HOME | DD

TheReviewer20 — Rat Pack Premire Week: Part 1 (The-Doctor-W)

Published: 2017-12-17 04:03:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 1383; Favourites: 11; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Warning: This is my opinion. Yes, you are free to call me out on any bullshit I say or you can ask to explain something more, but if you are just going to go ahead and disrespect my opinion, then please leave.


It will look good when done on your phone, they said. It will be fun, they said.


Intro: (set to tone of P&F theme song)

solanumlycopersicum.deviantart…


Hello, this is TheReviewer20 of TheRevi-


*Hey! Save that joke for the Alpha Jay review!*


Fine. Anyway, you know who I am, you most likely know what's going down (if not, then too bad), and are probably waiting for my history with the guy. Well...I have almost no history with the man. I kinda called him solid on my Top 10 Reviewers/Commentators thing. That's really it.


And my opinion on him now? Damn... it's changed. I think something I need to point out about him is that he has no bad reviews. That's pretty awesome. Unfortunately, the man also has no blessed reviews either, so...yeah, there's that. Honestly, the guy had a lot of potential to be a Divine Reviewer...for reasons I shall talk about soon.


So, let's talk about his content. Honestly...there's not much to say. Granted, it's not PPP levels of lukewarmness, but it's not Mike levels of great either. It's somewhere in the middle. But if I do have to say stuff, it's that his reviews are well structured. His Clone Wars reviews are good examples of this, with him dissecting point by point why this episode either sucks or is great. But what's holding him back is his lack of full-length reviews. Personally, I have nothing against his DTH-esque reviews, but I think whunt truly shines (by shines, I mean has Great reviews) when he does full-length. It lets him get his opinions across in way the DTHish reviews don't. And what is my main problem with him? Well...he doesn't have the elaboration. No one's perfect of course, but this is a problem that plagues most of his early reviews, which does bring him down a bit. But otherwise, his content is pretty good. And I forgot to mention that he has a good combination of objectivity and subjectivity.  


Oh, and his personality? He’s friendly. Yeah, that's about it. None of it rub s me the wrong way and he's sensitive of other’s feelings. What, did you expect an essay or something?


Going into whunt, I didn't expect that much from him. And it may be because I sorta lowered my expectations, but he impressed me. He’s nice, informative, friendly...all making of a Divine Reviewer. Unfortunately, his first few reviews are a bit rocky, so he's only good (79%). Yeah, I don't have much to say, other than he’s a solid guy.


Boy, I hope I get alot more material with ...and by the looks of it, I probably will. This is going to be fun...well, tune in next time for Phoenix's turn to possibly shine.
Related content
Comments: 8

DTH-Incorproductions [2017-12-17 19:35:53 +0000 UTC]

GRAND!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MikeTheHuman113 [2017-12-17 04:22:33 +0000 UTC]

"....it's not Mike levels of great either..."

I'm looking forward to my entry even more now! Thanks so much! Good start to the reviewer week and here's a link to my four-sectioned character icon if you want to keep the scorecards consistent in terms of visuals:




👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Doctor-W [2017-12-17 04:20:24 +0000 UTC]

Alright. I'll take it. 

I understand my older material was shitty, but I will NOT delete it. It is important you know where I came from to understand how I have evolved my content. I myself cannot even look over it without cringing. 

I myself heard about a lack of elaboration before. It's something I've been trying to fix, but can understand if that's a knock against me. So...good on you. I actually scored higher than expected. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheReviewer20 In reply to The-Doctor-W [2017-12-17 04:23:08 +0000 UTC]

I'm not asking you to delete your earliest content. I was just stating that it feels weaker compared to your newer content. But thanks for your thoughts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shevanda04 [2017-12-17 04:11:29 +0000 UTC]

*breathe of fresh air* I'm glad that you found Doctor-Of-W is solid enough to be good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PowerLoud-Girl [2017-12-17 04:11:11 +0000 UTC]

"Granted, it's not PPP levels of lukewarmness..."

...I have no idea how to take that.

Oh, and good review, of course. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheReviewer20 In reply to PowerLoud-Girl [2017-12-17 04:13:51 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

Oh, and just to make stuff clear, I wrote these reviews at the same time. So some hints I left here will make sense later.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PowerLoud-Girl In reply to TheReviewer20 [2017-12-17 04:15:12 +0000 UTC]

I see. It was more the "lukewarmness" part I was reacting to.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0