their wish. However, especially if the person was raped and/or taking contraception, it is clear knowledge that they were not consenting to pregnancy, at least intellectually. Consent isn't entirely transferable. There are always repercussions on people's actions, and the idea that a (possibly) consensual few hours of mutual pleasure means nine months of pregnancy is just cruel. If you drive, you might get into a wreck. If you swim, you might drown. If you smoke, you have a possibility of getting lung cancer. But we don't deny medical treatment on the premises that a choice was involved.
• "You're going to regret your abortion!" - Scientific proof shows that the majority of people that receive abortions feel relief. The point is, if you have an abortion you didn't want, you could regret it. If you have a pregnancy you didn't want, you could regret it. Regret is not a direct function of what choice is being made, it is one of being unsure of your decision.
• "There are so many infertile people in the world, and you're disrespecting them!" - As someone who has the possibility of ovarian cancer, and thus, infertility, I can assure you: I don't care. My personal want (or lack thereof) towards children does not change that. The concept that someone else is ruining my life by not using their ability to conceive the way I would (perhaps) perceive it, is just idiotic. Infertile people are not a basket case, and they are not part of your victim card.
• "Your aborted fetuses could have amounted to great things!" - They could also amount to awful things. This argument is just...I don't understand the mental capacity of the person who made this. By this argument, every infertile person's imaginary child and every non-pregnant person's imaginary child could've also amounted to great things. You can't blame someone for not having children.
• "Why can't you just leave them for adoption?" - Because in most cases, the foster care system is majorly corrupted. If people don't want their babies and children, they'll place them in an adoption center or an orphanage. People want young children, infants and babies, because they are easier to manipulate and mold into the person they wish their child to be. A child that is unwanted, for whatever reason, will stay there until 18. Not to mention, pregnancy is extremely dangerous, much more so than abortion. Especially if the community the pregnant person lives in is extremely pro-fetus and conservative, leading to ridicule and hatred. People could lose their occupations, and their income. Not to mention, adoption is a healthy alternative to parenting, not pregnancy. If someone is pregnant and wishes to be otherwise, abortion is the only option available as of now.
These are just some of the absurd arguments that pro-life/anti-choice people have started. Some, but not all are religious, so I cannot call them rabid Christians due to an extremist minority. Now, I know I've given numerous reasons as to why abortion should be legalized and is perfectly fine, but the only "valid" reason a person needs to abort is that they simply don't want to carry the pregnancy to term/don't want the fetus. It's that simple. I suggest you check here , if you're searching for abortion clinics.
Copyrighted to IdyllicSiren .
_____
Related content
Comments: 74
LadyLambdadelta In reply to ??? [2017-12-14 15:12:48 +0000 UTC]
You're a sick twisted bitch and I hate you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zidneya In reply to ??? [2017-09-22 22:49:26 +0000 UTC]
Why can't you just leave them for adoption?..... You know who says that. Someone who can't tell the difference between a fetus and a human child. On one instance we are talking of a tissue that will become a human being and on the other, we are talking about turning your back of your own son.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Orphically In reply to thekittywarrior9000 [2017-08-08 22:03:51 +0000 UTC]
I'm confused. Did you mean to comment this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OnlyTheGhosts In reply to ??? [2016-10-13 11:20:54 +0000 UTC]
Not for the father's choice, I see. Apparently the father of the child is given no say at all. Fix the foster care system, the trouble with adoptions is gone. I consider a baby a human being, to me killing a child is murder; calling it a "fetus" and denying they're human is just a repeat of the same redefinitions game that slavers used to play with African Negro slave trade.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Orphically In reply to OnlyTheGhosts [2016-10-13 20:31:50 +0000 UTC]
First of all, please never call an exercise of human rights to bodily autonomy synonymous to slavery. It just...invalidates every bit of your argument. I've even had a pro-life/anti-choice person admit that the argument was idiotic.
And hey, fathers deserve a choice! If the pregnant partner provides the privilege of helping decide what happens to the prospective child, they totally have a choice. Transgender men who are capable of pregnancy obviously have a choice, as well. But if you're talking about a cis dude getting to decide whether a woman gets an abortion or not just because he put a half-flaccid dick in her and came - yeah...not so much.
I tend to leave things that don't concern me. I don't decide upon things like male circumcision because it's not a decision that affects me. When it comes to a person's pregnancy, I don't tell them what to do.
Your life movement is quite ironic considering your brethren also support Trump, the illegalization of LGBT+ marriage, trans people, and justify hitting their child as "discipline". Pro-choicers grant bodily-autonomy all the time. We don't cherry-pick like you do.
In the end, you're entitled to your opinion. I don't have half the time to belittle you upon it nor do I wish to. Good day.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
LadyLambdadelta In reply to Orphically [2017-12-14 15:16:49 +0000 UTC]
I support transgender rights, and I'm still against abortion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Orphically In reply to ??? [2016-09-18 02:00:24 +0000 UTC]
I know I support all and every reason for abortion, by eugenics has played a large role in that decision. Disabled people are valuable intrinsically, and the idea that abortion-supportive people must take a dichotomous stand on that matter is fallacious entirely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wakaflockaflame1 In reply to ??? [2016-09-17 13:35:46 +0000 UTC]
Well, I'm pro-life because there are no unbiased sources to say whether it is alive or not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Orphically In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2017-01-24 22:32:19 +0000 UTC]
Fetuses are alive, by the way. I found this stamp once more after browsing my gallery and wanted to let you know that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Orphically In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-09-17 19:45:31 +0000 UTC]
You're entitled to your opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Orphically [2016-09-18 01:20:30 +0000 UTC]
But for once, I'd say this is the truth..unless you can fine an unbiased site or source...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Orphically In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-09-18 01:56:52 +0000 UTC]
What is the truth? Sorry, I'm just confused on what you're telling me. I've seen abortion-supportive sources claim that a fetus is sentient, and I've seen anti-abortion sources claim a fetus is not. I just find that the relevancy of that topic towards abortion legalization, eugenics, and intrinsic value of personhood isn't necessarily dependent on whether a fetus is sentient or not. You get what I'm saying?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Orphically [2016-09-18 01:59:21 +0000 UTC]
Hm, yes, more or less, I understand what you are getting at.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |