HOME | DD

sutureTips For the Novice
Published: 2004-03-20 01:15:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 29867; Favourites: 367; Downloads: 3595
Redirect to original
Description Tips For The Novice

It's an all-too common occurrence on my periodic forays into the world of internet poetry - writing weakened by a lack of fundamental knowledge concerning the essence of poetry writing. There are no rules set in stone about creative writing. The writer that strikes new trails can make a lasting impact on the world of poetry, but the chances of a writer stumbling upon golden words without a solid knowledge base are slim to none. The following tips for novice writers are intended to help shore up those fundamentals, to help the young writer breathe the essence of life into their poems, and to better share that essence with the reader.

The most important element you can inject into your poetry is imagery.  Imagery is made up of sense data: color, sound, smell, temperature, the feeling of physical contact.  When we remember anything with any vividness, we remember in images.  When we fantasize or hallucinate, it is in imagery.  Our dreams are made wholly of them.  Just ponder the word imagine for a minute.  Remember a particularly painful argument you had with someone in the past.  Do you remember only the words spoken, or can you close your eyes and picture the person's face, or details of the scene of the incident, or the harsh edge of their voice?  Maybe a breeze was blowing.  Maybe there was a siren in the distance.  Or maybe it happened in the kitchen, over the phone (which felt hot against your ear), while you absent-mindedly rearranged the magnets on the fridge.  These are the kinds of things you should include in your poetry to enrich the experience for the reader.  Try to avoid the use of abstract imagery or cliches.  Our senses note only particulars: we don't see color, we see red, or green, or yellow.  We don't just touch, we touch something.  We smell hamburgers, curry, hot tar, pine and lilacs.

If you think poetry is about "self expression," "emotion," or "the truth," then you are missing the point.  It is about well-written expression and emotion. The truth is inconsequential.  Before you hop up and down and debate me on this point, allow me to elaborate.  A lot of novice writers labor under the misconception that poetry stems from deep emotional truths and therefore all poetry must comply with "the way it really happened."  The act of poetry writing is a creative writing exercise.  Without the creativity, you are merely writing a report.  Breaking it into stanzas doesn't magically transform the report into a poem.  It's nice when poems do correlate to the truth, but quite often I find weak stanzas in poems and, after suggesting a change, I am told "but that's the way it happened."  Ugh.  If a poem could be improved by altering your past reality (at least on paper), then go for it.  If you broke up with someone on a sunny day but rain would better suit the mood of the poem, make it rain.  Make it night instead of day.  In poems we can have the courage that we lack in real life, we can ride off into the sunset, or be wealthy, or poor, or dead.  Imagination and creativity count for as much in poetry as they do in prose, painting, sculpting, screenwriting, business, recreation, and virtually every other human endeavor.  If you still feel like it is necessary to stick to the truth, then I wish you success.   But you'd better start living one hell of an interesting life - at least one a lot more interesting than mine, and mine thus far has been pretty damned interesting.

Words are incredibly powerful - not just for the meanings associated with them, but for their shape, their sound, their length, and the way they fit together.  Take note of syllables and vowel sounds.  Multi-syllabic words or long vowel sounds impart a connotation of fluid movement.  They have a way of softening the impact of language and are often used to show compassion, tenderness, tranquility.  Short words and vowel sounds can be used for emphasis or punctuation, and often show rigidity, honesty, toughness.  Single-syllable words can go off sharp like the crack of a fist, or as slow and round as the blush of a rose, depending upon the type of vowel sounds chosen.  Don't forget about the impact of hard and soft consonants - re-read the previous sentence to see what I'm talking about.

Never shy away from editing and revision.  Some young writers feel that to revise is to kill the spirit of the poem.  Again, this practice serves to sacrifice the potential of a poem for an ideal that really has nothing to do with the poem or with poetry.  It's a romanticized myth.  A skilled writer can revise a poem many times without the revisions being apparent in the final draft.  All writing should seem as if it flowed from the writer's mind, or soul, directly onto the page.  The process should be regarded as secondary to the finished piece because, after all, the reader sees only the final piece, not the struggle or ease that went along with its creation.  Does anyone seriously believe that Keats, Yeats, Wordsworth, Frost or anyone more contemporary never underwent the revision process?  Extant manuscripts prove otherwise.  Hell, Frost reveled in revision.

After your poem is ready for submission, what follows is an essential lesson: Disassociate your ego from your poem.  Workshops are often brutal and scathing affairs.  If you bring in a poem to which you have some kind of emotional attachment, when the critiques start flying you will feel as if it is you that is being critiqued, not the poem. You will feel hurt and insulted.  In the wake of this you will lose sight of the purpose of the workshop: the poem.  If someone shreds your poem, they are not making any judgment on you, but rather the poem.  If you can disassociate, you can learn.  And learning is something we should never refuse to do.
Related content
Comments: 195

Greki In reply to ??? [2005-11-09 22:45:22 +0000 UTC]

Ah, even if I have now a little bit of experience in writing poetry, things like this always helps to get better. Thanks for doing it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

the-expat In reply to ??? [2005-11-05 05:36:11 +0000 UTC]

oh man, nice...Disassociate your ego from your poem.


read gerard manley hopkins' "The Windhover"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Diamondshade [2005-10-27 06:09:57 +0000 UTC]

You have very eloquently stated many ideas that I have long stood by but haven't gotten around to putting into words. You have also managed to bring up a couple of really good points that I have never considered. Excellent job; I found this to be very informative despite its brevity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Redgold [2005-10-22 09:25:04 +0000 UTC]

'Tis a good read here although I think that

" If you broke up with someone on a sunny day but rain would better suit the mood of the poem, make it rain."

isn't necessarily true, because you can use the fact it was sunny as a contrast... but anyway, sorry, I do get your point there. My main problem is with editing my work, I am terrible with that, not because of my poem is 'sacred' or anything but because I'm too lazy!

Thanks for the essay man.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

annikalikesbees In reply to ??? [2005-10-21 20:19:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shrtcracker07 In reply to ??? [2005-10-21 15:15:25 +0000 UTC]

well said my friend...well said...

-sPiKe

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

inziladun [2005-10-18 13:31:40 +0000 UTC]

heyhey liking the new preview

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SpokenAubade [2005-10-15 22:20:54 +0000 UTC]

Bravo. I especially liked your points on details and imagery. Too many people rationalize vagueness with the idea that readers should simply get out of poems whatever they want.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mooseh [2005-09-20 14:09:50 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, I just stumbled across this and its actually helped me quite a lot. So thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dutchshun In reply to ??? [2005-08-20 12:06:29 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much, lots of good advice.
Particularly the last part, I had to learn that bit the hard way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

notear [2005-08-18 23:17:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for these little pointers.
Especially the part about syllables and sounds, made me do my first revision.
Which kind of proved another point of yours.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

unreconciled-spirit In reply to ??? [2005-08-07 15:20:15 +0000 UTC]

This essay was very helpful in reminding me of the objectives I have learned in the past but because of time, or creativity, have forgotten. The last paragraph about disassociating oneself from one's work is a good point and probably something I need to work on. Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FlowersLikeGlitter [2005-07-28 19:43:50 +0000 UTC]

Every poet should read this.

Not so much on deviant art, where people tend to put more consideration into their work, but on one poetry net group i was in it was just miles of prose about slitting wrists, conveniently shoe-horned into verse format.

A good explanation of syllables, without going into the murky, a-level-boring-essay world of anapaestic feet and other such technicalities.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lovin-kirsten In reply to ??? [2005-07-26 15:41:44 +0000 UTC]

Useful... Nice to you :w00p:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

selfishlyconscious [2005-07-19 19:12:33 +0000 UTC]

I'll try harder.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ndifference In reply to selfishlyconscious [2005-07-20 04:39:15 +0000 UTC]

That's the Poet's Mantra.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kei-Flox In reply to ??? [2005-07-14 22:20:06 +0000 UTC]

^^* Finally, something to help me!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Contemplate [2005-06-21 17:37:35 +0000 UTC]

I love you !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

the-forlorn-one [2005-06-09 15:54:46 +0000 UTC]

I found this an extremely useful guide thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Genesis-518 [2005-06-03 06:51:49 +0000 UTC]

This was perfectly confessed. Every point you made was a point I made in my poetry. My earlier poems were like how you described them. But eventually I started using better structure, more descriptive wording, and especially syllable counts. I found that once I started doing this, my poetry drastically improved. And it not only showed in pageviews, but also in the comments I received. I also learned to disassociate myself with my poems. Instead of writing about my past experiences, I wrote about experiences, which affected my past. I have written poems about abortions, plane crashes, fire-starters, six-year-old murderers, and even some of the sick/sad stories of the bible. My most recent poem was actually about Sodom and Gomorrah. Although I cannot directly relate to the story, the story has affected me.
I hope every person serious about developing their talents, reads this confession of poetic wisdom that you have so gracefully bestowed upon the poets of Deviant Art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

theConcubine [2005-05-09 17:48:10 +0000 UTC]

Do you always give such good advice in real life, too?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

justim [2005-05-02 07:51:10 +0000 UTC]

Something you didn't touch on (but which may have been discussed in the comments) is symbols. Having some symbolism in a poem is something I think is essential. This doesn't necessarily mean the poem has to be 'deep', but if its meaning is blatant and it just sounds pretty, I don't think there's too much point in writing it. For me, poetry, and perhaps all artwork, is an attempt to find or create meaning and there's nothing that infuriates me more than when an artist says, "No, you don't get it, it's not about anything."
So, meaning is good, and the more embedded it is in the poem the more the reader will enjoy it when they discover that meaning. A great way of embedding meaning is symbols and metaphor and there's nothing wrong, especially for novice poets, with starting with more obvious and familiar symbols. Say, the sun or the moon, the ocean or the forest, cats and dogs, etc, etc, etc.
It's both shocking, and a little bit sad, how much you can impress people (at least in my experience) simply by pointing out a possible symbolic meaning to your poem that your reader hasn't yet grasped.

Also, your point about revision is a crucial one. Good poems, like any quality work, aren't easy. They take dozens, sometimes hundreds of drafts. Poems aren't short, they're condensed, so everything about every single element in a poem, is vital to its success.

Cheers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MerlynMagus [2005-04-14 04:22:33 +0000 UTC]

Thanks there guy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NOCTURNMIDNIGHT [2005-04-13 05:56:44 +0000 UTC]

Very interesting reading. I have a poem that I always loved. However, I never felt it was quite right. I always wanted to revise it. I just never felt confident that I could do so without loosing what good is there. Some honest critique from a good poet would be much appreciated. As english was never my best subject (actually my worst) I am prone to just write how I think. Which is not very well structured. So, if you find the time feel free to tear it apart. Honesty is always appreciated here. [link] Fair Warning it is long.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

khan-tengri [2005-03-06 05:21:15 +0000 UTC]

"If you broke up with someone on a sunny day but rain would better suit the mood of the poem, make it rain. Make it night instead of day."

Or you could show how the sunny contrasts with the mood of the writer, darkness and rain doesn't always have be associated with negativity. The truth could be better "beautified" to fit the purpose of the piece, rather than necessarily "changing" it completely. Or maybe using the knowledge learned in retrospect to "enrich" it. But anyways, you pretty much hit the general point.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ravynne In reply to ??? [2005-02-11 15:37:47 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much for the advice, I reall had been looking for someone to help out. And this helps out!
<3
~Jenn

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DesrenShemahlen In reply to ??? [2005-02-05 03:16:48 +0000 UTC]

THANK YOU! I love it when people write something like this. I know that too many won't read it and continue to produce the same old stuff, but thank you for putting this out there. I am going to bookmark it and give the link out every time I run across someone with the lines 'her skin as gold as honey' or 'rose red lips'. Thank you so much, you've put into words exactly what I wanted to say, but never could (without starting a barrage of strident, offended shrieking about what a wonderful, original poet they are). Argh, I already said thanks twice, but you deserve it at least a million more times.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Semeran In reply to ??? [2005-01-26 13:02:20 +0000 UTC]

Very very good...

informative, helpful and actually a pleasure to read.. im impressed...

to cut down a little excesively

'The truth is inconsequential. '

any who disbelieve this or feel that it is unjust in any matter,
i advise that you read a short novel by Oscar Wilde callled 'The Picture of Dorian Grey' or the portrait of Dorian Grey depending on the publisher (apparently).

as they say the best lies are based on the truth, but as it says above if you inforce the truth your denying your artistic right... the same goes for interpretation of literature and in essence all art

but once again most likely fairly belated but congratulations on a marvelous text

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Creaseleave [2005-01-23 08:55:56 +0000 UTC]

Great Picture!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is fantastic! brilliant in every way ... I love it - definate fav ... well done

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aquemajere In reply to ??? [2005-01-23 08:31:04 +0000 UTC]

I am entirely too excited that someone has done this. Inasmuch as I love to break poetic rules and go backwards and sideways on them, I- and every other freakishly obsessive person interested in typographical poetry- needed this. The groundrules are "there" in a general sense. Now, they are here. Muah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aurora-Storm [2005-01-23 06:48:43 +0000 UTC]

Hm. Parts are useful; might take some of it into consideration.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Misaniovent In reply to ??? [2005-01-23 06:20:13 +0000 UTC]

Useful information indeed.

I learned a bit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

arracraidira [2005-01-23 06:15:06 +0000 UTC]

thanks just for the non-condescending tone, and for being such a help to everyone who seeks it -crash

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

baset [2005-01-23 05:59:08 +0000 UTC]

your making me re-think things again.(not that this is a bad thing by any means)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chrissi [2005-01-23 05:57:26 +0000 UTC]

AMAZING. This should be standard reading for everybody before they post into the poetry category. It's everything I've always wanted to say but didn't know how to present without it sounding insulting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheAndy [2005-01-23 05:13:27 +0000 UTC]

Wow, all that stuff about the syllables I really hadn't thought of. Now I look back on what I've written and see how much better it could be. Thanks a lot for this sort of wake-up call.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

balinlesavage [2005-01-23 05:03:11 +0000 UTC]

...and never rhyme 'fire' with 'desire'...not ever.

Seriously, though, after reading ubiquitous complaints about the state of writing on DA, it's nice to see instead a mature, constructive step toward improving it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mehronjoon [2005-01-23 04:41:21 +0000 UTC]

Another good tip for so-called "novices" is to go and read poetry of different types so they can get a sense of what works and what does not work, (little tricks they can use for later and so on), and I do mean go look at lots of books of poetry, not primarily stuff on the internet. I wager that some aspiring (novice) poets have not read any material by the authors you listed. I would use those names as perfect chance to prompt people to "study the classics", ie spend an hour at the local bookstore browsing.

As for the title, I might have preferred "Tips for the Aspiring Poet". I appreciate that this was a thoughtful, objective piece of literature rather than the all-too-common "damn you n00bs" rant.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

all-terrain [2005-01-23 03:48:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks - I need that kind of advice. I'm hoping to be able to be confident enough to write some lyrics.

Good stuff 8 )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Betelgeux In reply to ??? [2005-01-23 03:32:30 +0000 UTC]

it is refreshing to see someone who still thinks the physical content of a poem in its literal sense is worth something.......

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AthaneJuarez In reply to ??? [2005-01-23 03:21:39 +0000 UTC]

WEE HAH!!! Someone who speaks potent truth! Or at least a version of it... I think I may actually start writing poetry now... as yet, I've been afraid that you either had the artistic vision or didn't... Now I know that poetry can be a thinking man's game, wait... I'm a thinking guy, rather than an artsy guy... so now I know that poetry is not inaccesible to me... I'm going to stop while I still have sanity, Hear what I'm thinking not what I'm saying...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anonymousdonor In reply to ??? [2005-01-23 02:53:18 +0000 UTC]

much appreciation for your insight and wisdom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Winged-Design In reply to ??? [2005-01-23 02:39:33 +0000 UTC]

wow, this is helpful ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ryscaprice [2005-01-23 01:04:45 +0000 UTC]

wow you have a lot of comments on this...

first of all, I wish to thank you, this is a marvelous tutorial on what I believe poetry is and isn't. I love the way you worded this. it's quite amazing.

secondly, even though my poetry on here isn't quite as good as I wish it could be, its because I haven't gone back to revise. I haven't really looked at them recently to see what could possibly be done to them, but I feel like I already know what is needed to know to write good poetry.

thirdly, I have a friend who likes to critique my poetry badly because it "doesn't rhyme" or follow a really "distinct and named rhythymn". and, reading this, it made me realize that I don't need to necessarily accept her idea of what poetry should be, and that I shouldn't let it bug me really.

thanks again ^_^ and good job ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

njsykora [2005-01-23 00:55:16 +0000 UTC]

Hey, a long article I actually read through because it was actually useful. Thanks for that, I'll try to work some (if not all) of it into my future work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

like-spinning-plates [2005-01-23 00:43:51 +0000 UTC]

oscar wilde once said (something along the lines of) ' i spent the entire morning deciding whether or not to remove a comma from my poem and when i did , i ended up spending the afternoon debating whether to put it back' .... a fantastic paragraph of pointers !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

punk-poet [2005-01-23 00:41:19 +0000 UTC]

Good stuff!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OmriKoresh [2005-01-23 00:25:46 +0000 UTC]

i hate learning

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DaNoodleBox In reply to ??? [2005-01-22 23:54:43 +0000 UTC]

"Words are incredibly powerful - not just for the meanings associated with them, but for their shape, their sound, their length, and the way they fit together."
amen to that!

I'm fav-ing this. Niceness.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xcross In reply to ??? [2005-01-22 23:37:19 +0000 UTC]

Typically, I would not comment on something like this because it's usually bollocks and only serves to piss me off.

In this case, I think you have hit some extremely good points without elaborating too much on them. It's truly tips and points vs a guideline or rules.

Very well done. Your choice of suggestions is excellent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>