HOME | DD

#giganotosaurus #giganotosauruscarolinii
Published: 2016-12-15 17:43:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 11410; Favourites: 170; Downloads: 36
Redirect to original
Description
Giganotosaurus Carolinii was one of the largest theropods known to have existed. With a length of 12.2 meters and mass at 7 tonnes, Giga is large. A consequence of it's build and size, Giga is practically a clone of Tyranotitan, Carcharodontosaurus, and likely Mapusaurus.Disclaimer and credit:
I do not take credit for the skeletal references used in the making of this artwork, be they bases or just visual guides. I do not claim their creator's work as my own. Please give the authors a look, you may like what you see. links below.
this artwork in particular used 's Giganotosaurus carolinii
Franoys' Deviantart
Franois' Giganotosaurus carolinii
Related content
Comments: 22
Serulfen [2017-05-26 14:25:57 +0000 UTC]
About this design, is this reconstruction covered in fuzz?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Franoys [2016-12-16 02:52:02 +0000 UTC]
Very good, it is a big improvement over your previous Giga, at least I like it better!
Also, thank you for the mentions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Norththeicewing [2016-12-15 22:04:26 +0000 UTC]
You should draw acrocanthosaurus, that's one of my favorites
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to Norththeicewing [2016-12-15 22:55:10 +0000 UTC]
nah, nop, never gonna happen.
totally impossible
stop spoiling future things!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to Norththeicewing [2016-12-16 01:07:56 +0000 UTC]
totally not gonna release an acro tomorrow
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2016-12-15 20:12:43 +0000 UTC]
Nice!
Does he have only quills on the arms or are there feathers on the body too?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2016-12-15 22:54:08 +0000 UTC]
not this one, though I may fix that in the future
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dontknowwhattodraw94 In reply to Paleop [2016-12-16 22:18:00 +0000 UTC]
Okay
(nice seasonal avatar picture you got there)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to Spinosaurus14 [2016-12-17 15:02:06 +0000 UTC]
yes.
that is the most likely estimation for it's length.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kirkseven [2016-12-15 18:25:03 +0000 UTC]
any reason you didn't factor in the fragmentary dentry specimen?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to Spinosaurus14 [2016-12-17 15:00:39 +0000 UTC]
Well but just 2 identical replies?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Spinosaurus14 In reply to Paleop [2016-12-17 15:04:15 +0000 UTC]
WTF? I thought I deleted the other on e wrong placed coment, my bad!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Corallianassa [2016-12-15 17:48:20 +0000 UTC]
LOL it's franoys, not franois lmao
Anyway, nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0