HOME | DD
soy-monk β MtG - Morgana, Fallen Angel
Published: 2012-03-16 17:32:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 7734; Favourites: 26; Downloads: 421
Redirect to original
Description
Doing these for my own amusement.The Mother of Runes effect is a reference to her Black Shield spell.
Tormented Soil is referenced in her land destruction capabilities.
Morgana, the Fallen Angel (C) Riot Games
Magic: the Gathering (C) Wizards of the Coast
Original artwork belongs to Pennett and was used with their permission.
>>> penett.deviantart.com/art/Morgβ¦
Related content
Comments: 12
I'm a fan of your card designs overall, particularly for use in commander - that said, 7 mana for a 3-turn clock that flies is rather strong.. 6/6 would be fine too, I think. Particularly with the repeatable Stone Rain And Almost Nausea - I think that'd be better at 4 or 5 mana for balance reasons.
π: 0 β©: 0
7 mana for an 8/6 flyer?
Dayum, son.
Maybe 5/6?
Otherwise I DO love the abilities, as always.
π: 0 β©: 0
She is a more controll/support champ i think u shuld change her manacost to UB or WUB, she is not so red to me
π: 0 β©: 0
......hmmmm.....good for token and mana control
π: 0 β©: 1
Indeed. I'd use her for EDH.
π: 0 β©: 0
Her last ability is overpowered, repeatable land destruction would be overpowered but she's able to use it multiple times per turn. Your opponent has no chance.
π: 0 β©: 1
Could still cause one heck of a lock down. I'll be honest, I don't now what to do with land destruction. I have the same problem as wizards seeing as I don't want the card to be overpowered but land destruction is always either over- or underpowered. But yes, "1BR, Tap" at least!
π: 0 β©: 1
Okay, made it sorcery speed and changed its activation cost to 1BR, T.
Also added to her creature type
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah, yes. Sorcery speed does help quite a bit. That way you can't destroy the land he just played and he got a chance.
π: 0 β©: 1
Updated her White AA. It's exactly the same as Mother of Runes', so it only targets one creature rather than give your entire army protection.
π: 0 β©: 1
Good thinking there, I like it.
π: 0 β©: 0