HOME | DD
Tae-Rai — Tutorial: Animated Stamps!
Published: 2012-08-10 22:16:53 +0000 UTC; Views: 1076; Favourites: 16; Downloads: 17
Redirect to original
Description
After a few people have asked me how I make my stamps, here is an answer! Working knowledge of GIMP is needed but apart from that, it's pretty easy! It's my first tutorial so if anything is unclear or confusing, let me know so I know how to go better!Great templates!
, , and by `Shabadingle
by =shadowhatesomochao
See the stamp I made here:
Related content
Comments: 11
This is only a tutorial for animating images with Gimp but it is not a stamp tutorial. Your finished stamp has no border and a stamp border makes a stamp of deviantART. Other (animated) little squares are not real stamps but still some of the stamp groups accept them for some reason. For example #stamp-kingdom does not accept 'stamps' like this. Here is one good tutorial about stamp making:
[link]
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I still believe it to be a stamp, though I do admit I like them better with borders. I have not discovered how to keep the border and the animation and those tutorials don't tell me how to either.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have made animated stamps with Gimp. Every animation frame just has the border. But I admit that sometimes it is difficult to animate with Gimp and I have deleted some of my stamps that had serious problems with the animation (one stamp for example had some frames with border transparency and some frames without it). There is plenty of different webpages about how to animate with Gimp; I don't know which one is the best for stamps.
Maybe these will also help:
Here is one stamp tutorial for Gimp (not animated):
[link]
Here is one for animated stamp (it has a strange and German version of Gimp but the eplanation is in English):
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This is so helpful! I've been getting my friend who has photoshop to make my animations for me! I had no idea you could do it with GIMP! Thanks so much!
Well... which layers do we lower the opacity to 50%?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you. It's the very first after you rearrange them. If you see the previous layer start to come through, you've done it right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ah. I ended up just not doing that. It turned out alright
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not necessary, but it just helps
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Like for a fade in-fade out kind of deal?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1