HOME | DD

UnakiteorWhatever — Permafusion Reference (Synthetic Court Use Only

#court #diamond #synthetic #stevenuniverse
Published: 2017-12-15 02:40:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 403; Favourites: 11; Downloads: 8
Redirect to original
Description     

DO NOT COPY AND PASTE, DOWNLOAD FOR BEST QUALITY!!

edit: I totally forgot to add Size to the reference sheet XD Please keep size comparisons as close to the canon as possible! Thank you~!!

Finally an update of some sort, here is the Permafusion reference sheet~!!  So, below I will explain how to fill out the skill points for these guys,
along with a list of rules after. I'd like to add though that these rules are gonna be a little touch and go, or at least until JeclrsDogma releases one of
their incredibly helpful resource journals  

~Skill Points~

First of all, compare your gems' stats.

sta.sh/02i5tiwvsut

First look between the pair and see who has the highest points in each skill. Add one to the highest stat.
In addition, if your gems , add one more the matching stats. In this case, our example
gems share DEF, SPD, and SPEC. Here is our finished Permafusion stats~! 

sta.sh/09tp3a7tpe2


Beyond this point is the Permafusion Written Reference and Rules~!

Gem:
Given Name:
Component A:
Component B:
Size: (Comparable to Canon Fusion)
Rank:
Weapon:

Abilities:

History:

Personality:

Enhanced Characteristic: What is the special attribute of your fusion? A special power, a dominate personality trait? 

~ ~~

 Components of a Permafusion must be pre-existing members of the Court, regardless if they had been a Permafusion before coming to Kiron. All active parts of a fusion must have approved reference sheets.

 If there is already a Permafusion in the Group that shares gem types with your planned fusion, consult their headcanons. Of course there is a lot of freedom to this, just be mindful of pre-existing characters.
 
If your Permafusion is made of matching gems, keep the show's canon in mind~ Same Gem fusions do not have extra limbs or eyes!
 
 Fusions often have a varied skill set, and are not only qualified for a multitude of stations, but usually have the skill points for it. Permafusions have a lot of freedom here, however they may not join a rank that requires more skill points then they have.

 Be aware that this template is only for fusions that spend more than half their time together, if not all of it. A separate reference sheet will be released for canon fusions.

 You may use your Permafusion to complete Quests or Events, but are not required to. 
Related content
Comments: 20

Ac3Kat17 [2017-12-21 01:14:45 +0000 UTC]

Here's my question. Say you had two gems that were both high-ranking officials that met, fused, and decided to use their newfound strength as muscle, and became a laborer instead of... idk. Wouldn't that technically be breaking the stat sheet? or are the permafusion rules different like that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

UnakiteorWhatever In reply to Ac3Kat17 [2017-12-21 07:11:38 +0000 UTC]

This just crossed my mind now, but in addition, if they had suitable replacements for their roles (say a Countess in training, or even a Solo Agent) they would have even more freedom within the ranking system.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ac3Kat17 In reply to UnakiteorWhatever [2017-12-21 15:55:32 +0000 UTC]

Ok! Also, do permafusions count towards the 6 gems that you can own?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jeclrs In reply to Ac3Kat17 [2017-12-22 03:41:13 +0000 UTC]

No. Using perma fusions, you could potentially wind up with nine gems if you wanted. That's part of why we've made them such a pain

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

UnakiteorWhatever In reply to Ac3Kat17 [2017-12-21 07:03:27 +0000 UTC]

That'd a really fantastic question actually!! I hadn't thought about the lower ranks... but honestly, if they were of a rank with a lot of responsibilities, like a Sovereign or Officer, they wouldn't be able to just shrug off those duties and mandates. A fusion would have the freedom to explore other ranks, yes, but in some cases the fusion would be expected to fulfil at least one of the roles held by one of the previous components.

It'll definetly be a case by case issue, especially considering how different a fusion can turn out when compared to its parts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

decaying-birb [2017-12-16 17:05:48 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chaoticson [2017-12-15 09:58:05 +0000 UTC]

I nearly thought the diamond mural was one of White Diamond XD

Still, neat reference sheet. I wonder how prase's sheet will be like?

Keep up the good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

QuarterOfADollar [2017-12-15 02:59:02 +0000 UTC]

This looks so dope, omg.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HealingStreet [2017-12-15 02:53:30 +0000 UTC]

ACk i wanna make onEe??
so like- do we have to make seperate apps for the componetns??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

UnakiteorWhatever In reply to HealingStreet [2017-12-16 06:56:00 +0000 UTC]

Yup, both components must be approved members of the Court, regardless if they were a Permafusion before coming to Synthetic Diamond's Court

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HealingStreet In reply to UnakiteorWhatever [2017-12-16 17:21:26 +0000 UTC]

ohh ok. then it m i  gh t be easier for a perma fusion lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BreakingAKitKat [2017-12-15 02:48:11 +0000 UTC]

OwO
(i wish i had time to draw and i wasent sick as hecc)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MadKingMarc [2017-12-15 02:47:31 +0000 UTC]

SWEET
I REALLY WANNA MAKE A FUSION NOW AA

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArkticBoi [2017-12-15 02:45:15 +0000 UTC]

*B r e a t h e s*

I am dead it's here ahhhh!!! I'm still waiting for my permafusion adopt to come in ripp

(Also I just realized my fusion is a 3-gem fusion rippp)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MadKingMarc In reply to ArkticBoi [2017-12-15 02:47:18 +0000 UTC]

RIP

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ArkticBoi In reply to MadKingMarc [2017-12-18 00:24:46 +0000 UTC]

lmao I found a solution



My fusion's backstory is basically gonna be like 2/3 of the fusion were already in a permafusion, but the were like Fluorite and were like "WELP LET'S ADD ANOTHER TO THIS BUNCH" (Aka the single gem fell in love with the PF, the PF eventually fell in love too and convinced the single gem to join 'em )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MadKingMarc In reply to ArkticBoi [2017-12-18 00:38:54 +0000 UTC]

woa

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArkticBoi In reply to MadKingMarc [2017-12-18 00:57:40 +0000 UTC]

xD

That was random but I just had to say it lmao

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MadKingMarc In reply to ArkticBoi [2017-12-18 01:04:57 +0000 UTC]

lmaoo

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArkticBoi In reply to MadKingMarc [2017-12-15 02:48:34 +0000 UTC]

LOL

👍: 0 ⏩: 0