HOME | DD

TacDavey — TOS Relationships

Published: 2009-05-01 05:02:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 1547; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 29
Redirect to original
Description This was originally going to be some what of a little comic, but I just made it all one picture in the end. I know they don't come right out and say it in the game, but I always thought this was how they were paired up.

Raine and Regal must feel so left out.

The word bubble's lines are a little sketchy since apparently GIMP doesn't have a circle option that I could find. If I ever figure it out I'll probably go back in and fix it.
Related content
Comments: 72

TacDavey In reply to ??? [2011-01-31 13:53:19 +0000 UTC]

She's not. She just has three arms covering her chest.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

umbreonisdabomb [2011-01-04 04:45:28 +0000 UTC]

Collette trips on purpos. LOL

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TrulyBonkerrs [2009-05-26 19:52:37 +0000 UTC]

What anime is this? Picture is cool btw ^-^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to TrulyBonkerrs [2009-05-27 16:50:10 +0000 UTC]

It's a game for PS2 and Gamecube. It's called Tales of Symphonia. Pretty fun if you like RPG's and 6 trillion extra stuff to do.

And thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shquiggles [2009-05-01 05:57:41 +0000 UTC]

Well, you got Lloyd and Colette right. Shena and Zelos, definitely. But Genus and Presea. I never really got that feeling much. I mean. For anyone else reading:

SPOILER ALERT!

Presea is 28 years old. I thought her and Regal were more into each other. Wasn't Regel originally in love with Presea's sister? And what not? I think Genus may have liked her, but I don't recall her returning the feeling. What do you think, can you remember it that well?

Other wise though, I love the picture. Good job.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-01 20:03:54 +0000 UTC]

Well, they did give Presea and Genis some scenes. For instance Presea made Genis that little wooden bear. You don't remember? They were definitely a couple. Besides, Presea and Regal? Really? Not only is that creepy on so many levels, but Regal liked Presea's sister, not Presea. Nor did they ever give any hint that Regal was interested in Presea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-01 20:23:53 +0000 UTC]

So a 28 year old girl going out with a 12 year old, isn't creepy? I also already mention Regal liked Presea's sister.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-01 21:09:24 +0000 UTC]

She may be 28 in terms of how long she's been alive, but physically she's twelve. Plus, he likes her sister, again, not her. They never made any claim or showed any hint of him being interested in Presea in that way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-01 21:19:08 +0000 UTC]

I dunno, I thought I there were some hints of that. Or at leasts that's how I rememberd it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-01 23:33:09 +0000 UTC]

You are incorrect sir. That would be so wrong. Plus, Regal would be a dough, hey, I lost my wife, eh... her sisters just as good. No, he was interested in her because she was his wife/girlfriend's (I dunno if they were married) sister, but nothing more than that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-02 20:31:37 +0000 UTC]

Okay, now your just making him sinacle (FireFox won't let me spell it correctly.) Regal isn't like that. He's wouldn't be her friend for such reasons. Anywho, I don't care, it's your picture, and your opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-03 01:35:33 +0000 UTC]

Oh it's not just my opinion, it's the way it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-03 06:46:29 +0000 UTC]

Or so you believe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-03 16:34:45 +0000 UTC]

So I know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-03 20:30:46 +0000 UTC]

So you think, you remember.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-03 20:35:32 +0000 UTC]

Yeah... Wait... Huh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-03 20:42:24 +0000 UTC]

What? Nothing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-03 20:45:35 +0000 UTC]

Whatever...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-03 20:47:32 +0000 UTC]

That's right, you better run.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-03 20:48:23 +0000 UTC]

You're the one not making any sense.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-03 20:51:21 +0000 UTC]

Well it's not my fault Vietnam doesn't sell cheeseburgers on Sunday.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-03 20:52:11 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes it is. I called them and your name came up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-03 20:56:13 +0000 UTC]

... I have no idea what your talking about. I swear, I didn't convert all their cows to Christianity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-03 21:13:27 +0000 UTC]

Darn straight you didn't! You converted them all to Scientology!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-04 07:49:56 +0000 UTC]

You know, who are you to saw barnyard animals can't have a religion? Hmm... who made you Science Cow Pope?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-04 14:18:53 +0000 UTC]

The Science Cow Pope before me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-04 20:33:12 +0000 UTC]

But he isn't dead or anything. I ran into him, just the other day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-05 00:39:03 +0000 UTC]

He retired. Something about spending to much time with a calf.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-05 00:49:58 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I didn't know he was like that. So, if I converted the cows, and your their Pope, does that mean I helped you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-05 02:23:10 +0000 UTC]

No. I'm undercover. I'm working to bring down the Scientology cows.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-05 03:24:30 +0000 UTC]

Well, then I shall teach the cows to rebel, and your plan will have been all for not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-05 03:26:24 +0000 UTC]

They can't learn. According to Scientology, you are the enemy, and if they are caught with you, they will be forced to leave their families and stuff. It's awful. Better to let me take it down from the inside.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-05 04:06:30 +0000 UTC]

The cows do not fear you. They will continue to spawn, and the battle will never end. You are nary wasting your time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-05 14:25:41 +0000 UTC]

They listen to me. I'm their pope.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-05 22:29:14 +0000 UTC]

Trust me, that will change soon enough.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-06 04:30:31 +0000 UTC]

Not through you it wont.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-06 06:11:11 +0000 UTC]

Oh, but it will. In fact, my plan's already been put into action.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-06 14:14:22 +0000 UTC]

Whatever you say. Scientologists are a close nit group. They don't trust outsiders.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-06 20:47:27 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but I'm the one that converted the cows to Scientology, so they trust me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-06 21:11:22 +0000 UTC]

But I'm their pope. And I labeled you as a traitor and an oppressive person or whatever they call it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-06 21:28:22 +0000 UTC]

Yes, and they'll blindly believe that the person that taught them everything, was a traitor? I somehow doubt that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-07 04:22:08 +0000 UTC]

From their pope? Oh yeah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-07 05:14:28 +0000 UTC]

I referred them to you, although, admittedly I didn't know you were the pope at the time. I mean, really, what were the chances of that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-07 15:08:01 +0000 UTC]

Oh it has been set up for quite some time. You have been... useful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-08 01:20:10 +0000 UTC]

So... you used me? You son of a...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-08 03:31:20 +0000 UTC]

Don't take it to hard. This is for a good cause after all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-08 03:57:47 +0000 UTC]

Good cause, what do you intend to do to them?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-08 16:35:15 +0000 UTC]

I intend to free them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shquiggles In reply to TacDavey [2009-05-08 22:13:47 +0000 UTC]

From what? Scientology?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TacDavey In reply to Shquiggles [2009-05-08 22:20:38 +0000 UTC]

Uh-huh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>