HOME | DD

Published: 2016-07-30 21:00:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 2150; Favourites: 104; Downloads: 2
Redirect to original
Description
Let us have choice!Favorite before using. Credit is appreciated, but not required. Usage is allowed only within deviantART, if you find this elsewhere, please inform me. The stamp template I used is not my own, and can be found here .
Author's Notes: Apologies if the center-balance is off by a bit, I rushed to make this. I keep finding stamps that are either too garish, or plain unattractive, so I made a simple monochrome one for those that would use it. That's not to say that this stamp is entirely attractive or anything, but at least I'll use it! If you're anti-choice/pro-life, please do not leave a disrespectful comment, you may disagree peacefully. This is for those that are pro-choice, so please find a pro-life/anti-choice stamp instead.
• "But abortion is murder!" - At most, abortion could be considered involuntary manslaughter. Murder is the premeditated killing of one human being by another. Whether it is murder or not would depend on sentiency and personhood, both of which I believe that the fetus does not retain. Besides, people justify murder by numerous things, namely, as self-defense. I personally believe that bodily-autonomy of the person carrying the fetus should be put above all. Regardless of whether the fetus is alive or not, it doesn't grant it the rights to use another's body without continuous consent - the same way nobody can force another to give a blood donation or offer an organ.
• "You chose to have sex!" - Granted, consent to sex is (biological) consent to pregnancy, if it involves PIV-action. However, consent to sex isn't consent to remaining pregnant, so whether the pregnant person decides to abort, birth, or leave for adoption is their wish. However, especially if the person was raped and/or taking contraception, it is clear knowledge that they were not consenting to pregnancy, at least intellectually. Consent isn't entirely transferable. There are always repercussions on people's actions, and the idea that a (possibly) consensual few hours of mutual pleasure means nine months of pregnancy is just cruel. If you drive, you might get into a wreck. If you swim, you might drown. If you smoke, you have a possibility of getting lung cancer. But we don't deny medical treatment on the premises that a choice was involved.
• "You're going to regret your abortion!" - Scientific proof shows that the majority of people that receive abortions feel relief. The point is, if you have an abortion you didn't want, you could regret it. If you have a pregnancy you didn't want, you could regret it. Regret is not a direct function of what choice is being made, it is one of being unsure of your decision.
• "There are so many infertile people in the world, and you're disrespecting them!" - As someone who has the possibility of ovarian cancer, and thus, infertility, I can assure you: I don't care. My personal want (or lack thereof) towards children does not change that. The concept that someone else is ruining my life by not using their ability to conceive the way I would (perhaps) perceive it, is just idiotic. Infertile people are not a basket case, and they are not part of your victim card.
• "Your aborted fetuses could have amounted to great things!" - They could also amount to awful things. This argument is just...I don't understand the mental capacity of the person who made this. By this argument, every infertile person's imaginary child and every non-pregnant person's imaginary child could've also amounted to great things. You can't blame someone for not having children.
• "Why can't you just leave them for adoption?" - Because in most cases, the foster care system is majorly corrupted. If people don't want their babies and children, they'll place them in an adoption center or an orphanage. People want young children, infants and babies, because they are easier to manipulate and mold into the person they wish their child to be. A child that is unwanted, for whatever reason, will stay there until 18. Not to mention, pregnancy is extremely dangerous, much more so than abortion. Especially if the community the pregnant person lives in is extremely pro-fetus and conservative, leading to ridicule and hatred. People could lose their occupations, and their income. Not to mention, adoption is a healthy alternative to parenting, not pregnancy. If someone is pregnant and wishes to be otherwise, abortion is the only option available as of now.
These are just some of the absurd arguments that pro-life/anti-choice people have started. Some, but not all are religious, so I cannot call them rabid Christians due to an extremist minority. Now, I know I've given numerous reasons as to why abortion should be legalized and is perfectly fine, but the only "valid" reason a person needs to abort is that they simply don't want to carry the pregnancy to term/don't want the fetus. It's that simple. I suggest you check here , if you're searching for abortion clinics.
Copyrighted to IdyllicSiren .
_____
Related content
Comments: 74
Herowebcomics [2018-03-29 04:17:52 +0000 UTC]
Wow!
A point in this post involved justifighing abortion because of self defense.
Um, I practice martial arts and I can tell you that the best kind of self defense is to keep the other person off of you.
If you let the other person get on you and do the one thing that you can do to get pregnant you consented to the risk.
Also we are talking about self defense against a BABY here!
The best way to defend against one of these is to pick it up ,put it into another person's arms , and walk away.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Orphically In reply to Herowebcomics [2018-04-02 20:32:32 +0000 UTC]
"If you let the other person get on you" - I don't know if you're using this as a means to justify rape or victim-blaming, but it's really skewed how you've phrased it. Here's the thing about (consensual) sex, both of you consented to do the do. Meaning, s/he's just as much responsible as the person who is pregnant.
Also, as I've mentioned earlier, consent to do one thing is not consent to do another. Consent to kissing doesn't mean consent to sex. Consent to sex doesn't mean consent to pregnancy. You can acknowledge the risks of pregnancy (and many do with contraceptives - a clear and definitive indication that they were preventing against exactly that predicament), but that doesn't mean you need to sacrifice pleasure for the sake of a group's moral high ground. We don't dictate necessity of medical treatment on how morally subject the person was when making a decision.
I'm discussing self-defense as an abstract concept. Believe it or not, a uterus is one of the most hostile environments for a zygote to reside in (which, when you think about it, is fairly evolutionarily neat as it is a "biological" preventative of sorts). Some people choose to abort because they've been assaulted. Others choose to because because they aren't financially or mentally ready for parenthood and can't immerse a child into a toxic environment. Others choose to abort for a plethora of other reasons, none of which require justification to outside parties.
Adoption - which I'm assuming is what you've elucidated - isn't an alternative to pregnancy. It's an alternative to parenting. If you believe a person should be subject to nine months give or take, of hell and vomiting and terrible mood swings and pain (and I'm not saying you are) for the sake of a fetus that isn't covered by pre-natal care or insurance, and will likely be completely ignored by politicians and policymakers who try preventing abortion but don't attempt encouraging safe sex, better sexual education, and maternity leave - well, then, I'm not quite sure what you consider humane, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't encompass that.
Good day.
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
TakeruShiba In reply to Orphically [2018-08-28 15:31:13 +0000 UTC]
I don't see anything wrong with forcing a person that's pregnant from consensual sex (especially if they didn't use protection) and not in danger to give birth against their will.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Orphically In reply to TakeruShiba [2018-09-24 20:42:57 +0000 UTC]
Then that's a difference in our ideological beliefs and there isn't much I can do about that.
👍: 2 ⏩: 1
LadyLambdade1ta [2017-12-15 15:16:53 +0000 UTC]
to
Do you mean "I am incapable of caring because I have trash for a brain"? That's what you really mean, but you are too retarded to write properly. You have no sense of reality in that underdeveloped pathetic brain of yours. Again, you block me because you cannot handle the true reality.
And how can what I say be right back at me? It doesn't apply to me. I am the intelligent and true pro-lifer here. You are only a trash, pathetic, hobbyless, weeb, retarded, semi-lesbian, failed-abortion, sick glue-eating anti-lifer nazi.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LadyLambdade1ta [2017-12-14 15:34:36 +0000 UTC]
The true sick twisted bitch here is LadyLambdadelta
Exposing an evil anti-liferPlease, you need to see this. LadyLambdadelta is not a pro-lifer, she is one of the biggest anti-lifers here. This will probably be very, very terrible and disgusting for you to see, but you have the right to know the true and pure reality.
https://achthenuts.deviantart.com/journal/LadyLambdadelta-rant-706900121
She tells achthenuts to kill himself! Only anti-lifers do such things. There is even more anti-life stuff from her.
https://comments.deviantart.com/4/11689716/4479156561
https://comments.deviantart.com/1/303364159/4496548693
https://comments.deviantart.com/1/280415386/4492409339
https://comments.deviantart.com/4/36249796/4449978227
https://comments.deviantart.com/1/296075785/4426390837
A true pro-lifer would not wish death on people no matter what! LadyLambdadelta is not a good person, she is pure evil, just like the character she is named after.
Please, don't believe everything she says.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Breloomish In reply to LadyLambdade1ta [2017-12-14 16:04:42 +0000 UTC]
None of that stuff is as bad as support late-term abortion, is far worse.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LadyLambdade1ta In reply to Breloomish [2017-12-14 16:30:51 +0000 UTC]
You display your mental degradation again. You literally tell people to kill themselves, you think sinking into the SAME LEVEL as the anti-lifers makes you pro-life. You're even dumber than and combined.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Breloomish In reply to LadyLambdade1ta [2017-12-15 14:45:27 +0000 UTC]
Right back at you. I'm not even wasting my time with scum like you so you're blocked.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LadyLambdade1ta [2017-12-14 15:25:55 +0000 UTC]
Ah, the retarded one is so brain-damaged that she needs a tonne of pointless single-emoticon messages to express herself. Only someone as idiotic as LadyLambdadelta would need the pointless spam just to say a message that could all fit in one comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LadyLambdade1ta In reply to Breloomish [2017-12-14 16:29:30 +0000 UTC]
In your dreams, Katie. I know you're LadyLambdadelta .
In reality, your intelligence is below even that of a shit-eating koala. By spamming the comment section, you showed so much of your severe brain damage. You show so much of your mental capacity that way.
Are you going to tell me to kill myself? You show so much of your true anti-lifer self. You only want to make me feel down, too bad you only show your brain damage when you try. You say "You're the retard", when you actually mean "I'm the retard". You can't even write correctly. Please, replace the pile of trash that you have for a brain. No wonder you don't have any dates, you are just a retarded, hypocritical, evolutionary-failure, loser, semi-lesbian anti-lifer, nobody wants someone as anti-life and dumb as you are.
You are insulting the pro-lifers with your anti-life rubbish that you claim as pro-life. Leave the thinking to true pro-lifers and intelligent people. You should learn what pro-life really is, anti-lifer, supposing that you are even capable of that.
Your name fits you well. "Lambdadelta", isn't it? Oh, did you know that Lambdadelta is one of the most evil characters of all time? A witch of pure evil? Fits 100% to you, anti-lifer. You are even related. Crawl back to your anti-life well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Breloomish In reply to LadyLambdade1ta [2017-12-15 14:46:32 +0000 UTC]
I was spamming the comments section to annoy Orphically, not that I care what a retard like you thinks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BeholdThePowerOfNod In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-12-15 18:24:51 +0000 UTC]
In before ban.
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
LadyLambdade1ta In reply to BeholdThePowerOfNod [2017-12-16 17:39:52 +0000 UTC]
to
And what are you? You little Nazi anti-lifer. You better enjoy your last days, for you cannot last. There is an overhaul on internet laws coming: www.theguardian.com/technology… . These will be the end of you.
to
Don't worry, when they come, I will utilize the power of these new and overhauled laws to get rid of LadyLambdadelta once and for all. No matter how she thinks she doesn't care (while she is just too mentally-deficient to care about anything because she is too retarded), she cannot escape. Her days are numbered. Her final fate is sealed, as befits a pathetic anti-lifer as she is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LadyLambdadelta In reply to BeholdThePowerOfNod [2017-12-16 14:12:14 +0000 UTC]
Not that I'd have a problem with getting banned by a scumbag that supports abortion up to full term.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SpinoInWonderland In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-12-14 15:43:43 +0000 UTC]
Um, are you okay? You literally posted like 30+ consecutive comments composed of only a single emoticon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
LadyLambdadelta In reply to SpinoInWonderland [2017-12-14 15:55:56 +0000 UTC]
I did it because this deviant is the kind of person that really gets me riled up, it's one thing to support abortion, but she supports it full term regardless of the circumstances. I've tried to argue with her in the past, but she didn't take anything in.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
SpinoInWonderland In reply to LadyLambdadelta [2017-12-14 15:57:42 +0000 UTC]
Well, you only really needed your initial comment for that. You can edit your comments and expand one as long as it's less than 24 hours old.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LadyLambdade1ta In reply to SpinoInWonderland [2017-12-14 15:50:49 +0000 UTC]
Fuck off, retarded. I hope your own dinosaurs slap some intelligence into you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SpinoInWonderland In reply to LadyLambdade1ta [2017-12-14 16:08:53 +0000 UTC]
Seriously? Coming from the person who thinks real people can be related to fictional characters? You're ridiculous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>