HOME | DD
Pe7er — Solaris
Published: 2003-11-26 19:43:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 6132; Favourites: 48; Downloads: 1768
Redirect to original
Description
The planet. It looks like in Soderbergh's movie (which I liked) but is inspired by the book by the best Polish sf writer, Stanislaw Lem.If you like the image, read the book. You won't be disappointed.
Related content
Comments: 23
awesome , the book is by far more interesting than the movie , the description make your imagination run wilds!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WHOA.... this is the icing on the cake... now to go order that BOOK...heh !!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wonderful) The only thing i liked in Sordenberg`s movie was the way he made Solaris. It looked kinda creepier.
That one goes 2 my favs
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
...
Wow, that is amazing
It also reminds me of Phaaze so you get a 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I want this as a wallpaper. Or something like it. It's so beautiful. Both the book and recent movie were so beautiful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
*Sigh* Beautiful. I loved the idea of the looks of the planet with that strange ocean and the two sun. And the book was awesome, I regret I couldn't read it earlier. It become one of my favourites
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The movie was boring, but it made you think. It was kind of like Signs, but better special effects. They didn't even say if Solaris is a planet, star, nebula, pulsar, quasar, black hole, or inteligent subspace sentient-higher-plane-of-existence anomaly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fascinating! Very very close to original, You know...
I saw Soderberg's SOLARIS not so long ago...
I have to admit he made DIFFERENT movie (but he said he want to make re-make of our russian movie)...
Different from my favorite classics by Tharkovsky.
Did You saw russian Solaris?
I love new SOLARIS, though...
George & Natasha did a great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks! It's close to the planet as seen in the movie. In the book it was orange, not blue. More like fire. I don't know why I made it blue, I suppose I was under the influence of movie. I haven't seen Tharkovsky's movie - it's hardly available, apart of that Stanislaw Lem said that Tharkovsky messed up his book with Dostoievsky
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, You absolutely right about Lem's words on Tharkovsky movie...
Actually, after I saw Thark. movie, read the book and saw Sod. movie I have to admit, that these are 3 different (almoust absolutely different!) pieces of art...
Book is genius sci-fi item, scarry sometimes... But nothing (I think) philosophical... It's ABOUT PLANET.
Tharkovsky's movie is very self-contemplative, meditative piece. Hard philosophy, questions of humanity, etc. It's ABOUT PEOPLE.
Soderberg's re-make is ABOUT LOVE...
These pieces got different accents. But I'm very glad, tha I read the book and saw both movies. It's worth to do that, believe, since Lem's book is brilliant classics of sci-fi.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i clicked on it cos it looked like one of those plasma ball things from the really small thumb nail however thats much more interesting
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Like the image, love the book, but the movie stinks IMHO 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nice work on the planet....i mean realy nice looks great. but its in space it could do with stars, other planets a moon maybe. its a great start though. Just finished a book so i might check solaris out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
solaris..liek the movie with george clooney?..
yeah, the russian version of it is better than the american one..i should read the book someitme..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WOW! me likes! i agree with klovese... very VERY pretty
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The title is 'Solaris', author is 'Stanislaw Lem'. It's originally Polish but it was translated to English. Get it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhh! PRETTY!!!!!! SO gorgeous!!! I'm like, hypnotised by it! What book is that exactly? now you've piqued my interests!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0