HOME | DD

tranimation-art — Stamp: Robocop

Published: 2010-07-11 19:50:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 5756; Favourites: 187; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description "Murphy, it's you..."

Did you know that DA doesn't have a single stamp dedicated to the Robocop franchise — not a single one? This is the first (and, hopefully, not the last)! The original Robocop (1987) blew me away as a child and I have since devoured practically everything on it, from the mediocre sequels to the horrible TV spinoffs to the notorious animated series to the obscure comics and games to the loved fan-films and fan-edits. A remake is planned for 2013 in 3D, ugh! But, to this day, the original 1987 film remains one of my all-time favourite films.

Taking place in the not-so-distant future of a grim, ultra-violent, dystopian Detroit, the giant mega-corporation Omni Consumer Products (OCP) owns and runs practically every aspect of life, from the government to the military to the domestic. The idealistic Police Officer Alex J. Murphy, in one of the most horrific executions done on film, is killed during his first day of the job and OCP takes his remains to build a mechanical law enforcement prototype unit known as "Robocop" to cut down on the crime and eliminate human error (as the police force is ready to go on strike) in order to construct "Delta City," a domed district reserved for the rich and influential to be built over the Old Detroit slums and push the poor and undesirable out of their sights. As Robocop makes a name for himself around the city, he unexpectedly starts regaining the memories of his lost life and lost humanity, avenging his "death" by bring in the street thugs who killed him to justice, which soon lead him to the capitalistic corporate execs of OCP's boardroom.

The film with a silly name juggles genres, as it's an action film, a sci-fi film, a war film, a horror, a thriller, a crime drama, a tragedy, a social satire, a black comedy, a miracle play, and a morality play, packed with layers of depth, emotions, heart, intelligence, and a bit of camp. It's a social commentary against American culture and values, consumerism and materialism, the rise of right-wing conservatism, Reaganomics, corporate takeovers, militarization of the police force, over-dependency on technology, psychology, religion, existentialism, class conflicts, socio-politics, war, terrorism, Nazism, Vietnam, Cold War, crime, drugs, avarice, greed, and ultra-violence. The film, even by today's standards, has definitely indulged in ultra-violence and has no qualms about showing it; there are still scenes of this film that are still difficult to watch. In fact, although the film was released in theatres with barely an R-rating; VHS released the film in the original uncensored NC-17 edition. Recently, a Director's Cut DVD was released with a few extra seconds that didn't make it into the NC-17 edition. Filmed in my hometown of Dallas, Texas, the production also utilized fantastic practical effects and stunning stop-motion animation — fuck CGI! This was back when films were an art form!

If you haven't seen the first Robocop, watch it! And if you haven't seen it for a long time, watch it again! You won't regret it, my friend!

Clips from the Film:
          - Murphy's Death (uncensored)
          - ED-209's Glitch (uncensored)
          - The Drug Factory Scene
          - ED-209 vs. Robocop
          - Basil Poledouris' epic theme song for the film

Behind-the-Scenes:
          - Making Of, Part I
          - Making Of, Part II
          - Making Of, Part III
          - Peter Weller is Robocop
          - RoboSuit and Auto-9 Gun
          - Making ED-209
          - (Practical) Special Effects
          - Villains of Old Detroit, Part I
          - Villains of Old Detroit, Part II

(If you are going to post this stamp, please +fav. It would be most appreciated it! To place this on your journal or a shoutboard, if you are a DA subscriber, copy and paste the following code:  :thumb170926531:)



Medium - Photoshop, Jasc Animation Shop.

Robocop © MGM/Orion.
Related content
Comments: 129

tranimation-art In reply to ??? [2011-03-16 17:17:01 +0000 UTC]

I haven't seen the House series in a long time. One of my favourites is the Stepfather I and II (I disliked III), as well as Re-animator series.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Burntie In reply to tranimation-art [2011-03-16 17:20:36 +0000 UTC]

Should see them again. Rekindle a lost flame

I haven't seen Stepfather I or II Maybe I'll look them up when I have the time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Burntie [2011-03-16 19:04:00 +0000 UTC]

You can watch the Director's Cut of Robocop here: [link]

You can see the original Stepfather here in full: [link]

And Stepfather II here: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Burntie In reply to tranimation-art [2011-03-16 22:55:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I'll keep my eyes on it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Oroboros-Stamps In reply to ??? [2011-01-29 00:27:14 +0000 UTC]

I was thinking of making one but I decided to check and see if there actually were any around, and daaaamn. Animated! So, better than my idea woulda been. XD

I make make another one though just because there's only one Robocop stamp here. But it kicks ass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Oroboros-Stamps [2011-01-29 00:59:03 +0000 UTC]

That's the reason why I made this stamp: There wasn't a SINGLE Robocop stamp in all of DA. I always make it a point to make stamps on subjects that aren't on DA, or don't have any good stamps of on DA. It would be great for another Robocop stamp to join the fun and spread the love! I welcome it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Oroboros-Stamps In reply to tranimation-art [2011-01-29 01:53:52 +0000 UTC]

Ha, I was trying to do that too at one point. Sometimes the search bar fails me though and it turns out there actually were stamps for whatever I thought there wasn't of, but no harm in having a couple more if there's not a lot of the subject in question.

I'm trying to learn how to do more movie style animated stamps myself so I can make a couple from movies I like that have super little DA love.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Oroboros-Stamps [2011-02-02 15:06:37 +0000 UTC]

Animated stamps are a pain in the ass to make, which is why I have so few stamps made. If they were easier to make, I would have more. I really have to love and support the subject I make stamps for...because they're worth it the hours of time and effort.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Oroboros-Stamps In reply to tranimation-art [2011-02-16 17:24:48 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I've been trying to do a few and taking screen captures every couple of frames is a pain in the ass already! But they do look really good and attract a lot of attention so it is probably worth the effort for people who wanna do it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Oroboros-Stamps [2011-02-16 18:18:53 +0000 UTC]

If you look at the stamps I've made, you can see them slowly progress in difficulty. Started off with small and just went HUGE. It's worth the time, particularly if you really love the subject.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vigilante88 In reply to ??? [2010-10-11 14:07:25 +0000 UTC]

Robocop was a hero for me when I was reeeeal young. I love that you're a dedicated enough fan to create this. +fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Vigilante88 [2010-10-11 14:16:09 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! It's funny that Robocop has his large fanbase, but there wasn't a single stamp dedicated to the character or the franchise. This is the first! Spread the love!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vigilante88 In reply to tranimation-art [2010-10-11 14:43:44 +0000 UTC]

Win !!! I'm not sure how to use these stamps on deviantART--since I'm not on a paid account or anything, lol.

But I love your stamp, regardless. Robocop rocks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Vigilante88 [2010-10-11 15:17:33 +0000 UTC]

You have to have a subscription to use the stamps, unfortunately. There's a serial number for each deviation, including stamps, which look like , and you copy and paste that code. But like I said, you need a subscription to show them off on your front page.

Agreed! Murphy forever!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vigilante88 In reply to tranimation-art [2010-10-11 15:40:16 +0000 UTC]

Oh man I only come on here for fun... not really to sell so.

I do love the stamp, regardless. You rock!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Vigilante88 [2010-10-11 16:52:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! That really means a lot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vigilante88 In reply to tranimation-art [2010-10-11 16:59:32 +0000 UTC]

No problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

necrokain In reply to ??? [2010-10-05 19:49:45 +0000 UTC]

your stamps are amazing bro how do you create them? you got an excellent taste

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to necrokain [2010-10-06 02:43:33 +0000 UTC]

My process is rather prehistoric. I screencap each frame individually, number then, shrink them to size, change the levels (to make them clear) to each one, save them all over again, and compile them in Jasc Animation Shop as a gif.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

necrokain In reply to tranimation-art [2010-10-06 07:07:51 +0000 UTC]

woah sounds waaaay too comlicated for me but im looking forward that you have the same taste like me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to necrokain [2010-10-06 11:44:15 +0000 UTC]

It's an effort to make these stamps. Usually takes well over three hours. I think the longest I ever took was six hours.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

necrokain In reply to tranimation-art [2010-10-06 11:46:11 +0000 UTC]

your stamps look worth the work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to necrokain [2010-10-06 11:50:10 +0000 UTC]

Awwww, thanks! I really appreciate that! I like to take my time in making these stamps. Most stamps people make are whipped together quickly; I really wanted to make some high-quality ones and they're stamps that were, at the time I made them, one-of-a-kind. There were stamps anti-Nightmare remake stamps, but none supporting it and there wasn't a single stamp of Robocop or, at the time, a stamp for the original Sherlock Holmes books.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

necrokain In reply to tranimation-art [2010-10-06 11:56:00 +0000 UTC]

indeed i can see that you really work hard to let them look good and thats why they look special and way better than the most stamps around here keep it up

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to necrokain [2010-10-07 15:17:25 +0000 UTC]

Currently working on a new Nightmare 2010 stamp. (clicky clicky click) Heeheehee!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

necrokain In reply to tranimation-art [2010-10-08 10:32:56 +0000 UTC]

cant wait to see

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to necrokain [2010-10-09 12:43:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stickraven In reply to ??? [2010-07-26 05:52:56 +0000 UTC]

You totally rock! This was one of my favorite movies as a kid!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to stickraven [2010-07-26 09:02:59 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much! Glad the memory of this film lives on!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stickraven In reply to tranimation-art [2010-07-29 03:33:59 +0000 UTC]

^.^ you relize I had to watch it after I saw that stamp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to stickraven [2010-07-29 10:02:03 +0000 UTC]

Still love it? Notice now much more intricate the film is now?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stickraven In reply to tranimation-art [2010-07-30 02:46:01 +0000 UTC]

Haha, I rewatch things from when I was a kid....so many things that I didn't understand <.<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to stickraven [2010-07-30 02:50:18 +0000 UTC]

Same here. I didn't realize most of the jokes in Ghostbusters as a kid.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Queen-Vegeta69 In reply to ??? [2010-07-23 02:50:11 +0000 UTC]

ROBOCOP is DA Best movie ever. I love it! It's so....cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Queen-Vegeta69 [2010-07-23 10:37:31 +0000 UTC]

Agreed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cornelius--Slate In reply to ??? [2010-07-18 04:28:23 +0000 UTC]

thank you best action movies of all time!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to Cornelius--Slate [2010-07-18 05:32:07 +0000 UTC]

One of the best! Agreed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtemisLoki In reply to ??? [2010-07-14 23:38:26 +0000 UTC]

I love Robocop. The first one anyway. And while I'm pretty open about remakes and stuff, I 'm not to sure I feel comfortable about this one. IDk, what it is but this is one that I have to say no too, but may still give it a chance if it looks good.

Hollywood is starting to make me cry a bit. I'm aware of several remakes, movie/book/game/comic adaptions, unneccessary sequels that should never be made. The effects alot of times are barely as good as they should be. Theres unnessecary sex or foul dialogue that just doesn't belong and it tries to hard to be a 100% redo or goes to far and barely resembles what it is intended too with the exception of one detail.

Any way I didn't mean to go on a mini rant. But I am a little proud of Hollywood at the moment. Saw two comedy movie trailers that looked liked they'd be rated R, but were rated PG-13. That makes me so happy. I'm so sick of rated R comdies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-07-22 18:28:54 +0000 UTC]

Personally, I'm not too sure about remakes to what I call "perfect films." How can you beat perfection? You can't. Certain films should not be remake because you can't improve from perfection. However, if it's a "imperfect" film, then I understand. Robocop is a "perfect" film, for me. I don't think you can improve it.

I'm the opposite when it comes to horror. I'm sick of PG-13 horror. I miss the days, particularly back in the 1980s, when horror was rated R -- or rated X. For example, Robocop is rated X, Hellraiser was X, Re-Animator was X, Evil Dead is X, Nightmare on Elm Street was R, Silence of the Lambs is R, Se7en was R, etc, etc.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-07-22 18:39:29 +0000 UTC]

I agree, there are some older movies I'm sure that could use a well done remake, but not Robocop. But like the Nightmare on Elm Street remake or the Predator remake, I can deal with it if the movie makers try to do in their own way, instead of redoing the original scene by scene.



I'm the same way, I don't even bother with PG-13 horror films, they're just lacking in so much and I don't know if it's the acting or the plotline, I know its the lack of actual fear, but still.

But my main problem, and I'm sorry for coming back to this but it really bugs me to no end, is the sex. Some writer out there has to always force sex into a horror film or remake, when it totally isn't need and on a dorkier side goes against the rules of horror films or the ethics/moralness of the original film (in terms of remakes).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-07-23 21:46:11 +0000 UTC]

I also miss gothic horror. I miss PG horror films. I love film like Mad Love (1935) and Roger Corman's Poe films, such as House of Usher (1960), The Pit and the Pendulum (1961), Tales of Terror (1962), and The Masque of the Red Death (1964). The last great gothic horror was from the one good film from Masters of Horror collection called "The Black Cat". This films still scare me, but there was no sex, no gore, no swearing, little blood, little violence, but yet they're soooo creepy! I miss films like these. I miss Goosebumps! I miss "class" and "charm" in horror films.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-07-23 22:56:14 +0000 UTC]

I've never seen any of those films. But I will make sure to give them a try. Yes, Goosebumps used too and I will admit still scares me a bit. I'm a huge fan of Tales from the Darkside. Some of those segments really get under my skin.

Well it can't be helped unfortunately, Hollywood is barely doing the boo thing any more. They're starting to believe that the more gory it is, the scarier it is. Which simple isn't true. I'm so sick of these new horror films trying to see how badly they can mangle the human body or how much gross crap they can get to fall into the heroes mouth. That isn't true, if I say that I can't watch the movie because it's gross doesn't mean that I complimented the film or said that it was scary.

Two additional reasons as to why I loved the 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' remake, the deaths where still believable.

Also there's this overwhelming idea that if you kill almost everyone or everyone that you've some how made a movie that is truly terrifying.

Another annoying thing that new horror movies are doing, heck alot of movies are doing is leaving out the background information. If there is antagonist/protagonist that is supernatural in any form in the real world I want to know why. I want the background to at least make sense and not be so full of plot holes that I'm trying to think about it more than watching the movie.

((I hope all that made sense))

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-07-26 01:14:13 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I highly recommend those films! They're awesome! For example, Mad Love (1935) is extremely psychosexual film, dealing with obsession, sadism, voyerism, and fetishes that is all very, very subtly done because this was made during the height of the Hayes Code era. Films had to be clever because there's no blood, no sex, no gore, but it has these deep overtones. This film was the MGM answer to the "Universal Monsters" and marks Peter Lorre's debut in American cinema. It's about an actress, the "virginal" bride for one year, whom Dr. Gogol (Lorre) desires comes to him for help when her husband, a brilliant pianist, lost his hands in a train accident, so Gogol replaces the hands with those of a deceased murderer recently executed. However, "ze hands" seem to have a mind of their own, wanting to hurt and harm, and Gogol sees this as an opportunity to steal his wife to replace his "sex doll" for a real woman. It's interesting that Peter Lorre hated doing this film, saying "I'm not acting, I'm just making faces." Back when studios used to own actors, body and soul, Lorre was virtually blackmailed to do this B-flick in order to win the juicier starring role in Crime and Punishment (1935), so he shaved his head to prove he would do anything for a good part and transformed into the "MGM Monster" named Dr. Gogol. It's a great, creepy film; it's flawed but cerebral and intense.

You can see the entire film of Mad Love here: [link]

I agree that I really hate this idea that people thing gore is scary. Gore doesn't scare people; it's disgusts people. For example, I love and adore the film, Se7en (1995). We never see any murders being committed on-screen, instead we see the results of those crimes through the eyes of the detective. We watch the characters talk about what the victims were going through, we see photographs, images here and there, and we hear interviews of the witnesses, and our imagination fills up the rest and what you imagination cooks up is far worse than something you see. I miss films like that. I miss "classy" horror.

Now, I love and adore the Nightmare on Elm Street remake! I loved the way they did Jesse's death. It was an amazing death. It was so well done yet it's so simple and so real and so believable. And it was a bit of a shock to see him die the way he did.

I agree also the lack of backstory. Another problem is revealing too much. With Nightmare remake, I really hope they never explain why Freddy Krueger became the Master of Nightmares. The entire dream demon explanation was a cheap move and it still angers me to this day. Reveal enough to slate our lust, but not too much that it looses the mystique of the character.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-07-26 01:45:13 +0000 UTC]

Se7en was an amazing movie, I was so drawn into the characters of that film. Looking at the murders and the way they were set up and why, I was always anxious about seeing the killer and when they did show him he still got under your skin.

Some films arn't even meant to be necessarily scary I guess and they still got to me like Flatliners or M. Night Shyamalan's The Village or Signs. Truthfully it's what we think that really gets us. Seriously its 2010 and the original Psycho still kind of gets me.



Yeah revealing to much can be quite a problem as well. Same as doing too much with the character, like Michael Myers from the Halloween franchise. That's when I stopped liking the character, they tried to go to far with him kiling his family.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-07-27 23:59:08 +0000 UTC]

Agreed. Se7en's murders were like looking at art -- grizzly art, but art, nonetheless. And John Doe, even in handcuffs and leg-cuffs, he was still disturbing. And you know what the most horrible thing is? He was right. His speech in the squad where he talks about his murders as God's work, as vengeance, turning the sin on the sinner, is truthful. And that gets to you.

I don't know much about Michael Myers at all. I've only seen the first film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-07-28 00:16:27 +0000 UTC]

His films go on forever and I think there's this weird thing where it splits off into two different story lines and some point becomes psuedo-supernatural. I don't know, it got very confusing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-07-28 00:20:29 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm, same thing happened with Jason.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-07-28 01:07:56 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, its a something that's almost unavoidable when filmmakers decide to stretch a character too far. Things become annoying and unneccessary and the plot begins to lose itself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tranimation-art In reply to ArtemisLoki [2010-07-28 01:17:55 +0000 UTC]

Agreed. It's sad. That's the problem with sequels and spinoffs....and, in a way, fanfiction.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtemisLoki In reply to tranimation-art [2010-07-28 01:42:32 +0000 UTC]

Yes, it is. Rarely you get a sequel or spin-off that is either as good as the first or, in some cases which I've been lucky enough to witness, better than the first. And I really do mean good as or better, not okay.

In terms of fanfiction. It doesn't really bother me as much, unless the people can't write in character. I will read some, no matter how odd the plot if they can get the character just right. I plan on doing some fanfics/fancomics in the future, but I'm not going to do it and half-ass the characters. If you can't get them right I think you should research them more. But that's just me being a bit anal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>