HOME | DD

Rabbette — The Scheme 1

Published: 2011-01-28 13:45:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 29741; Favourites: 172; Downloads: 180
Redirect to original
Description Art by Erik Paul, plot by

Once again hunger gets a toon to try a lacy disguise.
Will it work?
See page 2
fav.me/d387y2a
Related content
Comments: 15

cartoonxcatxlover [2013-05-07 01:54:20 +0000 UTC]

what?is that pepe le pew?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rabbette In reply to cartoonxcatxlover [2013-05-07 02:56:52 +0000 UTC]

Nope, he shows up in part 2
[link]

The main character is just a random hungry skunk guy created for the story.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cartoonxcatxlover In reply to Rabbette [2013-05-07 03:25:27 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

luckyfanpup101 [2012-10-03 21:06:28 +0000 UTC]

Why was Pepe Le Pew so fat in part 2? Not that I mind, mind you. I actually really like it. I'm just curious as to why you fattened him up. He looks better that way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rabbette In reply to luckyfanpup101 [2012-10-03 22:35:31 +0000 UTC]

Nothing deliberate, it's just the way the artist drew him. The artist was not used to drawing toons so he ended up being off-model.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mariobros64 [2011-07-13 05:16:09 +0000 UTC]

Bad idea, more if Pepe is near.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rabbette In reply to mariobros64 [2011-07-14 11:31:03 +0000 UTC]

Any idea involving a female disguise is usually a bad idea in my stories.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mariobros64 In reply to Rabbette [2011-07-17 03:39:16 +0000 UTC]

Yes, one example is Buster when he puts a catwoman disguise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rabbette In reply to mariobros64 [2011-07-17 09:51:33 +0000 UTC]

Yep, although him squeezing into the costume and impersonating a female to get close to Babs did make sense (in a toonish way)for the story.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JohnTheCat1 [2011-02-01 15:48:10 +0000 UTC]

Great! ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

crabula290e [2011-01-31 02:33:41 +0000 UTC]

Wasnt this a woody woodpecker cartoon?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rabbette In reply to crabula290e [2011-01-31 13:26:29 +0000 UTC]

Well Woody always was motivated by food.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crabula290e In reply to Rabbette [2011-01-31 21:45:39 +0000 UTC]

True.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

W-Giselle [2011-01-28 17:50:55 +0000 UTC]

What could possibly go wrong?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rabbette In reply to W-Giselle [2011-01-31 13:26:00 +0000 UTC]

See page 2 for one possibility, heh heh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0