HOME | DD

prosaix — dep0rnification

Published: 2012-01-23 17:51:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 10996; Favourites: 662; Downloads: 40
Redirect to original
Description A satire of the retarded skyqeen's insipid 'stamps' that she's been shitting lately.

If you don't know what 'stamps' I'm referring to, look at one of the popular pages, say last 3 days. There's bound to be one there.


Anyway don't forget to fave this durrrr because it's totes awesome and this deserves 10000+


No egos were harmed during the making of this stamp. Also, please, no harassment! DO NOT STEAL MY STAMP!

MORE:
Related content
Comments: 625

FluffyLover1986 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 07:23:00 +0000 UTC]

Man...how the heck do you link to dA people? [link]

There. Not porn.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hehewuti In reply to FluffyLover1986 [2012-01-24 07:26:00 +0000 UTC]

Leave out the "plz". That's only for the fake accounts with the emoticons.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyLover1986 In reply to Hehewuti [2012-01-24 08:03:00 +0000 UTC]

okay, let's try

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hehewuti In reply to FluffyLover1986 [2012-01-24 14:24:24 +0000 UTC]

there you go ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vyse-KingofRogues In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 07:03:54 +0000 UTC]

I love how people don't bother to read that short ass description and make a huge fucking deal of this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EpkeArt In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 06:52:08 +0000 UTC]

FINALLY. I thought I was the only one bothered by it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShugarSketch In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 06:48:19 +0000 UTC]

Don't forget to make one every day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vyse-KingofRogues In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 06:44:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GeneralHandGrenade In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 06:06:21 +0000 UTC]

id suppose by your standard Picasso, Courbet, Degas, Matisse, Schiele, Caravaggio, Michellangelo, Manet, titian, klimt, rodin and virtually every other great master who has ever portrayed the nude figure in history should be deemed smut in the eyes of deviant art, eroticism and art walk hand in hand, it has always been that way and it always will be that way

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hehewuti In reply to GeneralHandGrenade [2012-01-24 07:27:08 +0000 UTC]

You're naive if you really believe that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

GeneralHandGrenade In reply to Hehewuti [2012-01-25 04:53:23 +0000 UTC]

caravaggio enjoyed painted nude little boys,some have even suspected him of pedophelia,picasso, women menstruating and being sexually violated by an octopus, courbet painted a blatant close up of a vagina and egon schiele, well egon made a whole career off sexual perversion, it is not a belief but a fact, there are whole books devoted solely to erotic art from ancient greek pottery depicting orgies and ancient japanese prints depicting masturbation and beastiality all the way to modern contemporary art

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hehewuti In reply to GeneralHandGrenade [2012-01-25 05:22:58 +0000 UTC]

That's all well and good, but when people post shitty webcam/cellphone picks of their vagina, I find it impossible to believe that that is art in any way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GeneralHandGrenade In reply to Hehewuti [2012-01-25 19:30:01 +0000 UTC]

people post alot of shitty photos, vagina or not, im not defending the quality of every post on deviant art, i just dont believe that a post should be banned solely on its subject matter, if you do that then youre defeating the point of even having an art forum

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hehewuti In reply to GeneralHandGrenade [2012-01-25 20:50:04 +0000 UTC]

If the post in question has no artistic value, it doesn't defeat the purpose at all. It upholds it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GeneralHandGrenade In reply to Hehewuti [2012-01-26 01:10:10 +0000 UTC]

the problem with modern art or maybe its a plus depending on your personal oppinion is that it no longer has a solid deffinition, anything from a urinal hanging on a wall to a painting of a dot can be argued to have artistic value these days. if someone can look at that image and pull some form of inspiration from it, then it has value

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shadow19734x In reply to Hehewuti [2012-01-24 08:12:09 +0000 UTC]

and how exactly is this person "naive"?

👍: 0 ⏩: 4

GeneralHandGrenade In reply to shadow19734x [2012-01-26 01:19:05 +0000 UTC]

i used to try to decide for myself what counted as art and what didnt but once i became familiar with the history and philosophy behind art i realized its about as pointless as saying my religion is right and yours is wrong

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GeneralHandGrenade In reply to shadow19734x [2012-01-25 05:07:45 +0000 UTC]

here is question, someone paints a nude at the highest level of technical skill, a true masterpiece, its considered art, now someone paints that same nude in the act intercourse with an equal or greater level of skill is it suddenly no longer art?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GeneralHandGrenade In reply to GeneralHandGrenade [2012-01-25 05:09:09 +0000 UTC]

or say that person painting the intercourse is a weaker artist and possably a little inept at the practice, is it now porn?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GeneralHandGrenade In reply to shadow19734x [2012-01-25 05:03:28 +0000 UTC]

lust is a human trait and art reflects humanity, if there is a line its very blurred, virtually everything posted on deviant counts as art, tasteless and vulgar perhapes but art none the less, but simply because something meets the barest definition of art doesnt mean you have to like it either

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shadow19734x In reply to GeneralHandGrenade [2012-01-26 14:01:17 +0000 UTC]

I agree with EVERYTHING you said their completely, I think weather its in good tastes or bad it doesn't matter what so ever because someone out there's going to see it as art and along with not liking it I don't think anybody should be apart of things they don't like, there's nothing forcing us to look at different art works that we don't like

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hehewuti In reply to shadow19734x [2012-01-24 14:24:18 +0000 UTC]

There is definitely a line between pornography and artistic nude

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shadow19734x In reply to Hehewuti [2012-01-26 14:05:32 +0000 UTC]

the definition of pornography is ANYTHING of sexual content as long as its not live. the definition of art is ANYTHING that feels you with emotion. there is no fine line between the two except the ones YOU alone write up and even then there's millions that will call art the things you choose to call porn or trash or anything else.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hehewuti In reply to shadow19734x [2012-01-26 16:10:05 +0000 UTC]

As long as it's not live? Does that include or exclude video?

Wikipedia and dictionary.com disagree with you. "Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging items (often with symbolic significance) in a way that influences and affects one or more of the senses, emotions, and intellect." Shitty cell-cam vag pics do not qualify in this category. Try to tell any art history or art appreciation teacher there's no fine line besides the one I make up and see what they say. There is a definite line between pornography and art.

I draw pictures, but I do not consider myself an artist, because what I draw has no deeper meaning or any symbolic significance. It's just what you see. They are pictures, they are not art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shadow19734x In reply to Hehewuti [2012-01-27 01:58:25 +0000 UTC]

yes that includes video because its not live.

"in a way that influences and affects one or more of the senses, EMOTIONS, and intellect.* if a picture of a vag makes you angry, that's an emotion, therefore your making it art, or any other emotion.

okay what about the deeper meaning in the shitty-cam vag shot about how she needs attention and everything else you could see with myspace whores like that, that has deeper meaning to it, it'd probably having a deeper meaning of not having a good father and stuff like that, when you look at things with a deeper meaning does that then make it art for you? because you can look at any picture and come up with a deeper meaning. just because you didn't draw a deeper meaning doesn't mean someone else wont come up and see one you don't, art isn't just what YOU see, or what YOU had drawn, there's millions of people who see things differently then the last person.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VoreAngelus In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:57:29 +0000 UTC]

For some reason I hope this makes the front page.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

peacewood In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:43:23 +0000 UTC]

skyqeen blocked me after i asked a simply question of her stamps which i didn't get at all

that pretendous cunt

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

T-Weaver In reply to peacewood [2012-01-24 14:51:56 +0000 UTC]

Same! Asked a question, only just realised she blocked me for it.

She's a coward.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Leah-the-Red In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:40:18 +0000 UTC]

Lol i follow someone and she recently made a stamp that was this big, I love the huge stamps, much easier to read with my crappy glasses than the small ones XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Musoukakitty In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:38:18 +0000 UTC]

I think the only reason I hate 'artistic nude' on this site is the EXTREME quantity of it, especially on the front page...I swear theres one nude to every 3 non-nude pics...

Then most of them are just a girl posing nekkid and people go on about how the shadows of her figure is the art, or tieing a girl to a table and gagging her well her belly is so skinny its caving in is ART. Bullshit its porn with some kind of erotic theme and I wouldn't care so much if it wasn't in excess...but there is just so much of it.

I came to Deviantart for more ART: drawings, creative photos, 3D models even! Not to find 60% of it pretty much be porn...isn't that what porn sites and newgrounds is all about?

Also I will apologize if this seems really harsh but I am sick of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 4

shadow19734x In reply to Musoukakitty [2012-01-24 08:13:54 +0000 UTC]

if you have a problem with is why don"t you turn your filter on?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Musoukakitty In reply to shadow19734x [2012-01-24 08:24:36 +0000 UTC]

As I said before *Copies and pastes*
Then I miss out on the few artistic ones and I can't look at some of the art the people I watch upload. Even then it only cuts down the amount of it by a small precent. Regardless last I looked Deviant art wasn't about nude art and in the last year or so the amount of it has sky rocketed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Teleway In reply to Musoukakitty [2012-01-24 07:52:55 +0000 UTC]

I totally agree.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SupaSupaKawaiiDesu In reply to Musoukakitty [2012-01-24 07:45:33 +0000 UTC]

Agree, completely.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JackalPath In reply to Musoukakitty [2012-01-24 05:59:53 +0000 UTC]

Edit your settings you can filter most of it out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Musoukakitty In reply to JackalPath [2012-01-24 08:24:01 +0000 UTC]

Then I miss out on the few artistic ones and I can't look at some of the art the people I watch upload. Even then it only cuts down the amount of it by a small precent. Regardless last I looked Deviant art wasn't about nude art and in the last year or so the amount of it has sky rocketed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

roamingtigress In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:13:51 +0000 UTC]

*steals*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flansy In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:10:46 +0000 UTC]

And here I thought I was the only one cringing at those fucking stamps.

right on, d00d.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShugarSketch In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:09:55 +0000 UTC]

COME ON FRONT PAGE!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flurffy In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:09:49 +0000 UTC]

Funny how I just got from the front page and saw 2 rather *ahem* unattractive women nude.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JackalPath In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:08:01 +0000 UTC]

Okay I laughed at the stamp! But I think its pretty clear that a lot of people aren't getting it or bothering to read your description.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kryvnus In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:05:22 +0000 UTC]

Ouch. My ego.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WatarimonoNoToukon In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 05:00:18 +0000 UTC]

YEEEESSS. Or at least it deserves a goddamn censor. >:/

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thestrange87 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 04:53:18 +0000 UTC]

It depends on if it breaks the rules or not. Deviant Art has full say in what it wants to allow. Unfortunately those rules are rarely enforced, nor are the exceptions spelled out at all. So one can never really be sure what is allowed and what isn't. An erect penis is not allowed, no matter how artful they are presented, according to the rules, but they still remain all over the place.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HollowMephiles In reply to Thestrange87 [2012-01-24 07:19:39 +0000 UTC]

It's not that the rules aren't enforced, it's just every time something with nudity makes the front page lots of people complain about "porn" being posted and report it so the moderators have to look at the same thing over and over and over and it takes a long time for the actual porn to get taken down. The was a comment about 1 page back where the person was complaining about how "sick" they were of "reporting crap". I would be willing to bet most of the stuff they reported didn't actually violate the rules, it was just something they didn't like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kenzeez In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 04:51:58 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for making this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DanchuPichu In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 04:36:25 +0000 UTC]

If it's art it belongs here. Hence the mature setting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Pink-Devil In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 04:24:20 +0000 UTC]

Truth be told I stopped caring now I just pass it by and say, "meh, next picture please." I don't know if this exists because I'm too damn lazy to check but when look at pictures on deviantart isn't there an exemption filter. For example, you can look at a bunch of different art except artistic nudes or blah blah category?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TealSkeletore In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 04:07:37 +0000 UTC]

She blocked me lol.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheBlackWolf07 In reply to ??? [2012-01-24 03:48:13 +0000 UTC]

THANK YOU! I mean, i know people are creative (if you know what i mean) but come on....that stuff on here? I bet there are people younger than 15 that go on here and they have to look at some of that? I'm not being mean, I'm saying to the people who are doing that, be respectful and label it "Mature content" at least. ok my ranting is done

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>