HOME | DD
PointzNow — Untitled
Published: 2017-12-03 05:37:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 1381; Favourites: 26; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 13
to all the people who are saying how come an empty deviation gets so much faves..
well guys that transparent image is used on the Featured deviation and you then you can use it like a custom box..
and this thing helps the noncore people to decorate their profile,,
maybe people who used it and got help from it faved 
chill
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That's impressive.
A bot who publishes a blank deviation featuring nothing, with the pretty accurate title of 'untitled', and it gets about as many favorites as I do normally...
Way to get outclassed by a bot. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I’m lucky if I get more than 3 favs a *post so I’m way out classed here
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wait, seriously?
You're art is awesome.
You got skills.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No problem! ^w^
Although, my relation towards furry/anthro characters remain neutral. XP
I have little information on them, and how they represent human-like characters and a lot of them not wearing any clothes (like a typical animals) Is kinda conflicting in my head. XP
One part of me thinks: "They are human-like, and nude. That's just wrong."
While the other part thinks: "They are animal-like, and since animals are nude anyway, it's okay. Also since they don't really have any visible genitals either."
So, as you can see, my view is kinda split on that mater. I don't really know what to think of them... XP
I find them to be cool looking and all that, but I can't tell if they are meant to be nude in a human kinda way or an animal kinda way. XP
...
Uhm, sorry. <'XD
I wrote a bit much here...
What i mean to say is, that you make great art, but i'm not quite sure how to view them. And I don't want to view them in a wrong way. XP
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Personally, it all depends on how human they make them, if it’s pretty much a naked man/woman with fur then it should have clothing but if it’s an animal standing/walking/ doing human like activities I think it’s fine if they don’t have any clothing on.
Also, I think art can be viewed however you want to view art. I honestly don’t think there is any wrong way to view art, even if you can’t tell if it’s a human or an animal of some sort :3~
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So...
Characters that are basically humans with fur (or scales/feathers for that matter), is not okay if nude.
While animals that is able to do human-like stuff is okay?
So, what about characters with a human stance, and with either fur, scales or feathers, aswell as a animalistic head, feets, hands and potentialy tail/wings? (Like typical anthro and furry characters are.) is them being "nude" okay?
Okay. Well, artworks of nude humans or anything related to something sexy or sex in artworks itself is very very wrong in my opinion.
Now, I've looked trough you're gallery, and you don't do such discusting things.
You draw pretty great animals and such. It's really wonderful work. I'll have to take a closer look at some of it, and favorite some of the things I like most.
After all, I think you deserve getting a little more attention. ^w^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It really depends on the character and how it was designed. Also, thanks for the possible favs
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I see.
I'll go with that policy then. ^^
And no problem.
I checked out some cool stuff, looks really rad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
