HOME | DD

Simarilius — Susan Ward

Published: 2005-05-11 21:50:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 17809; Favourites: 30; Downloads: 1076
Redirect to original
Description A hot female as requested by =ScislaC .
Manual vectorisation done in Inkscape, 2 1/2 hours.
Related content
Comments: 21

novus41 [2014-02-13 17:11:55 +0000 UTC]

great work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

the-junglequeen [2011-01-28 05:37:45 +0000 UTC]

This is very sharp - nicely done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Simarilius In reply to the-junglequeen [2011-02-11 18:31:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, glad you like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

morphonius821 [2009-03-10 11:39:40 +0000 UTC]

Well done....

P.S. I would really love to see this same piece re-done from a photo with allot stronger side lighting on the subject...

The best part of this piece are the highlights.....
i was itching to see the whole side of her face fully lit up and bleached out....

Your getting the beginnings of what i would call a painterly style....(you have a fair bit of natural tallent.)
I like your stuff....(and for some reason i always feel a yearning for more... its almost like i can feel your at a "water shed" or something and that your about to explode or something...
Sorry to crap on..perhaps i should have just said cool pic...LOL keep it up....2 hours im envious)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Simarilius In reply to morphonius821 [2009-03-10 18:00:49 +0000 UTC]

I'd love for her to drop by in her bikini so I could put some stronger side light on her, dont think I'm gonna be quite that lucky tho

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

morphonius821 In reply to Simarilius [2009-03-11 00:02:03 +0000 UTC]

you never know your luck in the big city

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

addon [2005-08-18 12:42:29 +0000 UTC]

truly awesome, and in that time!

adam

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hologlyphic [2005-05-13 07:09:48 +0000 UTC]

nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

junch [2005-05-12 05:26:43 +0000 UTC]

OOH, when I saw this from afar I thought it was a photo. Well done, this looks really realistic. Very hot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Simarilius In reply to junch [2005-05-12 16:32:28 +0000 UTC]

thanks, yeah it definitely works better from a distance (or scaled down)
And yeah, susan ward is a major hottie

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuicheLoraine In reply to Simarilius [2008-04-27 17:09:56 +0000 UTC]

Lovely! If you applied a bit of blur to the layers of skin tones except for the bottom layer, it would give a more realistic, fluid feel to the skin. Nice work!

BTW, thank you for the flattering comment on my Django pic!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Simarilius In reply to QuicheLoraine [2008-04-27 17:57:02 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, have played a little with that. Problem is tho that there isnt so much layers as a bunch of disorganised shapes all next to each other

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuicheLoraine In reply to Simarilius [2008-04-27 23:58:10 +0000 UTC]

Know what you mean. Have you tried the Alt+click feature? Alt+click switches between the layers, so once you've bitmap traced an image (make sure "stack scans" is clicked), Alt+click between layers rather than moving them, leaving them stacked. I love the bitmap trace feature, but the drawback is every object has millions of nodes even after simplifying, which can be frustrating (processors working on overdrive-ha!). On my portraits, I actually prefer to line/curve tool hand trace the tones of skin (less frustrating nodes), and using layers of gradients, the Alt+click feature, and so far, most of the portraits were originally black and white, which seems to be easier to trace and then render the colour to the objects. I learn something new each time I work with Inkscape. Before I started Inkscaping I hadn't really done any vector art since most of the progs had such steep learning curves and frustrating tools, but Inkscape is a wonderful tool! You might also enjoy Rotoscope (found on Source Forge or Freshmeat). I did a few Rotos, tweaked the colour in Photoshop, and then bitmap traced them in Inkscape, which came out nicely. Looking forward to seeing more of your work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Simarilius In reply to QuicheLoraine [2008-04-28 01:35:17 +0000 UTC]

Its a manual trace, rather than the autotrace. and my workflow is too disorganised to have nice orderly layers

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuicheLoraine In reply to Simarilius [2008-04-28 21:58:48 +0000 UTC]

Hey, sounds like my method- ha! It's all good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Simarilius In reply to QuicheLoraine [2008-04-29 00:41:05 +0000 UTC]

[link]
gives a pretty good example of how the images are built up. slightly deceptive tho as some of the first shapes shown there are some of the last I draw, where I put big blocks of color in behind every thing else to fill in any gaps

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuicheLoraine In reply to Simarilius [2008-05-03 17:14:24 +0000 UTC]

Nifty to see it all come together! Inkscape on YouTube- yay!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ScislaC [2005-05-11 22:41:48 +0000 UTC]

suhweet!! truly excellent bro! how could I not it? only critique is the shape of her right boobage... (on our visual left)

Psssst, you need to add another colon to the end of the ":devscislac"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Simarilius In reply to ScislaC [2005-05-12 16:23:10 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it mate, had wondered what i did wrong with that tag, thanks for explaining ot the noob
ta for the +fav too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lemontea [2005-05-11 22:23:19 +0000 UTC]

Very nice vector. I do like the shading style, though in some areas it doesn't feel as fluid as it should.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Simarilius In reply to lemontea [2005-05-11 22:26:29 +0000 UTC]

agreed, i should really put some more work into it, but it was getting late and I was hungry
I might rework some of the areas a bit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0