HOME | DD
RuneVix β Character Sheet - Spring Bonnie
#fnaf #fivenightsatfreddys #springbonnie #fnafworld
Published: 2017-04-22 23:00:17 +0000 UTC; Views: 14871; Favourites: 246; Downloads: 33
Redirect to original
Description
Sheet #4, Spring Bonnie. AKA Goldie, AKA the only person who actually might kind of like Springtrap.Misc Goldie facts:
The gender thing, because I've seen people ask about it: I went with Goldie being a girl for two reasons. One, the FNAF World model struck me as looking particularly feminine, and two, she's intended to be the opposite to Springtrap in many ways. Male vs female is keeping up that theme. She'd be written exactly the same if she was male.
The nickname Goldie was actually drawn from some RP with one of my betas; the two Goldies are actually completely different in personality, but the nickname stuck anyway.
I have trouble sometimes keeping track of who's Goldie and who's Springtrap sometimes, until torsos or details get drawn in. Oops.
Her intense interest in the flipside isn't something I'd planned at the start, and neither was her busting in on Springtrap and Fredbear. It just seemed like the natural progression of things.
Given Fredbear's status as technically-not-a-native, Goldie is the oldest resident of FNAF World.
From the start, I knew she had to be a part of this thing. Having a representation of the suit that killed him following Springtrap around and trying to help him was too good an opportunity to pass up.
Spring Bonnie and everything FNAF belong to Scott Cawthon, not me.
Related content
Comments: 53
π: 0 β©: 0
She pretty you did a good job since itβs summer what do you think the Fnaf characters are gonna do?
π: 0 β©: 0
I know this isnβt supposed to be canon, but Spring Bonnie is supposed to be Springtrap. But with a dead child murderer inside.
π: 0 β©: 0
Can I use this ref sheet for my OC and a OC Ref Sheet? I really love the style of yours!
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry, Goldie's ref sheet is only intended for reference for this comic. I am open to doing commission work, though.
π: 0 β©: 1
Do I have to give you points? I only have 2...
π: 0 β©: 1
Money commissions; I've been meaning to make a post about opening up for a few for awhile now. I just need to get around to actually doing it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dammit, sorry then. I was just curious...
π: 0 β©: 1
NP, no issue with asking.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks, I appreciate it.
π: 0 β©: 0
Finally, someone who agrees that Springbonnie is a girl! Β Yay!
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Β Β Β Β First off, you were somewhat rude while you were explaining why Spring Bon is a girl, especially with your opening "Not agrees, knows," which could easily deter a reader from believing you, or even finish reading your explanation. First rule of writing a persuasive essay, do not blatantly say that something is not how the reader originally said it was. It will deter them so much faster than anything else. Generally, it's better to introduce your idea a little later, not in the first sentence. Nice, strong opening, but a little too strong. Blocks of text are intimidating enough, I'd know, I write them. Second off, I believe Spring Bon's a girl too, but I do have a couple things to say about your argument. Spring Bon could still potentially be male. Don't stop reading because I say that, let me continue. First things first, I'm gonna get this out of the way. If we're using FNAF World as proof, Spring Bon's loading screen description is "Male? Female? It's a rabbit, who cares!" which is something Scott wrote about Spring Bon, possibly stating that they could be any gender and it wouldn't matter to their character, which would be/is more defined by them being a rabbit, rather than them being a boy/girl/etc. Also, just adding this in, another bit of proof for Toy Bon instead of the eyebrows - which is fine to use as evidence, but have more backup than that - is that Toy Bon's lashes are about half the length of the female character such as the Chica's.
Β Β Β Β Now that that's out of the way, I have to say this; FNAF World is not canon. I hate to say it, because I adore the game. Yes, it has canon characters and accurate designs, but that doesn't make it canon. It also has non-canon characters, and the way you play is completely different from every other game in the series. And even if it was canon, it would be like the books, it would only technically be canon, and we would only be allowed to prove it with the actual games. However, unlike the books, it has far less parallels story-wise with the series. Sure, it discusses Sister Location and Baby, but that doesn't make it canon. After all, the only lore pieces we could have taken from it would have been the clock minigames/ending and the Baby discussions. But, again, the game isn't canon. Therefore, the characters descriptions on the loading screens aren't canon. Nor are the character designs, unless they've been proven with sprites in canon games or models in canon games.
Β Β Β Β The only sprites/models we have for Spring Bon are from the minigames(if I remember correctly) are the sprites from the FNAF 4 minigames, in the closet, on stage, and the suit being worn, and I believe there was also one in a FNAF 3 minigame, on stage. None of those looked feminine. No feminine features. Not to mention the fact that Springtrap, who is pretty much always seen as male, is literally a thirty-years-or-more-later of Spring Bon. Sure, he's possessed by a male spirit, which could mean that the suit itself was intended to be female, but, going by the theory saying that the four front gravestones from FNAF 6(Lorekeeper Ending I believe) are in the order of the suit-heads from FNAF 3, which is supported by the way the gravestones are set up, with the third a little further back, etc.; the order it was in was male, male, female, male, going off of the names on the graves, which were Gabriel, Fritz, Susie, and Jeremy(might have mixed up the order a bit), which are all fairly obviously gendered names; in this case, that would make Spring Bon a boy, because the proper gendered soul tends to fit the suit.
Β Β Β Β Another point is that, in FNAF 3, purple guy confidently used the springlock suit of Spring Bon to escape the dead children, the only thing getting him killed being his laughter wiggling the suit, which, as we learn in Sister Location, would have greatly loosened the springlocks. Clearly, he knew what he was doing when he got into the suit, which of course means he worked there. As it is a wearable suit AND a mechanical suit, it would have to have a voice. Going off the idea, because we have no proof except for statistics of possibilities, that Spring Bon was used by purple guy, that would mean a male had to speak as the character. And while yes, purple guy could have used Fredbear, a character interpreted as male buy everyone, it would be more likely the he used Spring Bon, because the suits are bound to be different, and he did it with too much confidence to have never done it before/only done it once, making it highly likely that he either mainly used Spring Bon, equally used both suits, or solely used Spring Bon. Sure, there's a chance that the suits are similar enough for him to be confident with both, but the difference in size of the animatronics would mean that Fredbear is probably easier to use due to how much bigger he is body shape-wise.
TL;DR; Spring Bon could be any gender, as there is a lot of evidence pointing to them being female, male, etc., both within canon and non-canon games created by Scott.
(Side note; I'm sorry if I seemed somewhat rude, I was just trying to state facts. I didn't in anyway intend to come off as rude or mean, and if I sounded like I was, i'm very sorry. My only intentions were stating facts.)
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Β Β Β Yay, I didn't upset you, most people don't respond when I do this! I dunno why though, I never try to be mean, and always apologize just in case. Anyways, yay for civilized arguments(and terribly late replies)!
Β Β Β I think I'm a little confused on what you mean, so forgive me if I got it wrong, but, yes, if I remember right Spring Bon is smaller, and would be easier to use, but wasn't it the Fredbear suit used to lure the children? Which means that it was used as a suit at least fairly often, because people would've reacted oddly if Fredbear waltzed out with more awkwardly-trying-not-to-die human movements than with animatronic movements. Also, wouldn't all animatronics look awkward when being controlled by humans? Besides, gullible younger children who have yet to learn not everything can be trusted. Gullible-young-children is an actually accurate stereotype for nearly every child from zero to eight years old, sometimes more but I'm setting it at eight just 'cause, so yeah.
Β Β Β Gullible kids is a good segway for the next thing, oh, and don't worry, I think I understand what you were getting at. Yeah, I doubt the kids would care if things changed such as the voices, or the movement patterns for that matter. I was pretty gullible as a kid too, but kids in our world - or universe, because Fredbear's Family Diner doesn't exist in real life, sadly - aren't exposed to creatures/characters with voices that switch drastically, without explanation. But again, yeah, gullible kids.
Β Β Β Yeah true, where did he say that by the way? I don't keep up with anything but I did hear of that, though I thought there was a high chance it was just a hoax because, y'know, it's the internet. I didn't bother to look for it though.
Β Β Β No problem, I like arguing with people! I mean, in a civilized manner. A lot of people would ignore me or get really upset by it, thank goodness you didn't do that, I like pointing out facts. I don't care about proving myself right, sometimes I even help my 'opponent' out, heh. I just like stating facts(and sometimes opinions). Anyway, I'm glad you enjoyed the fact that I replied, and reading my argument! Also, if I ever get anything wrong feel free to point it out, I won't get upset over it. I hate having to point that out but, again, this is the internet.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
No problem!
π: 0 β©: 0
I like Spring Bonnie, she was my favorite character, and now, when I see this, I was explode of excited and happy, that you made me happy again that I see this one too : )
π: 0 β©: 0
βthe only person who actually might kind ofΒ likeΒ Springtrap."
Me: looks like someone is in love I guess....
π: 1 β©: 0
wait so Goldie on the flip side killed springtrap on the flip side and then he ended up where her "rotting corpse" for several years died (again) ended up here and now its awkward as hell
π: 0 β©: 1
That's a good summary, yes. Though of course the suit wasn't Goldie proper; it was just an incredibly dangerous costume/animatronic. As the personification of the thing (thanks, ironic hell), Goldie is tied to it, but I don't think you can really blame her for any of the springlock fun.
π: 0 β©: 1
on a serious note though why wouldnt springtrap kill him self thought seems like hell or is it impossible for him to die cuz of "baby`s promise" if so then that ould be one very awkward family reunionΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, the comic got rolling pre-SL, and nothing from that or from the books is used as canon. My Springtrap isn't an Afton; he's very, very stressed out guy named Dante. As for reasons to not off himself...well, let's just say I plan to address that at a certain point.
π: 0 β©: 1
so i take it that i was impossible for him to die because of some unknown reason
π: 0 β©: 0
Great fun when intentionally using them as comparisons. Less fun when you end up looking at a rough in progress and going 'okay, who's who?'
π: 0 β©: 1
I think she is by far my most favorite character in your comic so far. Of course Lolbit as well with her baby reapers XD But Goldie has such a nice temperament and I like how she gets along with Springtrap. Those two are a really amusing duo.
π: 0 β©: 1
I think her nice temperament is part of the fun with Goldie. Incredibly dangerous, hair-trigger animatronic; generally agreeable and friendly to work with personification.
π: 0 β©: 1
That's true. She has that character that people like. Well at least most people do 
π: 0 β©: 0
I haven't started Bonnie's sheet yet because I haven't got a good pose for him.
π: 0 β©: 0
I wonder how Springtrap actually feels about her.
Not so much in a relationship kind of way but as you said, she is literally the "weapon" that killed him.Β It's like holding onto the very gun and bullet that nearly killed you but worse since he's actually dead.
π: 0 β©: 1
His feelings are...complicated. Gut feeling is he should hate her-that damn suit killed him, kept him trapped in an pre-ironic hell ironic hell of its own, and here she is, a constant reminder...but. She's the one person he's met who's seemed to be actually interested in trying to be friendly with him, versus seeing him as a concerning problem to try and figure out how to handle or as someone who doesn't deserve any sympathy for his current predicament. Goldie is trying to help him, and it's been a long, long time since he's had anybody with a concern for his welfare.
And in a way, he can't really be surprised she keeps hanging around him. The Spring Bonnie character was such a constant in his life and death that it'd kind of be weird if she wasn't there. Plus, there's a certain pragmatism to his outlook right now: he wants out. The faster he can get out, the better, and if that faster way includes getting help from the personification of what killed him...fuck it, running with it, he'll take any advantage he can get. He's not making any plans to get buddy-buddy, though.
π: 0 β©: 1
Excellent.Β That makes a lot of sense and it's good to know his thought process.
Delving into religion and mythology of sorts. If he escapes this place, where will his soul go?Β He's still done much evil and not really attoned for it, so is he still damned?Β Or is this place to try and redeem him in someway?Β Or is that spoiler material? :v
π: 0 β©: 1
It's definitely a redemption-type ironic hell. Probably technically a purgatory, I guess-I've picked up most of my religious knowledge through pop culture osmosis. 
(It's a sound bet that the next step up doesn't involve being a rabbit.)
π: 0 β©: 1
XD Haha, I can imagine :3
π: 0 β©: 0
please anybody here don't ship these two yet because of this =_=
π: 0 β©: 1
...I have bad news for you about the amount of shipping going on already.
π: 0 β©: 1
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
π: 0 β©: 1
It's actually pretty funny how Springtrap/Goldie gets all the attention, rather than the ship that's actually explicit shown in the comics (poor, ignored Foxy and Bonnie).
If it helps, I don't plan for shipping between the bunnies to be a thing that appears directly in the comics, because Springtrap is in no shape for relationship during its course. As my one beta put it: this is not a comic where things are fixed by romantic relationships.
π: 0 β©: 1
ye I just hate it when people ship other people just because they fit together or they hang out with together a lot or just close to each other
π: 0 β©: 1
Mario & Luigi
I SHIP IT!
π: 0 β©: 1
THEY ARE BROTHERS YOU CREEP
π: 0 β©: 1
Freddy & Withered Freddy
I SHIP IT!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Now that's just weird =_=
π: 0 β©: 1
Scott Cawthon & Scott Cawthon
I SHIP IT!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>