HOME | DD

Published: 2009-04-18 04:05:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 6463; Favourites: 48; Downloads: 116
Redirect to original
Description
Launched 2151, the Enterprise NX-01 was the most famous spacecraft launched under the Warp 5 project. While at least a dozen or more vessels before the NX-01 had utilized the revolutionary Warp 5 Engine, the NX-01 was to be the first deep-space United Earth Space Probe Agency (UESPA) vessel to utilize the Warp 5 Engine.Its original mission profile placed it as a deep-space exploration craft, equipped with an extensive array of research vehicles, landing craft, and scientific facilities. Budget cuts during the development process continually necessitated a more stripped-down design. Even then, the NX-01 project became increasingly more expensive than UESPA could handle.
Recognizing the potential of a long-range multimission design like the NX-01 within their own service, the United Earth Space Service (UESS) proposed that the NX Project be turned into a joint UESPA-UESS venture. It took nearly a year of debate, but the NX Project eventually got under way once more.
The original design was relativley lightly armed - a number of strategically-placed close-in laser clusters, and a set of defensive counter-missiles. The revised armament used a set of eight high-velocity gauss turrets for point-defense. A pair of 100 MJ laser cannons on retractable mounts provided the NX-01's primary punch. Six torpedo tubes were mounted dorsal and ventral, with the torpedo magazines redesigned from the standard UESS design to allow for storage and preparation of research and observation probes.
The original 2236 design proposal for the NX-01 included; 4 landers, 2 "heavy landers" equipped with long-term accomodations and research facilities, and a warp-powered scouting/reconaissance craft. The revised 2249 proposal, which eventually became the final design, was significantly more conservative: 2 lifting body craft capable of ferrying 7 passengers to and from a planet.
Her Warp 5 engine was powered by a pair of Dyson-Yoyodyne matter/antimatter reactors, firing in an alternating pattern to provide a powerful gamma stream, and a steady plasma charge. The powerplant's safety limits limited the output to a level sufficient to achieve warp 4.8. The main reactors were also connected to a power converter and transformer assembly, a bulky, primitive cathedral of technological bulk which allowed usable electrical output to be derived from the warp reactors. This was unique at the time, as most craft were forced to derive power for onboard systems from sources other than the warp reactor(s).
The NX-01, dubbed "Enterprise", was pressed into service a week before its scheduled launch, when a Kzinti assault on the Earth colony on Akkad necessitated a rapid response.
-----------------------------------------
I have my beefs with the design of the NX-01. I don't think the visual detail clashes with the Original Show which its set before. Indeed, Doug Drexler designed it with an external rail system, tons of external gear, manipulator arms, bottle suits, the works (hardly ANY of which was seen on screen because the writers and producers phail). I just don't like the re-use of the Akira-Class ship.
Hundreds of worlds in the Federation and hundreds of years of growth and they're using designs which are practically exclusivley human? Come on.
So, I've ditched the saucer and, thus the most recognizable 'Federation' design element to push the idea that this is not a Federation ship. Same thing w/ the blue paint job.
Related content
Comments: 21
greatwhiteshark1993 [2024-01-05 06:38:42 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Kevinwinner [2023-04-22 09:15:51 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Argumemnon [2021-01-15 19:16:18 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 0
Max-Jonas [2012-08-11 09:21:17 +0000 UTC]
Very accurate and full of lovely details! Good work!
Well, beginning to watch ENT I always wondered how an "old" Enterprise has to look like and I coundn't figure it out. John Eaves is a wonderful designer but in some aspects the NX-01 didn't feel alright.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dr-Syn [2011-11-18 06:23:20 +0000 UTC]
Better than the NX-01 we got.
Personally I think they should have gone with the ringship design like we saw in the rec room of TMP.
Funny thing about the NX-01 model they used. It would actually have been more at home in the Star Trek Online era than 100 years before TOS.
I just cant accept Enterprise as TOS canon. Now make it the pre-history of the JJ Abrams universe, and you might have something.
π: 0 β©: 1
JasonWolfe In reply to Dr-Syn [2014-10-12 12:41:46 +0000 UTC]
Except that ship was only an experimental. It is in the Ships of the Line 2013 calendar.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dr-Syn In reply to JasonWolfe [2014-10-13 09:59:50 +0000 UTC]
So what?
Let's look at the NX-01 and it's supposed place in history.
- Singlehandedly saves humanity from extinction at the hands of the Xindi
- Singlehandedly saves the Klingons from extinction at the hands of Aric Soong and his Augment virus
- The most vital ship in the founding of the Federation.
- Singlehandedly changes the very nature of Vulcan culture
- Singlehandedly Wins the Temporal Cold War.
So this ship is the most ultra ultra super important Starship to ever exist in the history of history. And yet somehow it isn't on display in the ST:TMP rec room OR Captain Picard's mural of starships named Emterprise? There's no mention of Captain Archer, the man who founds the Federation? He's the most important man in history and there was no mention of him or his ship from TOS-Voyager?
Look, this ship is an asspull. It was forced in by people who never gave a shit about continuity. They didn't think we were smart enough to notice. The only reason it's in the ships of the line calendar is because Paramount has been mishandling the franchise since Gene died.
π: 0 β©: 1
JasonWolfe In reply to Dr-Syn [2014-10-15 19:19:31 +0000 UTC]
The XCV-330 Enterprise was never established (in canon) as the immediate predecessor to NCC-1701, nor was it established as being an actual Starfleet vessel. It was just established as being a significant part of the Enterprise lineage. XCV-330 was only seen in ONE movie (TMP). It isn't even on the wall of the Enterprise-D or E. A painting and mission patch are seen the 602 Club in Enterprise (the series that was shoehorned, as you claim, into the universe). After that, it is never seen (in canon sources) again, until Ships of the Line, where its significance is finally established.
You don't seem to appreciate the difficulties in making a prequel, especially when it runs for more than a year. They had to rewind the clock, both technologically and politically, to a time before the Federation even existed. Pre-Federation history has always been a mystery, with the only notable mentions being WWIII, the Eugenics Wars, and the Earth-Romulan War. It was established in TOS that the Federation was established in 2161, following the Earth-Romulan War. Β That leaves a great deal to the imagination. What did the ships look like? How did the crews act? What challenges did early Starfleet crews face? Enterprise sought to answer those questions, and did very well at it. Everyone always complains about how NX-01 looked more advanced than NCC-1701. Matt Jefferies design was meant to look as far from contemporary as possible, so as to set it firmly in the future. Β NX-01 was designed to be the opposite. It took key elements from NCC-1701, but with a more contemporary look. Gene Roddenberry was also limited by the effects of the day, as well as the cost of those effects. If he had access to today's computer technology, then NCC-1701 would have had LCD screens, push buttons, and CG models for everything.
XCV-330 lies somewhere between the Phoenix and NX-01. There is nothing wrong with that. The creators of Enterprise did take continuity into account, as best they could. They knew that the Federation didn't exist, that the Klingons were not as well known, and that phasers and photon torpedoes were relatively knew at this point in time. They even made it known that the transporter had only recently been approved for use by living beings. As I said before, there are a lot of things that were never discussed in any series, largely because they did not pertain to the episode at hand. Enterprise was exceptionally well-written and acted, and it remains one of my favorite Star Trek series.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dr-Syn In reply to JasonWolfe [2014-10-16 09:36:11 +0000 UTC]
Wow, youre really that deluded that this show can do no wrong. Don't make excuses for mediocrity. Berman and Braga half-assed this show.
Fact is Enterprise was a half-assed cash-in on Prequel mania with no attempt to honor continuity. Archer and the NX-01 are textbook Mary Sue's because they're the most important things to ever exist in Star Trek. (Who strangely enough are never mentioned considering their importance) It's a bad show. They thought their audience were idiots. Sadly, too many people not only take what's given toΒ them without question, but will go to anyΒ length to defend it.
If no NX-01 was shown in TMP or TNG then there can't be one. Period. Especially. It's like writing a new history book saying there was a President before Washington that singlehandedly won the Revolutionary War and founded the country all by himself. You can't go nack and change shit after the fact. That's bad writing.
Again, ships of the line is irrelevent, because Paramount has bungled Star Trek constantly since Gene died.
π: 0 β©: 1
JasonWolfe In reply to Dr-Syn [2014-10-19 17:08:54 +0000 UTC]
"An illusion is a trick, a slight of hand. Can't blame the ones who fall for it. Now knowing it's a trick, and still believing, that's delusion. Just thought I'd clear that up for ya."
Captain Harlock - Space Pirate Captain Harlock
I feel truly sorry for you, my friend. I guess Captain Kirk never went on a five-year mission, since TOS only lasted three years. And Sisko never designed the Defiant, since you never actually see him do it. Just because something isn't mentioned, doesn't mean it can't become canon later. Also, I'd be interested in knowing what other prequels came out at the same time as Enterprise, as you claim it just followed a trend.
Furthermore, you are comparing real-world history to a television show? You just torpedoed any credibility you may have had (very little, I assure you).
π: 0 β©: 1
Dr-Syn In reply to JasonWolfe [2014-10-20 05:11:24 +0000 UTC]
Oh really now. You liking ENT pretty much shows you have no credibility as a Star Trek fan whatsoever.
If anyone deserves pity it's you for having low enough standards to consider ENT to be any good. Ive been with Trek back when all there was to it was syndication of the original and TAS. So I have PLENTY of credibility about knowing what good Star Trek is. Because I make it my buisiness to know. And good Star Trek stopped with DS9.
But good thing there are sheeple like you who not only take what's given to you without question, but have the Stockholm Syndrome to defend it relentlessly the way a battered wife defends her abusive husband. I guess it really IS true that no one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the public.
π: 0 β©: 1
JasonWolfe In reply to Dr-Syn [2014-10-20 22:30:27 +0000 UTC]
Being a long-time fan doesn't give you credibility. If you were a true fan, you would love and appreciate every series for its own reasons. But since you want to deride Enterprise, here are the flaws with all the rest:
Deep Space Nine was lousy attempt by Paramount to cash in on Babylon5's popularity. The only good part was the Dominion War.
Voyager suffered from lazy writers uninterested in adding new characters or exploring new dynamics.
The Next Generaton might as well have been the Brady Bunch in space.
The Original Series was plagued by a shoe-string budget.
Oh, and I'd stop using big words that you don't understand. Stockholm Syndrome has nothing to do with wife-beating.
π: 1 β©: 0
Keiichi-K1 [2009-07-30 18:36:16 +0000 UTC]
Though I don't particularly like the windows in front, I do like the overall design. I would have liked this ship as Enterprise so much better than the upside-down Akira.
Also bears a somewhat close resemblance to the SS Columbia from "Where No Man Has Gone Before" (TOS), which makes it a logical step that would have fit neatly into canon.
Hell, they could have used the exact same design, since NX-02 was called "Columbia" would have fit into canon even better.... but NO, Berman and Braga insist on phailing wherever they can. I'm just glad they got new writers for season 4, and you can tell they spent the whole season playing canon cleanup.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheEvilCoiffio In reply to Keiichi-K1 [2009-08-08 05:02:53 +0000 UTC]
I was never too hot on the windows either.
Yet I put them on originally for some reason..
...probably because they were on the Conestoga design.
π: 0 β©: 0
chimera335 [2009-05-29 08:16:06 +0000 UTC]
This is not pfail. This is pwn.
While I like the thought Dougie put into his bird, and I know it was a decree from on high and all, I agree that the Conestoga basis was a much better one for the NX-01, cuz like you, I don't like stuff repeating.
I like the blue/white stripey livery. I assume the white circle at the front to be a United Earth seal?
So where are these details you promise? And whadja do this with? El Paint? If so, I'm even more impressado.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheEvilCoiffio In reply to chimera335 [2009-05-31 06:05:01 +0000 UTC]
The white circle is representative of a United Earth seal, aye.
Details are coming in a beet, that they are, aye.
And yeah, this is MSPaint like pretty much all me stuff.
π: 0 β©: 1
chimera335 In reply to TheEvilCoiffio [2009-05-31 21:41:26 +0000 UTC]
Excellent, aye.
And, that's doing really good especially to be in Paint. You may have seen my cut-and-paset job Yorktown which was from my Paint days. It's nowhere near as good as this.
You should consider giving Illustrator a whirl. It might blow your mind.
π: 0 β©: 0
TheEvilCoiffio In reply to mariaco [2009-04-19 08:10:28 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure what you're referring to.
I based the design off of this, with a few tweaks:
[link]
π: 0 β©: 1
mariaco In reply to TheEvilCoiffio [2009-04-19 13:34:01 +0000 UTC]
There's also a ship in the game Star Trek: Legacy that looks just like it.
π: 0 β©: 1
TheEvilCoiffio In reply to mariaco [2009-04-19 18:56:39 +0000 UTC]
Having taken a look, I can say there are numerous differences. Might wanna do a screenshoit comparison.
π: 0 β©: 0