HOME | DD

Roneri β€” CLICHES GUIDE: My Wolf OC

Published: 2012-08-11 04:55:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 26327; Favourites: 366; Downloads: 87
Redirect to original
Description EDIT! THIS IS OLD! AND I AM RE DOING IT WITH A MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION AND BETTER ANATOMY, AS WELL AS A BETTER AND POLITE DESCRIPTION, don't worry, this is reaaaaaaaally old, I am re doing the scars cliches guide too, dont even bother reading this Dx

WHAT I TYPED DOWN THERE MIGHT INSULT YOUR OCS, I WARNED YOU GUYS

IMPORTANT
Remember that this guide was built by dA users(As suggested ideas), it is what mostly everyone think about them, before posting anything harmful, I warn you that some cliches are somehow mean, while some are true, some can be untrue as well, it depends on the way you think toward them. If your story has one or several of them, that does not disqualifies your story as bad or overused story, also remember that not everything in this world is 100% accurate, and there is Artists that add strangeness to their styles which makes them unique in some way, sorry if anything down this insults your style.

Purpose
The purpose of making this guide is to help those who are trying to avoid cliches of any kind releated to wolf series.
I hope this helps you out! =Roneri

  • This is my ''Wolf'' oc

  • First of all, a wolf is a wolf, nothing with orange markings, red black pelts with tribal markings or manes, even adding a simple tribal marking to a wolf will cause it to be eliminated of a ''wolf species'' oc, this applys to felines, equines and even humans.(it also depends on the wolf subspecies) why do you guys call your ocs just a ''wolf?'' theres nothing as such a wolf, it must be either a Grey wolf, ethiopian wolf and such!

    First, what's a grey wolf coat color?
    Coat colour ranges from almost pure white through various shades of blond, cream, and ochre to grays, browns, and blacks. Variation in fur color tends to increase in higher latitudes. Differences in coat colour between sexes are largely absent, though females may have redder tones. Fur color doesn't seem to serve any camouflage purpose, with some experts concluding that the blended colors have more to do with emphasizing certain gestures during interaction. Black coloured wolves (which occur through wolf-dog hybridisation) rarely occur in Eurasia, where interactions with domestic dogs have been reduced over the past thousand years due to the depletion of wild wolf populations. Black specimens are more common in North America, with about half the wolves in Yellowstone National Park being blackWikipedia

    Even adding a single unatural marking disqualifies your ''wolf'' character, manes, wings, exta fur and such.

    This is a rule I myself fail to show, however I do believe this is correct!

    A wolf is an animal that has lived a long time here, its coat has stayed the same, theres NO green canines, NO blue striped canines NO winged canines, therefore your OCs are not ''wolves'' they are your own species or either hybrids.

    When someone creates a wolf character do they even bother to look for the anatomy? for how it should look IRL?

    How on earth is a wolf (or canidae species) a color red by the fault(pelt) with wings and mane? is a wolf that? no. even shiny eyes? blue eyes? natural wolves DONT have any other eye color besides yellow-green and brown tones that can go to orange, NO purple, NO blue and definitely NO RED.((of course with the cause of albiness that causes greish with blue tones.)

    If you guys dont know at which your oc resambles, then state is as own creation, you cant just go saying its a wolf because wolves are not like that in the wild.

    ''ITS MY OC MY IMAGINATION, MY CHARACTER MY WORLD!'' then why call it a wolf if they dont belong to you? wolves already exist.

    Now lets go to anatomy, I have seen some people giving this ''wolf'' ocs short bodies, really long tails, fluffy, extra dewclaws in each paws(backs too) fail fangs anatomy and super kawaii desu eyes.

    I know ''Its my style'' but still thats NOT a wolf.


    Drawing anatomy problems
    The following described information contains mistakes from the first image.


    1-A common mistake is giving them manes or fluffy foreheads, tufts and such.
    2-Big fox like ears, an often mistake done by a lot of dA users.
    3-Really fluffy chests, aparently the chest fur is the longests besides the tail fur in the whole body making them look ''bad ass''
    4-Super fluffy neck, a ''mane'' that makes them look bigger and bad ass, oftenly mistaken, usually the hair grows to the head direction instead of growing straight.
    5-Paws without claws, Cat paws? dafuq? a canine cant retract its claws.
    6-Super skinny oh bby! dafuq? some users draw them supper skinny and without showing parts of they ribs, like they were never there and yet the character is capable of taking down a bisont.
    7-The small leg problem, a lot of users does them, they draw the leg that is on the oposite picture smaller, the ankle is lower than the leg shownd infront, to avoid this picture, imagine watching the picture from the other side and the opposite leg from the correct side. you will see that the knee is placed in a certain distance from the belly, therefore try to draw the opposite leg as the front one, also the ankle should NEVER be smaller than the opposite ankle.
    8-Those Crane legs, SRLY? do people even bother to study anatomy before drawing? the ankle should be lower than the front leg's elbow, also I have seen a lot of people giving the characters those muscular like human elbows, they dont look good bro.
    9-Those fluffy tails that are as large as the body, take a look at the second image, a wolf's tail is short and fluffy with short and a souble coat fur. not straight fur all the way down its tail. something about 9 is that some people dont bother to draw the markings good, as like they only marke the stripes, take a look at where the fur starts and ends in the tail, is that even correct? were is the fur?
    10-For the last, The nose, some people give them rectangular(100%) noses or even feline noses like, they also forget to draw its whiskers(lol forgot to add in the second picture XD) and usually give them square and short muzzles.


    Like I said I fail to apply the first rule to myself, but I believe its right! X_x also if I typed something wrong, let me know! Remember that I am not perfect in Anatomy! so imagen 2 might have some problems. also this rules can be avoided if your oc is a Fantasy character at which this rules have nothing against.


    EDIT:

    ''xD oh haha now I see, you were aiming this more towards people claiming their OCs to be real wolves, not fantasy wolves'' Posted by ~Panterabytes

    Exactly! This is what I'm trying to say.
    ---
    PictureΒ©=Roneri
    Related content
    Comments: 341

    Applejack-Wolf In reply to ??? [2013-04-12 00:05:59 +0000 UTC]

    Umm, I don't even know what sparkles are.

    And I know, I'm not an idiot. I simply said "thanks" so as to not start another fight as the other person I had previously talked to had started one. I am offended, but I'm not going to be a jerk as everyone else is presently being.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    I-triedplz In reply to ??? [2013-03-16 18:11:01 +0000 UTC]

    Occasionally, you do. I didn't mean my characters were better, I was saying my art is way better than that pigshit you cough up.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Applejack-Wolf In reply to I-triedplz [2013-03-16 18:27:01 +0000 UTC]

    What the f*ck is your problem?! You don't even have any deviations so I would shut your filthy mouth if I were you. And I'll have you know, that stuff I have up is all just practice. I've never posted any of my best work, so leave me alone. You have no right to criticize my work like that when yours isn't even up here for others to see cuz you're to scared it isn't good enough. Go f*ck off, please, and I'm not talking to you again.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    I-triedplz In reply to Applejack-Wolf [2013-03-16 21:09:46 +0000 UTC]

    Can you not see the -plz after my name?
    You keep saying that, but, like any child, you can't stand to be insulted and not fire back. You were the one who started the real insults, so you have only yourself to blame. My main account would be Or just look up nijjawolf. You can see the deviations, but the account was deactivated. My art is shitty, but its better than your traced humans and shitty bases.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    nijjawolf In reply to ??? [2013-02-03 04:27:34 +0000 UTC]

    Sorry to be an annoying turdmuffin but
    [link] Did I at least not fail at anatomy Senpai

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    nijjawolf In reply to ??? [2013-02-03 04:23:21 +0000 UTC]

    Haha i probably failed this test XD but hey at least it has the physical properties of a wolf shrruuugggg


    AT LEAST IM NOT A SPARKLE
    SELF ESTEEM + 15

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    Spilled-Sunlight In reply to ??? [2013-02-01 18:10:07 +0000 UTC]

    oh my god i laughed so hard

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    Zoxyn [2013-01-31 23:41:39 +0000 UTC]

    heh this is actually good

    i draw un natural wolves but never anything extremely rainbow and stuff

    though i do try my best to stay on the anatomy side even though i am still learning and am not a pro yet heh

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    racotaco [2013-01-27 13:25:56 +0000 UTC]

    i agree
    there is nothing wrong with having a colourful wolf oc, i call mine a wolf just to abbreviate it from fantasy wolf XD Now i would be surprised to see my ocs walking around in real life XD

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    MediocreSon [2013-01-11 23:15:36 +0000 UTC]

    yes.

    My OC is technically a dog, not a wooooolllllf but owell woow.

    only thing that makes her a fuurlier is the red nose and fluffy hair wow.

    -highfive-

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    ThatAnimeDude In reply to ??? [2013-01-11 21:39:49 +0000 UTC]

    when you say red you mean BRIGHT red right? because wolfs can have a sort of red/brown fur

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Roneri In reply to ThatAnimeDude [2013-01-11 22:06:45 +0000 UTC]

    mhm red as for whiny reds.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    ThatAnimeDude In reply to Roneri [2013-01-11 22:15:38 +0000 UTC]

    ok just wondering :3

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    CalliiBloodlust In reply to ??? [2013-01-08 18:13:58 +0000 UTC]

    [link]
    Is he wrong?

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Roneri In reply to CalliiBloodlust [2013-01-08 18:50:34 +0000 UTC]

    there is nothing wrong in the picture

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    CalliiBloodlust In reply to ??? [2013-01-08 18:09:15 +0000 UTC]

    I agree that it may seem really stupid when people draw a "sparkledog" animal but they are just trying to give it a more personalized and unique look. If they were attempting to draw a realistic animal they would put that on the page.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Our-September-Rain In reply to CalliiBloodlust [2014-04-03 21:31:29 +0000 UTC]

    I like youΒ 

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    Patchwork-Clocks In reply to ??? [2013-01-06 04:28:08 +0000 UTC]

    I hope you don't mind that I referenced off of the bottom picture a bit. I'll give referencing credit to you when it's done. c:

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Roneri In reply to Patchwork-Clocks [2013-01-06 04:29:12 +0000 UTC]

    yeah sure! no problem x3

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Patchwork-Clocks In reply to Roneri [2013-01-06 06:01:56 +0000 UTC]

    [link] Here it is if you wanna see. c:

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    Sketch-Shepherd In reply to ??? [2013-01-03 02:21:26 +0000 UTC]

    Someone must also explain to me why people are drawing eyes SHOWING THROUGH hair.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Roneri In reply to Sketch-Shepherd [2013-01-03 02:29:01 +0000 UTC]

    LOL omggggg ikr???

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Sketch-Shepherd In reply to Roneri [2013-01-03 02:37:32 +0000 UTC]

    I know right?

    But really. It just disturbs me. Hair is OPAQUE. You can't see people's eyes SHOWING THROUGH their hair! (unless they've given their OC's freaky transparent hair.)

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

    Patchwork-Clocks In reply to Sketch-Shepherd [2013-01-06 01:26:13 +0000 UTC]

    The only exception would be with platinum blonde hair. Even then you can't see the eyes as much as some people draw them.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Sketch-Shepherd In reply to Patchwork-Clocks [2013-01-06 03:08:39 +0000 UTC]

    hm, okay.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    Ms-Marvel-DA In reply to Sketch-Shepherd [2013-01-05 12:22:19 +0000 UTC]

    Is see people do that all the time and it's horrifying, it's not like colouring the hair opaque is hard to do either

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Sketch-Shepherd In reply to Ms-Marvel-DA [2013-01-05 17:04:59 +0000 UTC]

    M-hm.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    KolmeNoitaa In reply to ??? [2012-12-19 02:59:35 +0000 UTC]

    It's definitely good to see the difference, but most people draw stylized wolves. If everyone drew their wolf OC's to actual anatomy, that'd be lame

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

    er49563 In reply to KolmeNoitaa [2013-02-25 23:07:28 +0000 UTC]

    yep

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    nijjawolf In reply to KolmeNoitaa [2013-02-03 04:31:02 +0000 UTC]

    lame*actually good art

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    KolmeNoitaa In reply to nijjawolf [2013-02-03 16:42:35 +0000 UTC]

    I saw your post on the last page and the example you had posted about your OC. That's completely stylized art, however, it's still good anatomy.
    I suppose I wasn't clear enough: Purposely drawing any sort of animal without its proper anatomy is just retarded in my opinion. Everyone should strive for reality. However, for example your drawing of your OC, is not 100% realistic. Not just in colour, but also because it is stylized.

    Stylisation =/= bad or sans anatomy.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    nijjawolf In reply to KolmeNoitaa [2013-02-04 16:24:48 +0000 UTC]

    Well at least I don't draw sparkle dogs PP im aware its not that realistic, but lately ive been trying to use references and improve. its not working I now have a full flash drive of wolves

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    KolmeNoitaa In reply to nijjawolf [2013-02-04 16:25:56 +0000 UTC]

    And that's what I'd expect from an artist who cares about their work; despite not having the anatomy 100% correct, they're still trying nonetheless.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    nijjawolf In reply to KolmeNoitaa [2013-02-04 17:03:10 +0000 UTC]

    Thank you uwu

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    Roneri In reply to KolmeNoitaa [2012-12-19 03:03:25 +0000 UTC]

    yeah I know XD, sometimes people go too far than they look like cats and they say they are wolves ._.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

    KolmeNoitaa In reply to Roneri [2012-12-19 03:16:26 +0000 UTC]

    but you also shouldn't take me serious because I have a blue and black character with a hair tuft, lolcats.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    KolmeNoitaa In reply to Roneri [2012-12-19 03:13:53 +0000 UTC]

    Everyone definitely has their own style of drawing. For me, my dogs look more like wolves which look more like stylized wolves. It's just how I learned how to draw them and to be honest, it's fine. They might not look like what wolves do in the wild, but they're some form of canine and to me, it's a wolf. I think people should do what they want. It's creativity and if they want a purple wolf creature with horns and a split tongue and hair, be my guest.
    HOWEVER, I can't stand when people actually think stylized wolf drawings (digitally or on paper) are what they really look like. no stahp. I think people should always try to get wolf anatomy right...or pug or border collie or cat or horse, etc... anatomy right. But if you want to add extra tuft on the chest and hair, idgf.
    BUT WHEN PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO ACTUALLY DRAW A WOLF FOR REAL OMG THEYRE NOT YELLOW. If that makes sense *flail* If you're really trying for a realistic wolf OC, give them real markings according to their species. If it's a gray wolf, don't give them a mane and long, thin legs like a maned wolf. And stop making OCs with scars. It's possible for your wolf to get scared, but if you have a scar on the nose and three on the hind leg and one on the back and a chewed off ear, no. That's not realistic.
    I hope this makes sense because I have no clue xD

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Roneri In reply to KolmeNoitaa [2012-12-19 03:34:40 +0000 UTC]

    LOL
    I will stick to my idea, is for example, kind of weird, I know that people can go with their imagination and such but for me is kind of weird, for example, lets use some human
    imagine a picture of a human with cat ears and a long fluffy tail, specie says ''human'' why does a human has ears?? at least if I read the information there could be any usefull facts that states why it has ears or why it got ears, if there was ''specie: human/cat mix'' I would have nothing against it, or just some ''specie:fantasy human'' I would have nothing against it either, for me its weirth, unless there is an explanation of why, you see I am kind of hard to handle but I like to clarify everything before thinking about other things, you see? people have the freedom to think what they want, so do I here and others who put their oc's species as they wish, as long as they believe that their character is a ''wolf'' I dont think they need my pinion, like I am stating it here.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    SpiritInSpace In reply to ??? [2012-12-10 01:46:33 +0000 UTC]

    I must point out that the eyes should be seen through the hair of the first wolf

    I need someone to explain to me why people add hair to "wolves"
    I just...
    I changed all my OCs species that were wolves to other things out of shame
    I hate what the internet has done to them

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Roneri In reply to SpiritInSpace [2012-12-10 01:49:13 +0000 UTC]

    XDDD omg
    ! I have seen that, anime or shouyo animals everywhere

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    Russia-Love In reply to ??? [2012-11-27 21:42:50 +0000 UTC]

    Why can't people draw wolfs? I mean, wolfs arnt Pokemon that you can color any color. <---that's a wolf

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Mitzi-Mutt In reply to Russia-Love [2012-11-29 02:26:13 +0000 UTC]

    because, people use them as fursonas, so they color them to express themselves. Why do people draw anime? When they obviously don't look like real humans?

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

    MediocreSon In reply to Mitzi-Mutt [2013-01-11 23:13:51 +0000 UTC]

    euheuheuh tru.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Mitzi-Mutt In reply to MediocreSon [2013-01-11 23:14:47 +0000 UTC]

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    MediocreSon In reply to Mitzi-Mutt [2013-01-13 04:23:46 +0000 UTC]

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Mitzi-Mutt In reply to MediocreSon [2013-01-13 05:07:27 +0000 UTC]

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    TehBlizzyWolf In reply to Mitzi-Mutt [2012-12-22 15:30:29 +0000 UTC]

    This ^ xD

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Mitzi-Mutt In reply to TehBlizzyWolf [2012-12-22 21:21:59 +0000 UTC]

    yeah

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

    complexdiagnosis In reply to ??? [2012-11-23 21:56:12 +0000 UTC]

    There are things about this image that I do and do not agree with.
    Wolves are not purple, green, and they never will be. There is a clear line between proper and improper anatomy.
    However I have to argue a bit with the statement about style. Anatomy is still important when drawing, but I do believe artists have creative freedom. They are welcome to call their character whatever they like, wether it be logical or not. But stylizing in your art is very important. It makes your art recognizable. If everyone did dead-on realism no one could tell apart the artists or styles.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

    Roneri In reply to complexdiagnosis [2012-11-24 01:18:34 +0000 UTC]

    I dont want to argue with ya, cause I disagree with the last thing so I will leave the replies to this.

    πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


    <= Prev | | Next =>