HOME | DD
stefmixo —
Back-lit V1
Published: 2012-09-01 18:30:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 15207; Favourites: 331; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
V2 : stefmixo.deviantart.com/art/Ba…V3 : stefmixo.deviantart.com/art/Ba…
----
Be respectful about the model(s) ... instant hide and ban system activated !
Respectez le(s) modele(s) systeme d'auto banissement activé !
----
Model : Liloukaky
You can find her on www.focale31.com/books/3055/in… . and www.liloukaky.book.fr/
Photog : FACEBOOK : www.facebook.com/pages/SRP-Pho…
2012/06/25
1/200s, F11, 100iso
Eos7D + 17-85 ~50mm
PaintShopPro + Photoshop
Related content
Comments: 180
i have seen over a hundred pictures exactly like this one. and I'm not even kidding.
=_=
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
You look at 100 asses? O__O Well I mean. . .I guess that is what you like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nah, it first take liking it to be exposed to it, but I do my homework
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yeah, but have you seen one that actually made DD? Honestly, I'm surprised as heck, and just... wow, really.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
There's pretty much a metric fuck ton of asses with DD's.
You can't miss them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
For sure I agree that this is truly art. BUT I'm not sure if a healthy well crafted butt can be considered art... well.. maybe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
There is no curve as elegant anywhere in nature and here it is captured in it's fullest expression of simplistic beauty. Thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That's the first thing everyone thought
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HAHA yeah right ? XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
this photo is good, but definitely not Daily Deviation worthy. no comment whatsoever on why this was nominated as a DD either, no surprise there. lmfao. Good job, dA staff. good job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 6
Any critique on the DD selections need to go to the Deviant who featured the piece, DistortedSmile , not the artist. They had no say in the selection.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If you have an issue with what is chosen as a DD you are supposed to take it up with the person who featured them, not the artist. The artist doesn't select themselves and can't do anything about it. It's against the rules to post on the art that it's not worthy of a DD, fyi.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yea... If the DD thing only supports photos, i've seen a lot of better photos here... At least much better than a butt... -.-'
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mhm, I'm not one to critique photos, but I must agree. Though the whole DD system isn't very correct, I will say. Good picture, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
very nice detail and overall very cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yeah it's nice but perhaps a mature tag? Sure it's just a woman's behind but it is provocative. From the stance, underwear and even lighting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Seriously ? You post drawings of the Joker and Metal Gear Solid holding guns (objects created to KILL people ) and GTA V (no explanation needed), and you think a human bottom in underwear is provocative ?
I strongly invite you to NOT look at my other images then. Thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Not drawings but stencils. But they aren't real are they? You've posted a photograph of a person. There's a difference.
Of course a bottom in underwear is provocative, in a sexual manner.
I only saw your image because it was on a thumbnail and thought it should have a mature tag. Don't worry I won't trawl through your gallery but thank you for looking through mine.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have no time to feed the troll, so the only thing I'm gonna say is :
lady-geekdom.deviantart.com/ar…
Thank you for stopping by, happy new year.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You have no time to enter into a debate?
Fair enough. (My brain is intact thanks)
Good luck with your art and happy new year to you too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It IS provocative. Is that not the point of your gallery? There needs to be a mature tag so that a younger deviant (which are all over the website) might not stumble upon it. A gun's not bad in itself, nor is Trevor Philips. Now if there was gore in his drawings, I'd bet you he'd make it for mature deviants only.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So you're saying it's ok for kids to see guns but not a human body covered with underwear ? Sorry but that's not the world I want to live in.
I'd rather my kids to see a naked fellow human (as long as it's not in a frontal/sexual way, I agree with you on that point ) than murder weapons. There's nothing wrong with the natural human body, no reason to hide or be ashamed of it.
(and yes, gun's sole purpose is to kill people... killing people is bad <-> guns ARE bad, good looking and interesting in movies but still bad )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, a military man holding a gun is much better than someone in their underwear.
To most people, this photo is sexual. Boobs and butts are sexual. A woman's rear in lace underwear is sexual. All of your gallery is sexual. And that deserves a maturity tag. There is a reason to hide it: Younger deviants shouldn't have to see an ass on their homepage.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
oversexualizing the female body is not good for your health
uvu
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I admire your dedication to your stance, but you are wrong. Look at the media for your own guns vs undies argument. In the 1970s they stopped showing raw war footage on the news, but Victoria Secret ads run to this day. Its a by far mild photo, rivaled only by butts in every day yoga pants that young deviants are exposed to every day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I like big butts and I cannot lie .... tho it's not HER case
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Why are people posting rude comments to Stefmixo? Why not send them to the person who chose this as a DD instead? 
Anyway congrats on the DD sir
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's a very nice... lighting setup you've got there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Salut~ c'est tres beau~ j'adore la photo <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>