HOME | DD

Steveoc86 — Styracosaurus in the mist...

Published: 2009-03-10 14:53:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 13494; Favourites: 191; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

Styracosaurus, standing in the mist. (Photoshop painting)

I used Greg Pauls's skeletal reconstruction, skull images in Ryan et al. (2007), and a muscle diagram by Scott Hartman as references.

I have tried to get the skin to look remotely like that of ceratopsians. Many dinosaur groups show small scales, usually only a few mm in diameter. Ceratopsians, however, have larger scales on average. Most ceratopsian scales are generally a couple of centimetres across, with extra-large feature scales now and again. How frequent the feature scales are, I am not sure. I have put them in loose rows across the animals' back.

The midline feature scales running down the back are based on those described in Brown (1917) for Monoclonius. Unfortunately, I haven't found an image of what they look like; below is the description of them:

''...another specimen, No. 5430, probably this genus, seven dermal plates were preserved, all similar in form, symmetrical and about equal in size. Each is characterized by a narrow, elongate base and a high, median center. They are about an inch wide, an inch and a half long and an inch and a half high. In that specimen the pelvis, a part of the tail, and the hind limbs are preserved and the plates were probably located above the spines in the caudal region similar to those of Ceratosaurus.''

I have also given it square belly scales on the underside, which are known from a specimen of Triceratops. These scales hadn't been properly described at the time of illustrating this image (only in a SVP abstract was available), and I hadn't seen them myself. So, I based them on the brilliant restoration by Lukas Panzarin seen in some of the media exposure for Farke (2009) ceratopsian combat paper. 

Related content
Comments: 34

Concavenator17 [2022-07-05 16:11:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to Concavenator17 [2022-07-08 12:14:23 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AchillobatorPrince [2016-05-21 17:33:52 +0000 UTC]

Realistically beautiful, looks like you used a time machine and made a painting there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thewhiningrhino [2010-12-22 15:21:01 +0000 UTC]

Very nicely done, a beliveable and appealing rendition of one of my favorite horned dinosaurs. Had no idea about the dermal plates!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to Thewhiningrhino [2010-12-22 16:03:23 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! I just wish I had an image of the plates to see if I've restored them correctly....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pilsator [2010-12-22 15:18:34 +0000 UTC]

Quite possibly the best ceratopsian reconstruction I've ever seen. Can't believe I didn't add it to me favorites until now...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to pilsator [2010-12-22 15:59:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the kind words! I personally think that Andrey Atuchin's are probably better. [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pilsator In reply to Steveoc86 [2010-12-22 16:55:50 +0000 UTC]

I like the approaches of both of you a lot. While Andrey Atuchin's recent work has a very clear style and is flat out beautiful, you're on a par with him. Your almost profile-view shows that your styracosaur incorporates all of the most recent knowledge about ceratopsids; it's incredibly rich in detail, and the background is just gorgeous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Paleo-King [2010-12-18 01:43:02 +0000 UTC]

Great job with the Styracosaurus! I'd like to see these dermal plates Brown reported finding. Based on his description I reckon they would look somewhat like rose thorns.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to Paleo-King [2010-12-19 13:20:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! The reason I drew them like I did was because of the word 'plate'. I'd imagine that if they looked like 'rose throns' then they would have been described as thorn like/spiked/pointed etc. The word 'plate' to me implies somthing broader.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleo-King In reply to Steveoc86 [2010-12-19 22:45:18 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps. I imagined more like a very dull rose thorn, but yours are equally plausible. It would be interesting to see these plates or at least a photo of them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MattMart [2009-04-20 17:49:23 +0000 UTC]

Dunno how I missed this, but it's amazing! I think this is my new go-to restoration when pointing people towards accurate ceratopsians (the way your Mamenchisaurus is for suaropods!). Very rare to find recons that strive for accuracy even in the detail of the scales. Way cool!

And didn't know about the dermal spines along the back in Monoclonius, wonder how these compare to the diplodocid spines, and if the Triceratops mummy preserves any...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to MattMart [2009-04-22 22:24:35 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Means a lot! I'd still like to tweak the scales overtime, maybe blend some of the larger scales in more. I wish there were some images of these spines, they could be placed differently than what I have. The way they grow over the back is speculative.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CraftyCreatures [2009-03-24 03:03:50 +0000 UTC]

This is beautiful!!! I really, really like it. It is a definite favorite of mine

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to CraftyCreatures [2009-03-24 17:50:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! and thanks for the favs!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EmperorDinobot [2009-03-17 10:54:14 +0000 UTC]

I had never heard of those dermal plate references before. Hmm interesting stuff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to EmperorDinobot [2009-03-17 15:47:17 +0000 UTC]

Before doing this image I hadn't heard of them either,
I'm still not sure what they exactly look like or were they go.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Alexanderlovegrove [2009-03-14 00:11:53 +0000 UTC]

Very nice, I love the level of detail on the skin. This is what digital art should be like!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to Alexanderlovegrove [2009-03-14 16:14:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrokenMachine86 [2009-03-11 02:52:40 +0000 UTC]

Cool work. I love the coloring.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to BrokenMachine86 [2009-03-11 10:50:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Afrovenator [2009-03-11 00:06:56 +0000 UTC]

Instant fav!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to Afrovenator [2009-03-11 00:52:21 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mountaineer47 [2009-03-10 23:19:55 +0000 UTC]

You're alive! Love the beastie.

-Erin

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to Mountaineer47 [2009-03-10 23:23:04 +0000 UTC]

Just about , thanks for the fav!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Miyess [2009-03-10 20:55:08 +0000 UTC]

Great markings on the head... Good job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to Miyess [2009-03-10 23:12:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZombieSaurian [2009-03-10 19:50:43 +0000 UTC]

awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to ZombieSaurian [2009-03-10 19:51:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NTamura [2009-03-10 16:15:39 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to NTamura [2009-03-10 16:24:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the fav!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tuomaskoivurinne [2009-03-10 16:12:04 +0000 UTC]

Switching into 3D, are we? Looks great, although I like your 2D-works more

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steveoc86 In reply to tuomaskoivurinne [2009-03-10 16:23:51 +0000 UTC]

Thanks......and no this is a 2D photoshop painting. The ground is semi painted/photo manipulation, that might be throwing you.
Don't worry I have some 'more traditional' works on the go as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tuomaskoivurinne In reply to Steveoc86 [2009-03-11 11:52:36 +0000 UTC]

It does look like 3D... Forgot the mention, that I love the colour pattern. Occasionally it's hard to come up with new colours schemes, without overdoing it. Nice, quite simple, but still striking!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0