HOME | DD
RenderDock β MiG-41 profile
Published: 2010-11-24 09:07:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 71601; Favourites: 671; Downloads: 2631
Redirect to original
Description
specificationsRelated content
Comments: 54
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
Congrats! Turns out it's believable enough that Southfront staff think it's an actual depiction of the real MiG-41 project.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank's! Funny that it is an old work. I'm planning to reveal an updated version soon enought
π: 0 β©: 0
A very interesting set of specs. Nicely done, but the cannon could use more ammunition. 110 rounds is very low. (The F-22 Raptor has 480 rounds for example)
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes it was my mistake) It will be 150 rounds as on MiG-29 and Sukhoi fighters when i will finish the new version of that plane
π: 1 β©: 0
this concept is easly one of the best i've ever seen. i want to model it Too
π: 0 β©: 1
Your comment is one of the best i've seen 
π: 0 β©: 0
Awesome I need some rendering like this for my website pages of my new release RC edf models.
Can you do Luft 46 WWII Jet types and aerospace missles plus waveriders......?
If so message me and lets get started.
π: 0 β©: 0
Few questions if you don't mind checking and/or answering:
1. Rate of Climb should be depended on payload. So that >320m/s RoC, is it when no payload is included and w/ max fuel?
2. Why 800 KM at ground level? Couldn't it be longer than that?
3. A gun w/ only 110 rounds? It must be insanely accurate and/or extremely long range-self guided shells?!!!
Thanks
π: 0 β©: 1
1. The rate of climb always means max rate of climb) So it is with minimum fuel and w/out of payload) Mig-29 now has the rate of 330 m/s and it is maximum for a combat aircraft. So i decided that it will be ok for a single engine fighter
2. fuel consumption on the ground level always is very high. This is one of the reasons airliners fly that high
3. It will be ok for a highly accurate future gun. 4-5 shells are enought for GSh-30 to destroy a fighter plane
π: 0 β©: 1
Hmm, thanks for the info. Forgot about the rate of climb. Been playing DCS A10C but forgot to brush up on the technical terms lately. Gotta go back to basics for a refresh course I guess.
π: 0 β©: 0
stumbled across your work through /k/, You should submit your designs to the next Ace Combat game. Keep up the good work!
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks for giving me a very hard mental orgasm. Very few people can give you orgasm (mental and/or physical) by drawing mechanical stuff. You have that gift...XD
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanx. I will try not to disappoint you in future
π: 0 β©: 0
Awesome design bro. would you upload the blue print ?
π: 0 β©: 0
THat looks badass! I hate to go toe-to-toe with that Mig!
π: 0 β©: 0
This reminds me of Yak-141 from the side view.
π: 0 β©: 0
What is the "milytary man" ? ))
π: 0 β©: 1
The military. I just happen to put man on the end of my sentences sometimes. Thats just me.
π: 0 β©: 1
This is cool, I like the design for the head..
π: 0 β©: 0
Sick design. The Mig 21 is also one of my all time favorite aircraft. Nice to see it's future self.
π: 0 β©: 0
I conceived it as analog to F-35 but smaller and lighter. The main reference to it was MiG-21
π: 0 β©: 1
only things smaller in it are the weight and height
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>