HOME | DD
Prywinko — Mermaids
#anime #ariel #cute #disney #littlemermaid #mermaid #redhead #support #water #patreon
Published: 2019-07-09 20:20:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 102512; Favourites: 2023; Downloads: 440
Redirect to original
Description
! Spicy art available on Patreon!
An alternative version on Patreon !
My art and video are created thanks to your support! Thank you!
Patreon Gumroad Ko-fi Instagram Facebook Twitter Tumblr Pixiv (print) RedBubble Youtube
Hight quality Images (4000x7450px)
Mature Content
Mature Content
Mature Content
Related content
Comments: 251
I heard her hair is still gonna be red, actually
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Don't know what that is suppose to mean but I love Ariel. Love her bright red hair though sometimes she is ridiculously skinny XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
The live action little mermaid cast singer Halle Bailey as Ariel. So in the pic its the original disney Ariel and a rendition of what the new one could look like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The new Ariel being casted for the little mermaid is black so that's why it's 'ariel and ariel'
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well she is dumb...supporting black washing is just as bad as white washing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wow! They are both so beautiful!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Lol I love the fake outrage about the new ariel. It's very funny ^.^ but I do have to admit, this is anouther redhead gone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
People are legit not happy with this unnecessary change to get brownie points from the "woke" twitter take. Just those who are super mad about it aren't that common, it's mostly just a fake outrage by people who want to "own the racists".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i know right? I might not like a lot of "woke" shit in movies, (like StarWars or Captain Marvel) but a simple change to a character who's race doesn't really play a part in who they are, or is iconic is not going to engage people.
if they changed Mulan into a black woman, I would be mad. if they change Aladin into a Chinese man I would be mad. because for them, the race plays a role in who they are.
Ariel could be changed to purple and it wouldn't affect the original movie.
I think the FAR left is starting to get desperate for attention because regular people are starting to call out their bullshit...
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
In the original story Aladdin actually was a Chinese man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ah yes let's make a white character black and get applause but if you do it reverse you are suddenly a "white supremacist" or "racist" changing the race of an established character is cheap, and pandering. Creating an original black character would work far better than this dose of racism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
talking properly, aladdin's tale was settled on china originally, but i think the problem is that the people perceive that the change of race only affects those characters that were created as europeans originally, and many people consider it a form of anti-white racism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
really? i did not know that about Aladin.
and while I get your point there are other characters whose race doesn't really play a role in who they are and could be changed.
in my opinion, you could change DC's cyborg from teen titans to anything else and it doesn't change the character.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'm confused, you sort of defend them changing Ariel to black (because tbh she may as well not be the same character because Ariel doesn't have a terribly memorable personality), and then say the far left (who are doing this crap) are just desperate for attention...
Getting mixed messages here. The issue here is Ariel's design is Iconic and everyone knows how she looks, changing her into a black woman actually does affect who she is as she's no longer...well Ariel. She's just Ariel in name only.
Not to mention all the plot issues that can arise, like the fact it's in the 1800s where black people were usually captured and turned into slaves...that's just gonna seem weird if something like that doesn't happen unless you make drastic changes to the plot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sorry, I wrote it while very sleepy so some things might have come out strange lol.
and your right i am on both sides. as a character, Ariel's race isn't very important. you can change it to anything and not affect the plot in any way.
some characters who could be similar are Spiderman, Batman, Kim posable. all 3 we know as white but could easily have the story changed for them to be something else.
characters whose race does play a part in who they are would be Black Panther, Mulan, Shurlock holms. you cant change them without having problems.
changes like this, while left, are not to bad if done write and not forced down your throat.
female ghostbusters, in concept, can work. but they pandered Far left and became trash.
same with StarWars, oceans 8, captain marvel, and others.
even black panters nearly suffered from this when the far left kept saying "its the first black hero!" "it did so well because the hero is black!""best marvel movie ever!" dispight him not being the first black hero (first lead black lead hero in the MCU), it was a good movie because the hero was good, and the movie still had its problems. (the final fight still makes me cringe.)
some diversity is not a problem if done well. but it becomes a problem when the far left want to make it ONLY about that. as of right now, the only thing they changed was that she's now black. if the story still goes basically the same, I don't see much of a problem.
also, this is Disney. they aren't the best when it comes to following history in their movies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ariel though is very popular and is known as a white redhead. Like, this isn't just some random character from a Disney movie, she's iconic and everyone knows how she looks. Changing her race basically means she's just Ariel in name only. Not very legitimate.
Also that thing about the plot not being changed is nonsense. It's the 1800s, country populated with white people, and a black mermaid. Do you not see why that would be an issue?
And it's not about historical accuracy or that stupid "She's a mermaid quit complaining!" meme that the shills are using to disregard the criticism, it's about the fact Ariel is apart of western culture (even non western countries love her) and they just changed her into a completely different looking design for the live action movie. Again, it's no longer Ariel. It's just Black Ariel (because it's not Ariel).
Apparently the only reason they did this was because they really wanted Beyonce in Lion King, but she wouldn't do it unless they made Ariel black. Basically they are complying with the demands of a powerful person because they REALLY wanted her in another movie. So this isn't done for representation, diversity, or any of that other bullshit. It's literally just because they really wanted Beyonce in the Lion King.
And also I will say that instead of making femalesplotation movies or whatever, why not just make original stories with black characters? Are people like you so used to preexisting IPs it's impossible to suggest a new IP rather than just a reboot/remake of already existing ones?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes, but in the original story, the mermaid was never named. plus with the story bring in the public domain, anyone could write a similar story. (theirs more to it to that but I think you get my point.) so Ariel is just a name given to the character in the Disney version.
Disney doesn't really follow how real life was in a lot of their movies. look at the Pocahontas movies and tell me they followed the real story.
while I find that argument to be stupid too, Ariel is still Disney character to do what they want with. best way to protest the change is to not go see it. (i know I'm not)
if that is the real reason why she is black then I find it even dumper then before.
LMAO! do NOT lump me in with them! I'm just making a point that for some characters it doesn't matter if their race is changed as it really wouldn't affect some movies. I completely agree that they should make their own IP's and stop fucking up existing IPs.
it's one of the reasons I like steaven universe. it's a new IP, and while it does have "woke" moments, it's done well because it's not hitting you over the head with it or fits in with the story it's telling.
but i know why the Far left takes the Preexisting IPs and fucks them up. they know the movies/shows already have a fanbase and they think it they make it "WOKE" it will suddenly make that fanbase "woke". nope, just pisses us off...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Who cares about the original story, it's the Disney animated movie that's relevant here.
Wasn't Pocahontas one of the more unpopular movies Disney put out in the 90s? And why does that have any bearing on such a drastic change to how the character looks when they are so faithful in other live action movies?
They are allowed to do what they want with Ariel, like how George Lucas was allowed to do what he wanted with Star Wars. In other words it doesn't mean shit.
And sorry, I don't meant to lump you in with the rest of the crazies on Twitter, but I think you don't need to try and side with them at any point on this as it's a completely unnecessary and stupid change. And your aware how these woke types work so again why even argue for their side?
They think they will make more money if they pander to different demographics. Doesn't always work though, has to be something a lot of people can appreciate and can appeal to both men and women. I don't think a lot of black men are into things like Princesses, but they are into superheroes, hence Black Panther being successful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
"Blackwashing" only shows the disdain that is actually held by those "minorities" that they are said to be "including" with changes like that. They already said it very clear by two afro intellectuals, "putting a black woman in a story of Caucasians is like saying that afro folklore is irrelevant and there is nothing salvageable that deserves to be told". By the way, is the black race really a minority? And no, disney has no right to do so, the story is not "theirs". This has nothing of "creativity" this is simple cheap ideology.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
disney already has us jaded with all that sjw ideology that is getting into their productions. Personally, I have stopped consuming anything from Disney monopoly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well said.
We should be allowing the creation of new IPs which won't result in people getting upset at stupid race changes, because they would have always been there from the start.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
to point out that Ariel is Disney's version of the story and that anyone could retell the story in similar ways but with some changes. including changing skin.
to point out that Disney isn't completely faithful to the source material they use for their movies. (hell show me were in the little mermaid movie Ariel needs to kill the prince to save herself from being turned to seafoam?)
as much as I hate the new StarWars, yes Disney has every right to do with it as they please. I've excepted that. which is why I voice myself with saying "until they get their heads out of their ass and start making good movies again, I won't buy shit from it."
lol, it's fine I understand. I like to see the points being made on both sides and see what is valid and not. then help separate the more rational left from the SJW far left that has slowly been killing the entertainment industry.
the SJW's are just very loud. which makes them think there is a lot of them when in reality they are a minority. but that minority has infected a lot of media so the moment they think something is "racist, sexist, or problematic" they smear it all over the place and try to make them look as bad as posable. which traps companies. either fall in line or be smeared in the media.
and black panther wasn't successful because of black people. it was a marvel property so it would already do good. it was successful becase the writing was great and they didn't pander to anyone audience.
a better comparison would be wonder woman and captain marvel. people love WW because it was a good movie (surprising everyone) with good writing. CM failed because she was just a mary sue and was pushing a (3rd wave) feminist message.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't have much more to say that hasn't already been said. I don't really want to support Disney for the time being until they get their act together...whenever that is. And you will likely see a sequel to Captain Marvel (unless it's sandwiched between some important Avengers movie again or something) perform much less then the first one because people won't have the incentive to see it. Unless they recast and rewrite her into a good character.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ya, unless its marvel I don't support Disney either.
and i agree. Captain Mary sue had the protection of coming between two BIG movies, falsely advertising that its important to endgame. (it wasn't), and still having to buy empty seats to make it look like CMS was a success.
hell, she wasn't needed in endgame at all. everything she did could be replaced by someone else and would make no difference.
the only way Marvel can fix it now, it to just get rid of brie as fast as posable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I've actually read she'll still have red hair
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gorgeous and sexy! Wow, I love the contrast between the two of them!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gorgeous work Pry! I do like the idea of a darkskinned Ariel.
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
So you support blackwashing...say a lot about you...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
well good because Disney is doing a live action little mermaid and they cast a black woman named Halle Bailey to play her, which this image is based on! So its happening!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LOL I didn't even notice you reversed the colors on Halle's fin and shell bra, I was too distracted by those capital knockers
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Okay, this version of New Ariel I can get behind. If Disney tries to make Halle green and redheaded, it'll be a harder pill to swallow.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
It's still pandering and blatant black washing, if they made an original black character nobody would have an issue.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>