HOME | DD
Paleop β Sasquatch
#bigfoot #sasquatch
Published: 2016-08-06 02:11:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 3896; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description
Has anyone seen the Hendersons?I think they might exist.
to be honest, I would like to see what a Sasquatch might really be, or atleast what one hypothetically would look like. the above is likely not accurate to what a giant hominid/ape thing would look like at bigfoot's scale.
I honestly am curious if he exists or not.
edit: just an update, changed fur and proportionsΒ
-update 8/6/16-Β
updated it, in accordance to the information that gave me, I hope I got it right
Related content
Comments: 66
Patterson has been said to be a hoax by someone who Patterson knew, so I'm not to sure about that.
The problem is that a bigfoot would need a lot more food than a moose. We're talking about a 10ft ape man thatΒ is quite intelegent, not a 7ft grazing mammal. there's definitely a difference in the amount of calories etc needed. granted this is mitigated by a lower population and omnivorous diet.
I like your counter to the fossil argument, thank you for providing that.
I do not think bigfeet could avoid humans all that well in the modern era.
Considering drones and trail cams becoming increasingly more common it's very likely that if bigfoot exists and we hadn't found it already we will find it soon.
Even very rare species still get found every now and then, so I still find it very unlikely.
π: 0 β©: 1
hey m8, interesting ideas about lack of calories, maybe if they are real, they overcome this by being omnivorous? during winter there in North America there is a large abundance of Lichen, like there is ALOT of Lichen, and other primates known to live outside of tropical regions like macaques and snub nosed monkeys feed on this. by relying on a omnivorous diet consisting of a combination of lichen, maybe more tough fibrous plants as well, (hinted at by the generally present sagittal crest) & animals as well, I think there would be enough food available for a population of these apes. keep in mind, most sasquatch seen are generally 7-8 foot, but thats another topic. and as for being seen by now, i would argue that their identity as possibly the most well known cryptid is evidence of them being caught on trail cams & drones. There is alot of evidence for the patterson film to be legitimate, one bloke saying it was him and no one else confessing seems negligible i think, compared toΒ for example the angle of its the ground to its knee when the creature lifts its foot is 70 degrees. in humans this only ever ranges between 50-55 degrees, and also the fact that patty is approx 7-8ft tall. i find it hard to believe that in the 1960s, two farmers wold have the economic resources to create a suit years ahead of the current special effects industry, that had moving muscles & breasts. its always fun discussing sasquatch, an interesting topic. on an unrelated note, good job on your art. I've been watching your page for an amount of time now & i love your paleoart. keep doing what your doing.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
This is something I just want to say, and it isn't at you, it's to other people. It's usually hard to argue with skeptics over unknown creatures, I tried it but they have to give their explanation on why it's illogical that these creatures exist and it's all confirmation bias and all this other lame excuses they give. Besides I imagine those skeptics have confirmation bias themselves. Since that simply means "seeing what they want to see, or believe what they want to believe", those skeptics just don't bother and expect that creature to not exist, and that's how they see it as. Though saying that to them may hurt their feelings.
π: 0 β©: 1
Just give him a red neck tie and it's perfect
π: 0 β©: 0
I can ensure you on that something is out there, whatever it is, we don't know
π: 0 β©: 1
Good Glaux, I love that movie! An' I think it's possible for Sasquatch to exist aswell. It's not too far a stretch, to be honest.
Β Great work on this, btw!
π: 0 β©: 0
Why does his facial expression look so familliar?
π: 0 β©: 1
you'll see why Β soon enough 
π: 0 β©: 0
well out of all the giant ape stories, the Yeti can be completely roled out, Trey himself confirmed to me that that one is a bear. Honestly for all of these giant ape cryptids the most convincid is the one behind Menk, due to the documentary "The Russian Yeti" The first half of it brings facts and tells the storyof the original incident over 70 years ago, and it seems quite convincing, though aome of it may be fabricated, I never checked, the second half of the documentary on the other hand seems like just all bullshit, they go out and try out their knowledge in modern times by going out in that location, to me it seems like that lart of it was COMPLETELY fabricated and fake, as they almost on the exact day "supposedly" get a Menk call along with other unrealistic shit, though again I never bothered check wether its real or fake, though the original older incident as I checked is completely legit, though again, the documentary may have lied about a few facts. In the end, all of em are most likely owl-- I mean bears or other large fluffy things.
π: 0 β©: 1
nah, big foot is a basking shark
π: 0 β©: 3
s2.quickmeme.com/img/8a/8a35b3β¦
π: 0 β©: 1
i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/oβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
"It's what I'd call: Quite a spicy meme"
π: 0 β©: 1
Or an owl because you know: Chubacabra, a few Globsters, Kongamato, Ropen, Jersey Devil, Flatwoods Monster, and of course Mothman were all owls. Doesn't seem too far off at this point.
π: 0 β©: 0
well I suppose a decomposing basking shark IS large and fluffy
π: 0 β©: 1
That's not what a bigfoot sounds like.
π: 0 β©: 1
hah hah
that's pretty good
π: 0 β©: 1
He looks funny with that smile on his face xD
Read Darren Naish's article about it?
π: 0 β©: 1
nope, I have not
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh okay, I stumbled upon it yesterday, thought others might've read it before when it got published.
blogs.scientificamerican.com/tβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
I could see it being real.
I may have even had a sighting! I had tried some things i saw on "Finding Bigfoot" I now know that it's probably fake. But it seems i got a responseΒ of knocking. My cousin didn't believe in bigfoot. Know she does.
Well, i shouldn't say it was bigfoot. It was around West Palm Beach, FL. In the "Lion Country Safari KOA" We were visiting to go to the park for my 14th birthday (here's a link www.lioncountrysafari.com/ )! So it was a Skunkape, not a Bigfoot. But nevertheless, im not sure if it was a bigfoot or not. But who knows?
π: 0 β©: 0
I say to many people around the world are seeing something like theΒ SasquatchΒ for it to be fakeΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
I think it's more that people WANT to see a sasquatch so much they convinced themselves they have than actually seeing a sasquatch.
π: 0 β©: 0
I did a years worth of Bigfoot research for a research project and I can say that Bigfoot is only able to exist rather than being definitive, and while there is a small amount of positive evidence, like the patterson film and the casts analyses by primatologist Jeff Meldrum that displayed real anatomy, it isn't enough to say the animal (or animals) are real.Β
Now in terms of what it looks like, you might want to use the anatomy of Paranthropus boisei as a reference for drawing a Sasquatch. This is because of two things:
1. a study of the patterson film has shown the figure's face and head is very homologous to that of Paranthropus
2. while witness say (and I'm on a knifes edge saying this because of how poor anecdotal evidence is) that Bigfoot has either an ape-like or man-like face, there is a photographic phenomenon with primates and great apes in which a shadow forms between the bottom of the nose and the top of the lip. this would give a primate face a more human-looking appearance. So Paranthropus or not, its best to use a more ape-like facial structure.Β
These are other descriptions to use when interpreting Bigfoot based on witness testimony (again, very sketchy at best):
1. pointed head with a pronounced bow
2. small flat nose
3. pale face
4. broad shoulders and an almost non-visible neck
5. barrel-like torso (use gorilla x hominid anatomy for reference)Β
6. feet that are 15inches long and flat (rather than arched) with 5 toesΒ
7. adults are 9-10ft tall, juveniles are 6-7ft tall, and infants are 3-4ft tallΒ
8. adults are colored either reddish brown or just brown, while juveniles and infants are black in colorΒ
hope this all helps ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
it did, quite a lot, the new bigfoot is on the way
π: 0 β©: 1
Awesome 
Keep up the awesome reconstruction art π
π: 0 β©: 0
Finding Bigfoot is one of the funniest shows I've seen in recent years..
π: 0 β©: 0
super sayian neckbeard level 4
π: 0 β©: 1
NO!!!!
well, no
I have my raisins for not making hominids....Β
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't like making humans, not sure if the taxonomy is impaired by racial and young earth beliefs or not.
humans are boring, etc.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>