HOME | DD

Description
I welcome you to another rant again. I know, I'll try and get other things soon, so be aware. However I decided to make this because it's got me wondering for this long time, quite frankly I just don't see it. From the stamp and title above you see this is my thoughts on the Sonic Fandom (again) mocking Rouge's sexual appearance.

Now I do want to make a couple of things clear, because someone is sexually liberated or wears revealing clothing does not make that person a whore. What my message here is, Rouge isn't really a whore unless her character was just exclusively dating or wanting sex to where its the focus of her character over everything else. Most people just take a look at appearance and go "WHORE!" This brings me back to the "Female hate trends" stamp. People will find anything wrong with a set female that isn't their standards and overreact.

Sure Rouge's appearance may be conducted as sexual or even slutty, but it doesn't make her entire character devoted to just that. Rouge is a very cunning, sly and flirtatious character. Because she flirts with guys doesn't make her a slut either. People in the Sonic fandom seem to have a poor analysis whenever it comes to resorting to negative arguments. About 90% is either bandwagon arguments or just poor misunderstanding of the character with hypocritical responses. Just about every female Sonic character is called a slut when its plain overreacting.

I happen to like Rouge as a character, the fact she was always called a whore because of her looks I never got. Sure it's revealing, but she's not a slut. Based on her design its clear that Sega wanted her too like that the female secret agents with the flirtatious looks and skin tight outfit. Not a sex object who goes on dates and cheats.

Anyways, this rant was short, what do you guys think? Was I wrong, was I misunderstood, leave it below. Until next time.

Description
I welcome you to another rant again. I know, I'll try and get other things soon, so be aware. However I decided to make this because it's got me wondering for this long time, quite frankly I just don't see it. From the stamp and title above you see this is my thoughts on the Sonic Fandom (again) mocking Rouge's sexual appearance.

Now I do want to make a couple of things clear, because someone is sexually liberated or wears revealing clothing does not make that person a whore. What my message here is, Rouge isn't really a whore unless her character was just exclusively dating or wanting sex to where its the focus of her character over everything else. Most people just take a look at appearance and go "WHORE!" This brings me back to the "Female hate trends" stamp. People will find anything wrong with a set female that isn't their standards and overreact.

Sure Rouge's appearance may be conducted as sexual or even slutty, but it doesn't make her entire character devoted to just that. Rouge is a very cunning, sly and flirtatious character. Because she flirts with guys doesn't make her a slut either. People in the Sonic fandom seem to have a poor analysis whenever it comes to resorting to negative arguments. About 90% is either bandwagon arguments or just poor misunderstanding of the character with hypocritical responses. Just about every female Sonic character is called a slut when its plain overreacting.

I happen to like Rouge as a character, the fact she was always called a whore because of her looks I never got. Sure it's revealing, but she's not a slut. Based on her design its clear that Sega wanted her too like that the female secret agents with the flirtatious looks and skin tight outfit. Not a sex object who goes on dates and cheats.

Anyways, this rant was short, what do you guys think? Was I wrong, was I misunderstood, leave it below. Until next time.