HOME | DD

SquireJames β€” Pattern P-14 or M1917 Enfield

Published: 2005-03-30 21:18:53 +0000 UTC; Views: 2866; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 57
Redirect to original
Description A rather obscure rifle with a complex history.

At the beginning of the 20th Century, the British Army, as most armies of the time did, had three seperate rifles. A "Long Rifle" for the Infantry, an "Infantry Carbine" for the Engineers and Gunners etc, and a "Cavalry Carbine" for the Mounted Troops. In 1907 the Lee-Enfield SMLE No.1 Mk I came into service, and it caused a stir. Rather than 3 seperate rifles, the SMLE was of intermediate length and was designed for all three branches. America followed suit soon after with the M1903A1 Springfield. The old guard in the Higher Command thought the SMLE was a useless weapon. Too long for the Cavalry and too short for accurate long range shooting with the Infantry, they sought an immediate replacement. They looked at several designs, including the Mauser M98 and the M1903A1 Springfield. Eventually the design known as Pattern P-13 was settled on. It was a long rifle with a 5 round internal magazine, Mauser Bolt-Action and boared to the new powerful .276 Calibre. However the .276 Calibre was dangerous and prone to premature explosions and blowbacks (the shockwave from the bullet fires back down the barrel and blows the breech back in your face), and so it was reboared to the traditional .303 Rimmed Calibre as used by the SMLE. It never caught on for use as an infantrymans rifle but it was easier to fit a scope to it than the SMLE and so it entered service as a Snipers Rifle as the Pattern P-14.

In 1917 the United States entered the First World War. Soon the AEF (American Expeditionary Force) found itself short of M1903A1 Springfields, and General 'Blackjack' Pershings Command Staff sought a local alternative. Finding the French Rifles to be primitive and too dissimilar to the Springfield for ease of training, they went to the British Royal Armories at Enfield, London. They had a few thousand Pattern P-14 Rifles in storage, and the AEF bought them and ordered them and 100,000 more to be produced to the American .30-06 Springfield Cartridge. The Pattern P-14 became the M1917 Enfield in American Service and it almost replaced the M1903A1 as the Standard Issue American Rifle.

After the Armistice, the Pattern P-14 was declared reserve standard and put in storage, as was the M1917 Enfield stateside. When hostilities broke out again in 1939, the Pattern P-14 was brought out of storage and issued to Home Guard Units. The M1917 Enfield was issued as Emergency Standard to troops in the Pacific and National Guard Reservists. By 1944, all Pattern P-14 and M1917 Enfields had been withdrawn from service.
Related content
Comments: 10

menapia [2015-06-03 21:37:16 +0000 UTC]

Nicely done, my Granddad trained with these rifles during WW2 here in Ireland where they were issued amongst the equivalent of the Home Guard as we ended up with a hill of them after WW1. Β He said they were very accurate.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SquireJames [2013-04-07 15:50:03 +0000 UTC]

RommelDeserFox, I am afraid you are incorrect. Both the P14 and M1917 in their respective calibres hold 5 rounds in their magazine, not six. You might be misunderstanding that they could be loaded with 6 rounds (5 in the magazine and 1 chambered)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AmblingPhotographer In reply to SquireJames [2013-09-10 00:35:57 +0000 UTC]

The rifle was originally designed to hold 5 rounds of the British .303 Which is a rimmed cartridge. When it was re-chambered for 30-06, a rimless cartridge that did not take up as much space 6 rounds would fit. Although since the stripper clips used to load held 5 rounds (having been designed for the M1903 which only held 5 rounds) it was not often fully loaded.


I recently received my grandfathers M1917 and have looking into the history. A lot of the P-14's were made in the US. In fact that's why we made the M1917. The factories were already set up.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SquireJames In reply to AmblingPhotographer [2013-09-10 00:50:29 +0000 UTC]

Ah I see. A bit like how Stens were only loaded with 30 or 28 rounds rather than 32, (although that was to save on the mag springs which tended to break). Official practice varying from what *could* be done. I've only ever known P14s and M1917s to hold five rounds. I believe the Ishapore made 7.62 version of the SMLE can hold 12 rounds, but again, most commonly held two 5 round strips, 10 in total, the same as the .303 original

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RommelDesertFox [2012-08-27 18:26:55 +0000 UTC]

Not to be too picky but the picture says it's a 5 round magazine, but they really hold 6.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ManWithaHat [2010-08-29 06:37:55 +0000 UTC]

Few but if so sturdy, advanced, and so paved the way of modern Mauser systems. Best thing is no scopes required, it even has a simple flip up Aperture Sight that is fused in part of the rear sight. One of the best rounded expeditionary rifles.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MensjeDeZeemeermin [2010-08-20 05:47:13 +0000 UTC]

Don't forget that a lot of M1917 armed the British Home Guard in those nervous early years. The idea was that the U.S. didn't want them (NOT INVENTED HERE!) and that the British armourers would know how to fix them.

I much prefer the M1917 to the M1903 rifle. It's easier to shoot, has better sights, built like a tank, and doesn't beat me to death.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

darthpandanl [2007-10-18 08:53:27 +0000 UTC]

Good work!

This rifle also enter the service of Nationalist Chinese Army in India around 1944, and fought great battles in Burma.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

the-human-puppet [2007-05-30 00:30:14 +0000 UTC]

my friends quite good with a enfield. lolz

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Humphro [2005-03-30 21:22:30 +0000 UTC]

Woodwork looking better still

Metal areas seem a bit blurred though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0