HOME | DD

titanlizard — Carcharocles megalodon

#carcharocles
Published: 2015-08-28 13:52:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 3377; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description In this time one of the most famous and yet mysterious carnivorous fish, the megalodon!

Megalodon is offten interpreted as an oversized version of great white shark which had the totally same colouration like the antagonist of the Jaws movie. Which is (I think) pretty ridiculous, because I have never seen any shark species which had the totally same colouration like another one's. Perhaps there are similarities, but not in a "colour clone" way, as in the case of carcharias and megalodon. And I know, because of its hunting strategy it is possible that like most of the sharks its back was darker and the belly was lighter, but I don't think that means in a ctrl+c ctrl+v way. Even mako shark's colouration doesn't look like the great white's.
And we know now, megalodon was not even the member of the genus "Carcharodon" but the Carcharocles, thanks to its ancestor, the Otodus.

But somehow, this meme/clisché still exists. Even there was no any evidence how its body plan might look like. We have megalodon teeth and for a long time we thought these looked similar to the teeth of carcharias (they are not), and just because of that, "the whole animal looked just like a carcharias"! 
Well, I don't agree with this logic, because I think Megalodon is mysterious enough to imagine various versions of it. As myterious as Deinocheirus was for a very long time. We have only its teeth and a few vertebrae.
So, here is my version. This one is totally different what we generally see on internet. 
My Megalodon is a pretty long, and slender animal, not as fatty as normally (makes him a bit more agile compared to its size). Its snout is more elongated to have more Lorenzini Ampullae, which allow him to find its victims easier in the vast ocean. It would have been a very necessary feature to a macro-predator with that size. But I'm not an expert of sharks, so...just say'n.
And its colours? Well....not impossibru. Because...life finds a way!

So c'mon people, use a few imagination, because megalodon approves it 
Related content
Comments: 7

RainbowFireShark17 [2018-04-06 14:59:11 +0000 UTC]

Nice! This is kind of like what they did with the meg in Hungry Shark World: making him longer/more slender with more of a brownish color scheme, rather than just making the great white model bigger. Awesome job here

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JeditheSciFiFreak [2017-08-08 03:58:23 +0000 UTC]

It is nice to see an art rendition of the Megalodon that doesn't look like an giant Great White Shark. I'm 
sure there were similarities as you said, but it was an exact clone of a Great White. So I'd say you're
interpretation is pretty good   . 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bLAZZE92 [2015-10-29 23:33:06 +0000 UTC]

At its size and habitat we can at least make educated guesses of its body plan and what colors it had.

Adults were pelagic so they must have been under great selective pressure to adopt the most hydrodynamic body shape possible and that is the tunniform one, think tuna, great white sharks, dolphins, this constraint becomes so great at large sizes that even slow and lumbering filter feeders like the whale and basking sharks have to adopt it so it is almost a given that C. megalodon would too have this kind of body shape, long bodies like the one you gave it is something you see in animals living exclusively in shallow costal waters.

The same goes for the color, pelagic animals living in tropical to warm-temperate waters are generally blueish/grey with lighter (if not white) bellies, the brown coloration you gave it is something you'll see animals living in shallow waters, either murky or close to the bottom.

Of course I do not think that a carbon copy of a great white is how it should always be portrayed, some liberties can be taken but not taken so far that they end up contradicting what's suggested by what we do know of the shark.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TarbosaurusBatar [2015-08-28 15:08:50 +0000 UTC]

Your interpretation is very nice. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

titanlizard In reply to TarbosaurusBatar [2015-08-28 15:24:37 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

acepredator [2015-08-28 13:54:47 +0000 UTC]

I say it was actually more robustly built than a great white. After all, it needs the muscle to propel its huge body. Some of the reconstructions we have are ridiculously fat, though. 

Also, how about a wider head (making the animal seem closer to a tiger shark in profile but with a pointed nose)?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

titanlizard In reply to acepredator [2015-08-28 14:19:22 +0000 UTC]

Even if it was big its skeleton was made out from cartilages, which could make him lighter built compared to its size, wasn't as heavy as a similar sized whale. But doing an argue about that its quite useless, because we don't even know its body plan

👍: 0 ⏩: 0