HOME | DD

#camarasaurus #sauropodomorph #camarasauridae #macronaria #eusauropod #camarasaurussupremus #neosauropoda
Published: 2016-03-13 13:08:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 7003; Favourites: 112; Downloads: 39
Redirect to original
Description
Sauropodomorpha>Eusauropoda>Neosauropoda>Macronaria>Camarasauridae>Camarasaurus>C.supremusEdward Drinker Cope, 1877
Time: Kimmeridgian-Tithonian (156-147 million years ago)
Length: Up to 18.2m (59.7ft) when fully grown.
Height: Up to 4.9m (16ft) at the shoulder when fully grown.
Weight: Up to ~20 tonnes, possibly heavier.
Habitat: The Morrison Formation of Colorado and Utah, North America. The climate was similar to a savanna, although dominated by gymnosperm rather than angiosperm flora.
Ecology: Large terrestrial megaherbivore. With front limbs higher than the hindlimbs, large adults probably could have fed at over 8 meters above ground, a similar browsing height to some brachiosaurs and titanosaurs, despite their relatively short neck. The teeth of Camarasaurus are highly developed for sauropod standards; this indicates that it chewed food to some degree before swallowing, unlike the majority of its relatives.
Diet: Treetop foliage, mostly originating from large conifers and gingkoes. Juveniles, too small to reach the treetops, would've eaten lower foliage like tree ferns, cycads, and possibly horsetails.
Social behavior: There is record of two adults and a juvenile specimen found in Early Tithonian sediment, which suggests that the animal lived in small family groups or herds.
Potential predators: Hatchlings would be fodder for small theropods such as Koparion, Stokesosaurus and Ornitholestes, and young juveniles by the likes of Marshosaurus and Ceratosaurus. Adolescents and subadults were potential prey for large theropods like Allosaurus or Torvosaurus , while the mature 20+ton adults would have been immune to conventional predation when in healthy conditions.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
''How to make Camarasaurus interesting? Scale it up.'' ~Evolution, when shaping C.supremus
Update 03/25/16: Resized human figure.
Update 06/30/17:
-Lineart completely remade.
-Replaced human scale figure (now it's the same as used in my charts)
-More accurate size estimate, now along the centra as is the norm, instead of in a straight line. PS: d o w n s i z e d
-Minor text corrections.
Related content
Comments: 51
Spinosaurus14 [2017-07-01 13:24:30 +0000 UTC]
Good work, even though I would increase at least the front legs in thickness, elephants (and gibbons if you want to) for example have pretty bulky front legs, even though their bones don't imply that: They are tick (god, the internet made me hate this word), but their ledge at the upper end of the ulna, the part of the bone where the triceps is attached to, isn't as pronounced as the one of dogs and ungulates, but their musles are still huge, if not bigger.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to Spinosaurus14 [2017-07-01 15:27:10 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! And good point, I increased the muscle thickness on the limbs a bit.
''(god, the internet made me hate this word)''
xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PCAwesomeness [2017-07-01 03:09:16 +0000 UTC]
when the most humble Morrison giant sauropod gets a downsize
Nice, though!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
randomdinos In reply to Glavenychus [2017-07-01 01:40:20 +0000 UTC]
Oh shit, early 2016 spelling strikes again
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Glavenychus In reply to randomdinos [2017-07-01 01:49:17 +0000 UTC]
Lol, at least environmental science taught me something last year
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
randomdinos In reply to Majestic-Colossus [2017-07-01 12:55:56 +0000 UTC]
Indeed, I will... at some point xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vasix [2017-06-28 12:27:30 +0000 UTC]
Camarasaurus is actually quite far from ugly...it's also big...yeah not legendary gigapod big but anything around (eyeballs slowly) 26 or so feet tall and 37 tons, big.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to vasix [2017-06-29 20:37:14 +0000 UTC]
finds this comment a bit odd
checks parent deviation
AHHHHHH
Well I'm gonna have to say at least the size is off, and badly...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vasix In reply to randomdinos [2017-06-30 00:40:30 +0000 UTC]
So as usual, it's smaller than this? lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to vasix [2017-06-30 01:27:03 +0000 UTC]
Yep, about 20 tonnes though I might have to rescale it again.
The thing is about 18.7m, but it's along the centra, not in a straight line as depicted here (I was still going by the ''23m along the centra'' estimate... ;-
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vasix In reply to randomdinos [2017-06-30 07:24:52 +0000 UTC]
Oh that famous 23-meter Camarasaurus estimate...yeah...I remember that...is there even a source for that beyond, I think Foster's book Jurassic West? I would think that such a find would receive a ton of attention. Although X-Rex didn't receive a ton of attention even after it was included in Horner's Hell Creek census so...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to vasix [2017-07-01 00:44:31 +0000 UTC]
I have no idea, tbh. Maybe it's scaled from some kinda inaccurate diplodocid-ish proportions.
Or maybe there is secretly a 2.3-meter C.supremus femur somewhere. That'd be pretty terrifying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RizkiusMaulanae [2016-09-14 14:31:28 +0000 UTC]
I heard that this guy is larger than the other camarasaurus species, which is about 23 meters long.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to RizkiusMaulanae [2016-09-14 22:13:47 +0000 UTC]
Indeed, Camarasaurus lentus was 13.8 meters long, and C.grandis was similar to C.lentus in size. C.supremus was the largest species (though it may be too big here).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RizkiusMaulanae In reply to randomdinos [2016-09-21 10:27:47 +0000 UTC]
I also heard that the C. supremus's fossil was belonged to a sub-adult. So does it mean that C. supremus could be more larger ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to RizkiusMaulanae [2016-09-21 12:29:56 +0000 UTC]
I don't know about that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bh1324 [2016-03-29 11:26:38 +0000 UTC]
"Still the ugliest Sauropod" Matt Wedel; Mike Taylor (2011- )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to bh1324 [2016-03-29 13:06:02 +0000 UTC]
Probably Atlasaurus or some turiasaurian to me. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
acepredator [2016-03-27 20:05:43 +0000 UTC]
I am in shock after finding most sauropods got way bigger than popularly assumed. You'd think their size was exaggerated.
Used to think of Camarasaurus as the mainland dwarf of sauropods...guess not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to acepredator [2016-03-27 23:26:16 +0000 UTC]
Lol mainland dwarf.
In the Morrison that's probably some Kaatedocus-type thing (diplodocids are already lightweight, now scale them down.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
scyther500 [2016-03-18 23:39:25 +0000 UTC]
Dino fanboys: waaaaaahhhh camarasaurus is so BOOOOORRRIiinnnnnnggg
Evolution: I gotchu
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to scyther500 [2016-03-18 23:48:37 +0000 UTC]
Allosaurus: *overhearing the conversation* Huh I wonder what they meant-
37-tonne Camarasaurus: 'sup.
Allosaurus: waaOH GODZILLA NO
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
scyther500 In reply to randomdinos [2016-03-19 00:05:59 +0000 UTC]
Allosaurus: *sweating bullets * (oh lordy)HEEEEEEY, no hard feeling right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
grisador [2016-03-16 10:34:04 +0000 UTC]
Yes !
For once it's astonishing to know that a sauropod achieved social behaviore and parental care !
Not the soulless unbearably idiotic sauropods of usual documentaries presented; I am mentioning eating machine Sauroposeidon of Discovery channel; clash of the dinosaurs
Very Awesome work !
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
SpinoInWonderland In reply to grisador [2016-03-16 19:32:13 +0000 UTC]
I would want to kill every CoTD "sauropod" with fire, then teleport to the afterlife and keep killing them with fire over and over again. I just hate CoTD's depiction of sauropods so much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to SpinoInWonderland [2016-03-16 23:22:03 +0000 UTC]
You're not the only one !
You're definetly not the only one who hates COTD's ''' soulless eating-Robots '''
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SpinoInWonderland In reply to grisador [2016-03-18 11:45:07 +0000 UTC]
Calling them robots is an insult to robots.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to SpinoInWonderland [2016-03-29 19:15:04 +0000 UTC]
Agreed; even robots have decency
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SpinoInWonderland In reply to grisador [2016-03-30 02:17:28 +0000 UTC]
As a Transformers/Bayformers fan, I fully agree. Giant alien robots are awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to SpinoInWonderland [2016-03-30 20:04:12 +0000 UTC]
Especially when they are evil !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
randomdinos In reply to grisador [2016-03-16 16:25:50 +0000 UTC]
Lol, and even the usual non-parental care sauropods would still be much better parents than those Sauroposeidon, it just laid eggs at random and kept on walking! Even though most sauropods didn't care for their offspring, even they built nests and covered their eggs in vegetation for warmth; not just leave them on the ground.
Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
scyther500 In reply to randomdinos [2016-03-18 23:41:07 +0000 UTC]
Oh? Most? Is there evidence of any sauropod parental care???
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to scyther500 [2016-03-19 00:01:04 +0000 UTC]
Well, we can't say it was parental care, to be exact, but in some sauropod herd tracks the juveniles are kind of being protected by the adults, near the center of the herd.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
grisador In reply to randomdinos [2016-03-16 23:23:42 +0000 UTC]
I know right ?
Indeed; I mean is there proof of that ? Last time I read; even the animals fossils were rare.
Very welcome Great works
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to grisador [2016-03-16 23:44:39 +0000 UTC]
IIRC it's mostly from Auca Mahuevo en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auca_Mah… that we can learn how sauropods nested, but there are also smaller discoveries from other times and places.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to randomdinos [2016-03-29 17:42:58 +0000 UTC]
Really ? That's very great to learn !
So the nesting changes between species to species ?
Or all sauropods had the same nesting\parenting style ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to grisador [2016-03-30 00:11:43 +0000 UTC]
Similar parenting styles as far as we know, but they differed a little bit (some sauropods nested in massive communal sites, others didn't for example)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2016-03-14 16:53:27 +0000 UTC]
Yup, I was doubtful of these big size estimates too until I saw a picture of a C.supremus quarry. The bones looked pretty much brachiosaur-sized.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1