HOME | DD

Published: 2013-01-31 18:32:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 1017; Favourites: 32; Downloads: 72
Redirect to original
Description
Apophysis 2 - PhotoshopRecently rescued a DVD containing all of my old Apo 2.02 pars...lots of them!...in various stages of development. This one was taken by Apo 2.09 very well, and rendered really fast. A far cry from the annoying Apo7X render times.
Hope you like it and TX for viewing.
Note: If you download, please fave. It's just a one click away common courtesy.
Related content
Comments: 52
SergioKodemo In reply to ??? [2013-05-07 23:29:23 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much Lily, truly appreciated.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fractalbeke [2013-02-17 16:42:26 +0000 UTC]
I have no other words than : "SPLENDID, really splendid !"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to fractalbeke [2013-02-17 17:14:55 +0000 UTC]
I'm really honoured by your encouraging words. Thanks!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
baba49 [2013-02-10 23:55:10 +0000 UTC]
I see that you were having fun with rotations Great movement
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to baba49 [2013-02-11 22:20:59 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Barbara! Yes, these designs are addictive for me, and have to refrain from developing and posting them all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
baba49 In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-12 00:30:04 +0000 UTC]
I remember someone who seemed to have been addicted to rotations and uploaded hundreds of them. I can't recall the name at the moment but I am sure it will come back to me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to baba49 [2013-02-12 18:00:38 +0000 UTC]
LOL, good to know I'm not alone. I do remember someone who created this way too, but it's vague. Not even sure if it was here or at Renderosity. Maybe both you and me will resurrect rotational designs and amaze everyone with them. Nowadays it has suddenly become original.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to baba49 [2013-02-17 20:13:43 +0000 UTC]
Checked on the gallery, it wasn't the one I vaguely remember. I was very impressed by several works, really can't imagine how he made them. Others were excellent too, but I think both you and me have already been there (which doesn't mean we can still create that way ) . Thanks Barb, it was a good experience taking a glance at those works.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
baba49 In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-18 22:35:40 +0000 UTC]
I am a stubborn ox and just had to find out who it was that I had in mind... it took quite a while because he also changed name, so when I finally did find him I just had to tell you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to baba49 [2013-02-19 15:37:38 +0000 UTC]
So you are stubborn too, welcome to the club! It was a very good find indeed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
baba49 In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-19 20:53:38 +0000 UTC]
I have lot's in common with a Scorpio
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
baba49 In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-21 23:03:33 +0000 UTC]
oh I've got some of that too
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to baba49 [2013-02-22 21:06:32 +0000 UTC]
I'm so sorry for that Barb!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fractamonium [2013-02-05 19:10:49 +0000 UTC]
Again, this is kinetic! I really like it a great deal! Nice color also!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to Undead-Academy [2013-02-01 15:55:45 +0000 UTC]
Cool it is...it brings down the temperature. Many thanks Patty!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Undead-Academy In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-02 15:07:40 +0000 UTC]
Oh then please give me one I can use it for summer Many welcomes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to Undead-Academy [2013-02-03 18:53:07 +0000 UTC]
LOL, sure why not?. For now, it's busy here. We had a scorching heat wave, then a huge T-storm...and a 24 hours blackout. No computer or...energy exchanger. Still have to develop it and get rid of electrical supply.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Undead-Academy In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-04 14:56:55 +0000 UTC]
Ouch that sucks I hate the heat can't take it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to Undead-Academy [2013-02-04 20:02:26 +0000 UTC]
Me too, but don't worry, then we freeze to death in Winter. Can't find my place in the world, for this and other reasons which you can probably relate too...always outsiders...or......aliens
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Undead-Academy In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-05 14:11:06 +0000 UTC]
Aliens ha ha winter is not too bad here at least no snow .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to Undead-Academy [2013-02-05 17:58:26 +0000 UTC]
No snow here too, even when below freezing point. However, in 2007 it did snow quite a lot. We were all outside enjoying it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Undead-Academy In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-06 15:28:17 +0000 UTC]
Oh sweet must be nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SergioKodemo In reply to Topas2012 [2013-02-01 15:54:16 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much Sergio!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Topas2012 In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-01 16:00:20 +0000 UTC]
Always welcome my friend
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SergioKodemo In reply to jccrfractals [2013-02-01 15:53:51 +0000 UTC]
Muchas gracias Juan Carlos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to barn9 [2013-02-01 15:53:10 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much, really glad that you liked it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
batjorge [2013-01-31 21:37:26 +0000 UTC]
Buen render lleno de finas lineas que sólo se ven a pantalla completa.
Excelente dibujo!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to batjorge [2013-02-01 15:51:48 +0000 UTC]
Muchas gracias Jorge! Tengo muchos diseños de líneas finas. Con una calidad de 4000, Filter en 0.8 y Oversample en 4, Apo 2.09 hace un mejor trabajo de render, que settings idénticos en Apo7. Aún así, no es del todo suficiente.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
batjorge In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-01 17:58:53 +0000 UTC]
EL 2.08 hack era el mejor para mí. el otro dia me instalé la nueva v. del apo y me tardaba 24hrs en hacer un render, a igual calidad que describes arriba, a 4500x 3500, cuando la vieja versión me lo hacía en 7-8 hrs. Además me pone que es la versión de 64 bits, cuandi todavía uso el xp de 32. Creo que mencionaban algo así en el link del apo 3.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to batjorge [2013-02-03 17:57:24 +0000 UTC]
Si mal no recuerdo, la última versión de Apo que utilicé, fue la 2.06 Hack. Muy interesante. Hay un nuevo Apo 7X?. Si es aún peor en cuanto a tiempos de render, muchas gracias, paso. Ya fueron más que suficientes las 8hs 50 mins que me llevaron un par de renders a 2560x1600. Cuando los suba, lo mencionaré.
No hay que darle demasiada bola al tema 32 y 64 bits. De la teoría al hecho, hay mucho trecho. Photoshop CS5, supuestamente no funcionaba an XP. Lo instalé...y funciona perfectamente. Los geeks, tienen cada uno opiniones distintas, y nos confunden aún más. Simplemente, tenemos que hacer las pruebas nosotros.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
batjorge In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-03 18:24:06 +0000 UTC]
No importan los 64 bits, al menos que quieras dedicarte al 3D o video profesional, o que vayamos a hacer megarenders de 500Mpx
Coincido que esa versión del apo era la que mejor iba para mi. Da la impresión de que cada vez son mas lentas. Por eso el MB3D ofrece buenos tiempos de render y otra forma de hacer fractales.
Chaotica si mal no recuerdo, es una evolución de apo, pero tiene limitaciones de calidad y tamaño, si no quieres pagar. Es un poco extraño siendo el apo de código abierto
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to batjorge [2013-02-04 19:29:42 +0000 UTC]
Es verdad. Sin embargo, trae ciertas dificultades al momento de instalar algunos programas. Es confuso, y nadie sabe dar la respuesta justa, incluso los que supuestamente saben. La única ventaja que le ví, por ahora, es la capacidad de RAM, mucho más allá del límite de 4GB de los sistemas de 32 bits.
Probé Chaotica hace algunas semanas atrás. Tamaño limitado (muy curioso ), no tomaba muchas variaciones, comenzaba a hacer renders sin que le diera instrucción de hacerlo, etc. Tengo poca paciencia con softwares que me rompen los huevos. Lo eliminé a los 2 días.
PD: la tecla "delete" salvará a la computación, así como .flac salvará a la música.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
batjorge In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-04 19:58:02 +0000 UTC]
Chaotica no me soportaba muchos plugins que usaba el apo, por lo que lo descarté rápidamente...
Al final uno se queda con lo conocido, aunque sea malo, que me quede como esté
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to batjorge [2013-02-05 16:45:10 +0000 UTC]
Más que quedarse con lo conocido, diría que uno se queda con lo que funciona, aunque tenga sus defectos. Siempre está Photoshop para corregir muchos de ellos.
Ni el mejor render hará bella a ciertas mujeres...PS sí.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
batjorge In reply to SergioKodemo [2013-02-05 17:01:17 +0000 UTC]
Siempre cuando tenga uno conocimientos buenos del programa, si no acaba en desastre.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SergioKodemo In reply to batjorge [2013-02-06 16:14:53 +0000 UTC]
También hay cosas que son imposibles de arreglar, ni siquiera siendo un experto!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>