HOME | DD

Published: 2008-03-03 22:28:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 1113; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description
13atrix+3, f/2.8, 1/1000
special thanks to ~zort again
Related content
Comments: 40
vspecialk In reply to Sugarman [2008-03-10 14:41:01 +0000 UTC]
aww,it's sweet you remember such things.
i hope i'll start developing my own film as well (if Bern read this he'd sarcastically point his finger and laugh at me.he'd heard this so many times ).I think we're lucky to be born in a generation that can still understand and enjoy film photography,cause the nowdays born kids will obviously only know what mega pixels are
Well,isn't photography magic by essence?..
It's not magic,it's an ultimate telepathy
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ComeWatchMyArt In reply to Sugarman [2008-03-07 18:53:13 +0000 UTC]
nachbelichten? so richtig richtig mit schablone? buuurn? oder ein split toning mit 2 verschiedenen gradationen übers ganze bild?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ComeWatchMyArt In reply to Sugarman [2008-03-07 19:44:47 +0000 UTC]
split toning sieht irgendwie bei mir auch meistens am schluss so aus, wie wenn ich alles mit einer mittleren gradation (2.5) gemacht hätte...
Schablone...mühsam...die muss man ja zuerst machen hmmm, muss ich aber auch mal probieren bei gewissen Negativen...
Mal ne Frage...wie schafft man, dass die Entwicklerlösung 20°C hat?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gnato [2008-03-05 08:56:03 +0000 UTC]
wunderschöbvmnmkcn,hjlö
JU
zouitkghfjgmd
ohu ohui ohu ohu
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
a-i-k-i [2008-03-04 18:50:33 +0000 UTC]
Cool one, the reflections are just at the right place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
quizzard87 [2008-03-04 10:29:28 +0000 UTC]
"herr ober, da ist ein korn auf meinem film."
schaut gut aus.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hedoublehockeysticks [2008-03-04 01:27:00 +0000 UTC]
gut augen; welche hat du erste gesehen? "good eyes, which did you see first?" two semesters and i am worthless. the exposure is perfect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hedoublehockeysticks In reply to Sugarman [2008-03-04 03:24:58 +0000 UTC]
bernhard wolf is everywhere these days, doing everyones dirty work, dirtying everyones under garments. it does look very good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zort In reply to hedoublehockeysticks [2008-03-04 22:18:06 +0000 UTC]
it's one of those times where the world requires a new kind of super heros - everything minus hot chicks and getting laid on a daily base.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hedoublehockeysticks In reply to zort [2008-03-05 19:33:51 +0000 UTC]
how could this be? i see plenty of nice ladies on the zeitgeist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zort In reply to hedoublehockeysticks [2008-03-05 23:39:31 +0000 UTC]
i call it pathetic and platonic. but today i learned something new: facebook calls this thing "it's complicated" so i guess i'll stick to that term from now on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hedoublehockeysticks In reply to zort [2008-03-07 21:39:30 +0000 UTC]
pawn the leica, invest in flowers. a real smart trade.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aschi23 [2008-03-04 00:50:44 +0000 UTC]
hmm weisst was mir noch aufgefallen ist... der mann rechts schaut fast so aus wie der blende 7 typ. denk nicht dass ers ist aber vielleicht.. wär ja sauwitzig und würd sein lächeln erklären....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zort In reply to aschi23 [2008-03-04 21:51:07 +0000 UTC]
hahahaha... ja, aber erst in 20 jahre.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
aschi23 In reply to zort [2008-03-04 22:15:14 +0000 UTC]
und er 7er am bus dann noch dazu... naja jetz wirds ein bissl viel
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aschi23 In reply to zort [2008-03-04 22:14:21 +0000 UTC]
habs mir gedacht dass er's nicht ist. aber er schaut ihm schon verdammt ähnlich oder!?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zort In reply to aschi23 [2008-03-04 22:15:45 +0000 UTC]
"oiwe nua schaun, owa nix kaufn" - den satz würd ich ihm aber auch zutrauen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aschi23 In reply to zort [2008-03-04 22:18:56 +0000 UTC]
den haben doch alle fotogeschäftbesitzer im repertoire oder!?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zort In reply to aschi23 [2008-03-04 22:23:40 +0000 UTC]
nur dass er eine doch unvergleichliche markigkeit zu tage legt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mergana [2008-03-03 23:37:33 +0000 UTC]
I like it a lot. However, as I won't bore you with a comment that could be as long as my first semester essay explaining why I like this photograph, I will not say anything constructive. Tiring (for me) and boring (for you).
Me likes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rhapsouldize [2008-03-03 23:36:30 +0000 UTC]
this is great, stefan. i just got a roll of XP2 back... it turned out sepia. looks nice, but i like tri-x better... wish i had a more convenient darkroom near me! jules (*MyPrivateParty ) is processing a roll of tri-x for me when he goes next... i'm excited to see how it turned out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rhapsouldize In reply to Sugarman [2008-03-04 17:16:27 +0000 UTC]
don't worry about it. i just like to hear from you!
yes, i think we talked about both having an AE-1 before. but yes, i am in love with it... i'm not sure why the film came out sepia. i heard xp2 sometimes came out purple-looking, but i wasn't expecting sepia. i like it! but the scans don't look so great on the computer (i got a cheap photo CD with it), so i converted them to black and white. i'll upload one tomorrow, maybe.
i'll add you on msn.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
a-i-k-i In reply to rhapsouldize [2008-03-04 18:49:34 +0000 UTC]
It's actually that XP2 gets developed like a color film. This brings this sligt sepia tone with it. I got already quite a few XP2 developed, all with the sepia. But I also get em scanned and have a preset in Lightroom for b/w them right at the import. XD
Thought he sepia tone is actually quite nice sometimes. :-.
Bah, shame on me!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rhapsouldize In reply to a-i-k-i [2008-03-04 19:16:39 +0000 UTC]
yes, i know, that is why i got the film, so that i could easily develop it. i like the sepia too
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sublimeone [2008-03-03 22:41:40 +0000 UTC]
+3! damn, u da man.. beautiful grain, expressions. what dev?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sugarman In reply to sublimeone [2008-03-03 23:09:49 +0000 UTC]
thanks, credit for dev. and printing goes to ~zort .
xtol 20°C, we did 19,5 min, 4 inversions every 60 sec.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Sugarman In reply to kerian [2008-03-04 00:34:16 +0000 UTC]
der lehrmeister hat gesagt, die terminologie is korrekt.
aber du musst es ja wissen, hansl adams .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kerian In reply to Sugarman [2008-03-04 01:19:08 +0000 UTC]
kann mih nicht daran erinnern schon mal inversion gehört zu haben. eher agitation. aber inversion passt ja auch ur. fak mann
ich schau mir jetz das polaroid mit dir drauf an und geh dann schlafi schlafi <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
zort In reply to kerian [2008-03-04 21:55:09 +0000 UTC]
oh mann, ich muss da schon wieder als garant herhalten, dabei weiß ich doch selbst nicht mal, wie ich es schaff, dass mir mein genital nicht in alle himmelsrichtungen davonschießt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kerian In reply to zort [2008-03-05 13:24:46 +0000 UTC]
mann du bist halt urgscheit und wenn mich die leute so komische sachen fragen dann kann ich ja ned einfach so gscheitig reden, da klingt ja als ob ich mich auskennen würd, und ich mach dann immer hih( und (hund) weil ichs ur nicht tu
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
azrael3000 In reply to Sugarman [2008-03-04 08:00:59 +0000 UTC]
da fühlt man sich ja richtig geehrt und so... da könnte man fast meinen das adams epos gehöre in meine fähigen Hände (meine Ex wird dir das bestätigen
) und da du advanced critiques nicht an hast: nice b/w
👍: 0 ⏩: 0