HOME | DD

SameerPrehistorica β€” Proboscideans

#comparison #evolution #loxodonta #mammut #mastodon #size #gomphotherium #elephas #mammuthus #palaeoloxodon #proboscideans #stegodon #elephants #mammoth #deinotherium
Published: 2012-11-28 17:06:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 88335; Favourites: 577; Downloads: 1354
Redirect to original
Description A tribute to one of the most awesome and famous group of mammals and by far my top favorite mammalian group, the mighty proboscideans !!

(Moeritherium, Deinotherium giganteum, Platybelodon grangeri, Primelephas gomphotheroides, Numidotherium, Gomphotherium steinheimense, Amebelodon fricki, Chilgatherium, Palaeomastodon , Deinotherium bozasi, Notiomastodon platensis, Stegodon trigonocephalus, Zygolophodon borsoni, Phiomia, American mastodon, Barytherium grave, Stegotetrabelodon syrticus, Cuvieronius hyodon, Deinotherium proavum, Tilos dwarf elephant, Palaeoloxodon namadicus, Prodeinotherium bavaricum, Stegodon ganesha, Loxodonta atlantica, Palaeoloxodon falconeri, Palaeoloxodon antiquus, Cretan dwarf mammoth, Palaeoloxodon recki, Rhynchotherium falconeri, Mammuthus africanavus, South African mammoth, Sardinian dwarf mammoth, Southern mammoth, Pygmy mammoth, Steppe mammoth, Woolly mammoth, Columbian mammoth, Stegodon zdanskyi)- (extinct), African bush elephant, Asian elephant and African forest elephant.

There were perhaps over 100 species of proboscideans. In this image, there are only 41 species.


Nearly half of the proboscideans are based on the skeletal reconstruction by Asier Larramendi.

Larramendi, A. 201X. Shoulder height, body mass and shape of proboscideans. Acta. Palaeontologica Polonica XX (X): xxx–xxx. dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.00136.2…


(The order proboscidea has one of the most comprehensive fossil records of any species. The evolutionary history of proboscideans has always been of great interest to vertebrate palaeontologists.

There were tiny mammals lived alongside dinosaurs for many million years. Mammals diversified after the extinction of dinosaurs and among those mammals was a tiny proboscidean. It evolved into several different species. This group was very successful that they were so diverse. Over time, they not only became bigger but became the most dominant of all the mammals. They inhabited every continent except Australia and Antarctica. Some proboscideans are heavier than the largest carnivorous dinosaurs.

Elephantidae is a family of large, herbivorous mammals collectively called elephants and mammoths. These are terrestrial large mammals with a snout modified into a trunk and teeth modified into tusks. Most genera and species in the family are extinct. Only two genera, Loxodonta (African elephants) and Elephas (Asiatic elephants) are the only surviving members of the order proboscidea. The largest land mammal alive today, the African elephant which weighs about 6 tonnes, the record holder individual weighed about 10.4 tonnes. The order proboscidea also has the largest ever land mammal, Palaeoloxodon namadicus which weighed upto 22 tonnes.)

Related content
Comments: 262

SameerPrehistorica In reply to ??? [2015-11-02 04:23:12 +0000 UTC]

I never knew about that before either except the 3 living species.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pootisman90 [2015-09-19 19:57:02 +0000 UTC]

I realized something. Just because most people think that the dinosaurs were the largest land animals ever doesnΒ΄t mean that they REALLY "were". Iguanodon was as big as a white rhino but less agressive, apparently the largest Smilodon could reach weights of nearly 600 kilograms, Deinotherium was could reach 15 tons... Anymore examples?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Pootisman90 [2015-09-22 16:41:48 +0000 UTC]

It's not about "just because most people think that the dinosaurs were the largest land animals ever". Dinosaurs are the largest of all the land animals and we have proof for it,so you don't have to think that some people claiming some fake evidence.
Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β  The largest Smilodon which is Smilodon Populator weighed upto 400 kg and there is no felid known at 600 or 500 kg.Those weights are for some bears.May be Deinotherium could have reached 14 tonnes and the biggest mammal,Paleoloxodon Namadicus at 22 tonnes. There is no land mammal even at 30 tonnes and the biggest known Dinosaur is at 110 tonnes and even though it is not ending there.Some large Dinosaur track ways are known which could be from some very large Dinosaurs.Dinosaurs are a mystery,still nobody knows how heavy is the largest dinosaur. There is a lot of difference.Sauropods are the largest of the Dinosaurs and they own all the land animals.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Pootisman90 In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2015-09-22 18:44:23 +0000 UTC]

Sauropods, but no hadrosaur, ceratopsian,stegosaurid or theropod will ever match the Palaeoloxodon or the Paraceratherium in sheer mass. Right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Pootisman90 [2015-09-23 03:30:08 +0000 UTC]

One Ceratopsian called as Ceratopsipes or Triceratops Maximus which is known from footprints indicating a very large animal probably weighing as much as a Paraceratherium but we don't have to take it seriously because we can't defend an animal which is known from footprints. In that case there are several giant Sauropod tracks and we can't defend those Sauropods saying it is bigger than Blue Whale.It's always best if we have fossils of giant animals.

Here is the link to the scientific article for Ceratopsipes.

digitallibrary.amnh.org/handle…

Except the Sauropods,one or two Hadrosaurs might rival or come close to the size of Palaeoloxodon Namadicus or Paraceratherium Transouralicum.The biggest Hadrosaur known is at 16 tonnes and i don't know whether if that is it's average weight or maximum weight.No other Dinosaur species would approach the weight of the biggest Proboscideans and Indricotheres.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pootisman90 In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2015-09-23 05:06:35 +0000 UTC]

Yes!
Hey, can I ask you a weird question?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pootisman90 [2015-09-07 19:31:31 +0000 UTC]

Given the fact that Palaleoloxodon could reach weights of nearly 30 tons, proboscideans could give sauropods a run for their money, right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Pootisman90 [2015-09-08 17:55:24 +0000 UTC]

Not 30, it's 22 tonnes and there is no way any other land animal could give Sauropods a run for their money. The largest Sauropods known at 100 tonnes and sure there might be few of them getting to 125 or even 150 tonnes +. Time will tell..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pootisman90 In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2015-09-08 18:07:50 +0000 UTC]

A run for the money of the hadrosaurs then?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Pootisman90 [2015-09-08 18:11:33 +0000 UTC]

Definitely.. The biggest Proboscideans have the size and power to beat most Dinosaurs except giant Sauropods.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pootisman90 In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2015-09-08 18:41:59 +0000 UTC]

And what carnovores (mammals) could have matched (or at least approached) the theropoda family?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Pootisman90 [2015-09-09 17:07:28 +0000 UTC]

You mean, which mammalian carnivores could have approached the size of Theropods ?
Β Β Β Β Β  There is no mammalian carnivore on land which comes close to large theropods but in the sea, it's a different story.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pootisman90 In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2015-09-09 18:57:40 +0000 UTC]

And medium-small theropods? Ndong tigers could reach half a ton, Andrewsarchus a little more than a ton, Arctotherium could be nearly 12 feet tall and two tons, daeodon were scavengers... maybe?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Pootisman90 [2015-09-10 11:35:44 +0000 UTC]

Yes,some mammalian carnivores can come close to the size of small Theropods. Medium-sized theropods are bigger. Some large Felids come slightly close to the size of small Theropods.I am talking about small theropods in the range of 1 tonne and there is no felid being that heavy. The bigger mammalian carnivores which are well known mostly are the bears like Arctotherium,Arctodus,Agriotherium and then there are some other bigger carnivores like Andrewsarchus,Megistotherium..these animals equal the weights of small Theropods. Medium sized theropods are 3-4 tonnes and the weight of the biggest mammalian carnivore known is only 1.5 tonnes which is indeed a bear,Arctotherium.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pootisman90 In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2015-09-10 12:08:48 +0000 UTC]

I didnt say that the Ngandong tiger weighted a ton; i said a half

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pootisman90 In reply to ??? [2015-09-07 19:30:47 +0000 UTC]

Damn, proboscideans could give sauropods a run for their money

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LittleTamarin [2015-08-27 23:46:31 +0000 UTC]

The ones as small as humans, how cute!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kolroling In reply to ??? [2015-07-18 05:51:36 +0000 UTC]

I tripping love this! Can you do for other animals to? Like, ex. the Rhino or the Horse?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to kolroling [2015-07-22 07:52:00 +0000 UTC]

This image needs an update.There is a Rhino comparison in the gallery which doesn't look good and i will update it someday.

I use to mention what i will make in my journal.

sameerprehistorica.deviantart.…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rhinos-Rule In reply to ??? [2015-01-28 00:01:59 +0000 UTC]

Wow...this is outstanding!! MUCH better than your old one, I like how you have every single Proboscidean that has ever lived. Don't you kinda hope someday someone will find a 20 footer that weighs 22 tonnes? that's what I'm aiming for.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

ForbiddenParadise64 In reply to Rhinos-Rule [2015-10-26 23:45:11 +0000 UTC]

Lol, right about at least the weight

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Rhinos-Rule [2015-03-05 17:55:11 +0000 UTC]

Now i am not much confident about a 20 tonne Proboscidean but i believe that any one of them could have touched 15 tonnes and stood at 16 feet in height and that is a lot more.A Proboscidean that size is more of a monster and i 'm fine with that size.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vasix In reply to ??? [2015-01-21 11:17:04 +0000 UTC]

Wow...I see...updates!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to vasix [2015-01-21 13:02:16 +0000 UTC]

Yup..Probably the final update. (There can be an exception if a new giant gets discovered someday bigger than any known Proboscidean, before i die.)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

vasix In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2015-01-21 16:30:37 +0000 UTC]

Oooh! Probably hope for a 16-footer? 17-footer?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to vasix [2015-01-21 16:53:49 +0000 UTC]

Yes..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rhinos-Rule In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2015-02-08 03:37:06 +0000 UTC]

Why're you making the Steppe Mammoth bigger than all the other Proboscideans? It was the exact same size as Columbian Mammoth, Southern Mammoth, Palaeoloxodon Antiquus, Stegodon and Deinotherium. The only Proboscidean who may be slightly larger is Palaeoloxodon Recki. He should be considered the largest Proboscidean.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

acepredator In reply to ??? [2015-01-17 14:40:38 +0000 UTC]

Don't let the ones we killed off stay extinct-let them reclaim their rightful place on modern earth.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jdailey1991 In reply to acepredator [2015-01-17 16:14:51 +0000 UTC]

Clarify.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

acepredator In reply to Jdailey1991 [2015-01-17 18:48:02 +0000 UTC]

Referring to the megafauna extinction, because no matter what you think every evidence points to humans.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jdailey1991 In reply to acepredator [2015-01-17 19:08:04 +0000 UTC]

SMALL evidence points to humans.Β  You got to stop saying that man caused the extinction because our numbers were too small and our technology not sophisticated enough to make such an impact.Β  And don't say that we brought disease on them to extinction, because there is no evidence in history saying that a plague was responsible for a species' extinction.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

acepredator In reply to Jdailey1991 [2015-01-17 20:52:10 +0000 UTC]

The numbers weren't really small........

ALL evidence points to us for the megafauna extinction. The timing, the pattern, and the fact climatic changes had little effect on the megafauna population.

There used to be people that believed dodos were wiped out by natural causes.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Jdailey1991 In reply to acepredator [2015-01-17 21:32:26 +0000 UTC]

You are disgusted by the mere fact that the Walking With series existed.Β  You thought I was using dinosaurs from the Nemegt Basin when I was actually using dinosaurs from the Flaming Cliffs.Β  You blame the megafauna extinction solely on us, which is just dumb, dismissive and simplistic.Β  You spam respectable artists with comments so idiotic that it provokes enough arguments to make people hate you.


Why, then, are you on DeviantArt?Β  >

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

christina1969 In reply to ??? [2015-01-17 12:06:08 +0000 UTC]

If the shoulder height of the Woolly Mammoth can range between 9 and 11 ft, then why it is 11 ft tall at the shoulder here and the picture of it? Isn't 10 ft at the shoulder would be better as average size?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to christina1969 [2015-01-19 17:57:21 +0000 UTC]

Till now it's not much clear for me that if it's average height is 10 or 11 ft.You can find some good sites stating that it was upto 12 ft and 8 tonnes.However in my opinion,it's not wrong to put it at 11 ft.In that case,you have to tell me why the record holder Blue Whale size is always used in comparisons instead of it's average size.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AleksaBG [2015-01-17 11:07:38 +0000 UTC]

The first few proboscideans are a littleΒ blurred (maybe a gray background is not exactly the best for gray animals), but I liked that now it has 35Β proboscideansΒ Β Β Β Β Β (I think).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to AleksaBG [2015-01-18 14:54:22 +0000 UTC]

If you put something in a very big background(No matter what color) and then reduce the size of the image,you barely could able to see it. No other way.Right,i'm glad that now at least there are some 30 plus.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

acepredator [2014-12-23 03:40:53 +0000 UTC]

We have a dead guy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to acepredator [2014-12-27 13:21:34 +0000 UTC]

You mean ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

acepredator In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2014-12-27 14:40:28 +0000 UTC]

That guy is about to be trampled.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to acepredator [2014-12-28 04:13:18 +0000 UTC]

oh,i thought you were talking about some proboscidean.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Juliefan21 In reply to ??? [2014-12-14 18:58:22 +0000 UTC]

I hope you should add Barytherium, Phiomia, Anancus, and Cuvieronius.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pretty-Planet In reply to ??? [2014-11-23 07:13:22 +0000 UTC]

VERY impressive!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Pretty-Planet [2015-01-18 14:50:15 +0000 UTC]

Now updated..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Pretty-Planet [2014-11-24 05:26:28 +0000 UTC]

Actually this is not good,but it is in the update process.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kate3624 In reply to ??? [2014-10-02 23:02:26 +0000 UTC]

WHAT HAPPEND TO THE LAST ONE?!?!?!?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Kate3624 [2014-10-03 03:29:31 +0000 UTC]

The last one is Deinotherium and what you mean by what happened to it ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kate3624 In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2014-10-06 21:14:12 +0000 UTC]

Its tusks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SameerPrehistorica In reply to Kate3624 [2014-10-07 01:57:07 +0000 UTC]

That is how it looks like.It's a weird looking animal.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kate3624 In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2014-10-08 00:19:37 +0000 UTC]

ya, I can tell

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>