HOME | DD

#megalodon #carcharocles
Published: 2015-08-28 16:35:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 3413; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description
Version two with different colours.--
In this time one of the most famous and yet mysterious carnivorous fish, the megalodon!
Megalodon is offten interpreted as an oversized version of great white shark which had the totally same colouration like the antagonist of the Jaws movie. Which is (I think) pretty ridiculous, because I have never seen any shark species which had the totally same colouration like another one's. Perhaps there are similarities, but not in a "colour clone" way, as in the case of carcharias and megalodon. And I know, because of its hunting strategy it is possible that like most of the sharks its back was darker and the belly was lighter, but I don't think that means in a ctrl+c ctrl+v way. Even mako shark's colouration doesn't look like the great white's.
And we know now, megalodon was not even the member of the genus "Carcharodon" but the Carcharocles, thanks to its ancestor, the Otodus.
But somehow, this meme/clisché still exists. Even there was no any evidence how its body plan might look like. We have megalodon teeth and for a long time we thought these looked similar to the teeth of carcharias (they are not), and just because of that, "the whole animal looked just like a carcharias"!
Well, I don't agree with this logic, because I think Megalodon is mysterious enough to imagine various versions of it. As myterious as Deinocheirus was for a very long time. We have only its teeth and a few vertebrae.
So, here is my version. This one is totally different what we generally see on internet.
My Megalodon is a pretty long, and slender animal, not as fatty as normally (makes him a bit more agile compared to its size). Its snout is more elongated to have more Lorenzini Ampullae, which allow him to find its victims easier in the vast ocean. It would have been a very necessary feature to a macro-predator with that size. But I'm not an expert of sharks, so...just say'n.
And its colours? Well....not impossibru. Because...life finds a way!
So c'mon people, use a few imagination, because megalodon approves it
Related content
Comments: 21
TheJaquen [2025-03-17 04:25:03 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheJaquen [2025-03-17 04:23:32 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Doofingus [2025-01-26 18:11:09 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Guyverman [2019-10-28 03:45:16 +0000 UTC]
I imagine that it’s snout would’ve been more short and blunt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PaganCrusade [2018-05-21 21:16:40 +0000 UTC]
30 meters is way too large. Even 20 meters is considered a bit of a stretch according to more recent measurements.
According to a study conducted by the University of Cambridge, the maximum size of a Megalodon is 18 meters, and the average is about 10.5 meters. It is worth noting that the average takes into account specimens across different time periods (C Megalodon was slightly smaller in earlier periods), regions (North Hemisphere Megalodons were smaller than South Hemisphere), and sexual dimorphism (males are typically smaller than females), explaining the immense skew between the average and maximum height.
Based on the presence of claspers, the Megalodon in your image would likely be on the shorter side of the scale, since males are consistently smaller across almost all Chondrichthyes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
TheJaquen In reply to PaganCrusade [2025-03-17 04:24:41 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
titanlizard In reply to PaganCrusade [2018-05-25 09:56:44 +0000 UTC]
I agree with you, this was a rather biased period of mine
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
MatthewOnArt [2015-10-29 21:18:18 +0000 UTC]
now THIS is an Interesting reconstruction. Much better than "Take a Great White and Fucktuple it in Size"
bonus points for the similarity to Goblin Sharks, which are awesome
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mcraelodon In reply to MatthewOnArt [2019-12-02 22:38:13 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tarturus [2015-10-22 05:32:30 +0000 UTC]
I like this look for megalodon. Makes sense that it would look somewhat different to the great white.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2015-08-31 19:12:29 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me of a goblin shark. Imagine this thing shoving its jaws forward like they can...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
titanlizard In reply to grisador [2015-08-31 19:21:29 +0000 UTC]
We don't know, it is just my own "logical" speculation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grisador In reply to titanlizard [2015-08-31 19:29:25 +0000 UTC]
A very Good & lovely One; ı must tell that much
At least an alive specimen from Pacific will give us a good example of what the animal look like
(JOKE )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TarbosaurusBatar [2015-08-28 16:48:49 +0000 UTC]
I'd have to say I like this color scheme more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
titanlizard In reply to LythroA [2015-08-28 16:48:00 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Things in the past (even the most famous ones) could have stranger than we could ever imagine!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LythroA In reply to titanlizard [2015-08-28 16:51:19 +0000 UTC]
Couldn't have said it better.
However I like to imagine it more as a more robust Tiger Shark, and not quite as large. But opinions are just that, opinions .
Again, awesome painting sir!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
titanlizard In reply to LythroA [2015-08-28 17:00:54 +0000 UTC]
Opinions can't kill each other in this case, because we have only teeth and just a few vertabrae. So everyone's own speculation has a chance to be accurate
👍: 0 ⏩: 1