HOME | DD

#feminism #mra #sexism #reddit #tumblr #sjw #mensrights #gamergate #anitasarkeesian #zoequinn
Published: 2014-12-02 10:04:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 7410; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description
...and then when she hangs up the phone, they complain about a media blackout.Related content
Comments: 137
345rv5 In reply to ??? [2015-01-01 23:29:26 +0000 UTC]
His words not mine, he thinks Anarchist and Feminism is comparable.
π: 0 β©: 1
345rv5 In reply to zoeblo [2015-01-01 23:40:06 +0000 UTC]
Yep, Anarchism which is about Β rejecting Β hierarchies can't mix with Feminism which is a Hierarchy
π: 0 β©: 1
Briannabater In reply to ??? [2014-12-07 07:23:15 +0000 UTC]
This is just awesome and dead-on.Β Thank you for drawing it.
π: 0 β©: 0
jacksonfivecheal In reply to ??? [2014-12-02 18:27:10 +0000 UTC]
First off, it's called a troll; they make it their business to impersonate and trick people into believing them. By the way, did you know different parts of the gaming industry just called 10,000 supporters of Gamergate harassers, including Kentucky Fried Chicken---> www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Lo⦠Did you know Anita Sarkeesian is now being called a con artist because another feminist known as Christina Sommers with a philosophy degree proved her wrong with her videos? Not only that, but did you know there are other videos made by both girls and boys that proved SJWs wrong and how did they respond? They cried misogyny, just for being proven wrong.
And most importantly did you know Gamergate people sometimes are being framed without factual proof and have been harassed themselves by both feminists and SJWs? Did you know the gaming journalists lied about the game, Gone Home, being great giving it a 10 out of 10 when really it wasn't and the story was really short. People spent 20 dollars on a short video game with no challenges that thinks it great to steal from your parents and runaway with your girlfriend, did you know that? Did you know gamers were called dead and did you know the media is ignoring #NotYourShield because it's filled with colored people and girls saying they don't want to used as pawn just for the them, SJWs, and feminists to get their way. Speaking of which, did you know there are girls who support Gamergate?
So please get your facts straight and the reason why there's probably a media blackout because they don't want to admit they were wrong. If you ask me gaming like art should be a subject that should allow your fantasy to run lose and not get restricted by others just because they don't like it. I can name plenty of examples, but I don't want to make this comment too long. So good day to you.
π: 1 β©: 1
RednBlackSalamander In reply to jacksonfivecheal [2014-12-03 02:10:42 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I'm saving screenshots of your comment. It's just such a perfect example of everything that makes Gamergate hilarious; the obsession with "SJWs" like they're some kind of sinister Illuminati, the citing of an ultraconservative "news" site as fact, the name-dropping of one single feminist who disagrees with Sarkeesian as if that's enough to end the debate, the belief that because someone gave a good review to a game you didn't like then they must be lying...the list just goes on an on! Thank you. Thank you so much, that comment made my day.
π: 0 β©: 3
345rv5 In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2015-01-01 01:37:36 +0000 UTC]
Boy. i though your were an intelligent man but you proved to be a retard.Β
π: 1 β©: 0
whiskeyhammer95 In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2014-12-29 00:36:09 +0000 UTC]
Social justice weenies (or at least the ones getting involved in the gaming industry) come from old money families or the nouveau riche and through collusion with each to control media. It's not a "sinister Illuminati", it's just good old-fashioned nepotism.Β
π: 1 β©: 0
jacksonfivecheal In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2014-12-03 03:27:46 +0000 UTC]
Go ahead, it will only make you look bad and quite honestly guys like you don't really intimidate me. I'm saw a photo of you in your gallery and I can definitely say there's nothing any bit intimidating about you at all and reading the comments you made here rednblacksalamander.deviantart⦠I can describe you in many different ways in what you are and how you're acting. However, I think I'll use one word to describe you and that word is "clueless".
In the mean time here's a bunch of real screenshots made by both SJWs and feminists towards anyone who disagree with them---> www.deviantart.com/art/A-Colla⦠Oh and nice comeback; the fact you replied immaturely proves my point exactly. Good day.
π: 1 β©: 1
RednBlackSalamander In reply to jacksonfivecheal [2014-12-03 07:27:55 +0000 UTC]
Jesus Christ, grow up. Nobody's trying to "intimidate" you.
π: 0 β©: 2
345rv5 In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2015-01-01 01:38:00 +0000 UTC]
Which is why SJW's censored my artwork for criticizing them.
π: 1 β©: 0
jacksonfivecheal In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2014-12-03 16:23:19 +0000 UTC]
Wow, you're telling me to grow up yet you're the one who replied immaturely from the beginning after I simply shared my opinion backed up with facts. Tell me, who's really the one who needs to grow up here? And ofcourse I know nobody's trying to intimidate me, especially you, because if I was intimidated why would I still comment?
π: 1 β©: 1
RednBlackSalamander In reply to jacksonfivecheal [2014-12-03 16:39:59 +0000 UTC]
If you know that nobody's trying to intimidate you, then why did you go out of your way to point out that you're not intimidated? Doesn't make much sense to me. In fact, it almost seems like you've got a bit of a persecution complex going on. But I guess that's pretty common among Gamergaters.
π: 0 β©: 1
jacksonfivecheal In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2014-12-03 16:59:35 +0000 UTC]
I said I wasn't intimidated because I know how people like you work. Somebody approaches you in the most rational way, you take things such as screenprinting and put it out of context just to benefit yourself. Also I don't really call myself a "gamergater", but I still support Gamergate considering they had provided better substantial proof. I just don't like it when people like you don't get the full facts of things just like the media.
π: 1 β©: 1
RednBlackSalamander In reply to jacksonfivecheal [2014-12-03 17:07:05 +0000 UTC]
The screenshots weren't part of some evil scheme or anything, I just think your comments were funny. Quit being so defensive.
π: 0 β©: 2
Scramblus In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2014-12-04 13:54:17 +0000 UTC]
so you don't see the inherant attempt at intimidation present in "I'm saving your post for future usage"?
π: 0 β©: 1
RednBlackSalamander In reply to Scramblus [2014-12-04 16:24:51 +0000 UTC]
How the hell is that intimidation? I thought that the comment was a hilariously perfect example of Gamergate bullshit, and I wanted to save it in case the author realized how stupid it was, and edited it later.
π: 0 β©: 1
Scramblus In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2014-12-04 23:35:45 +0000 UTC]
you wish to embarrass and humiliate him-how is that not an attempt at intimidation?Β I'm tempted to save your posts to show the juvenille hypocrisy of anti-gg's.
π: 0 β©: 1
RednBlackSalamander In reply to Scramblus [2014-12-05 05:38:44 +0000 UTC]
When somebody says something stupid, pointing that what they said was stupid is not intimidation. If you want to save my posts, you're more than welcome to do so! Why would I write something in a comment section, in full view of the public, if I wasn't comfortable with people reading it? I don't think you quite understand how the internet works, and you seem equally confused about the definition of "intimidation." And the definition of "humiliation." In fact...you're pretty much just wrong about everything, to be perfectly honest. Sorry.
π: 0 β©: 1
Scramblus In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2014-12-05 11:52:03 +0000 UTC]
they made a fairly well-rounded argument, a little by the numbers but still pretty solid. But I digress, are you seriously arguing that using stating that you're going to use someones posts for the purpose of humiliating said person (or at least attempting to) and then openly stating so-how are you not trying to intimidate them? So what is your motivation-to degrade them for fun? To provide propaganda for your stance? A little mental masturbation c'mon help me out.
Also looking at you're post can I ask you a question-why are anti-GG's so condescending and passive aggressive also has that ever got you anywhere with anyone?
π: 0 β©: 1
RednBlackSalamander In reply to Scramblus [2014-12-05 12:51:13 +0000 UTC]
This conversation is surreal.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
jacksonfivecheal In reply to RednBlackSalamander [2014-12-03 17:26:55 +0000 UTC]
Good, glad to see I have another fan and glad to see I'm right as always.
π: 0 β©: 0
Artman40 In reply to ??? [2014-12-02 13:09:15 +0000 UTC]
That's more of an anti-GamerGate logic.
π: 0 β©: 1
Flags2Riches In reply to Artman40 [2015-01-04 03:30:21 +0000 UTC]
Win levels your comment contains: So much win.
Proof it is Anti-GG logic. gamergateharassment.tumblr.com
π: 0 β©: 0
Valendale In reply to ??? [2014-12-02 10:47:40 +0000 UTC]
The comments section of any video about #GamerGate justifies this cartoon.
π: 0 β©: 1
345rv5 In reply to Scramblus [2015-01-01 01:38:42 +0000 UTC]
Agreed, these Anti GamerGate clowns are digging their own holes.
π: 0 β©: 0
Valendale In reply to Scramblus [2014-12-04 14:06:06 +0000 UTC]
You're misapplying the fallacy.
π: 0 β©: 1
Valendale In reply to Scramblus [2014-12-05 00:02:34 +0000 UTC]
For it to be circular logic, it would have to be self affirming. For example, The comments section of any video about #GamerGate justifies this cartoon because this cartoon is justified and it says so in the comments.
That would be circular reasoning.
But I am stating that the comments sections justify it because misogynistic comments, feminist bashing, harassment, and even threats can be found there.
π: 0 β©: 2
Flags2Riches In reply to Valendale [2015-01-04 03:33:24 +0000 UTC]
"...feminist bashing..."Β Like that's a bad thing.
ehbon.tumblr.com/post/10683585β¦
dewymossempire.tumblr.com/postβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
Scramblus In reply to Valendale [2014-12-05 11:43:17 +0000 UTC]
it is self-affirming "angry comments generated by anti-gamergate works validate anti-gamergate works"-basically I'm being a jerk because you're being a jerk.
π: 0 β©: 1
Valendale In reply to Scramblus [2014-12-05 21:39:10 +0000 UTC]
No, it's not self affirming, you're confusing the issue, a lot of the comments are by anti-feminist and misogynist pro-GGers too, theirs are the comments I'm referencing.
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev |