HOME | DD

Sekhmet-SCII — Protoss Body Studies

Published: 2010-11-08 02:39:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 7849; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 164
Redirect to original
Description Used the Blizzard study of Zeratul, copyright Blizzard Entertainment, to create matching somewhat rougher versions for the male and female regular protoss

I'd like to think the females are taller than the males, but more delicate and thin so they end up being about the same weight.

Compared to Zeratul the male is more muscled and heavy, and with a more upright posture(straighter legs)

seeing as Blizzard draws them without sexual anatomy I'm gonna assume they psionically have sex....? Anyway, physically very androgynous between the male and female!
Related content
Comments: 25

razielreaper [2015-10-01 22:58:45 +0000 UTC]

Also, since I forgot. No idea what their purpose is, but apparently since the model of a certain protoss LotV unit became available for viewing, Protoss boobies are canon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

razielreaper [2015-10-01 22:20:32 +0000 UTC]

Also relating to a short zeratul comment. If i noticed correctly... he sorta adopts a hunchback position with his pair of knees realy bent

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

razielreaper [2015-10-01 22:17:47 +0000 UTC]

to be honest the lack of genitalia could also be a censoring attempt from the developpers.i doubt blizzard would explain it, and i also do not see the need for loincloths then, which appear rather common, especially if you watched the last LotV trailer which details on the way old protoss were during the aeon of strife. My guess is as good as any tho, but we lack conclusive evidence for either opinion nevertheless.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mystilik-Mew [2012-06-08 20:50:46 +0000 UTC]

Do u do commissions at all? I really like this study of yours

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RichTheWolf257 [2012-05-15 23:10:59 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... Psionic Sex. ...Honestly, I can't see how that would work out, seeing that the purpose of sex is to reroduce. Perhaps the male's organs are completely internalized.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aque-mizuhara [2011-01-19 18:28:22 +0000 UTC]

I like your study! Very informative and clear. I used to reference the concept art you provided for my Protoss art, but I think I will now use this thing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Meken [2010-11-10 09:17:24 +0000 UTC]

Man you are totally AMAZING! I love these, find them SO hard to draw myself!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sekhmet-SCII In reply to Meken [2010-11-10 09:43:35 +0000 UTC]

I know! there's just not enough drawings of them out there by Blizzard yet!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Meken In reply to Sekhmet-SCII [2010-11-10 09:48:50 +0000 UTC]

Damn straight, I love seeing that remedied! There's just not enough cool 'toss fanart period! So looking forward to seeing more from you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sekhmet-SCII In reply to Meken [2010-11-10 09:51:15 +0000 UTC]

this dev group found me when I started posting 'toss art [link]
you might like

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

johauna-darkrider [2010-11-09 23:29:17 +0000 UTC]

Awesome, totally awesome. Might be a good reference how to actually do a Protoss anatomy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GlueMaster [2010-11-09 04:13:46 +0000 UTC]

nice...

I've always wondered what a Protoss skull would look like. would there be a small outline of a jaw from a long lost point in their evolution? would it be smooth and flat or jagged and covered with holes? these are the questions I ask myself at 10:15pm when I sould be asleep but instead deside to get on the computer...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sekhmet-SCII In reply to GlueMaster [2010-11-10 07:47:21 +0000 UTC]

I should do some skull studies...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

coquiii In reply to Sekhmet-SCII [2011-04-30 16:03:45 +0000 UTC]

yes!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArrinKirr [2010-11-08 13:18:41 +0000 UTC]

I figure everything is internal, and that Blizzard doesn't want to get in trouble for putting even a hint of sex organs.

Interesting comparison.

I agree with Eldalosse up there, except for the "bulge" bit

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Sekhmet-SCII In reply to ArrinKirr [2010-11-08 18:16:30 +0000 UTC]

lol, y'know, I kinda like that idea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArrinKirr In reply to Sekhmet-SCII [2010-11-08 18:42:55 +0000 UTC]

I definitely choose to believe it. X3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Eldalosse In reply to ArrinKirr [2010-11-08 15:21:09 +0000 UTC]

[link] does seem to suggest a bit of a bulge, but I'm not going to insist on that point.

But yeah, I imagine part of the reason is Blizzard just not wanting the fuss that would result if there were visible "organs". So they leave those bits out, probably.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArrinKirr In reply to Eldalosse [2010-11-08 18:42:45 +0000 UTC]

It does, I agree... hm. >8| Well, it could be a pelvic bone, too. I wish Blizzard would give us a damn answer XD

The wussies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

J-SantamariaCarpio [2010-11-08 12:43:34 +0000 UTC]

Nice work !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Eldalosse [2010-11-08 10:15:02 +0000 UTC]

Poor shortass Zeratul. *pats him*

As for the sexual bit, I sort of assumed Protoss' parts are internal (when not in use). Some pictures of a pantless Zeratul I've seen, he does seem to have a bit of a bulge going on.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Veratai [2010-11-08 07:46:01 +0000 UTC]

looking very cool, although the Protoss female should have a lill wider shoulders
buut, that is just me xD

good job there :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

admiral-squee [2010-11-08 04:37:50 +0000 UTC]

Interesting how you made the females taller... Also, it makes sense that the DTs would be shorter, since they spent most of their lives either on Shakuras or aboard ships, and it's hard to get proper nourishment in those environments.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sekhmet-SCII In reply to admiral-squee [2010-11-08 04:55:43 +0000 UTC]

I felt the taller females just might be a fun minor twist to make them more distinct as a race from humans.

and I agree about the nourishment thing! I hadn't thought of that. I figured they're stealthy ninjas so they probably adopt a stance with a lower center of gravity and it's better to be lean and small when you're sneaking around than big and bulky. I like that we now have two reasons for being shorter

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

admiral-squee In reply to Sekhmet-SCII [2010-11-08 05:22:22 +0000 UTC]

It is now canon in my mind: Zeratul is short.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0