HOME | DD

SteveStanleyArt — Star Trek: The Search for Spock

Published: 2012-10-06 14:01:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 7099; Favourites: 171; Downloads: 111
Redirect to original
Description Here's some collector plate art I did, remember the ones you'd eat your mashed potatoes on? I did! Artwork for the Hamilton Collection. 16 x 16"- acrylics, airbrush, Prismacolor on cold-press illustration board.

All characters are Ā© Paramount Pictures.
Related content
Comments: 48

Phenometron [2017-11-15 22:34:25 +0000 UTC]

This is beautiful.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Tuftberg [2017-01-07 14:18:12 +0000 UTC]

That'sĀ a very impressive work you did!!! Very good job!!!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to Tuftberg [2017-04-08 18:13:19 +0000 UTC]

Thank you x a million!Ā 

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Tuftberg In reply to SteveStanleyArt [2017-04-11 14:46:43 +0000 UTC]

Can't wait to see more great artworks of yours.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to Tuftberg [2017-04-11 20:26:14 +0000 UTC]

I'm honored! Thank you and soon!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

ANDY1701A [2015-01-29 21:42:31 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to ANDY1701A [2015-02-05 00:11:24 +0000 UTC]

Many thanks, Andy!Ā 

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Prue84 [2014-01-03 10:36:11 +0000 UTC]

Good job.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Mami02 [2013-11-11 08:13:43 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work on one of my favorite Star Trek movies! (I don't know why many people think it as not one of the good ones)... many memorable and touching scenes, and your art really did it justice. I especially love Spock's appearance

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Corylea In reply to Mami02 [2014-01-24 20:47:20 +0000 UTC]

Movies 1 and 5 were bad, so folks often lump #3 in with the other odd-numbered movies as a bad one, even though "The Search For Spock" was actually quite good.Ā  It's sheer laziness, I think.

And now to the artist -- that central image is especially well done.Ā  Kudos!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

blissis33 [2013-04-18 17:22:57 +0000 UTC]

Really epic

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to blissis33 [2013-04-20 01:45:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Daniel! I suck at art and I'm cixelsyd too.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

blissis33 In reply to SteveStanleyArt [2013-04-30 16:03:24 +0000 UTC]



...how'd you know my name?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to blissis33 [2013-04-30 20:17:41 +0000 UTC]

Leinad Rethgual. Ev'I neeb gniklat sdrawkcab ylbaborp ecnis erofeb uoy erew nrob.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

blissis33 In reply to SteveStanleyArt [2015-01-06 22:06:51 +0000 UTC]

M'i desserpmi.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to blissis33 [2015-01-07 16:45:39 +0000 UTC]

Tnellecxe! Knaht uoy os hcum!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Phenometron [2012-12-20 22:23:13 +0000 UTC]

Mr. Spock approves of this piece.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to Phenometron [2012-12-20 23:32:51 +0000 UTC]

Funny you mention this. When my color comp for this piece was sent to Nimoy and Shatner for their contracted input, Shatner refused to sign off, stating, "It doesn't look like me." On the comp, his head/face measured roughly 1". At that size Kirk's image was admittedly more representational as he was not the focal point of the collector plate art. My director asked that I redraw him and resubmit. With about 2 hours of work, the new head was pasted in and the comp was resubmitted. Shat approved.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

GemHaters [2012-11-13 16:02:18 +0000 UTC]

WOW! Amazing!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Tuiteyfruity [2012-11-05 02:36:37 +0000 UTC]

Oh! this is wonderful!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

auratrekkie [2012-10-21 17:16:20 +0000 UTC]

again absolutely amazing work!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to auratrekkie [2012-10-22 19:23:18 +0000 UTC]

And thank you again, auratrekkie!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

entallat [2012-10-08 18:19:16 +0000 UTC]

I remember those plates! Very cool.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to entallat [2012-10-22 19:22:11 +0000 UTC]

You should see the plate in my head.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

artistamroashry [2012-10-08 08:24:06 +0000 UTC]

Amazing

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to artistamroashry [2012-10-22 19:23:54 +0000 UTC]

All hail...!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

elfvale [2012-10-07 05:12:27 +0000 UTC]

Very nice work. Love it.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to elfvale [2012-10-22 19:32:40 +0000 UTC]

I appreciate you taking the time just to stop by and take a look.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

DimRasha [2012-10-06 22:51:39 +0000 UTC]

outstanding...really outstanding!!! *o*

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to DimRasha [2012-10-22 19:40:12 +0000 UTC]

All hail the talent of Lady Sarah!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

DimRasha In reply to SteveStanleyArt [2012-11-22 17:49:30 +0000 UTC]

really kind, but I'm not so talented as you are!! ^^

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

JohnHaunLE [2012-10-06 19:56:35 +0000 UTC]

Your Awesome!!!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to JohnHaunLE [2012-10-22 19:31:22 +0000 UTC]

That's just what I've been saying about you all this time. You just never listen.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

JohnHaunLE In reply to SteveStanleyArt [2012-10-23 04:10:44 +0000 UTC]

LOL!!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

TribalGraces [2012-10-06 19:37:46 +0000 UTC]

Really wonderful.

If I may ask, what helped you most when you were first learning to do likenesses? (You do them so incredibly well.) Is there some bit of wisdom you could pass on, or did it just come naturally to you?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to TribalGraces [2012-10-06 22:18:16 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely. Here's the simplest and most often thing I do-- If you're working from photo reference, and let's say you've been working on your piece for a few hours and are at the point of not seeing the likeness emerge, turn the reference along with you artwork upside down, and resume drawing/painting. This perception shift will seem like you're working on another piece of art completely, giving a fresh point of view. Rotate back and forth this way and you'll be amazed at how these new details will pop out at you.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

TribalGraces In reply to SteveStanleyArt [2012-10-06 22:45:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the advice! I'll give it a try.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

nastyomik [2012-10-06 17:51:10 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful! ^^

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to nastyomik [2012-10-22 19:53:06 +0000 UTC]

Š“-н ŠŸŃ€ŠµŠ“ŃŠµŠ“Š°Ń‚ŠµŠ»ŃŒ, я Š±Š»Š°Š³Š¾Š“Š°Ń€ŃŽ вас за обзор моей работы. ŠœŠ¾Š¶ŠµŃ‚ всех Š²Š°ŃˆŠøŃ… творческих усилий может Š±Ń‹Ń‚ŃŒ успешной. Моего ŃƒŠ²Š°Š¶ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ Šŗ вам.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

StarTrekFTW [2012-10-06 15:42:00 +0000 UTC]

This one's awesome too!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to StarTrekFTW [2012-10-22 19:55:09 +0000 UTC]

If you look up the word awesome in the dictionary you'll see Grace's picture. I swear.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

StarTrekFTW In reply to SteveStanleyArt [2012-10-23 01:22:22 +0000 UTC]

No kidding! What dictionary?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to StarTrekFTW [2012-10-23 01:57:18 +0000 UTC]

lol! I got nothin'!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

StarTrekFTW In reply to SteveStanleyArt [2012-10-23 10:33:13 +0000 UTC]

Well that's cool!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

ferrignofan [2012-10-06 15:00:06 +0000 UTC]

holy crap, thats amazing.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

SteveStanleyArt In reply to ferrignofan [2012-10-22 19:57:37 +0000 UTC]

'Holy crap'-- and I'm thinking, "yeah, I've described my work like that-- and worse--daily." Thanks, FF!

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

ferrignofan In reply to SteveStanleyArt [2012-11-03 14:11:32 +0000 UTC]

yeah bro

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

xXKittehCatXx [2012-10-06 14:17:52 +0000 UTC]

Amazing!~ *3*

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0