HOME | DD

trainboi — Ironwork

#blender #central #el #gobernador #locomotive #pacific #rail #railroad #railway #road #steam #way
Published: 2016-06-30 05:48:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 2339; Favourites: 49; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description The more I look at this engine, the more it impresses me...the scrollwork on the cab bracing is an example of marvelous craftsmanship, and that reversing rod under the running board is basically a 22-foot-long ferrous 2x4. Just imagine how much force it must have taken to move the reverser on this loco at speed...
Related content
Comments: 25

concretecruncher38 [2019-07-21 20:01:27 +0000 UTC]

Questions:
Do you have the blueprints, and may I please have a copy?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to concretecruncher38 [2019-08-06 02:31:57 +0000 UTC]

Not exactly. Locomotives in this era (and steam locomotives in general) weren't ever built to blueprints, so as such, none exist. The closest I've got is an 1882 engineering journal's elevation of Mastodon, which are probably not remotely close to what you're looking for. Among other things, they are cut off at the pilot and cab, and are taken as a half-section across the cylinders and boiler, so they're very difficult to follow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

concretecruncher38 In reply to trainboi [2019-08-06 17:23:42 +0000 UTC]

Oh. Alright then. Cheers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheIdahoRailfan [2018-06-27 02:43:14 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful! Glad to see ole El Gobernador in amazing 3D quality. Very great model indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to TheIdahoRailfan [2018-06-28 03:57:54 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I need to texture it at some point, probably once I have an entire CP lettering set.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gunslinger87 [2016-08-07 03:52:27 +0000 UTC]

So how's the progress on this thing coming along?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to gunslinger87 [2016-08-08 19:53:10 +0000 UTC]

I've been traveling lately, the mesh should be done on this but I haven't started textures yet. I'm working on F2s and F3s right now, though, and looking to build some C&C stock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to trainboi [2016-08-10 19:28:49 +0000 UTC]

I must say I'm looking forward to that! There does need to be more C&C equipment out there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to gunslinger87 [2016-08-14 20:34:51 +0000 UTC]

Indeed; the C&C had a great deal of unique stock that I'm looking forward to building.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to trainboi [2016-08-14 20:49:15 +0000 UTC]

Do you plan on modeling their business car out of curiosity?
carsoncolorado.com/wp-content/…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to gunslinger87 [2016-08-15 00:06:57 +0000 UTC]

In time, though it'll be in the C&C era first. (It only became a business car after 1905)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to trainboi [2016-08-15 01:54:48 +0000 UTC]

What was it originally? A coach or a caboose? I ask as that's the car I would like to use for the M&P's "Mojave Cannonball". 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to gunslinger87 [2016-08-15 05:01:36 +0000 UTC]

It was Caboose No. 10, basically a lengthened version of No. 2.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to trainboi [2016-09-04 03:59:39 +0000 UTC]

Well I'm looking forward to seeing them! do you have any structures in the works to out of curiosity?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to gunslinger87 [2016-09-06 01:46:51 +0000 UTC]

Afraid not; at present I'm working on a good deal of larger projects which we're keeping under out hats for the moment.   

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to trainboi [2016-09-10 20:42:17 +0000 UTC]

I was just generally curious. Didn't you have an engine shed you were working on? Is that still in development or did you put it on the DLS?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to gunslinger87 [2016-09-10 20:56:01 +0000 UTC]

I believe it was on my old laptop and never made it to my Cloud drive before it died... It wasn't a very complicated model; certainly I could replicate it with no trouble. Mind you, I've seen some other engine houses that are of essentially the same design, so it's not high priority.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to trainboi [2016-09-11 01:39:23 +0000 UTC]

Again, just curious was all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gunzel101 [2016-07-17 22:59:28 +0000 UTC]

Getting up to that speed would have been the problem though. It was sadly under powered so it would have struggled to get up above 30MPH

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to Gunzel101 [2016-07-18 01:47:46 +0000 UTC]

That much I know...it's firebox is nearly 12 feet long and it was hungry enough to require two firemen at speed...even with that there wasn't enough capacity to keep pressure. That and 30mph was practically a fast freight by 1880s standards.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KCStudiosCA In reply to trainboi [2016-08-01 05:23:39 +0000 UTC]

If they had oil back then, then it would have worked.

Either that or make more problems for the engine.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to KCStudiosCA [2016-08-03 15:01:00 +0000 UTC]

At that time it may well have caused more issues...while you could get more even distribution and better firing, it would have suffered a lot of the same issues as earlier oil burners, i. e. leaks, clogged pipes and the like. Fuel oil is pretty nasty stuff; it takes a lot of heating to even flow.
Alternatively, I was considering that a mechanical stoker could have helped, though superheating and a wide firebox would be the best to increase the Goob's performance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gunslinger87 [2016-06-30 18:45:24 +0000 UTC]

"El Goob" is looking pretty good, friend! I can't wait to see it get some color.
And you're right, there was a remarkable amount of craftsmanship on those old steamers back in the day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stormsirens2 [2016-06-30 06:14:08 +0000 UTC]

Wooooooooooooooo 4-10-0!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RattlerJones [2016-06-30 06:09:04 +0000 UTC]

wow

👍: 0 ⏩: 0