HOME | DD

Shoguneagle β€” Rothana Heavy Engineering Dominator-class SD

#spacecraft #star_wars #starship #thrawn #warship #infinities #star_destroyer #galactic_empire #father_and_son_of_the_suns #dominator_class #galactic_dominion #rothana_heavy_engineering #empire_of_the_hand
Published: 2018-11-16 16:01:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 35597; Favourites: 604; Downloads: 380
Redirect to original
Description The Rothana Heavy Engineering Dominator-class star destroyer, first of its class constructed after the Battle of Endor under the authority of the Empire of the Hand. As part of the Father and Son of the Suns infinities setting.

Artwork by Adam Kopala adamkop.deviantart.com

Craft: Rothana Heavy Engineering Dominator-class Star Destroyer
Type: Star Destroyer
Scale: Capital
Length: 1,210 meters
Skill: Capital ship piloting: Dominator-class star destroyer
Crew: 7,254, gunners: 292, skeleton: 2,262/+10
Crew Skill: Astrogation 3D+2, capital ship gunnery
5D, capital ship piloting 4D+1, capital ship shields 4D,
sensors 3D+2
Passengers: 1,240 (troops)
Cargo Capacity: 8,000 metric tons
Consumables: 2 years
Cost: Not available for sale
Hyperdrive Multiplier: x1
Hyperdrive Backup: x12
Nav Computer: Yes
Maneuverability: 2D
Space: 7
Atmosphere: 350; 950 km/h
Hull: 6D
Shields: 3D
Sensors:
Passive: 40/1D
Scan: 70/2D
Search: 150/3D
Focus: 4/3D+2
Weapons:
4 Long-Range Heavy Turbolaser Batteries
Fire Arc: 4 front
Crew: 5 (4)
Skill: Capital ship gunnery
Fire Control: 1D
Space Range: 6-30/70/150 km
Atmosphere Range: 12-60/140/300 km
Damage: 9D
16 Heavy Turbolaser Batteries
Fire Arc: 8 front, 4 left, 4 right
Crew: 4 (8, 4)
Skill: Capital ship gunnery
Fire Control: 1D
Space Range: 3-15/35/75
Atmosphere Range: 6-30/70/150 km
Damage: 9D
24 Medium Turbolaser Batteries
Fire Arc: 8 rear, 8 left, 8 right
Crew: 3 (8)
Skill: Capital ship gunnery
Fire Control: 3D
Space Range: 3-15/35/75
Atmosphere Range:6-30/70/150 km
Damage: 5D
24 Ion Cannons
Fire Arc: 6 front, 6 left, 6 right, 6 rear
Crew: 2 (6)
Skill: Capital ship gunnery
Fire Control: 3D
Space Range: 1-10/25/50
Atmosphere Range: 2-20/50/100 km
Damage: 5D
12 Proton Torpedo Launchers
Fire Arc: 8 front, 2 left, 2 right
Crew: 2 (8), 2 (2)
Skill: Capital ship gunnery
Fire Control: 1D
Space Range: 2-12/30/60
Atmosphere Range: 4-24/60/120 km
Damage: 9D
10 Tractor Beam Projectors
Fire Arc: 4 front, 2 left, 2 right, 2 rear
Crew: 10 (4), 4 (2)
Skill: Capital ship gunnery
Fire Control: 2D
Space Range: 1-5/15/30
Atmosphere Range: 2-10/30/60 km
Damage: 6D
Starfighter/Support Ship Complement:
-36 TIE starfighters (3 squadrons)
-2 shuttles
-6 drop-ships
-several support ships
-14 AT-ATs, 28 AT-STs

Star Wars is a copyright of Lucasfilms Ltd., subsidiary of Disney, All Rights Reserved.

The Star Wars d6 RPG is a copyright of West End Games, All Rights Reserved.
Related content
Comments: 25

ardian32 [2022-11-27 22:06:02 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alexempire19 [2020-10-22 21:33:53 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shoguneagle In reply to alexempire19 [2020-10-29 02:07:40 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

stellarmagic01 [2019-07-02 06:13:42 +0000 UTC]

Cool design, I'm thinking of using it in a D6 campaign... though I'll have to change the name. I've already got a Dominator-class (It's the old EU style Interdictor Star Destroyer). I'll probably call it the Munitor-class, which would be a roman engineer or sapper.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JeanLucCaptain [2019-02-10 21:31:13 +0000 UTC]

very cool, clearly a Rothana design but without the super exposed bridge.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dejesusscott [2018-12-01 18:07:25 +0000 UTC]

very well done yo.............

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mavericksawyer [2018-11-21 08:09:54 +0000 UTC]

See, now THAT'S how to do a bridge if you absolutely have to. Low-slung, low profile, no giant windows screaming "SHOOT ME HERE!!!1!", no unneeded greebles and fancy contour lines... just simple, effective, box o' whoopass.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CaptainBrownies [2018-11-18 05:57:51 +0000 UTC]

Very nice! Love the low profile. Makes it feel compact and tight. Good for a military ship.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pokemonever [2018-11-18 04:12:15 +0000 UTC]

Okay, really nice ship there and I agree with another reviewer, no bridge tower = 9001% improvement. It does remind me of the New Republic's Nebula-class Star Destroyer in terms of that flat bit at the rear of the ship where less well-designed Star Destroyer have huge towers. Not sure if I am just misremembering it but still, just happens to remind me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zfragger [2018-11-16 23:21:30 +0000 UTC]

This is how a war ship should be designed. The bridge is hard to find, no towers advertising the shield generators. Just needs about a few hundred more guns and she'll be perfect.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Colourbrand [2018-11-16 19:59:15 +0000 UTC]

Dunno why but this comes across more of a prison ship than a combat vessel....


Good work as always

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Flagman15 [2018-11-16 19:49:15 +0000 UTC]

Hey love the designs but I was also wondering (asked this question before πŸ˜‚) would you do legends ships like the galactic Alliance ships like the Scythe-class or new republic nebula or endurance class?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shoguneagle In reply to Flagman15 [2018-11-18 23:55:39 +0000 UTC]

The Scythe, Nebula, and Endurance have all been covered artwork-wise, especially if you have the Essential Guide to Warfare. With EU ships, I prefer to commission vessels that either haven't been depicted in a 3D rendering before, or don't have any official artwork for them at all. That said, there are several ships that we haven't seen that I've been most interested in, like the Corellian Dreadnaughts, Megador, the "pocket" star destroyer, all from Legacy of the Force.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

Flagman15 In reply to Shoguneagle [2018-11-23 21:43:30 +0000 UTC]

Oh shoot another thing to ask will do the MC90’s? Or was that rolled in with the Mc85 you designed?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shoguneagle In reply to Flagman15 [2018-11-24 14:04:53 +0000 UTC]

Hmmmm, I'd really like to see the MC90 commissioned, as it is one of my favorite New Republic designs. Time permitted, you may very well see it in the near-future

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flagman15 In reply to Shoguneagle [2018-11-24 18:27:16 +0000 UTC]

Sweet cantik wait πŸ˜ŽπŸ‘

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Flagman15 In reply to Shoguneagle [2018-11-21 23:30:06 +0000 UTC]

Oh then will do the starhawk? From the new cannon?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shoguneagle In reply to Flagman15 [2018-11-24 14:06:51 +0000 UTC]

Maybe. But I have a feeling we'll see that ship either in Star Wars Resistance or Episode IX.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flagman15 In reply to Shoguneagle [2018-11-24 18:28:55 +0000 UTC]

Eh maybe but I don’t think so because at that point like the mc80s they would be outdated, plus knowing Disney they find some way to mess it up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Flagman15 In reply to Shoguneagle [2018-11-21 23:29:31 +0000 UTC]

Damn well okay either way I love your work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Shoguneagle In reply to Flagman15 [2018-11-24 14:06:04 +0000 UTC]

Most of the rendered Star Wars work is from Adam Kopala adamkop.deviantart.com

I'm merely the commissioner and the literary dude.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Flagman15 In reply to Shoguneagle [2018-11-24 19:20:31 +0000 UTC]

Ah I see...well now that makes sense

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MonsterousOperandi [2018-11-16 19:20:10 +0000 UTC]

Nothing I don't like about this design. The tiered look suits it and the nose is quite distinguished. The engine bells look both sleek and utilitarian. Nice work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sharlin [2018-11-16 17:28:39 +0000 UTC]

Very clear nods to the Mandator series but damn this is very nice! A smaller, but no less lethal warship for sure.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

lemerart In reply to sharlin [2018-11-16 19:01:32 +0000 UTC]

oh hey you're totally right

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0