HOME | DD

#coping #kink #mentalhealth #psa #stamp #chire #agere #ddlg #kinkcommunity #antiddlg
Published: 2019-07-23 22:52:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 16782; Favourites: 122; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Oh boy some of y'all are gonna call me hypocritical. My last status? Literally made me connect the dots in my head and realise things that will be mentioned here. And also, my "ddlg" stamp is also outdated and I'll explain more here. But let's go!
No, I'm not saying teenagers CAN'T have kinks or fetishes. That's stupid. However, just because a teen may have a kink DOES NOT mean they should be participating in kink communties, online or not. A big issue is consent, which teens can not give to adults, no matter how "old they are for their age". It's still pedophilia, manipulation and taking advantage of insecure teens.
There's one kink community infamous for allowing or even promoting minors to partcipate in the kink community, even in subtle ways. The DDLG community.
I know some of you may say "But what about sfw ddlg, like survivors, and it's just some representation of the relationship dynamic??? Like you said before????" I realise now that I was wrong. DDLG IS inherently kink, it's in the name.
No matter how you treat it, it will always mean "Daddy Dom/Little Girl". It uses the idea of a father figure and a child, and sexualizing that and the trust and bond that should be there is gross. To clarify, I know that a ton of people who say they like DDLG actually just like being called baby, calling their partner daddy, collars and cute clothes. I don't have a problem with these people BUT the community they are associating with is not something you want to be known for.
There are many, MANY adults in the community who are pedophiles, and try to treat it as if young teens can totally join because "it's not inherently kinky!" and then the children get groomed. These adults are taking advantage of vulnerable children.
It doesn't help when there are people who can't fathom people NOT WANTING TO SEE THEIR KINK IN OTHER SFW PLACES. Most people wouldn't care if they didn't post ddlg shit in tags like princess, age regression, chire, kidcore and other tags that survivors use whilst coping or in actual age regression. They are and have invaded these tags. People who need to cope can't in fear some kinky fucker posted a hello kitty plush saying "ohhh i want to suck daddies cock owow!".
This also tricks children into thinking it's not inherently kinky, as they see it in tags that should be sfw. It's putting children in danger, and overall making people know about what you do in your PRIVATE time.
Remember when I said I didn't have a problem with a certian part of the community. Here's the part I truely hate. The pedophiles, the people who otherwise wouldn't be pedos that will only fuck their partners if they feel as if they are raping and toddler, and people treating their rape thoughts/being raped thoughts as good and healthy. It's sick, disgusting. Anti-recovery and has hurt people.
When you say "DDLG", these are the people most think of......and can you blame them? The irresponsibility in the community has given them an easy way to take advantage of insecure teens and vulnerable adults. No shit me and others will be against it when it's rampent with pedophiles and allows children to interact directly with them!!!
"Oh god,,,,,,what are some actual sfw terms? I didn't mean to use for us in a sexual way..etc"
It's not your fault if you were fed this. Showing that you can regonise the community is dangerous and disconnecting from it, even if you weren't a part of the problem is brave.
For single-person-use, terms such as "Agere" and "ChiRE" exist, meaning age regression and child regression respectively. They are completely sfw, though there are always toxic people in communities so stay safe.
For describing relationship dynamics, there's the oh-so controversial CGLRE. The thing is CGL means caregiver/little, which is a part of the DDLG spectrum. Though, CGLRE is completely disconnected from that as some feel there's no better way to describe or visualize the relationship when one if age regressing. The issues are obvious.
Other terms have the same issues, those being DXLG, DXLB, etc... These mean "Daddy/Little Girl", it removes any mention of dom/sub sexual relationship and it's mean to represent/visualize when one is regressing. You can see the issues with these too.
I've mentioned several times "represent/visualize the relationship when one is regressing". By this, I mean the caregiving figure the other partner gives to support their partner while they're regressing due to childhood trauma or neurodiversity. It's the comfort someone gives to their partner to help them cope, without the need for romantic things and definitely not sexual things.
I know I may get nasty comments by both those who strongly support the DDLG community and strongly hate the DDLG community. But I don't care.
I know where people are coming from and their concerns are valid, especially as a childhood sexually assault (csa) survivor myself. Keep children and teens safe and out of kink communities.
And like, destory the ddlg community. The amount of issues-good ratio it's caused is extremely one sided, and it's too the left.
Please do not use this piece if you are a;
Terf, Swerf, Ace Exclusionist, Transmed/Truscum, Nazi, (No)map, anti-anti etc, or intend to make fun of it
Mini Flag Commissions | Stamp commission info on my page!
Related content
Comments: 16
OMGShay92 [2025-04-24 16:28:16 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GalaxyGirl422626277 [2025-04-14 05:39:21 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
StevnGutierrezTalvin [2024-04-09 16:36:52 +0000 UTC]
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
butt-muncher [2024-02-21 23:55:07 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Smyset111 [2022-09-10 20:34:56 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
kwjciabfk [2020-09-29 13:51:29 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely based. Let's stop these pedo fetishists once and for all!
👍: 3 ⏩: 1
Whydidicreateth1s In reply to kwjciabfk [2024-06-24 23:00:38 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Another-Realm [2019-08-11 03:12:35 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry, but I mainly disagree.
First of all, I was a teenager who was about 16-17 and I don't have a problem with roleplaying with a similar age as long as it's legal, and it's possible that there can be consensual. Not only that but a 17 year old is not naturally a child anymore (but the law might still say that for some cases). Maybe it depends what a "kink" is. I've hear teenagers could have some dating romance but can't do this and that. Kinks? It might depend.
If there is an adult who likes DD/LG, and it's not hurting anyone and isn't going to, then it will never be wrong. Any issue surrounding that is wrong should be looked at as something wrong alone when it's not a threat to the other.
It's possible some people in it are pedophiles, but that's just some people. Not only that, but if a pedophile found a way to have sex with an adult with consent and there was no victim and only prefers that, then I don't think I see a real problem anymore. Now you might strongly disagree with this, but the problem with being attractive to real children is usually because children cannot consent. However, if a "pedophile" has an alternative where they can in fact have sex with a consensual adult, then perhaps that might actually be a good thing. It just wouldn't be fair to say everything is bad, JUST because children exist. Otherwise, "Heterosexual is bad because some adult humans will never consent to sex.". Should we blame heterosexual now?
Not only that, when it comes to the risk of actual children engaging it, I believe that can be handled without being against the consensual community itself. Though there is age of consent laws. It might be legal for a 17 year old to have consensual sex with a 19 year old.
______
You probably won't agree but I will state that I am against discriminating two consensual adults who does the whole mommy daddy thing in private, or those who wants to openly talk about it while being fairly responsible (e.g. not wanting to cause someone too young to be part of it.) Of course I think you won't agree with the alternative thing either to those that really are pedophiles, but if it helps them focus away from real children then (and please understand where I'm coming from), I think it might be a good thing as a way to prevent child sexual abuse. Though sadly it might not be good for every pedophile, but I do think it's better than nothing morally.
I won't expect you to agree but it's my thoughts.
👍: 2 ⏩: 2
FanArtArtist1993 In reply to Another-Realm [2020-03-13 02:13:18 +0000 UTC]
Minors are not allowed to be in any of the communities including age regression and age play and DDLG and any BDSM and any BDSM related community.
👍: 4 ⏩: 1
Another-Realm In reply to FanArtArtist1993 [2020-03-13 07:05:53 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FanArtArtist1993 In reply to Another-Realm [2020-03-14 00:54:18 +0000 UTC]
The age of consent doesn't count. You have to be 18+ to participate in DDLG and BDSM and and BDSM related activity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Another-Realm In reply to FanArtArtist1993 [2020-03-14 03:57:45 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Another-Realm In reply to placoderms [2019-11-21 04:08:29 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JacobIsAGast In reply to Another-Realm [2020-03-01 15:18:34 +0000 UTC]
I agree, having all communities as 18+ is very US central as in the UK the age of consent is 16. Meaning I had to wait 2 years before coming into the community which teaches you how to be safe, etc
👍: 0 ⏩: 0