HOME | DD
Taggerung1 β Acclamator class Star Destroyer (back view)
Published: 2013-12-31 23:23:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 1633; Favourites: 27; Downloads: 27
Redirect to original
Description
Just a back view of the Acclamator class SD. I put a lot of work into the engines and heat sink, trying to make them look right, and you couldn't see them in the other pic, so I wanted to show them off.Front view: fav.me/d708csi
Other ships to scale: fav.me/d708hcz
Related content
Comments: 20
True, but it is also a Star Destroyer. starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Acclam⦠See the table on the right side.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thats the Product line. -_-
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes. ..Meaning it is one. Meaning I can call it that.
π: 0 β©: 1
It is really a assault cruiser, but if it says it it is i wont argue
π: 0 β©: 1
It can be both. The term 'Star Destroyer' basically means it's a ship that is probably capable of taking and holding a typical star system on its own. Saying "Acclamator class Star Destroyer" makes as much sense as saying "Nimitz class Aircraft Carrier"
π: 0 β©: 1
uh maybe not on it's own, maybe two or three per system
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, it's just good tactics to have more than you think you'll need.
π: 0 β©: 1
I know. but you can take them out them easily though. step 1)take out communications. step 2) neutralize the hanger bay doors. step 4) knock out the engines. step 5) go underneath and destroy the lie support
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks! 
π: 0 β©: 1
indeed
π: 0 β©: 1
It is notable though that the Venator class has a similar tail design, though somewhat less pronounced, and overshadowed by the tall bridge tower. asphiax.files.wordpress.com/20β¦ I think the Acclamator's design is more unique and memorable though, because the tail section isn't so over-cluttered with engines as the Venator. It's simply two main and two secondary engines on either side of the main cooling fin, which melds with the shape of the main hull and looks like it belongs on the ship. On the Venator, the tail has as many engines as Episode II had extra lightsabers, and the tail itself looks tacked on and unnecessary. Like it's trying too hard to show how it's evolving into the ISD.
π: 0 β©: 0
Glad you like it.
π: 0 β©: 0