HOME | DD

PC-JUNKY — Could This Be Data v.3

Published: 2005-01-29 06:46:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 1166; Favourites: 6; Downloads: 386
Redirect to original
Description Well finally here is the 3rd and final part of my "Could This Be Data" series.

Created and rendered in Bryce 5

The render time was an ungodly 4-days, 14-hours, 45-minutes, and 37-seconds if you want proof of this render time go here >>> Render Report

I really hope you enjoy this one as it is, because there will be no further modification to it.
Related content
Comments: 23

JonnySchweer [2006-12-14 21:04:00 +0000 UTC]

Somehow the cubic format reminds me of the processor chip from the Terminator series.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GT86 [2005-03-10 15:07:37 +0000 UTC]

woah, thanks 4 the link on2 this mate, this is........ wow
i think im gona have 2 get hold of bryce, u seem 2 get great results from it. i mean, 4 & a half days for just 1 render is mad, but i wudn't care if i were 2 get this kinda quality

great pic, i really like this kinda futuristic come abstract ones which r so simplistic yet so complex at the same time
great water reflections too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to GT86 [2005-03-10 16:06:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks I am glad you checked this one out

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GT86 In reply to PC-JUNKY [2005-03-10 16:24:11 +0000 UTC]

yeh & its my background now heh

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to GT86 [2005-03-10 16:30:07 +0000 UTC]

Cool! I am glad you like it that much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KanaDragonheart [2005-01-30 14:01:20 +0000 UTC]

The render time migth've been so ernomous, because the inner parts of the surrounding plates around the green cubes are reflective too, i bet this could be rendered way under a day if you only set one side of the plates as reflective =,

Very nice job, nevertheless

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to KanaDragonheart [2005-01-31 03:17:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

Unfortunatly Bryce does not allow you to set only certain parts of the surfaces of objects to be textured or not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pakkman781 [2005-01-30 08:20:48 +0000 UTC]

Awesome! A combonation of v.1 and v.2. PLEASE stop using PNG though, I love the format, but:

1. I have to re download to save it

2. I have to convert it to a jpeg

Still deserves a tho

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to pakkman781 [2005-01-31 03:15:41 +0000 UTC]

Thanks I am glad you like it

When I use .jpeg the quality of the preview pictures is just not up to par with what I want people to see when viewing my artwork, but .png is lossless so it is as perfect as viewing a bitmap.

I am curious as to why you have to download it twice and convert it to .jpeg

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pakkman781 In reply to PC-JUNKY [2005-02-01 02:05:13 +0000 UTC]

I agree, png is better, I have always hated jpg.

I didn't want to download the 7.7meg file(HUGE for dialup people like me...) so I clicked the show full dev button, it DLed, and then for some reason when I dragged it to the desktop, it wanted to DL again. I dunno why, I guess Safari just wanted too...

I'll probably start using png too though, as I'm sick of jpg...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NoNProph3t [2005-01-29 19:31:06 +0000 UTC]

pretty gnarly dude

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to NoNProph3t [2005-01-31 03:12:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks and I havn't heard the word "gnarly" in a long time lol.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PeterRama [2005-01-29 14:43:23 +0000 UTC]

A lot of hard work and it shows! Good job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to PeterRama [2005-01-31 03:11:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Teoryn [2005-01-29 13:18:30 +0000 UTC]

Very well made, Very nice colors and great textures.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to Teoryn [2005-01-31 03:11:13 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Teoryn In reply to PC-JUNKY [2005-01-31 03:16:01 +0000 UTC]

Your Welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

soloact-the-bard [2005-01-29 10:05:34 +0000 UTC]

Whew! Long time, lots of patience you have! Beautiful creation!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to soloact-the-bard [2005-01-31 03:05:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cariadav [2005-01-29 09:40:46 +0000 UTC]

my god.

just... wow.

it was worth every minute of it, it looks amazing The internal reflections are great, and the water in this one seems a vast improvement - possibly because of the spave is filled up with the cubes? I'm not sure, but I really love it. Great work yet again

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to cariadav [2005-01-31 03:05:10 +0000 UTC]

Thank you I am really happy that you like it this time

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

elvarien [2005-01-29 09:15:51 +0000 UTC]

heh this here shows why your stuff is good : ) .. all you used were cubes .. just .. cubes and you made something wich looks pritty spiffy
( even though the rendering time is ungodly high)
`ts a good piece of work dude .. keep it up

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PC-JUNKY In reply to elvarien [2005-01-31 03:03:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0