HOME | DD

prosaix β€” dep0rnification

Published: 2012-01-23 17:51:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 10996; Favourites: 662; Downloads: 40
Redirect to original
Description A satire of the retarded skyqeen's insipid 'stamps' that she's been shitting lately.

If you don't know what 'stamps' I'm referring to, look at one of the popular pages, say last 3 days. There's bound to be one there.


Anyway don't forget to fave this durrrr because it's totes awesome and this deserves 10000+


No egos were harmed during the making of this stamp. Also, please, no harassment! DO NOT STEAL MY STAMP!

MORE:
Related content
Comments: 625

N1ghTw4lk3r666 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 15:39:07 +0000 UTC]

true stuff but who cares anyway...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Vampiress892 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 15:25:54 +0000 UTC]

I agree! To many more porn images on the front than nude art (seriously people.. there is a difference!! And needs mature tags..). It isn't art just because you use a good a good camera! <3 <3 <3 <3 <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Domifox In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 15:22:30 +0000 UTC]

Right on!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Stelluna85 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 15:16:27 +0000 UTC]

Finally! xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TakNomed In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 15:09:57 +0000 UTC]

Here, here!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SkyVixie In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 15:03:37 +0000 UTC]

I always believe everything is art. There's a difference between nudity and porn. But I sort of agree. I've seen artists contantly draw women in a way which portrays more of a sexual message :\ I mean, if that's what they want to do, I'm not really bothered, but y'know, it's kind of ...==; I dunno, i guess I can see where you're coming from.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

T-Weaver In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 14:38:10 +0000 UTC]

I'm a bit amused and confused. I just noticed she had blocked me - out of the blue?
[link]
This was my only time talking to her 10 days ago. I guess explaining her reasons is too hard and it's better to block someone?

Questions must be scary.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

moni158 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 14:31:42 +0000 UTC]

Agreed

And you even stuck it in that category you felt was inappropriate? Well? glad you changed your mind.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ninaqueenbee In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 14:17:42 +0000 UTC]

Porn = NOT ART
Nudity = BEAUTY

I'm a normal teenage kid, and I see nudity on dA as ART. Why would anyone go on dA to masturbate, anyways???
If people want porn, they just go on youporn or something

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vergilblack25 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 14:07:24 +0000 UTC]

technically there is no porn in DA ... there are " artistic nudes" and those are block to minors... if the staff believe that there is offensive content they would take it down .... there is no real porn on DA ...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Vampiress892 In reply to vergilblack25 [2012-01-24 15:28:03 +0000 UTC]

dA hasn't been blocking much recently. minors can still see it if the artist doesn't mature tag it themselves. I'm set with my mature filters on to avoid those images yet I see them everyday. I report them but dA says my reports are invalid, so really. Its not blocked to minors.
And this may be your opinion. But this stamp given by the comments obviously represents others opinion that there is to much of it on dA with tasteless haste.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

vergilblack25 In reply to Vampiress892 [2012-01-25 18:25:38 +0000 UTC]

i see ... i didnt know DA wasnt blocking images that arent filtered. i mean i never actually cared much ... but you should talk to the staff if u really want a change ... u can find them on chat or message them and see what u can do

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fenris31 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 12:53:55 +0000 UTC]

I would not say it better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sabisade In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 12:12:50 +0000 UTC]

So true. I'm sick and tired of seeing those boob & vagina pics in the front page.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Teleway In reply to Sabisade [2012-01-24 20:40:12 +0000 UTC]

That's so true! I go onto the front page and within a minute or so...

"Oh look. Another butt hole in the community."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Sabisade In reply to Teleway [2012-01-25 09:08:28 +0000 UTC]

Indeed. D<

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

virtualbeerboy In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 11:58:55 +0000 UTC]

Bro, dear Bro, You can correct yourself always, no one stops you, but you can't correct everyone, and hardly you know who needs what...


nevermind the creators of that stuff, because even they know it's viewable, and they are sure it catches the attention.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Asomatica In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 10:45:56 +0000 UTC]

I saw what you did there ;D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Asomatica In reply to Asomatica [2012-01-24 10:48:48 +0000 UTC]

Now make one every day.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

StardustLotus In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 10:44:59 +0000 UTC]

FINALLY. A statement, that should be much earlier here. Thanks for that!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mhm98 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 10:42:36 +0000 UTC]

Porn here or Porn elsewhere...
who cares...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

muurtje93 In reply to mhm98 [2012-01-24 10:44:46 +0000 UTC]

the people that don't go to DA to see porn....?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mhm98 In reply to muurtje93 [2012-01-24 12:36:15 +0000 UTC]

Couldnt they just, like, not look it up then?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

muurtje93 In reply to mhm98 [2012-01-24 14:30:20 +0000 UTC]

kinda hard to avoid it when you're just looking thru the most popular deviations sadly ._.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mhm98 In reply to muurtje93 [2012-01-24 14:33:07 +0000 UTC]

Kinda hard it is, yes. But then, why look at popular art?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

muurtje93 In reply to mhm98 [2012-01-24 14:36:29 +0000 UTC]

wtf =.= because, why not? theres some good stuff between it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

mhm98 In reply to muurtje93 [2012-01-24 23:07:56 +0000 UTC]

Bleh! Lies...
It's all the same stereotype animu.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CPMacDonald In reply to muurtje93 [2012-01-24 16:28:00 +0000 UTC]

Reading between the lines it's called.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wolfofthemoon In reply to mhm98 [2012-01-24 13:31:00 +0000 UTC]

Thats kinda hard when every other picture on the front page is boobs.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mhm98 In reply to wolfofthemoon [2012-01-24 13:48:00 +0000 UTC]

If thats how it is, then why the hell does one look at the frontpage to begin with?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

wolfofthemoon In reply to mhm98 [2012-01-24 14:33:13 +0000 UTC]

To see what's popular, I suppose.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mhm98 In reply to wolfofthemoon [2012-01-24 23:09:36 +0000 UTC]

Obviously, pron is popular

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PurpleShootingStar In reply to mhm98 [2012-01-24 13:54:48 +0000 UTC]

So basically you're saying that we should browse dA with our eyes closed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

mhm98 In reply to PurpleShootingStar [2012-01-24 14:01:05 +0000 UTC]

OMGWHATANEXELANTIDEA!!!

No im not. i asked: why are you looking at the frontpage, if you know it's mostly porn?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PurpleShootingStar In reply to mhm98 [2012-01-24 16:46:07 +0000 UTC]

Because it's the first thing that comes up when you go to this site. Yes, people with subscriptions can choose what categories they want to see on the front page, but people without subscription can't. And browsing through popular deviations is an easy way to find interesting stuff and helps finding new artists.

I’m not against β€žnudityβ€œ as long as it’s really artistic and is marked as mature content. Unfortunately, much of this β€žnudityβ€œ is just tasteless p0rn and has no mature content on it. That’s what we’re talking about.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mhm98 In reply to PurpleShootingStar [2012-01-24 23:04:30 +0000 UTC]

You dont necessarely have to look at what's on the frontpage, even though it's the first thing that pops up.

When i go to dA, the first thing i do is log in. Then if i want to see something, i use the searchbar from there on, and im quite sure you dont need a subscription to do that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

christelwink In reply to PurpleShootingStar [2012-01-24 13:59:25 +0000 UTC]

Scratch that, since you also get to choose what YOU put up here.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

christelwink In reply to PurpleShootingStar [2012-01-24 13:58:13 +0000 UTC]

You could turn the maturity filter on. Anyway, you don't get to choose what other people put up on dA. You only get to choose what you click on.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Vampiress892 In reply to christelwink [2012-01-24 15:29:47 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but if the people don't mature tag it (Which doesn't happen alot anymore) it won't get blocked even with mature filters on *Says person whostill sees tits and vag's on front page with Mature filter ON*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KatieZientek In reply to Vampiress892 [2012-01-25 18:28:21 +0000 UTC]

It's something that just can't be fixed.. there will always be idiots who ignore the rules. A site that allows free uploads of images will never truly be safe from pr0n.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thedarkvixen In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 10:37:23 +0000 UTC]

You deserve a report and a ban, not harassment.

Needlessly abusive description. Sounds like u jelly, bro.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

IsakiYukihara In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 08:55:42 +0000 UTC]

soo truee

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hotarubi-Kyoshi In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 08:15:20 +0000 UTC]

Anyway, featured you here [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BioKiwi In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 08:14:45 +0000 UTC]

I was once told by a higher upper that porn wasn't art.

I guess it is, since you guys say it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hotarubi-Kyoshi In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 08:10:15 +0000 UTC]

It seems that someone heard my prayers in deviantart forum...
Vaginas aren't artistic. Vaginas are genetals. Genitals should wear pants.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Teleway In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 07:50:06 +0000 UTC]

THANK YOU!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FluffyLover1986 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 07:22:33 +0000 UTC]

There's a difference between artistic nudes and porn. Porn=get off. Artistic nudes=you know them when you see them.

Honestly, go look at :iconoldboy1985plz: and tell me if you think that's porn.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

shadow19734x In reply to FluffyLover1986 [2012-01-24 08:11:02 +0000 UTC]

..."porn: ANYTHING of sexual content that is not live" meaning it doesn't matter if its on paper, stone or in a museum its still porn. but that doesn't mean porn cant be art, just like music, dancing and other things as such are a form of art, and your definition is flawed because everyone has a different eye for different beauties

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyLover1986 In reply to shadow19734x [2012-01-24 08:12:10 +0000 UTC]

I see porn as deliberately sexual with no other redeeming qualities. You may have other definitions.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shadow19734x In reply to FluffyLover1986 [2012-01-24 08:20:21 +0000 UTC]

I would agree with that, but somebody else could look into every detail of the picture and still see more meaning to it and others could look at it and only see whats on the surface and right it off as crap or bad art

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>