HOME | DD

Starlow-FTW — First Amendement

Published: 2011-06-09 20:35:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 3941; Favourites: 155; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description I support the 1st amendment.

People should have the right to express whatever they believe in, so long as they:

1. Do not cause harm to others or infringe on the rights of others.
2. Do not use blatant lies to support what they believe.
3. Do not speak with the purpose of silencing someone else.

Would I defend the rights of a Nazi to protest? Absolutely. Do I support Nazis? No. If someone said "I hate creationists" then that is a valid (but childish and stupid, IMHO) statement, but it is not right to say, "I hate creationists- shoot them". See the difference? One is expressing belief, the other is expressing belief with the ability to harm others.

And by the way, hate speech is relevant to this because it's not hate to be racist, but it is to be racist and to include anything about harming a certain race. If someone hates Jews, they can, but they can't include anything about killing or hurting them.

Get the point? Other freedoms are included in the 1st amendment that are just as important, but I wanted to focus on this one.
Related content
Comments: 135

Fujin777 [2019-01-16 23:40:34 +0000 UTC]

Rock on!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MANNIMARC0 [2018-01-30 07:08:40 +0000 UTC]

its our one right behind trampled upon constantly. and one, like the fourth amendment, we love to just throw away.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Clorox [2017-09-10 20:23:32 +0000 UTC]

heil hitler

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

HurriScuriWurri In reply to The-Clorox [2021-02-06 20:10:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

doctorwhovian1963 In reply to The-Clorox [2019-07-30 05:41:25 +0000 UTC]

Hell Hitler, oh wait your no longer on here...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CommunismNotEvenOnce In reply to doctorwhovian1963 [2019-09-21 16:40:27 +0000 UTC]

But you're still on here so let's 'Heil Hitler!' together.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

doctorwhovian1963 In reply to CommunismNotEvenOnce [2019-09-21 21:43:51 +0000 UTC]

How about no?

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

CommunismNotEvenOnce In reply to doctorwhovian1963 [2019-09-21 21:44:52 +0000 UTC]

How about yes ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

doctorwhovian1963 In reply to CommunismNotEvenOnce [2019-09-21 21:48:04 +0000 UTC]

Okay, Enough is enough... go praise a murderer somewhere else

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

PasteIwingz [2016-12-20 18:51:34 +0000 UTC]

Yes!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EnforcerWolf [2016-07-12 13:53:01 +0000 UTC]

I may not always agree with things that are said here in America, but I believe people have a right to say what they want, so long as they are aware of the rewards and/or consequences of the wording. Plus I don't feel if it impedes on others that the free speech is useful. You may have the right to say something, but not the reason.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wwwarea [2015-11-08 01:57:52 +0000 UTC]

1. Do not cause harm to others or infringe on the rights of others.Some "rights" (E.g. Copyright) violates Freedom of Speech though.
But I understand the pain part.

2. Do not use blatant lies to support what they believe. Not that I defend them, but isn't it still 'Free Speech'?
Edit: Well slander, and other serious stuff that involves other people directly is different though. xD
3. Do not speak with the purpose of silencing someone else.If it's possible..
Isn't the act of censoring a separated thing though?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to wwwarea [2015-11-09 16:02:49 +0000 UTC]

Well I was referring to slander when I mentioned "blatant lies", which is a civil offense.  Copyright is also protecting the right of the creator of said product to profit off their creation, so violating copyright would be speech (in a sense) that violates the creator's right.  That said, some other aspects of what I said are purely moral in nature; you should not lie to defend your position, you should not attempt to silence the speech of others with your own (a simple example is yelling to literally drown out the other person).

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

frankier-o [2015-05-29 20:06:15 +0000 UTC]

saying "I believe that homosexuals are all sinners" is alright to say (though i disagree with whoever says that strongly), but it's not alright to say "I believe that homosexuals are all sinners and they all deserve to burn in Hell" is not alright to say.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to frankier-o [2015-05-30 02:58:54 +0000 UTC]

First of all, homosexuals are all sinners... you are a sinner, and I am a sinner... we are all sinners.   We also all deserve hellfire for siding with the enemy, but it's out of grace that we have a chance out of it.  That said, it's all freedom of speech, even if I strongly disagree with the notion that we should ever be excited for anyone's hellfire. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Commander-Dominic [2015-05-23 03:31:06 +0000 UTC]

Yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilentRosySunrise [2014-08-15 16:42:27 +0000 UTC]

Right on!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to SilentRosySunrise [2014-08-20 06:08:26 +0000 UTC]

  thank you. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MissMuffinTop [2014-06-20 21:19:43 +0000 UTC]

Does advocating for inequality count as causing harm or infringing on the rights of others? Ya know, like if someone was like, really big into Apartheid or something else demonstrably horrible. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to MissMuffinTop [2014-06-21 03:56:59 +0000 UTC]

No.  That's a debate on an entirely different issue.  Advocating for the removal of other people's freedom of speech is the point of this one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ryu238 [2014-06-20 02:47:23 +0000 UTC]

"Would I defend the rights of a Nazi to protest? Absolutely. Do I support Nazis? No." I like this part for some reason

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to ryu238 [2014-06-20 16:08:22 +0000 UTC]

If I can toot my own horn a bit, you probably like it because not many people are willing to defend the rights of their adversary, and I do consider the neo-Nazi movement a foe.  By denying the rights of those with whom we disagree, we ourselves lose such rights.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Calypsoeclipse [2013-01-10 23:26:17 +0000 UTC]

For the second part, is it saying you aren't allowed to make lies of people? Like all Catholics are pedofiles or what not?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to Calypsoeclipse [2013-01-12 22:35:28 +0000 UTC]

Well, you can lie, sure, but depending on circumstance that can get you in a variety of trouble, some legal and some not. It just depends. However, for the most part, if you lie and receive backlash, you can't hide behind the first amendment. My advice to you would be "deal with it".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Calypsoeclipse In reply to Starlow-FTW [2013-01-13 23:23:00 +0000 UTC]

I was about to say that it would interfere with freedom of speech. you made it make sense though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cryobash [2011-06-25 14:11:25 +0000 UTC]

On the basis, I agree but on the shape....
I mean, it's not so obvious, and quite difficult to say someone "You hate me? Don't worry dude! You can! And I will take care that you'll get this right forever and beyond!"
See what I mean?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to Cryobash [2011-06-25 15:38:36 +0000 UTC]

I see where you're coming from. XP I mean, people do have the right to hate someone else, but...just I don't know. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Head-ZonkStudios [2011-06-10 22:13:48 +0000 UTC]

I too believe in this and I wouldn't have it any other way.
However, I've noticed that there are some people that should be silenced because the things that they're talking about are wrong or even dangerous. Hundreds of problems and issues have been created because someone said something that shouldn't have been said.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to Head-ZonkStudios [2011-06-10 23:15:10 +0000 UTC]

Some people do need to learn to keep their mouths shut. But with great freedom is great responsibility.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Head-ZonkStudios In reply to Starlow-FTW [2011-06-11 00:25:55 +0000 UTC]

You're right. But responsibility for whom? For people to keep their mouths shut when they need to or for us to silence those who need not speak to preserve the country?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to Head-ZonkStudios [2011-06-13 20:08:12 +0000 UTC]

It's like the old Chinese proverb: It's better to keep your mouth shut and have others believe you to be a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Head-ZonkStudios In reply to Starlow-FTW [2011-06-14 03:29:22 +0000 UTC]

Amen! And again, all it would take is one wrong person to start on those who need to speak up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to Head-ZonkStudios [2011-06-14 03:31:51 +0000 UTC]

Here's my own proverb: It's not the most intelligent people who are heard, but merely the loudest.

But thank God we live in a place where we all have a chance to say our piece no matter what our race, or creed, or religion, or gender, is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Head-ZonkStudios In reply to Starlow-FTW [2011-06-14 03:38:14 +0000 UTC]

Yes, yes and yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MetalShadowOverlord [2011-06-10 11:49:59 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to MetalShadowOverlord [2011-06-11 17:59:40 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to Starlow-FTW [2011-06-11 18:36:03 +0000 UTC]

[link] (Just figured you'd might like this, since it's surprisingly similar O.o)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to MetalShadowOverlord [2011-06-11 18:41:10 +0000 UTC]

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to Starlow-FTW [2011-06-11 19:26:40 +0000 UTC]

Wow.....and I thought I found all of her epic stamps. O_o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to MetalShadowOverlord [2011-06-11 19:31:55 +0000 UTC]

We should make an "I support SailorWolf4" stamp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to Starlow-FTW [2011-06-11 19:44:16 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. We could both do our own stamps expressing support.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to MetalShadowOverlord [2011-06-11 19:49:03 +0000 UTC]

Woo. I'll get on that. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to Starlow-FTW [2011-06-11 19:51:42 +0000 UTC]

Same here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to MetalShadowOverlord [2011-06-11 19:52:59 +0000 UTC]

^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to Starlow-FTW [2011-06-11 20:26:14 +0000 UTC]

Well, I just made mine: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to MetalShadowOverlord [2011-06-11 20:30:06 +0000 UTC]

Cool. Mine's actually going to be blue.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetalShadowOverlord In reply to Starlow-FTW [2011-06-11 20:40:59 +0000 UTC]

Alrighty, that's cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thunder-ROXX [2011-06-10 01:25:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Starlow-FTW In reply to thunder-ROXX [2011-06-11 17:59:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SuperDitz [2011-06-10 00:23:12 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>